Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

Ukraine's Zelenskyy to meet Trump on Monday after US-Russia summit secured no halt to fighting - WSVN 7News | Miami News, Weather, Sports | Fort Lauderdale

wsvn.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 5:23:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, Media Coverage & Press Relations
Ukraine's Zelenskyy to meet Trump on Monday after US-Russia summit secured no halt to fighting - WSVN 7News | Miami News, Weather, Sports | Fort Lauderdale

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) -- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he will meet U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday after a Russia-U.S. summit ended without an agreement to stop the fighting in Ukraine after 3 1/2 years.

In a reversal only few hours after meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump said an overall peace agreement, and not a ceasefire, was the best way to end the war. That statement echoed Putin's view that Russia is not interested in a temporary truce, and instead is seeking a long-term settlement that takes Moscow's interests into account.

Trump and Ukraine's European allies had been calling for a ceasefire ahead of any negotiations.

Zelenskyy, who was not invited to Alaska for the summit, said he held a "long and substantive" conversation with Trump early Saturday. He thanked him for an invitation to meet in person in Washington on Monday and said they would "discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war."

It will be Zelenskyy's first visit to the U.S. since Trump berated him publicly for being "disrespectful" during an extraordinary Oval Office meeting on Feb. 28.

Trump, who also held calls with European leaders Saturday, confirmed the White House meeting and said that "if all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin."

Trump rolled out the red carpet on Friday for Putin, who was in the U.S. for the first time in a decade and since the start of his full-scale invasion of Ukraine. But he gave little concrete detail afterward of what was discussed. On Saturday, he posted on social media that it "went very well."

Trump had warned ahead of the summit of "very severe consequences" for Russia if Putin doesn't agree to end the war.

Zelenskyy seeks European involvement

Zelenskyy reiterated the importance of involving European leaders, who also were not at the summit.

"It is important that Europeans are involved at every stage to ensure reliable security guarantees together with America," he said. "We also discussed positive signals from the American side regarding participation in guaranteeing Ukraine's security."

He didn't elaborate, but Zelenskyy previously has said that European partners put on hold a proposal to establish a foreign troop presence in Ukraine to deter future Russian aggression because it lacked an American backstop.

Zelenskyy said he spoke to Trump one-on-one and then in a call with other European leaders. In total, the conversations lasted over 90 minutes.

Trump puts onus on Zelenskyy and Europe

Trump said in Alaska that "there's no deal until there's a deal," after Putin claimed the two leaders had hammered out an "understanding" on Ukraine and warned Europe not to "torpedo the nascent progress."

During an interview with Fox News Channel before returning to Washington, Trump insisted the onus going forward might be on Zelenskyy "to get it done," but said there would also be some involvement from European nations.

In a statement after speaking to Trump, major European leaders said they were ready to work with Trump and Zelenskyy toward "a trilateral summit with European support."

The statement by French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and the European Union's two top officials said that "Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees" and welcomed U.S. readiness to provide them.

"It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory," they said. "International borders must not be changed by force." They did not mention a ceasefire, which they had hoped for ahead of the summit.

EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said "the harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war anytime soon," noting that Moscow's forces launched new attacks on Ukraine even as the delegations met.

"Putin continues to drag out negotiations and hopes he gets away with it. He left Anchorage without making any commitments to end the killing," she said.

Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala said the summit confirmed that "while the U.S. and its allies are looking for ways to peace, Putin is still only interested in making the greatest possible territorial gains and restoring the Soviet empire."

Ukrainian and Russian forces are fighting along a 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line. Since spring, Russian troops have accelerated their gains, capturing the most territory since the opening stages of the war.

"Vladimir Putin came to the Alaska summit with the principal goal of stalling any pressure on Russia to end the war," said Neil Melvin, director of international security at the London-based Royal United Services Institute. "He will consider the summit outcome as mission accomplished."

Questions on a Trump, Zelenskyy and Putin meeting

Zelenskyy voiced support for Trump's proposal for a trilateral meeting with the U.S. and Russia. He said that "key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this."

But Putin's foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, said on Russian state television Saturday that a potential meeting of Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy has not been raised in U.S.-Russia discussions. "The topic has not been touched upon yet," he said, according to Russian state news agency RIA Novosti.

Zelenskyy wrote on X that he told Trump that "sanctions should be strengthened if there is no trilateral meeting or if Russia tries to evade an honest end to the war."

Russian officials and media struck a largely positive tone, with some describing Friday's meeting as a symbolic end to Putin's isolation in the West.

Former President Dmitry Medvedev, deputy head of Russia's Security Council, praised the summit as a breakthrough in restoring high-level dialogue between Moscow and Washington, describing the talks as "calm, without ultimatums and threats."

Russian attacks on Ukraine continued overnight, using one ballistic missile and 85 Shahed drones, 61 of which were shot down, Ukraine's air force said. Front-line areas of Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk and Chernihiv were attacked.

Russia's Defense Ministry said its air defenses shot down 29 Ukrainian drones over Russia and the Sea of Azov overnight.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Join our Newsletter for the latest news right to your inbox Email address Submit

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine, which has persisted for more than three years, remains a critical issue not only for Eastern Europe but also for global geopolitical dynamics. The recent summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, which ended without a significant agreement to halt hostilities, underscores the complexities surrounding the Ukraine crisis. The absence of a ceasefire agreement highlights the limitations of U.S. foreign policy when it is influenced by a desire to maintain strategic alliances while simultaneously addressing humanitarian concerns. This situation reflects a broader historical pattern where great power negotiations often overlook the voices and needs of smaller nations embroiled in conflict, a dynamic that perpetuates cycles of violence and instability.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's upcoming meeting with Trump offers an opportunity for a direct dialogue about peace, but it also raises significant questions about the role of the United States in supporting Ukraine. Zelenskyy's call for greater European involvement in the peace process is particularly telling. It reveals not only a recognition of Ukraine's position as a frontline state but also an understanding that European security is intrinsically linked to Ukraine's sovereignty. The historical context here is vital; Ukraine has long been caught in a struggle between Western aspirations for democracy and Russian imperial ambitions. The West’s failure to fully support Ukraine in the wake of Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 has left a legacy of mistrust and insecurity that continues to shape the current conflict.

The dynamics of this meeting serve as a reminder of the importance of solidarity among nations facing aggression. Zelenskyy's emphasis on the need for robust security guarantees from European partners is a reflection of the ongoing struggle for self-determination in the face of external threats. This situation mirrors other historical struggles where nations have sought to assert their sovereignty against more powerful adversaries, such as the post-colonial movements throughout Africa and Asia. In each case, the global community's response—or lack thereof—has been crucial in determining the outcomes of these conflicts. The call for European support can be framed as not merely a request for military assistance, but as an assertion of Ukraine's right to exist free from the shadow of aggression.

Furthermore, the rhetoric surrounding the Trump-Putin summit reveals a troubling trend in international diplomacy: the prioritization of strategic negotiations over humanitarian concerns. Trump's insistence on securing a long-term settlement, as suggested by Putin, rather than a temporary ceasefire, demonstrates a willingness to sacrifice immediate peace for the sake of political expediency. This poses ethical questions about the role of leaders in conflict resolution, particularly when civilian lives hang in the balance. The historical legacy of diplomatic decisions that prioritize geopolitical interests over humanitarian needs is fraught with instances where communities have suffered as a result, reminding us that peace cannot be built on the foundations of realpolitik alone.

In conclusion, the upcoming meeting between Zelenskyy and Trump is not only a significant moment for Ukraine but also a critical juncture in international relations. As the conflict in Ukraine unfolds, it is imperative for the global community to recognize the historical injustices and ongoing struggles that shape this crisis. Advocacy for a peace process that prioritizes the voices of those most affected—Ukrainians—must be at the forefront of discussions. This situation calls for a renewed commitment to international solidarity, recognizing that the fight for justice, equity, and peace transcends borders and requires collective action. Engaging in these discussions, particularly with those who may hold opposing views, is critical in fostering an informed public discourse that prioritizes human rights and the dignity of all people.

Action:

The recent developments surrounding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine highlight the complexities of international diplomacy and the varying interests that influence peace negotiations. As President Zelenskyy prepares to meet with President Trump in Washington, the backdrop of a U.S.-Russia summit that failed to yield a ceasefire raises critical questions about the effectiveness of leadership and the role that global power dynamics play in resolving conflicts. This situation is not merely about Ukraine; it speaks volumes about America's foreign policy and its implications for international justice and security.

Historically, U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts has been marked by an oscillation between interventionism and isolationism. The situation in Ukraine can be traced back to the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the subsequent geopolitical realignments that have often left smaller nations vulnerable to the ambitions of larger neighbors. The West's failure to integrate Russia into a cooperative security framework post-Cold War has fostered an environment ripe for conflict. By prioritizing strategic interests over human rights, the U.S. and its allies have, at times, contributed to the very instability they seek to mitigate.

In light of this recent summit, it becomes crucial that the Ukrainian narrative is not overshadowed by the interests of superpowers. Zelenskyy's call for European involvement in peace negotiations underscores the necessity for collective security efforts that transcend national boundaries. As Americans, we must advocate for policies that prioritize diplomatic engagement over military solutions, acknowledging that genuine peace can only be achieved through inclusive dialogue. Citizens can support initiatives that bolster diplomatic channels and advocate for humanitarian aid, recognizing that the suffering of ordinary people in conflict zones should be at the forefront of our foreign policy agenda.

Moreover, the apparent dismissal of Zelenskyy at the U.S.-Russia summit provides a stark reminder of the need for more equitable representation in global discussions. It is essential to support grassroots movements and organizations that empower voices from affected nations, ensuring that leaders who are directly impacted by conflicts have a seat at the table. This can be achieved through educational campaigns that raise awareness about the importance of equitable diplomacy and mobilize public opinion to pressure political leaders to act responsibly.

Furthermore, we must not overlook the potential for American citizens to influence domestic policy regarding military aid to Ukraine. Engaging in conversations about the implications of military assistance versus diplomatic solutions is vital. By advocating for a foreign policy that emphasizes peace-building initiatives, conflict resolution programs, and economic support, we can challenge the prevailing narrative that equates military might with national security. This shift in perspective can be instrumental in fostering a more just international order where diplomatic resolutions take precedence over military interventions.

In conclusion, the situation in Ukraine serves as a microcosm of broader challenges in international relations, where the stakes are high, and the consequences of inaction can be dire. As engaged citizens, it is our responsibility to push for a foreign policy that reflects our values—one that champions peace, diplomacy, and the protection of human rights. By understanding the historical context, supporting equitable representation, advocating for responsible military aid policies, and promoting inclusive dialogue, we can contribute to a more stable and just world that honors the dignity of all nations and peoples.

To Do:

To respond to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and support efforts for peace and stability, individuals can take a variety of concrete actions. Below is a detailed list of ideas that we can personally engage in, including specific petitions, representatives to contact, and suggested messages.

### Personal Actions

1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - Stay informed about the situation in Ukraine, the role of the U.S. and European allies, and the implications of global geopolitics. Share this knowledge through conversations, social media, and community forums to raise awareness.

2. **Support Humanitarian Organizations** - Consider donating to or volunteering with organizations providing aid to those affected by the conflict, such as the International Red Cross, Doctors Without Borders, or local Ukrainian charities.

3. **Advocate for Diplomatic Solutions** - Engage in activism that promotes diplomatic solutions over military intervention.

### Specific Actions to Take

1. **Sign Petitions** - **Petition for Ceasefire and Diplomacy**: Look for petitions on platforms like Change.org or Care2. For example, you can support petitions calling for immediate ceasefire negotiations. A current example is the petition titled “Demand a Ceasefire in Ukraine” on Change.org. - **Petition Links**: You can search for relevant petitions online, as they often change based on current events.

2. **Contact Your Elected Officials** - **Who to Write**: Contact your Senators and Representatives to express your views. Use the following resources to find contact information: - **U.S. Senate**: [senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov) - **U.S. House of Representatives**: [house.gov](https://www.house.gov) - **Example Officials**: - **Senator Bob Menendez** (Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee) - Email: https://www.menendez.senate.gov/contact - Address: 528 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 - **Representative Adam Schiff** (Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee) - Email: https://schiff.house.gov/contact - Address: 2211 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515

3. **Participate in Rallies and Protests** - Look for local organizations that are organizing rallies advocating for peace in Ukraine. Engaging in these events can amplify your voice and show solidarity with those affected by the conflict.

4. **Write Letters to the Editor** - Submit letters to local newspapers expressing your views on the U.S. involvement in Ukraine and the need for diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict.

### Suggested Messages

When contacting elected officials or engaging in activism, consider using the following templates:

- **For Letters and Emails:** ``` Subject: Urgent Action Needed for Peace in Ukraine

Dear [Official’s Name],

I am writing to you as a concerned citizen regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. It is imperative that the U.S. takes a strong stance in advocating for a ceasefire and a diplomatic resolution to the crisis. I urge you to prioritize humanitarian aid and support negotiations that involve both U.S. and European leaders, ensuring that Ukraine's sovereignty and security are respected.

Thank you for your attention to this critical issue.

Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] ```

- **For Social Media Posts:** ``` It’s time to call for peace in Ukraine! #CeasefireNow #DiplomacyOverWar ```

By engaging in these actions, we can contribute to a collective effort towards peace and support the needs of those affected by the conflict in Ukraine. Every voice matters, and together we can advocate for policies that promote stability and humanitarian support.


Sign Our Petition



10 Related Article(s):

Eric Ham: The Alaska summit is Trump's 'wobbly' moment

Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin Meeting Today: What's On Agenda? All You Need To Know

Trump and Putin's dueling summit strategies: ANALYSIS

Hidden reason Putin will walk with one arm by the side when meeting Trump released

Trump Heads to Alaska for Pivotal Summit With Putin on Ukraine War - Conservative Angle

Alaska summit: Ukraine wary as Trump, Putin meet without Zelenskyy

Transcript: Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan"

How Trump's desire for a Nobel Peace Prize looms over Putin summit

Trump says he will raise territorial issues with Russia, but Ukraine will have final say

SUMMARY - Friday, 15 August 2025 - 5 p.m.


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com