US seeks shipbuilding expertise from South Korea, Japan to counter China

Opinion:

The recent trip of U.S. lawmakers to South Korea and Japan to explore shipbuilding partnerships highlights a crucial aspect of contemporary geopolitics—the pressing need for the United States to revitalize its naval capabilities in the face of a rapidly growing Chinese maritime power. Senators Tammy Duckworth and Andy Kim's mission underscores the importance of international cooperation in sectors critical for national defense, but it also serves as a reminder of the broader implications of military spending and industrial policy, especially in the context of America’s declining shipbuilding industry. The narrative surrounding this endeavor, however, warrants a deeper examination of historical patterns, economic implications, and social justice concerns tied to military expenditures.

Historically, the U.S. has maintained a formidable naval presence, which has been pivotal in asserting its global influence since the post-World War II era. The rise of China as a dominant player in global shipbuilding—producing over half of the world's vessels—has shifted the maritime balance of power and prompted American lawmakers to recognize the urgent need for reinvestment in their own shipbuilding capabilities. This current strategic pivot not only reflects a response to perceived threats but also symbolizes the consequences of decades of neglect in domestic manufacturing and industrial policy. The U.S. shipbuilding industry, which once thrived, now accounts for a mere fraction of global capacity, down from its historical highs, highlighting a failure to adapt to changing economic realities and technological advancements.

Moreover, the urgency to enhance naval capacity must be scrutinized through the lens of the substantial financial resources allocated to military endeavors. The proposed $47 billion for shipbuilding in the Pentagon’s annual budget raises critical questions about the prioritization of military spending over pressing domestic needs. The rhetoric surrounding national security often overshadows the pressing social issues at home, including healthcare, education, and climate change. Investing in military infrastructure while neglecting social welfare programs perpetuates cycles of inequality and hinders progress on pressing social justice issues. It is imperative to challenge the notion that military superiority equates to safety and security, as the militarization of the economy often comes at the expense of social investments that could enhance the well-being of communities across the nation.

The focus on joint ventures and partnerships with South Korea and Japan also brings to light the complexities of globalization and its impact on domestic labor. While collaboration might seem beneficial for enhancing shipbuilding capacity, it risks further eroding American manufacturing jobs, especially if the U.S. continues to rely heavily on foreign expertise and investment without adequately prioritizing domestic production. This reliance on international partnerships could exacerbate economic disparities, particularly in regions where shipbuilding was once a source of stable employment. As the U.S. seeks to bolster its naval power, it must also consider how these strategies can be implemented in ways that uplift American workers and communities, rather than displacing them in favor of cheaper labor abroad.

Lastly, the implications of this naval expansion are intertwined with broader environmental concerns. The construction and maintenance of naval vessels contribute significantly to carbon emissions and environmental degradation. As the world grapples with the climate crisis, it is crucial to integrate sustainable practices into military operations and to reimagine defense initiatives that do not compromise ecological integrity. Shifting investment toward green technologies and sustainable practices in shipbuilding could serve dual purposes: strengthening national security while also addressing the urgent need for climate action. In this context, conversations about shipbuilding partnerships should not only revolve around military readiness but also about fostering a future where ecological sustainability and social justice are at the forefront of national policy.

In conclusion, the U.S. lawmakers' mission to enhance naval capabilities through international collaboration reflects a complex interplay of historical legacies, economic imperatives, labor dynamics, and environmental considerations. While bolstering military capacity is a legitimate concern, it must be contextualized within a broader framework that prioritizes social welfare, equitable job creation, and environmental sustainability. As discussions around military spending and industrial policy continue, it is essential to advocate for a vision of national security that transcends militarization and embraces a holistic approach to building a just and sustainable society.

Action:

The article highlights a critical issue in contemporary geopolitics: the United States' urgent need to bolster its naval capabilities in the face of rising competition from China. As American lawmakers, such as Senators Tammy Duckworth and Andy Kim, turn to South Korea and Japan for shipbuilding expertise, it’s essential to consider not just the implications for military readiness but also the broader socio-economic dimensions of military-industrial partnerships. This trend raises significant questions about the priorities of U.S. defense spending and the impact on American communities, jobs, and the environment.

Historically, America's shipbuilding industry has been a cornerstone of its maritime strength and economic growth. However, the decline in domestic shipbuilding capabilities signifies a troubling trend that mirrors broader industrial decay in the U.S. This decline is not merely a matter of numbers; it reflects a shift in policy focus away from domestic manufacturing toward a reliance on foreign partnerships. As the article notes, U.S. commercial shipbuilding accounted for a mere 0.1 percent of global capacity in 2024, creating a troubling dependency on nations like China, South Korea, and Japan. This reliance could undermine national security, as strategic assets become increasingly reliant on foreign nations for production and maintenance.

Furthermore, the call for joint ventures signals the potential for significant foreign influence in U.S. military operations and infrastructure. While collaboration can yield benefits, it also raises concerns about transparency, accountability, and the overall direction of U.S. defense policy. As lawmakers explore partnerships, it is crucial to scrutinize the implications of offshoring critical military capabilities. Are we prepared to relinquish a level of control over our national defense to foreign entities? These are vital questions that need to be addressed as the nation considers its military strategy.

In response to these developments, Americans must advocate for a renewed commitment to domestic shipbuilding and manufacturing. Engaging in grassroots efforts to promote policies that prioritize the revitalization of American shipyards is essential. This could involve supporting legislation that incentivizes domestic production, investing in workforce development programs to train a new generation of shipbuilders, and advocating for robust environmental standards in military contracting. Additionally, raising awareness of the implications of reliance on foreign partners can help shift public opinion and galvanize support for a more sustainable and equitable approach to military readiness.

Finally, education plays a vital role in shaping discourse around defense spending and military partnerships. Engaging in community discussions, hosting forums, and leveraging social media platforms to share insights can empower citizens to become informed advocates for responsible military policy. By emphasizing the importance of a robust domestic shipbuilding industry, we can create a compelling narrative that resonates with a broad audience, including those who may not typically align with progressive ideologies. Through thoughtful dialogue and grassroots mobilization, we can advocate for a future in which American maritime capabilities are strengthened and secured by American workers, ensuring a more resilient and self-reliant defense posture.

To Do:

The recent article highlights the United States' efforts to enhance its shipbuilding capabilities in collaboration with South Korea and Japan, in response to concerns about China's growing naval power. This development prompts a range of actions that individuals can take to engage with the issues of military spending, international cooperation, and the broader implications of shipbuilding on domestic industries and the environment.

### What Can We Personally Do About This?

1. **Educate Ourselves and Others**: Understanding the implications of military spending and international partnerships in the context of shipbuilding is crucial. Share information with friends, family, and community members to foster a broader dialogue about defense priorities and their social and economic impacts.

2. **Advocate for Responsible Military Spending**: Encourage local and national representatives to prioritize funding for social programs over military expenditures. Highlight the opportunity cost of military budgets that could instead be invested in education, healthcare, or infrastructure.

3. **Support Local Shipyards and Industries**: Advocate for policies that prioritize American shipbuilding initiatives and support local industries. This includes pushing for investments in green technology within shipbuilding to create sustainable jobs.

### Exact Actions We Can Take

1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition for Reduced Military Spending**: Websites like Change.org frequently host petitions aimed at reducing military budgets. Look for petitions that advocate for reallocating defense funds to social programs. - **Example**: Search for petitions regarding "Military Spending vs. Education Funding" on Change.org or similar platforms.

2. **Contact Lawmakers**: - Write to elected officials expressing your concerns about military expenditures and the prioritization of local shipbuilding over foreign partnerships. - **Who to Write**: 1. **Senator Tammy Duckworth** Email: duckworth.senate.gov/contact Mailing Address: 524 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 2. **Senator Andy Kim** Email: andy.kim.house.gov/contact Mailing Address: 1406 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515

- **What to Say**: - Express your concerns regarding the shift toward international partnerships in shipbuilding at the expense of local industries. - Advocate for policies that invest in domestic shipbuilding, emphasizing the potential for job creation and technological innovation. - Highlight the need for transparency in military spending and the importance of prioritizing community needs.

3. **Join or Support Advocacy Groups**: - Engage with organizations focused on peace, environmental sustainability, and responsible defense spending. Groups like Peace Action or the Center for International Policy often have campaigns you can join. - Participate in local events or campaigns that advocate for a reduction in military spending and promote peaceful international relations.

4. **Participate in Local Government**: - Attend town hall meetings or local government sessions where defense spending and local industry are discussed. Voice your opinions and advocate for policies that emphasize sustainability and community investment.

5. **Raise Awareness on Social Media**: - Use social media platforms to share articles, infographics, and personal reflections on the implications of military spending and international cooperation in shipbuilding. Tag your local representatives to amplify your message.

6. **Support Sustainable Practices**: - Advocate for the incorporation of environmentally sustainable practices in shipbuilding and military operations. Promote the idea that investments in green technology can lead to jobs and economic growth.

By actively engaging in these actions, individuals can contribute to a broader movement that prioritizes responsible military spending, supports local economies, and fosters a more sustainable and peaceful world.