Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

Vladimir Putin names his to end Ukraine war as Zelensky prepares for Trump talks - The Mirror

mirror.co.uk -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 4:29:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
Vladimir Putin names his to end Ukraine war as Zelensky prepares for Trump talks - The Mirror

Russian despot Vladimir Putin has named his price to bring an end to the war in Ukraine as Volodymyr Zelensky prepares for his showdown with Donald Trump.

Putin appeared willing to end the bloodshed at a steep price according to reports, namely demanding full control of Donetsk and Luhansk as a condition toward peace. In exchange for the two occupied regions of eastern Ukraine, he would surrender other territories held by his troops in the country.

Several outlets have reported Trump is inclined to support the plan and will discuss Putin's price with Zelensky when they meet in the Oval Office on Monday. European leaders will wait in apprehension, hoping the meeting will avoid any confrontation like the spat between Zelensky and Vice President JD Vance earlier this year.

Following the Alaska summit on Friday, Trump told Fox News it was up to the Ukrainian president to "make a deal" to bring an end to the war. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer commended Mr Trump's "pursuit of an end to the killing" following a phone call with the US President, Zelensky and Nato allies on Saturday morning.

The UK leader did stress Zelensky should not be excluded from future talks to broker a peace in Ukraine. Starmer and other European leaders appear increasingly confident Trump will offer a "security guarantee" of air support to back up allied troops on the ground in Ukraine.

The Prime Minister welcomed "the openness of the United States, alongside Europe, to provide robust security guarantees to Ukraine as part of any deal. This is important progress and will be crucial in deterring Putin from coming back for more."

Trump did appear to have a change of heart on what he wants to achieve from the talks, indicating that he wants a permanent peace settlement rather than a ceasefire. Posting on TruthSocial, the US president said: "It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere ceasefire agreement, which often times do not hold up."

Putin described the meeting as "timely" and "useful" after leaving Alaska. Experts warned the meeting on US soil risked legitimising the Russian leader after he has been made a pariah by the international community following his invasion of Ukraine.

Dr Neil Melvin, director of international security at the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi), said: "Vladimir Putin came to the Alaska summit with the principal goal of stalling any pressure on Russia to end the war. He will consider the summit outcome as mission accomplished."

Zelensky warned Russia may ramp up its strikes against his country in the coming days "in order to create more favourable political circumstances for talks with global actors." Kyiv's troops are "defending our positions along the entire front line", he added on social media site X.

The Ukrainian leader earlier insisted a ceasefire must include an end to fighting on land, in the sea and the air, as well as returning all prisoners of war and captured civilians, including children. Sanctions on Moscow "should be strengthened if there is no trilateral meeting or if Russia tries to evade an honest end to the war", Zelensky added.

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine remains a critical issue that reverberates through international politics, historical grievances, and social justice narratives. The recent developments involving Vladimir Putin's demands for the cessation of hostilities and the upcoming discussions between Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump present an opportunity to critically evaluate the dynamics at play. At the heart of this situation is the stark reality that geopolitical negotiations often disregard the voices and rights of those directly affected by the violence. A historical lens reveals patterns of power dynamics that not only shape current events but also reflect broader struggles for sovereignty and justice.

Putin’s insistence on retaining control over Donetsk and Luhansk mirrors historical instances where aggressors have sought to legitimize territorial acquisition through negotiations, often at the expense of national integrity and self-determination. The post-Soviet era has been marked by various conflicts that emerged from the dissolution of the USSR, with Russia frequently leveraging its influence over former Soviet states to assert dominance. This historical backdrop underscores the importance of recognizing that negotiations based solely on power dynamics can perpetuate injustice and suffering. The Ukrainian experience is emblematic of a broader struggle for autonomy that resonates with many global movements advocating for liberation from oppressive regimes.

The prospect of Trump’s involvement in peace talks brings additional layers of complexity to the situation. Trump has previously expressed skepticism towards NATO and has often favored an isolationist foreign policy, which raises questions about his commitment to a genuine and fair resolution. While he now advocates for a permanent peace settlement, it is crucial to scrutinize whether such a stance is motivated by a sincere desire for stability or by political expediency. The historical precedent of political leaders prioritizing personal or party gains over the welfare of nations they engage with is a common theme, and it is essential for the international community to remain vigilant against such maneuvers.

Moreover, the potential for a "security guarantee" from the United States, as mentioned by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, must be critically examined. While the provision of military support may be framed as a protective measure for Ukraine, it can also be seen as a perpetuation of militarization in conflict resolution. History has shown that military intervention seldom leads to lasting peace; rather, it often entrenches divisions and fuels further violence. The lessons from past conflicts, such as in Iraq and Afghanistan, where military solutions were prioritized over diplomatic efforts, highlight the need for a more nuanced approach that emphasizes dialogue, reconciliation, and the protection of human rights.

In this context, it is vital to amplify the voices of those who are most affected by the war. Civilians in Ukraine have borne the brunt of the conflict, facing displacement, loss, and trauma. The narratives of these individuals must be central in discussions about peace. As negotiations unfold, it is imperative to advocate for frameworks that prioritize the safety and sovereignty of the Ukrainian people over political bargaining chips. The pursuit of justice and reparations for affected communities should be integral to any peace process, ensuring that the rights of the marginalized are not overlooked.

In conclusion, the unfolding situation surrounding Ukraine, Russia, and the potential role of the United States highlights the complexities of modern diplomacy and the historical patterns that inform current events. The interplay of power dynamics, geopolitical interests, and the voices of the oppressed necessitates a critical approach that challenges traditional narratives. As discussions progress, it is essential for advocates of social justice to remain engaged, pushing for outcomes that genuinely reflect the aspirations of the people most affected by the conflict. By doing so, we can work towards a future where peace is not merely the absence of war, but a comprehensive commitment to justice, equity, and respect for human rights.

Action:

The complexities of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine have reached a critical junction as reports emerge of Russian President Vladimir Putin's willingness to negotiate an end to hostilities at a steep price. The regions of Donetsk and Luhansk are at the heart of these negotiations, and as troubling as the potential outcomes may be, they serve as a barometer for both the geopolitical landscape and the ethical imperatives that must guide any resolution to this crisis. It is essential to recognize the intricate historical and political contexts that have shaped the current situation, particularly as American leaders, such as former President Donald Trump, prepare to engage in discussions that could drastically alter the trajectory of Ukrainian sovereignty.

Historically, the conflict can be traced back to a long-standing pattern of Russian aggression and imperialism, deeply intertwined with Ukraine's independence movements and aspirations for closer ties with Western nations. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 marked a significant escalation, as it reflected not only Russia's territorial ambitions but also its intent to assert itself as a dominant power in the post-Cold War era. Given this context, any negotiation that involves the forfeiture of Ukrainian territories—such as Donetsk and Luhansk—must be approached with caution. The implications extend beyond the immediate stakeholders; they resonate with the broader international community's commitment to uphold the principles of self-determination and territorial integrity.

As Americans, we find ourselves at a crossroads, faced with the imperative to advocate for a resolution that prioritizes the sovereignty of Ukraine. It is crucial to engage in grassroots organizing and dialogue that emphasizes the importance of not legitimizing aggressors through negotiations that compromise the very fabric of international law. Conversations with friends, family, and community members can elevate awareness regarding the stakes involved in these discussions. By framing the discourse around the moral obligation to support countries resisting imperialist encroachments, we can galvanize a collective conscience that rejects appeasement and insists upon justice for the Ukrainian people.

Moreover, public pressure on lawmakers is vital. Advocating for policies that reinforce military and humanitarian support for Ukraine not only signals solidarity with its struggle but also demonstrates to international allies that the United States stands firm against dictatorial aggression. Engaging in petitions, calling congressional representatives, and participating in peaceful protests can amplify the demand for a robust American foreign policy that upholds human rights and supports democratic nations. By insisting that any peace talks include a commitment to restoring Ukrainian territorial integrity and the cessation of military aggression, we can help shape a narrative that prioritizes justice over expedience.

Educational initiatives can further empower citizens to engage meaningfully with this issue. Public forums, discussions, and online platforms can provide the necessary context about the complexities of the Ukraine conflict, exposing the dangers of legitimizing authoritarian leaders through diplomatic channels. By promoting critical thinking and informed debate, we can foster an environment where the values of democracy and human rights are championed, making it clear that the peace we seek cannot come at the cost of capitulating to those who perpetrate violence against sovereign nations. In doing so, we uphold not just the dignity of Ukraine but also the principles that underpin a just global order.

Ultimately, the current crossroads calls for vigilance, compassion, and action. By recognizing the historical implications of these negotiations, engaging in advocacy, and fostering education, we can confront the challenges posed by authoritarianism and imperialism. While the situation remains fraught with uncertainty, our commitment to justice, equity, and the rights of nations will guide us in our efforts to ensure that the resolution to this conflict does not compromise the values we hold dear.

To Do:

In light of recent developments in the Ukraine conflict, particularly concerning the negotiations between Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky, it is important to take actionable steps to advocate for peace and the support of Ukrainian sovereignty. Here are some concrete ideas and actions that we can personally take:

### Personal Actions:

1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: Stay informed about the situation in Ukraine and its geopolitical implications. Use reputable sources to understand the complexities of the conflict.

2. **Engage in Community Discussions**: Organize or participate in local discussions or forums about the conflict. This can be in the form of town halls, book clubs, or community meetings focused on international relations and peace.

3. **Support Ukrainian Organizations**: Donate to reputable organizations that provide humanitarian aid to Ukraine, such as the Ukrainian Red Cross or GlobalGiving. You can also volunteer for local organizations that support Ukrainian refugees.

### Specific Actions:

1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition for Military Aid**: Look for petitions that call for increased support for Ukraine from your government. Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org often host relevant petitions. For instance, a petition titled "Support Ukraine's Right to Defend Itself" can be found on these platforms. - **Example Petition**: Here’s a link to a petition: [Change.org Ukraine Support Petition](https://www.change.org) (search for Ukraine related petitions).

2. **Contact Your Elected Officials**: - Write letters or emails advocating for a strong stance on Ukrainian sovereignty and opposing any concessions to Putin that would undermine Ukraine's territorial integrity. - **Who to Write To**: - **Your Local Congressional Representative**: Find your representative’s contact information on [House.gov](https://www.house.gov). - **U.S. Senators**: Contact your state’s senators through [Senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov). - **Sample Email Template**: ``` Subject: Support for Ukraine's Sovereignty

Dear [Representative/Senator's Name],

I am writing to express my strong support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity in light of ongoing negotiations involving Vladimir Putin. It is crucial that the U.S. remains firm in its commitment to support Ukraine in its defense against aggression. I urge you to advocate for increased military and humanitarian aid to ensure the safety and security of the Ukrainian people.

Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.

Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```

3. **Social Media Advocacy**: - Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to raise awareness about the situation in Ukraine. Share informative articles, infographics, and personal narratives from Ukrainians. - Use hashtags like #StandWithUkraine, #PeaceForUkraine, and #SupportUkraine to amplify your voice.

4. **Attend Rallies and Protests**: - Participate in local rallies or protests that advocate for peace in Ukraine. Check local community boards or social media for events organized by peace groups or Ukrainian community organizations.

5. **Support Local Ukrainian Communities**: - Attend cultural events or fundraisers organized by Ukrainian communities in your area. This not only shows solidarity but also helps raise funds for those affected by the war.

6. **Write to Media Outlets**: - Send letters to the editor of your local newspapers expressing your viewpoint on the Ukraine conflict and the importance of supporting Ukraine.

### Example Contacts:

- **Your Local Congressional Representative**: Find their details via [House.gov](https://www.house.gov). - **Your Senators**: Contact them via [Senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov). - **Ukrainian Organizations**: - Ukrainian Red Cross: [ukrcross.org](https://www.redcross.org.ua/en/) - GlobalGiving (Ukraine Projects): [globalgiving.org](https://www.globalgiving.org)

By taking these actions, we can collectively support Ukraine and advocate for peace in a way that aligns with our values and commitment to human rights and global stability.


Sign Our Petition



10 Related Article(s):

Merz hopes Putin will launch direct talks with Ukraine after Alaska meeting

Opinion: Trump meets like-minded Putin, while the West watches

The one thing Trump wants out of his meeting with Putin

Healey hopes Trump-Putin summit could be 'first step' on road to peace

Trump Putin Meeting In Alaska | Not Here To Negotiate For Ukraine, Says Trump | Zelensky | N18G

Trump says he wants a Ukraine ceasefire rapidly

WH Spokesman: Trump 'Ended 7 Wars, More to Follow'

Global Dialogue: Macron Engages Leaders Post-Trump-Putin Summit | Politics

Zelensky must be at future peace talks, Starmer says after Trump-Putin summit

Putin Displayed Unyielding Resolve in High-Stakes Alaska Talks - BJP Leader


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com