Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

Sen. Van Hollen says an armed National Guard in DC would be 'troubling'

abcnews.go.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 10:28:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Presidential Campaigns
Sen. Van Hollen says an armed National Guard in DC would be 'troubling'

The Maryland senator said the Guard's mission in D.C. doesn't require it.

U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., on Sunday underlined his stance that President Donald Trump deploying the National Guard to Washington, D.C., over concerns of high crime and the levels of homelessness isn't necessary

Speaking with ABC News' "This Week" co-anchor Martha Raddatz, Van Hollen said, "The abuse of power is claiming that this is an emergency. And everybody who is watching what happens knows that this is not an emergency in Washington, D.C.," Van Hollen said.

Violent crime levels have decreased dramatically compared to years prior, down 26% since 2024, a 30-year low, leaving outstanding questions over why Trump deployed roughly 800 troops around the city.

In response to the possibility that the National Guard could be armed, Van Hollen said, "Well, that's very troubling, because, as you know, the National Guard, first of all, is not supposed to engage in any local law enforcement activity. We have the Posse Comitatus Act that prohibits them from engaging in local law enforcement. And so I'm not sure what it is that they need to do where they need to be armed."

The National Guard has been posted around the National Mall, a popular spot for tourists, as well as Union Station. Troops have already arrested hundreds of people in the past week, and to combat homelessness, troops are destroying homeless encampments and forcing those to seek shelter and resources or face being arrested.

Van Hollen disagreed with D.C. Police Chief Pamela Smith's comments in which she said the enhanced police presence will have a positive impact, saying, "The best way to help the police chief in Washington, D.C., is for President Trump and Republicans in Congress to give them the $1 billion in money that belongs to them, so that they can hire those police rather than bringing in these federal agents."

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

Senator Chris Van Hollen's recent remarks regarding the deployment of the National Guard in Washington, D.C., present a critical opportunity to examine the intersection of power, public safety, and social justice in the U.S. The decision to activate the National Guard, particularly in a city where violent crime has dropped significantly, raises troubling questions about the administration's motives and the implications for civil liberties. Van Hollen's assertion that the situation does not constitute an emergency reflects a broader concern about the militarization of domestic law enforcement and the misuse of emergency powers, which has historical roots that should not be overlooked.

Historically, the deployment of military forces for domestic policing has often been a response to social unrest rather than an actual need for public safety. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 was enacted in the wake of the Reconstruction era, primarily to prevent federal troops from engaging in local law enforcement activities. This law was a recognition of the potential abuses that could arise from military intervention in civilian affairs, especially given the legacy of the Civil War and the struggle for civil rights. In recent years, however, we have seen a troubling trend towards the normalization of police militarization, with both local police departments acquiring military-grade equipment and federal forces increasingly deployed to manage civil disobedience and social movements. Van Hollen's concerns emphasize the importance of adhering to established legal frameworks and maintaining a clear boundary between military and law enforcement roles.

Moreover, the recent actions of the National Guard—arresting individuals and dismantling homeless encampments—highlight a disturbing trend towards criminalizing poverty. The rise of homelessness is not merely a byproduct of personal failure but a systemic issue exacerbated by decades of neoliberal policies that prioritize profit over people. Instead of addressing the root causes of homelessness, such as inadequate housing policies, lack of mental health resources, and economic inequality, the response has been punitive. The deployment of armed troops to handle social issues points to a failure to recognize the humanity of those affected and a preference for force over compassion. This approach not only deepens the stigma surrounding homelessness but also detracts from meaningful solutions that could lift individuals out of poverty.

Van Hollen's advocacy for additional funding for D.C. police officers serves as a reminder that addressing crime requires investment in community resources rather than militarized responses. The senator rightly points out that the funding available to local law enforcement is critical for effective policing that prioritizes community safety. This perspective aligns with a growing body of research suggesting that community-based approaches, such as mental health services, housing support, and economic development initiatives, are far more effective at reducing crime than increased policing or military presence. Emphasizing this point can be a powerful rebuttal to those who argue that more aggressive policing is the solution to social issues.

Finally, the conversation surrounding the National Guard's deployment is an entry point into broader discussions about governance, accountability, and the role of federal authorities in local matters. In an era where many citizens feel disillusioned with government institutions, it is crucial to advocate for policies that prioritize community input and democratic engagement over top-down control. The use of military forces in domestic settings should be scrutinized and debated within the public sphere, as it carries implications not only for civil liberties but for the very fabric of democratic society. By highlighting these issues, we can foster a more informed dialogue about the balance of power and the need for a just response to societal challenges.

Action:

Senator Chris Van Hollen's comments surrounding the deployment of the National Guard in Washington, D.C., highlight a critical intersection of governance, civil liberties, and the proper role of military forces in domestic affairs. His assertion that the current situation does not constitute an emergency is particularly salient given the historical context of military engagement in civilian life. The Posse Comitatus Act, which limits the use of federal military personnel for domestic law enforcement, underscores the potential for abuse of power when the military is deployed without just cause. The deployment of approximately 800 armed troops amid a significant decrease in violent crime raises questions about the motivations behind this action. It also reveals a troubling trend: the use of militarized responses to social issues, such as homelessness, which ought to be addressed through social welfare programs and community engagement.

Historically, the over-militarization of law enforcement and local communities often stems from an underlying narrative of fear and control, particularly among marginalized populations. The decision to dismantle homeless encampments rather than provide sustainable solutions is emblematic of a broader failure to address systemic issues such as poverty and housing insecurity. As troubling as it is to see the National Guard involved in law enforcement activities, it is more disconcerting to note the criminalization of homelessness. This approach not only undermines the dignity of vulnerable individuals but also defies the principles of compassion and justice that should inform our policy responses. The use of force to manage social issues invites a dangerous precedent, effectively normalizing the militarization of public spaces and further alienating already marginalized communities.

In light of these developments, it is essential for citizens to engage in meaningful dialogue about the proper role of the National Guard and law enforcement within our communities. Activists and concerned citizens can advocate for a reevaluation of funding priorities that favor social services over militarization. Rather than relying on an armed presence to deter crime, communities would be better served by investing in mental health services, affordable housing initiatives, and economic opportunities. Engaging local governments to prioritize these solutions can create a grassroots movement that counters the narrative of fear often propagated by those in power. By channeling resources towards community-building instead of enforcement, we can foster environments that promote safety and well-being without resorting to militaristic tactics.

Additionally, it is vital to hold elected officials accountable for their decisions regarding public safety and military deployment. Citizens should demand transparency on the rationale behind the National Guard's presence and advocate for a dialogue that emphasizes community input in public safety strategies. This can be achieved through town hall meetings, public forums, and advocacy campaigns aimed at informing the community about their rights and the implications of militarization. By mobilizing constituents to engage with their representatives, it becomes possible to challenge the status quo and demand policies that prioritize human dignity and safety rather than simply maintaining order through force.

Education plays a critical role in equipping individuals with the knowledge necessary to engage in this discourse meaningfully. By disseminating information about the historical context of the Posse Comitatus Act, the implications of militarized policing, and the systemic issues surrounding homelessness, we can inspire informed activism and foster a more compassionate response to societal issues. Educational initiatives could include workshops, community discussions, and online resources that not only raise awareness but also encourage civic engagement. Ultimately, by fostering an informed citizenry that understands the implications of militarization and demands equitable solutions, we can begin to shift the narrative and advocate for a future that prioritizes justice and community well-being over fear and control.

To Do:

### Personal Actions to Take in Response to National Guard Deployment in D.C.

1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - Stay informed about the implications of deploying the National Guard in urban settings and the legal boundaries set by the Posse Comitatus Act. - Share articles, videos, and discussions on social media or community forums to raise awareness about this issue.

2. **Contact Your Representatives** - Write to your local congressional representatives to express your concerns about the use of the National Guard for local law enforcement and the impact on communities, especially marginalized ones. - **Who to Contact:** - Find your congressional representatives through [House.gov](https://www.house.gov/) - Consider contacting: - Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) - Email: info@vanhollen.senate.gov - Mailing Address: 110 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C., 20510 - Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD) - Email: cardin.senate.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 509 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C., 20510 - Local representatives in your state who can influence policies regarding law enforcement and military engagement.

3. **Sign and Share Petitions** - Participate in or create petitions demanding a halt to the militarization of police and the National Guard in urban areas. - Example Petition: Search for petitions on platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org that address military presence in civilian life and homelessness. Sign and share them to gather broader support. - **Example Petition:** A petition asking for the reallocation of funds to mental health and housing services instead of military enforcement in urban areas.

4. **Attend Local Meetings and Forums** - Participate in town hall meetings or community forums where local policing and safety are discussed. Voice your concerns and suggest alternatives focused on community support rather than militarization. - Check local government websites for public meeting schedules.

5. **Engage in Advocacy for Housing and Homelessness Support** - Support local organizations that advocate for homelessness prevention and affordable housing. Volunteer your time or donate to shelters and community-based organizations. - Examples include: - National Alliance to End Homelessness: [endhomelessness.org](https://endhomelessness.org/) - Local shelters or outreach programs in your area.

6. **Connect with Civil Rights Organizations** - Reach out to organizations advocating for civil liberties, such as the ACLU or Human Rights Campaign. They often have resources and campaigns focused on police accountability and the impact of military presence in communities. - Example Contact: - American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) - Email: info@aclu.org - Mailing Address: 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10004

7. **Public Demonstrations and Protests** - Join or organize peaceful protests or demonstrations against the militarization of local law enforcement. Ensure to follow local laws and regulations when organizing.

8. **Utilize Social Media for Advocacy** - Use platforms like Twitter or Instagram to amplify your voice. Tag elected officials and use hashtags relevant to police militarization and homelessness (#DefundThePolice #HousingIsAHumanRight). - Create or join online campaigns that focus on promoting community-led alternatives to policing.

9. **Write Opinion Pieces or Letters to the Editor** - Contribute to local newspapers or online platforms by writing opinion pieces that articulate your concerns about the current situation and propose solutions focused on community engagement rather than militarization.

10. **Support Legislative Initiatives** - Monitor and support legislation that aims to address homelessness and crime through community-based solutions, such as increased funding for social services and affordable housing initiatives.

### What to Say When communicating with representatives or engaging in public forums, consider emphasizing the following points:

- **Safety and Community:** Argue that safety is best achieved through community support and resources, not through military presence. - **Rights and Legal Boundaries:** Highlight the legal implications of using the National Guard for local law enforcement, referencing the Posse Comitatus Act. - **Investment in Solutions:** Advocate for reallocating funds from military and emergency deployments to social services, mental health support, and affordable housing. - **Empathy and Humanity:** Share personal stories or historical examples of how militarization can negatively impact communities, especially marginalized populations.

By taking these actions, you can contribute to a movement that advocates for community-centered solutions rather than militarization and punitive measures.


Sign Our Petition



10 Related Article(s):

Trump's 'safe and beautiful' move against DC homeless camps looks...

Trump administration gives corporate cheaters $360 million of consumers' money - NJTODAY.NET

Why Republicans Are Terrified of Nonexistent Crime

Federal agents gather in DC to enforce Trump-directed crackdown on homeless encampments | CNN Politics

Youngkin tells legislators Virginia's economy is strong

US lawmakers push to extend carpool lane incentives to push EV adoption - electrive.com

National Academy Organizes Rapid Response To Trump's "Scientific" Hackfest Downplaying Climate Threat

U.S. Military Deploys in Caribbean for Most Ambitious Drug War Since the 1980s

Pete Hegseth does believe in a woman's right to vote, Pentagon insists

Commentary: The true cost of abandoning science


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com