LEONARD GREENE: Trump's police takeover bid won't fly in NYC
nydailynews.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 12:57:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: White House Policy Proposals, Democratic Party Responses
Maybe they can pull off that stunt in Washington, D.C., where there's no statehood or congressional representation, but President Trump shouldn't even think about trying that takeover mess here, because this is New York, and we're not having it.
Even New Yorkers who don't like the NYPD or who senselessly want to defund the police department would draw the line at a federal government takeover.
"That act would unify New York in resistance," said Hawk Newsome, chairman of Black Lives Matter's Greater New York chapter.
Newsome says he can see it now: Blacks, whites, Christians, Jews, Muslims, Liberals, Conservatives, Socialists, Democrats and Republicans, holding hands in a mass circle around 1 Police Plaza daring Trump's troops to step one foot across that line,
Understand that Newsome, a frequent police department critic, has about as much love for the NYPD as Yankees fans have for Fenway Park.
But if Trump's pen comes anywhere near an executive order that would put New York's Finest in his control, Newsome says he would defend the police with his dying breath.
"I know I have this hate-hate relationship with the NYPD," Newsome said. "But an attempted takeover of New York is like an act of war, and people are going to stand in unity and stand together. Not this city."
Last week, federal agents fanned out across Washington, D.C. as part of what Trump called a clamp-down on crime in the nation's capital -- even though city officials say crime is already on its way down.
D.C's status as a congressionally established federal district allows the president to take control, although he's limited to only 30 days under statute unless he gets approval from Congress.
Despite those limitations, the delusional despot has set his sights on other major cities, including the one he used to call home.
"I'm going to look at New York in a little while," Trump said at the White House Monday, after mobilizing National Guard troops.
He's looking at the wrong city.
Even Mayor Adams, who has a softer spot for Trump than most New York City politicians, says Trump's troops are not welcome here.
"We don't need anyone to come in and take over our law enforcement apparatus," Adams said. "We have the finest police department on the globe,
Adams, a retired NYPD captain, is, of course, a little biased.
But even if he wasn't, he understands the damage that would be done under even one day of Trump rule.
The others know, too.
"You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is," Trump said. "We have other cities that are very bad. New York has a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore -- they're so far gone.We're not going to lose our cities over this, and this will go further."
Trump is nothing if not transparent.
And consistent.
"I think it's very notable that each and every one of the cities called out by the president has a Black mayor, and most of those cities are seeing historic lows in violent crime," Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott told CNN. "The president could learn from us instead of throwing things at us."
D.C.'s mayor, Muriel Bowser, is also Black.
Every time you say this president has reached a new low, he reaches a new low, .
Unleashing the National Guard in Los Angeles to embarrass that city's Black mayor Karen Bass, wasn't enough for him. He has to command troops to raise war against some enemy, and right now it's the people in Democratic cities who didn't want him or his immigration policies.
Newsome doesn't think it's even about politics anymore.
"It's about good and evil. Certain things are just wrong," Newsome said. "We disagree on a lot. We disagree on who's going to be the best mayor. But one thing we won't stand for is a dictatorship. This is a no dictator zone."
Sign Our PetitionThe recent pronouncements by former President Donald Trump regarding a potential federal intervention in cities like New York reveal a troubling pattern of political maneuvering that harkens back to historical efforts to centralize control under the guise of law and order. This exploration of the dynamics at play not only highlights the gravity of Trump's intentions but also serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggles for justice and autonomy faced by marginalized communities. The notion of federal forces imposing themselves on urban centers, particularly those with predominantly Black leadership, raises significant questions about race, power, and governance in America.
Historically, federal intervention in local law enforcement has frequently unfolded during periods of social unrest, often justified as a necessary means to restore order. However, these actions have often had the opposite effect, exacerbating tensions and undermining local authority. Trump's comments about looking to "take over" law enforcement in cities like New York can be viewed through the lens of the long-standing distrust between federal authorities and urban communities. The Black Lives Matter movement has made clear the detrimental impact of aggressive policing, particularly in cities where systemic racism has historically shaped law enforcement practices. Trump's proposed federalization of police in New York serves as a stark reminder of how power can be wielded in ways that disregard the voices of the very communities it purports to protect.
The pushback from figures like Hawk Newsome, chairman of the Black Lives Matter Greater New York chapter, illustrates the potential for unity across diverse groups against federal overreach. This moment reflects the broader social struggle for civil rights and community autonomy, as various factions—including those traditionally at odds—recognize the existential threat posed by federal control. The idea that New Yorkers, regardless of their stance on policing, would unite against a federal takeover underscores the importance of local governance and accountability. It is a testament to the deep-rooted values of self-determination that have characterized New York City’s history, particularly its long-standing immigrant and activist communities.
Furthermore, Trump's remarks about crime rates in cities with Black mayors cannot be overlooked. It is not merely a coincidence that these cities, which have often been subject to scathing critiques from the right, also serve as focal points for discussions about race and inequality in America. The assertion that cities like Baltimore and Oakland are "so far gone" reflects a racially charged narrative that places blame for urban struggles squarely on the shoulders of Black leadership, ignoring the broader socioeconomic factors at play. This narrative feeds into a historical trope of criminalization that has long been used to justify neglect and disinvestment in communities of color, perpetuating cycles of poverty and violence rather than addressing root causes.
In the context of contemporary social movements, it becomes crucial to frame these discussions within the larger narrative of resistance against systemic oppression. The unity expressed by Newsome in the face of an attempted federal takeover can serve as a rallying cry for those who recognize that the fight for justice extends beyond police reform and into the realms of economic equity and voter representation. The struggle for D.C. statehood, mentioned in the article, highlights the ongoing fight for representation and autonomy, as its lack of congressional representation exemplifies the marginalization of urban populations, particularly those of color.
As the political landscape continues to evolve, it is imperative for advocates of social justice to remain vigilant against federal overreach disguised as public safety initiatives. Engaging in conversations around local control, community-led justice initiatives, and equitable resource allocation can help to dismantle the harmful narratives that seek to divide and conquer. By standing in solidarity against attempts to undermine local governance, we not only protect the autonomy of our cities but also advance the broader struggle for justice and equity that is deeply rooted in our history. The resistance to Trump's "police takeover bid" in New York is more than a rejection of federal authority; it is a powerful assertion of community strength and resilience in the face of systemic oppression.
The recent commentary by Leonard Greene highlights an alarming trend in the political landscape concerning President Trump's attempts to exert control over local police departments, particularly in major cities like New York. This situation calls for a deeper analysis of the historical context and implications of federal intervention in local law enforcement. The potential for a police takeover is not merely a matter of governance; it reflects a broader struggle over power dynamics, race, and civil rights in America. As citizens, it is vital that we understand the implications of such actions and how they could undermine the very fabric of our democracy.
Historically, the relationship between federal authority and local governance has been contentious, particularly in urban areas with significant minority populations. From the Civil Rights Movement to contemporary discussions about police brutality, there has been a consistent pushback against federal overreach that tends to exacerbate racial tensions rather than resolve them. Greene's article reminds us that cities like New York, with their rich tapestry of communities, are not willing to accept federal control that disregards local voices. The resistance articulated by figures like Hawk Newsome of Black Lives Matter is crucial, as it underscores the strength found in unity across diverse demographics when faced with authoritarian tactics.
As Americans, we must actively engage in the political process to ensure that our local governments remain empowered and representative of their constituencies. One concrete action is advocating for the strategic decentralization of power from federal to local authorities, particularly concerning policing. This could involve supporting legislation that reinforces community control over police departments, fostering accountability, and enhancing transparency. By empowering local voices, we can create a system that prioritizes the needs and concerns of the community rather than a top-down approach that often fails to address the unique challenges faced by urban populations.
Moreover, it is essential to recognize the broader implications of Trump's rhetoric regarding crime in cities led by Black mayors. Historically, such language has often been a dog whistle for racial bias, reinforcing stereotypes and legitimizing unjust policies. As advocates for social justice, we must call out this tactic and emphasize the importance of viewing crime through a socio-economic lens rather than a purely punitive one. By shifting the narrative to focus on systemic issues—such as poverty, lack of access to education, and inadequate social services—we can push back against the criminalization of communities and advocate for solutions that address root causes rather than symptoms.
In conclusion, the potential for federal intervention in cities like New York poses a significant threat not just to local governance but to the very principles of equity and justice that many Americans hold dear. By understanding the historical context and mobilizing against such overreach, we can foster a more inclusive dialogue around policing and governance. Encouraging community engagement, advocating for local control, and reframing discussions around crime are all actions we can take to resist authoritarian impulses and work towards a more just society. It is crucial that we remain vigilant and united in our efforts to protect the values we cherish, ensuring that our cities remain bastions of democracy rather than pawns in a larger political game.
The concerns raised in this article about the potential federal takeover of local law enforcement in New York City highlight several key issues that resonate deeply with community values and the importance of local governance. Here’s a detailed list of actions you can take to engage with this pressing issue:
### Personal Actions to Take
1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Stay informed about local and national policies regarding law enforcement and federal intervention. - Organize or participate in community forums to discuss these issues and mobilize community responses.
2. **Support Local Advocacy Groups:** - Contribute your time or resources to local organizations that focus on civil rights, police accountability, and community safety. Examples include the Black Lives Matter movement, the ACLU, and local advocacy groups.
3. **Engage with Elected Officials:** - Write to your local and state representatives expressing your opposition to federal overreach in law enforcement. - Attend town hall meetings to voice your concerns directly to elected officials and to discuss community safety.
### Specific Actions and Petitions
1. **Petition for Community Control of Police:** - Start or support petitions that demand community control over local police departments to ensure accountability and transparency. - An example petition could be through Change.org titled "Community Control of Police Now," which can be accessed and shared widely.
2. **Contact Elected Officials:** - **New York City Mayor Eric Adams** - Email: mayor@cityhall.nyc.gov - Mailing Address: City Hall, New York, NY 10007 - **New York State Governor Kathy Hochul** - Email: governor.hochul@exec.ny.gov - Mailing Address: NYS State Capitol Building, Albany, NY 12224 - **New York Senators:** - **Chuck Schumer** - Email: schumer.senate.gov/contact/email-chuck - Mailing Address: 757 Third Avenue, Suite 17-02, New York, NY 10017 - **Kirsten Gillibrand** - Email: gillibrand.senate.gov/contact/email-kirsten - Mailing Address: 780 Third Avenue, Suite 2601, New York, NY 10017
3. **Draft Letters to Officials:** - In your letters, express your opposition to any federal takeover of the NYPD. Emphasize the importance of local governance in law enforcement and cite the need for community trust and accountability. Here is a basic template:
``` Dear [Official's Name],
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any federal intervention in New York City's law enforcement. The idea of a federal takeover undermines local governance and disregards the community's right to determine its own public safety policies.
New York City has a diverse and vibrant community that deserves self-determination and accountability in our law enforcement. I urge you to stand firm against any attempts by the federal government to impose control over our police department.
Thank you for your attention to this critical issue.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
4. **Social Media Engagement:** - Use platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook to raise awareness about potential federal overreach. Share articles, engage in discussions, and use hashtags like #ProtectNYC to unify your message.
5. **Participate in Local Protests:** - Join or organize peaceful protests against federal intervention and in support of local accountability measures. Check community calendars for events or organize your own with local groups.
6. **Connect with Local Media:** - Write op-eds or letters to the editor of local newspapers expressing your concerns about federal intervention. This can help amplify community voices and foster dialogue.
By taking these actions, you can play an active role in shaping the conversation around law enforcement in your community and protecting the values of local governance and accountability.