Baltimore Sun: Spare vaccines, focus on ultra-processed foods
pantagraph.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 9:26:52 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Presidential Campaigns
One of the more notable successes of President Donald Trump's first term was how the administration was able to develop effective COVID-19 vaccines so quickly.
That impressive speed -- less than one year compared to the decade or more of research and development that other vaccines have required -- likely saved millions of lives worldwide. And what made that Operation Warp Speed feat possible?
That would be Messenger RNA or mRNA. In layman's terms, laboratory-created mRNA vaccines can teach human cells how to make a specific protein that triggers an immune response inside our bodies.
Yet on Tuesday, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that his department's Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority is killing nearly $500 million in contracts with university researchers and private companies to develop new uses for the mRNA technology.
People are also reading... Normal man identified after fatal bike crash in Comlara Park 1 dead, 3 injured in crash on I-55 near Pontiac Friday morning 'Exactly what Pontiac needs': Route 66 RoadHouse offering farm-to-table eats Bloomington man gets 8 years in prison, ordered to pay $15K in meth, financial cases Woman sentenced to 5 years in McLean County robbery case Prosecutors: Bloomington man tries to kill a woman, stabs teenage girl McLean County officials are investigating after a man was found dead in Comlara Park What to eat at the 2025 Illinois State Fair Illinois farmers turn to agroforestry for profit, soil health and crop diversity Bloomington man accused of stabbing woman, injuring 2 others Officials: Heyworth man seen swinging machete threatened, tried to bite police chief ISP asks for public's help in search for suspect in shooting of Gibson City officers Scott Best, a 24-year-old autoworker, to challenge LaHood for Illinois' 16th Congressional District Appellate court orders release of man charged in McLean County with traveling to meet a minor A love story -- and a Pantagraph cameo -- a half-century in the making
That's the same technology that saved so many lives during COVID. Now, it won't necessarily be available for the next pandemic. That ought to give Americans considerable pause.
Listen now and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | RSS Feed | Omny Studio | All Of Our Podcasts
Kennedy has certainly been a vaccine skeptic. But any reasonable, science-based analysis of vaccine development generally, and even mRNA technology specifically, would not support abandoning this lifesaving approach, not when global threats like measles are on the rise.
Kennedy says he supports vaccines developed under more traditional circumstances (with weakened or dead virus cells), but scientists say the newer techniques are not only faster but can be more effective.
What makes this doubly frustrating is that Kennedy and his back-to-the-past approach to public health would be better off directing his ire at quite a different but still-serious threat.
A report published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention just two days after those 22 research contracts were canceled found that ultra-processed foods account for more than half the calories consumed by Americans, both adults and children. That includes everything from sweetened cereals to frozen pizzas, instant soups and sodas. They are high in fat, salt and sugar and are linked to ailments ranging from obesity to diabetes, cardiovascular disease, depression and cancer.
While a virus may be more fear-inducing, ultra-processed food can prove just as life-shortening, albeit not quite as suddenly. This is not a new threat, of course. Health authorities have been warning against trans fats, chemical preservatives, excess calories and other ultra-processed food components for years. But the consequences are stunning: To name just one example, a diet high in such ultra-processed food is estimated to increase the risk of death from cardiovascular disease by 50%.
Kennedy has promised to crack down on this scourge and regulate additives that are often used merely to extend shelf life or make products a bit sweeter or tastier. What a shame that he has instead chosen to put lives at risk by, instead of turning back the clock to make food healthy, turning it back on vaccine science.
Love 0 Funny 0 Wow 0 Sad 0 Angry 0
Catch the latest in Opinion
Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!
Sign up! * I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent commentary from the Baltimore Sun regarding the abandonment of mRNA vaccine development contracts under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s leadership raises urgent questions about the future of public health in the United States. While the article primarily highlights the remarkable achievements of the COVID-19 vaccine development, it also exposes a troubling trend toward regressive public health policy that reflects a broader ideological battle over science, health, and equity. The Biden administration must confront these challenges head-on, as they are not just about vaccines; they symbolize a deeper societal struggle to ensure that health innovations are accessible, equitable, and rooted in evidence-based science.
Historically, health crises have often been met with both innovation and controversy. The rapid development of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic is a prime example of how scientific advancement can be harnessed in times of emergency. This method, which involves instructing human cells to produce a viral protein to provoke an immune response, has the potential to revolutionize not only our approach to pandemics but also to chronic diseases like cancer. Yet, just as the scientific community achieved a breakthrough, political actors emerged to undermine that progress, favoring a return to "traditional" methods steeped in outdated paradigms. This rejection of modern science is reminiscent of past eras when medical advancements faced backlash due to ideological beliefs rather than empirical evidence, ultimately costing lives and hindering progress.
The implications of reversing the momentum gained in mRNA technology extend beyond mere vaccines; they reflect a larger struggle over public health policy and the accessibility of medical innovation. The current health landscape is riddled with socio-economic disparities that disproportionately affect marginalized communities, who often bear the brunt of preventable diseases and inadequate healthcare access. As the article points out, there is an urgent need to combat rising diseases like measles, which have surged in recent years, primarily due to vaccine hesitancy and misinformation. By cutting funding to innovative vaccine strategies, the administration risks perpetuating these inequalities, undermining public health initiatives at a time when they are most needed.
Moreover, Kennedy’s stance highlights a growing divide in public opinion regarding vaccines and scientific expertise. Vaccine skepticism is not simply a fringe belief but has found its way into mainstream political discourse, often fueled by misinformation and anti-science rhetoric. This situation presents a significant challenge for advocates of science-based policy, who must now navigate a complicated landscape where facts are frequently contested. The implications extend to how we frame health discussions: rather than fostering a culture of trust in scientific institutions, the current administration’s actions may inadvertently reinforce doubt and skepticism among the public. The path forward must involve robust public education campaigns that engage communities and dismantle the myths surrounding modern vaccination technologies.
In light of these developments, it is crucial for advocates and concerned citizens to unite and resist this regressive trend. The abandonment of cutting-edge vaccine technology not only jeopardizes public health but also sends a message that scientific progress can be sacrificed on the altar of political ideology. It is imperative to demand a recommitment to funding and supporting innovative health solutions that prioritize both rapid response capabilities and equitable access. As we look to the future, we must ensure that the lessons learned from the pandemic do not fade into the background but instead shape a new paradigm of health equity and scientific integrity.
In conclusion, the Baltimore Sun’s article serves as a critical reminder of the ongoing battles over public health in America. The decision to cut funding for mRNA vaccine development underlines an urgent need for a collective response that champions scientific progress while addressing the systemic inequalities that plague our healthcare system. As we advocate for a future that prioritizes health equity and trust in science, we must also be vigilant against those who seek to undermine these ideals. The stakes have never been higher—our health and the health of future generations depend on it.
The recent decision by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to terminate nearly $500 million in contracts aimed at further developing mRNA vaccine technology exemplifies a troubling trend in public health policy that prioritizes skepticism over scientific progress. This decision, especially in light of the immense success of the mRNA vaccines in combating COVID-19, raises critical questions about our preparedness for future public health crises. Historically, the development of vaccines has been a cornerstone of medical advancement, significantly reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with infectious diseases. By rolling back investments in innovative vaccine technology, we are not only jeopardizing our response to future pandemics but also undermining decades of scientific progress.
The historical context surrounding vaccine development reveals a complex interplay between innovation, public health, and political ideology. The rapid development of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic was a triumph of scientific collaboration and investment. It showcased the ability of modern science to respond to emergent threats swiftly and effectively. However, the recent decision to cut funding for mRNA research reflects a broader skepticism towards modern medical advancements, particularly from certain political factions that prioritize traditional methods over proven innovations. This regression to outdated practices poses a significant risk, especially as we face the resurgence of diseases such as measles and potential new viral threats.
As engaged citizens, we must advocate for policies that support ongoing research and development of mRNA technology. This can be achieved through a variety of avenues. First, contacting our elected representatives to express support for funding initiatives that promote scientific research is crucial. Engaging in grassroots campaigns that emphasize the importance of modern vaccine technology can help create a more informed electorate that values evidence-based public health practices. Furthermore, participatory efforts such as community forums or educational workshops can raise awareness about the benefits of mRNA vaccines, countering misinformation and skepticism.
In addition to advocating for funding, we must also focus on combating the narratives that fuel vaccine skepticism. Historical evidence shows that vaccine hesitancy often stems from misinformation, fear, and distrust in government and pharmaceutical companies. By actively engaging in discussions with those who hold differing views, we can help dismantle misconceptions surrounding mRNA technology and vaccines in general. Utilizing social media platforms and community networks to share credible scientific information can amplify our voices and foster a culture of trust in public health initiatives.
Lastly, we must recognize the interconnectedness of public health and social justice. The recent funding cuts disproportionately affect marginalized communities that have historically faced greater barriers to accessing healthcare. By advocating for equitable health policies that prioritize research funding and access to vaccinations, we can work towards a more just healthcare system that addresses the needs of all Americans. Emphasizing the role of science in promoting social equity can help bridge the divide and build a collective commitment to public health that transcends partisan lines.
In conclusion, the decision to cut funding for mRNA research highlights the critical need for continued advocacy for scientific progress in public health. By educating ourselves and others, engaging with policymakers, and promoting equitable health initiatives, we can harness the lessons of history to ensure that we are better prepared for future health challenges. It is imperative that we rally around the science that has proven effective in saving lives, and work collectively to foster a culture that values innovation and evidence-based practices in healthcare.
**Personal Actions to Address the Current Situation Regarding mRNA Vaccine Development**
1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Read up on mRNA technology and its implications for future pandemics. Consider resources like articles from reputable scientific journals or public health organizations. - Share this information in community forums, social media, or even local book clubs. Use platforms like Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram to disseminate accurate information.
2. **Sign and Share Petitions:** - **Petition for Continued mRNA Research Funding:** - Find or create a petition urging the government to allocate funding for ongoing mRNA research. Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org often have petitions related to health and vaccine issues. - Example Petition: Search for titles like "Support mRNA Vaccine Research" or "Protect Public Health through mRNA Technology." - **Real-World Example:** - “Sign the petition to demand continued funding for mRNA technology development.” (Create a petition on Change.org and share it widely). 3. **Contact Elected Officials:** - **Write to Your Representatives:** - Identify your local and state representatives. Use resources like [GovTrack](https://www.govtrack.us/) or [Ballotpedia](https://ballotpedia.org/Main_Page) to find contact details. - Example Contacts: - **U.S. Representative (for example)**: - Name: Jan Schakowsky - Email: https://schakowsky.house.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 5536 W. Dempster St., Suite 201, Skokie, IL 60077 - **Senator (for example)**: - Name: Dick Durbin - Email: https://www.durbin.senate.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 230 S. Dearborn St., Suite 3892, Chicago, IL 60604 - **What to say:** - Express your concern about the reduction of funding for mRNA research and its implications for public health. - Example Message: "Dear [Representative/Senator's Name], I am writing to express my support for continued funding of mRNA research, which is crucial for our preparedness against future pandemics. The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines demonstrated the potential of this technology. Abandoning it would jeopardize public health. I urge you to advocate for increased investment in this area. Thank you.”
4. **Engage with Local Community Health Initiatives:** - Volunteer with local health organizations or coalitions that promote vaccination and public health education. This can be done through local hospitals, non-profits, or community health fairs. - Offer to help organize events or workshops that educate the community about vaccines and preventive health.
5. **Support Relevant Organizations:** - Consider donating to organizations that focus on vaccine research and public health advocacy. Examples include: - **The Vaccine Alliance (GAVI)**: [GAVI](https://www.gavi.org/) - **The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation**: [Gates Foundation](https://www.gatesfoundation.org/) - Your contributions can help sustain their efforts in vaccine research and education.
6. **Utilize Social Media Advocacy:** - Use platforms like Twitter or Instagram to amplify the message. Share articles, statistics, and your opinions on the importance of mRNA technology. - Create hashtags to raise awareness, such as #KeepMRNAResearchAlive or #VaccinesSaveLives.
7. **Attend Town Halls or Community Forums:** - Participate in local government meetings or town halls where health issues are discussed. - Ask questions or express your concerns directly to policymakers about their stance on vaccine research funding.
By taking these actionable steps, individuals can contribute to the dialogue around mRNA research funding and advocate for a science-based approach to public health.