"We are strongly against any terrorist attack, stand by people of India": South Korean Foreign Minister condemns Pahalgam terror attack
northernirelandnews.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 12:28:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Trade Policy & Tariffs, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations
New Delhi [India], August 16 (ANI): South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun has expressed solidarity with India over the Pahalgam terror attack and on its fight against terrorism, saying his country stands by the Indian government and the people of India.
In an interview with ANI, Cho Hyun said South Korea is firmly against terrorism.
'We are very stern and firm on this issue. We are strongly against any terrorist attack. We stand by the Indian government and the people of India,' Cho Hyun said.
India had launched Operation Sindoor in retaliation to the Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were killed. India conducted precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and PoJK and repelled subsequent Pakistani aggression and pounded its airbases.
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, who had a bilateral meeting with Cho Hyun, expressed gratitude for South Korea's condemnation of Pahalgam terror attack and recalled that the parliamentary delegation from India that went to Seoul later 'got very good meetings'.
'I want to express our gratitude for the RoK's condemnation of the terrorist attack that took place in Pahalgam on 22nd of April, and the fact that when our Parliamentary delegation went to Seoul, I think they got very good meetings, you yourself made an effort to meet them - it is something which we appreciate,' Jaishankar said.
Answering queries, Cho Hyun said the tariffs being imposed by the United States in the rapidly changing situation in global trade is not unexpected and that his country was able to sort out the problem and 'make a win-win' through trade negotiations.
He said South Korea and the United States were able to strike a deal 'that will again lead us to a win-win proposal'.
'This is something not unexpected given the rapidly changing situation in global trade. We were able to sort out a problem and make a win-win through these negotiations, and we were able to strike a deal that will again lead us to a win-win proposal,' he said.
US President Donald Trump had announced last month that he has reached a trade agreement with South Korea, which includes a 15 per cent tariff on South Korean exports to the United States.
Trump made the announcement on July 31 on his social media handle Truth Social.
'I am pleased to announce that the United States of America has agreed to a Full and Complete Trade Deal with the Republic of Korea. The Deal is that South Korea will give to the United States $350 Billion Dollars for Investments owned and controlled by the United States, and selected by myself, as President. Additionally, South Korea will purchase $100 Billion Dollars of LNG, or other Energy products and, further, South Korea has agreed to invest a large sum of money for their Investment purposes,' Trump had said.
'This sum will be announced within the next two weeks when the President of South Korea, Lee Jae Myung, comes to the White House for a Bilateral Meeting. I would also like to congratulate the new President on his Electoral Success. It is also agreed that South Korea will be completely OPEN TO TRADE with the United States, and that they will accept American product including Cars and Trucks, Agriculture, etc. We have agreed to a Tariff for South Korea of 15%. America will not be charged a Tariff. I would like to thank the Trade Representatives who came forward today. It was an Honor to meet them, and talk about the Great Success of their Country!' he added.
The United States has imposed 50 per cent tariff on Indian goods.
Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods in July, even as there were hopes of an interim India-US trade deal that would have otherwise helped avoid elevated tariffs. A few days later, he imposed another 25 per cent tariff, taking the total to 50 per cent, citing India's continued imports of Russian oil.
Asked about the Alaska Summit meeting between the US President and Russian President Vladimir Putin, the South Korean Foreign Minister said it was too early to assess the outcome of the meeting but stressed that avoiding conflict was crucial.
'It is too early to make any assessment of the meeting itself. We really hope that this will be the first step in the right direction. It is very important to avoid war and peace at any cost is better than war,' he said.
Cho Hyun said he had good meeting with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Saturday and recalled his tenure in Delhi as Ambassador from 2015 to 2017, stating that significant changes were made in India under Prime Minister Modi's leadership and that 'more good changes' have been made during the past ten years.
Cho Hyun said it is great to be back in Delhi and when he landed in the city about 10 years ago, he was humbled by the depths of India's culture.
'I feel great to be back in Delhi and ten years ago, I landed in Delhi and I was very much humbled by the depths of the culture and the largest of the subcontinent and the people. I was very proud to serve as the Korean Ambassador to India, during which time I recognised the significant changes made in India under Prime Minister Modi's leadership...Now I see even more good changes that have been made during the past ten years. So I'm very glad to be back here, meet my friends,' Cho Hyun said.
Cho Hyun recalled that when he served as Ambassador, he had meeting with S Jaishankar who served as Foreign Secretary from 2015-18.
He said they discussed various issues and explored ways to enhance the bilateral relationship. The Korean Foreign Minister arrived in the national capital on Friday.
'It was a good meeting and I used to meet him when I was here and he was the Foreign Secretary. We discussed various issues and explored ways to enhance our bilateral relationship, addressing both the geopolitical and geo-economic challenges our countries face,' Cho Hyun said.
In his opening remarks during meeting with the visiting South Korean leader, Jaishankar said 'it's not very often that you have a chance to welcome an old friend as a new colleague'.
'So, it's a very special privilege to welcome you back to India. Please accept my congratulations on your appointment, you have been barely a month in the job, the fact that you are here literally a day after your National Day, and our National Day, says a lot really about the value we attach to the relationship,' Jaishankar said.
'Let me also take the opportunity to extend our greetings to you for the National Liberation Day of Korea, and your visit, I think, in many ways, comes at a very important time - it is the 10th anniversary of our Special Strategic Partnership, and I had the privilege of being with the Prime Minister when he met your President in Kananaskis in Canada. It was, by the way, a very good meeting I must tell you, they had very strong bonding,' he added. (ANI)
Sign Our PetitionThe recent statements from South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun regarding the Pahalgam terror attack in India reflect a critical intersection of national security, international relations, and the enduring conflicts that characterize the South Asian geopolitical landscape. Cho’s unequivocal condemnation of terrorism and his expression of solidarity with the Indian government highlight a broader narrative in which nation-states often rally around shared values while simultaneously navigating complex historical grievances. This moment serves as a reminder that the fight against terrorism cannot be disentangled from the historical contexts that give rise to violence and conflict, particularly in regions like Kashmir, where the Pahalgam attack occurred.
Historically, the Kashmir conflict has its roots in the partition of British India in 1947, which led to widespread communal violence and territorial disputes between India and Pakistan. The region has been a flashpoint for conflict, marked by claims of human rights abuses and a struggle for self-determination. The Pahalgam attack, which left 26 people dead, is not an isolated incident but part of a long continuum of violence that has resulted from geopolitical tensions, religious divides, and the militarization of the region. By framing the attack solely as a terrorist act without acknowledging its historical context, there is a risk of perpetuating a narrative that simplifies the complexities of the conflict and ignores the lived realities of the Kashmiri people who have suffered through decades of unrest.
The response from India, exemplified by Operation Sindoor—a military retaliation aimed at what it classified as terror infrastructure in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir—raises questions about the efficacy and ethical implications of such military actions. While the Indian government positions its military responses as necessary actions to combat terrorism, it is essential to consider the humanitarian impact of such operations. Civilian casualties and further escalations of violence can lead to a cycle that exacerbates the very issues that governments claim to address. A more comprehensive approach would emphasize diplomacy, dialogue, and reconciliation, recognizing that long-term peace is predicated on addressing underlying grievances rather than further militarization.
Furthermore, the dialogue surrounding trade agreements, such as the one mentioned between the United States and South Korea, underscores the interconnectedness of global politics and local conflicts. Cho Hyun’s comments on trade negotiations reflect a pragmatic approach to international relations, emphasizing economic interdependence as a means to mitigate conflict. However, this raises critical questions about whose interests are being served. Trade deals often prioritize corporate profit and geopolitical maneuvering over the welfare of ordinary citizens. In discussing international cooperation, it is crucial to advocate for frameworks that prioritize equity, justice, and the dignity of all peoples, rather than simply aligning with state interests.
This incident and the accompanying discourse serve as crucial points of engagement for those concerned with social justice and human rights. Drawing attention to the historical roots of violence, advocating for peaceful resolutions rather than military responses, and promoting equitable trade practices can help shift the narrative toward a more just and humane approach to international relations. In conversations with those who may hold opposing views, it is essential to highlight these connections—encouraging a broader understanding of how historical injustices inform current conflicts and the importance of addressing these root causes in any meaningful pursuit of peace. By doing so, we can challenge reductionist narratives and advocate for a world that values human life above political expediency.
The recent statements made by South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun regarding the Pahalgam terror attack, as well as the ongoing geopolitical tensions surrounding trade tariffs, reveal critical intersections between international relations, national security, and economic policies. This incident serves as a reminder that countries are often compelled to navigate complex landscapes of both diplomacy and domestic concerns, which can lead to significant regional and global ramifications. Understanding the depth of these dynamics provides an opportunity for American citizens to engage in meaningful dialogue about foreign policy, trade, and terrorism, and can serve as a catalyst for broader discussions about ethical governance and international cooperation.
Historically, the fight against terrorism has often been weaponized by governments to justify military actions and heightened surveillance measures at home and abroad. In the case of India, the Pahalgam attack has been used as a rallying point for military responses, such as Operation Sindoor, which highlight the tensions between India and Pakistan that date back to their partition in 1947. The long-standing conflict between these two nations is underscored by deep-rooted issues of national identity, territorial disputes, and religious tensions. It is crucial to recognize that retaliatory military actions can lead to cycles of violence, exacerbating the very issues they purport to resolve. As global citizens, we must urge our leaders to prioritize diplomacy and engagement rather than military confrontation, advocating for a peace-building approach that addresses the root causes of terrorism rather than merely its symptoms.
On the economic front, Cho Hyun's comments about the tariffs imposed by the United States reflect the ongoing complexities of international trade. The notion of "win-win" agreements can be misleading; they often mask underlying inequities and exploitative practices that harm labor forces and communities, both domestically and abroad. The trade deal negotiated during the Trump administration, which includes hefty tariffs on South Korean exports, serves as a reminder of the delicate balance of power in global trade. As citizens, we can call for transparency in trade negotiations and advocate for policies that protect workers' rights, promote fair trade practices, and prioritize environmental sustainability. Engaging with local representatives and holding them accountable for their positions on trade can amplify the voices of those who are often marginalized in these discussions.
In light of these developments, we must also consider how terrorism narratives are framed in our political discourse. The alignment of foreign policy with national security interests often leads to an oversimplification of complex international relations, creating an 'us vs. them' mentality. This not only has implications for foreign policy but also affects how we perceive and treat immigrants and refugees in our own country. By fostering an environment of empathy and understanding, Americans can challenge xenophobic narratives that arise in the wake of terrorist events. Educational initiatives that promote cultural exchange, critical thinking, and empathy towards diverse communities can play a significant role in mitigating fear and prejudice.
Finally, as we confront these multifaceted challenges, we must prioritize grassroots movements and community organizing that advocate for peace and justice. Supporting organizations that work towards conflict resolution, social equity, and humanitarian assistance can help shift the narrative around terrorism and promote a more compassionate understanding of global issues. By engaging in local activism, attending town hall meetings, and participating in campaigns that align with these values, we can foster a collective responsibility to promote peace and justice on a global scale.
In conclusion, the recent diplomatic exchanges surrounding the Pahalgam terror attack and the ensuing discussions on trade tariffs highlight the intricate web of international relations, national security, and economic policies. By approaching these issues with a commitment to justice, empathy, and diplomacy, we can engage in meaningful conversations that challenge the status quo and advocate for a more equitable and peaceful world. It is through our collective action that we can influence the political landscape, ensuring that policies reflect our shared values of compassion, understanding, and solidarity with those affected by violence and economic disparity.
Analyzing the article, there are several potential actions that individuals can take to engage with the issues of international relations, terrorism, and economic policies discussed. Here are some ideas for personal actions, including ways to advocate for peace, support for communities affected by violence, and promote fair trade practices:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Advocate for Peace and Non-Violence:** - Organize or participate in community discussions about the importance of non-violent conflict resolution and peace-building initiatives. - Support organizations that focus on conflict resolution and peace education.
2. **Support Victims of Violence:** - Contribute to or volunteer with NGOs that provide support to victims of terrorism and violence, both in India and globally. - Host fundraising events to gather resources for communities affected by such attacks.
3. **Engage in Fair Trade Advocacy:** - Promote fair trade products to support ethical economic practices that benefit producers in developing countries. - Educate others about the implications of tariffs and trade agreements on global inequality.
4. **Participate in Digital Activism:** - Use social media platforms to raise awareness about the impacts of terrorism and the importance of international solidarity.
### Exact Actions We Can Take
1. **Petitions:** - Start or sign petitions advocating for peace-focused policies or humanitarian aid for regions affected by violence. Websites like Change.org or Avaaz.org often have petitions related to international issues. - Example Petition: "Support Peace Initiatives in Conflict Zones" on Change.org.
2. **Contact Officials:** - Write to your local representatives or influential leaders about the importance of supporting policies that prioritize peace and human rights over military retaliation. - **Example Officials to Contact:** - **U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren**: Email via her official website; Mailing Address: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury St., Boston, MA 02203. - **U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar**: Email through her website; Mailing Address: 2226 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515.
3. **What to Say:** - When writing to officials, express concern about the escalation of violence and the need for diplomatic solutions. Here’s a template: ``` Dear [Official's Name],
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the recent escalation of violence in [specific region]. The response to terrorism should prioritize humanitarian aid and peace-building efforts rather than military action. I urge you to support policies that promote dialogue and cooperation in international relations.
Thank you for considering the importance of peace in addressing these critical issues.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
4. **Community Engagement:** - Attend or organize community forums to discuss terrorism's impact on global politics and the importance of peaceful resolutions. - Partner with local universities or organizations to host educational workshops about international relations and ethical trade practices.
5. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Read books and articles on international relations, terrorism, and trade policies. Share insights with your community through discussions or social media. - Recommended readings include "The Anatomy of Fascism" by Robert O. Paxton and "Why Nations Fail" by Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson.
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to a broader movement advocating for peace, understanding, and cooperation on a global scale. Engaging with these issues allows us to foster a more compassionate and informed society, ultimately working towards a world where dialogue prevails over violence.