LA Federal Judge Denies Trump Bid to Alter Immigrant Children Protections - MyNewsLA.com
mynewsla.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 5:53:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Immigration Policy & Border Issues

A federal judge in downtown Los Angeles has rejected the Trump administration's move to terminate a 28-year-old edict governing how immigrant children are detained in federal custody.
U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee issued her ruling Friday, finding that "defendants fail to identify any new facts or law that warrant the termination of the Flores Settlement Agreement at this time."
The so-called "Flores agreement" -- overseen by Gee in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California -- remains one of the only legal tools to prevent the prolonged incarceration of immigrant children detained at U.S. border crossings.
Approved in 1997, the settlement -- named for lead plaintiff Jenny Lisette Flores, a 15-year-old detainee when the class-action complaint was filed in 1985 -- requires that children be held in licensed, child-appropriate facilities and released to family members or guardians as quickly as possible. Under the terms of the settlement, Flores co-counsel are permitted to visit detention sites where children are being held and hear directly from them about their treatment and the duration of their detention.
Lawyers for the federal government had argued that the agreement is out of date and needed to be dissolved in order to reflect changes brought by the second Trump administration, including modifications to law, compliance, "facts," shifts in policies and executive function.
During a hearing on Aug. 8, U.S. Justice Department attorney Tiberius Davis told the judge that the Flores settlement was unusual in that it "dictates the operation of immigration law," which should not be under the supervision of the court.
"It does not dictate the operation of immigration law," the judge countered, explaining that the agreement dictates the conditions of children in immigration custody. Moreover, Gee said, the government bound itself to the consent decree nearly 30 years ago.
Immigrant-rights groups have alleged ongoing violations of the settlement's protections, including the long-term detention of migrant children in punitive conditions at border stations.
Arguing for the plaintiffs on the motion to terminate, Carlos Holguin, an attorney at the Center for Human Rights & Constitutional Law, said the government wants to terminate the settlement "so it can detain children for as long as it wishes ... given this administration's propensity for hardship on children."
Joshua McCroskey, a Justice Department attorney, responded that "there have always been difficult cases where processing takes longer periods of time. ... (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) does try to transfer minors out of its custody as quickly as possible."
White House officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday's ruling, which can be found at storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.45170/gov.uscourts.cacd.45170.1637.0.pdf.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent ruling by U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee, which maintains the integrity of the Flores Settlement Agreement, is a significant victory for the rights of immigrant children and a crucial reaffirmation of the legal protections that have stood for nearly three decades. The Flores Agreement, established in 1997, was birthed from a long history of struggles surrounding the treatment of immigrant minors in U.S. custody. It mandates that children be held in humane conditions and released to family members or guardians as expeditiously as possible. This ruling not only serves as a legal bulwark against the harsh policies of the Trump administration but also reflects broader societal values that prioritize the welfare and dignity of vulnerable populations.
Historically, the treatment of immigrant children in the U.S. has been intertwined with the nation’s changing immigration policies and public sentiment. The Flores Settlement arose during a time when advocacy for the rights of children was gaining traction, highlighting a societal recognition of the unique vulnerabilities children face, particularly in the context of immigration. In stark contrast, the Trump administration's attempts to dismantle these protections are emblematic of a broader trend toward punitive immigration policies that have characterized recent decades. By attempting to dissolve the Flores Agreement, the administration sought to erase decades of progress in treating immigrant minors with the decency and respect they deserve, instead opting for a framework that could lead to prolonged detention under harsh conditions.
The implications of the ruling extend beyond the courtroom and into the realm of social justice and human rights. The argument presented by the Justice Department—that the Flores Agreement is outdated—ignores the ongoing humanitarian crisis at the border, where children continue to be subjected to conditions that violate their rights. Advocates for immigrant rights have consistently reported instances of children being held in overcrowded and unsuitable facilities, further exacerbating their trauma and suffering. By denying the request to terminate the settlement, Judge Gee has effectively recognized the need for continued oversight and accountability, pushing back against a narrative that seeks to normalize inhumane treatment in the name of border security.
Moreover, the ongoing fight for immigrant rights underscores a critical intersection of race, class, and human rights in American society. The struggle of immigrant children is not merely an isolated issue but is deeply connected to larger socio-political frameworks that dictate how marginalized groups are treated. The historical context of immigration in the U.S. reveals that these struggles are often exacerbated by systemic racism and xenophobia. The rejection of the Trump administration’s motion can be framed as a stand against these injustices, reinforcing the idea that the rights of all individuals—regardless of their immigration status—should be protected. It is vital for advocates to continually connect these struggles to the broader fight for social justice, as they are all part of the same tapestry seeking to challenge oppressive systems.
Educating oneself and others about the importance of the Flores Settlement Agreement and the ongoing challenges faced by immigrant children is essential in fostering a more compassionate and just society. Engaging in thoughtful conversations with individuals who may not share the same views can help illuminate the dire consequences of abandoning such protections. Highlighting the human stories behind the legal battles, such as those of Jenny Lisette Flores and the countless other children affected, can help bridge the emotional disconnect that often accompanies discussions on immigration. By framing the issue not only in legal terms but also in the context of human rights and dignity, advocates can effectively challenge the narratives perpetuated by those who favor punitive immigration policies.
In conclusion, the ruling to uphold the Flores Settlement Agreement is not just a legal precedent; it is a moral imperative rooted in the recognition of the rights and dignity of immigrant children. As this issue continues to evolve, it remains crucial for advocates to leverage this ruling as a foundation for ongoing activism and education around immigrant rights. By doing so, they can ensure that the voices of the most vulnerable are heard and that the fight for justice and equity remains at the forefront of public discourse.
The recent ruling by U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee to uphold the Flores Settlement Agreement marks a significant moment in the ongoing struggle for immigrant rights in the United States. This 28-year-old legal framework, designed to protect the rights of immigrant children in detention, remains a crucial bulwark against the harsh realities many young migrants face at the U.S.-Mexico border. The decision reinforces the notion that legal protections for vulnerable populations cannot simply be swept aside for political expediency, particularly by administrations that have sought to increase the severity of immigration enforcement. Historical context surrounding the Flores agreement highlights the urgent need to protect the rights of children in custody and the moral imperative to uphold humane treatment.
The Flores Settlement Agreement was established in 1997 in response to widespread reports of inhumane conditions in which immigrant children were being held. It set forth critical protections, mandating that children be housed in licensed facilities conducive to their well-being and released as quickly as possible to family members or guardians. This legal framework emerged from a sobering recognition that children, more than any other demographic, are uniquely vulnerable to the psychological and physical tolls of detention. The ruling against the Trump administration's attempts to dissolve the agreement thus serves as a reminder of the historical struggles faced by immigrant communities and the need for robust legal protections to guard against potential abuses.
In recent years, we have witnessed a growing trend of aggressive immigration policies and rhetoric that seek to dehumanize and criminalize immigrants, particularly children. The argument put forth by the Trump administration—that the Flores agreement is outdated—betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of the principles underlying human rights protections. The assertion that the agreement interferes with the operation of immigration law is, as Judge Gee pointed out, misguided; it is precisely about the treatment of vulnerable children in these systems. This ruling underscores that the legal system can and must serve as a counterbalance to executive overreach when it comes to the rights of marginalized populations.
As Americans, we have a vital role to play in supporting immigrant rights and ensuring that protections like the Flores Settlement Agreement remain intact. Advocacy efforts can take many forms, from engaging with local immigrant rights organizations to contacting elected officials to express our support for humane immigration policies. Mobilizing community support for organizations that work on behalf of immigrant families can help amplify their voices in the face of systemic challenges. Furthermore, raising public awareness about the realities faced by immigrant children in detention can foster a more compassionate and informed dialogue around immigration issues.
Educational initiatives are also essential for creating a more informed citizenry. By disseminating information about the effects of current immigration policies and the historical context of legal protections like the Flores agreement, we can better equip ourselves and others to engage in meaningful conversations. Hosting community forums, workshops, or panel discussions that include immigrant voices can provide a platform for sharing experiences and advocating for change. In doing so, we not only combat misinformation but also create a collective sense of responsibility to protect the most vulnerable among us.
The ruling by Judge Gee serves as a reminder that the struggle for immigrant rights is ongoing and requires our unwavering commitment. By supporting legal protections, advocating for humane treatment of all migrants, and educating ourselves and our communities, we can help build a society that values the dignity of every individual, regardless of their immigration status. This is not just a legal battle; it is a moral one that reflects our values as a nation and our shared humanity.
The recent ruling by U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee, which upholds the Flores Settlement Agreement, is a significant victory for the protection of immigrant children in U.S. custody. However, ongoing challenges and allegations of violations highlight the need for continued advocacy. Here’s a detailed list of actions we can take to support immigrant rights and ensure the humane treatment of children:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: Understanding the complexities of immigration law and the specific protections afforded by the Flores Settlement Agreement is crucial. Share information through social media, community meetings, and discussions to raise awareness.
2. **Support Immigrant Rights Organizations**: Many organizations are on the frontlines advocating for the rights of immigrant children. Consider donating your time or resources to these groups.
3. **Engage with Your Local Representatives**: Creating a direct line of communication with your elected officials can help advocate for policies that protect immigrant rights.
4. **Participate in Local Activism**: Join local protests, rallies, or community forums on immigration issues to amplify your voice and support collective action.
### Exact Actions We Can Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition for Child Detention Reform**: Use platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org to find and sign petitions aimed at reforming child detention practices. - Example: Search for petitions related to the Flores Settlement or immigrant children’s rights, such as "End Child Detention" or "Protect Immigrant Families."
2. **Write to Your Politicians**: - **U.S. Senators**: Contact your state’s senators to urge them to support legislation that protects immigrant children. - Example: - Senator [Name] - [Senator’s Email Address] - [Senator’s USPS Mailing Address] - **U.S. Representatives**: Reach out to your local representative. - Example: - Representative [Name] - [Representative’s Email Address] - [Representative’s USPS Mailing Address]
**Suggested Message**: ``` Dear [Senator/Representative Name],
I am writing to express my concern about the treatment of immigrant children in U.S. custody and to urge you to support policies that uphold their rights and welfare. The recent ruling by Judge Dolly Gee reinforces the necessity of the Flores Settlement Agreement, which mandates that children be held in appropriate conditions and be released swiftly.
I urge you to advocate for stronger protections for these vulnerable children and to hold the government accountable for any violations of their rights.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
3. **Attend Town Hall Meetings**: Check your local government or congressional office website for upcoming town halls where you can voice your concerns directly to elected officials.
4. **Volunteer with Local Organizations**: - Organizations such as the **American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)** or **Human Rights Watch** often have volunteer opportunities to assist with advocacy efforts or educate the community. - Check their websites for local chapters or events.
5. **Raise Awareness on Social Media**: - Use your platforms to share information about the Flores Settlement and ongoing issues related to immigrant children. - Use hashtags like #ProtectImmigrantKids and #FloresSettlement to join larger conversations.
6. **Engage in Fundraising for Advocacy Groups**: Organize or participate in events that raise funds for organizations working to protect immigrant rights. This could be a community bake sale, a charity run, or an online fundraiser.
7. **Stay Informed**: Subscribe to newsletters from immigrant rights organizations to stay updated on current events and future actions you can take.
By taking these actions, we can contribute to a larger movement that advocates for the rights of immigrant children and ensures their protection against unjust treatment. Each effort, no matter how small, plays a role in creating a more just and humane society.