'No deal' as talks between Trump and Putin finish up at summit
7news.com.au -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 7:56:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, U.S. Elections & Voting Rights
The two world leaders discussed Moscow's war in Ukraine, seeking an end to the deadliest conflict in Europe in 80 years.
There was no immediate word on whether the talks had produced any progress toward a ceasefire in the war, a goal that Trump had set at the outset.
Know the news with the 7NEWS app: Download today
Trump and Putin, along with top foreign-policy aides, conferred in a room at an Air Force base in Anchorage, Alaska in their first meeting since 2019. A blue backdrop behind them had the words "Pursuing Peace" printed on it.
Trump's publicly stated aim for the talks was to secure a halt to the fighting and a commitment by Putin to meet swiftly with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to negotiate an end to the war, which began when Russia invaded its neighbour in February 2022.
Earlier in the week, Trump said he would know if Putin was serious about peace within minutes of seeing him. He also threatened to walk out of the talks if they were unproductive.
Putin and Trump addressed the media in a press conference after their talk, and both provided a statement, but did not take questions from reporters.
Putin said in a press conference following his talk with Trump, that Russia's primary reason for the war would need to be eliminated for the war to end.
"The situation in Ukraine has to do with the fundamental threats to our security," Putin said.
"We're convinced that in order to to make the settlement lasting and long term, we need to eliminate all the primary roots, primary causes of that conflict."
"To consider all legitimate concerns of Russia and to reinstate a just balance of security in Europe and in the world on the whole.
"And I agree with President Trump, as he has (said) today, that naturally, the security of Ukraine should be ensured as well.
"Naturally, we are prepared to work on that. I would like to hope that the agreement that we've reached together will help us bring closer to that goal and will pave the path towards peace in Ukraine."
Putin's suggested that a subsequent summit take place in the Russian capital -- a request he made in English -- prompting Trump to acknowledge that agreeing to his proposal would be highly controversial.
But Trump didn't completely shut the door to it: "That's an interesting one, I'll get a little heat on that one ... but I could see it possibly happening."
President Donald Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton commented after the press conference, that Putin walked away from the meeting with the upper hand.
"He escaped sanctions. He's not facing a ceasefire. The next meeting is not set ... It's far from over, but I'd say Putin achieved most of what he wanted. Trump achieved very little."
"Trump did not lose, but Putin clearly won. Trump didn't come away with anything, except more meetings."
Zelenskiy, who was not invited to the summit, and his European allies fear Trump might sell out Ukraine by essentially freezing the conflict with Russia and recognising -- if only informally -- Russian control over one-fifth of Ukraine.
Trump sought to assuage such concerns as he boarded Air Force One, saying he would let Ukraine decide on any possible territorial swaps.
"I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine, I'm here to get them at a table," he said.
Asked what would make the meeting a success, he told reporters: "I want to see a ceasefire rapidly ... I'm not going to be happy if it's not today ... I want the killing to stop."
Once on the ground in Alaska, Trump greeted Putin on a red carpet on the base's tarmac. The two shook hands warmly and touched each other on the arm before riding in Trump's limo to the summit site nearby.
The initial talks also included US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump's special envoy to Russia Steve Witkoff, Russian foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
Trump hopes a truce in the war that Putin started will bring peace to the region as well as bolster his credentials as a global peacemaker worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize.
For Putin, the summit is already a big win that he can portray as evidence that years of Western attempts to isolate Russia have unravelled and that Moscow is retaking its rightful place at the top table of international diplomacy.
Putin is wanted by the International Criminal Court, accused of the war crime of deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine.
Russia denies allegations of war crimes and the Kremlin has dismissed the ICC warrant as null and void.
Russia and the United States are not members of the court.
Both Moscow and Kyiv deny targeting civilians in the war. But thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority of them Ukrainian.
A conservative estimate of dead and injured in the war in Ukraine -- from both sides combined -- totals 1.2 million people, Trump's envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, said in May.
Trump, who once said he would end Russia's war in Ukraine within 24 hours, conceded on Thursday it had proven a tougher task than he had expected.
He said if Friday's talks went well, quickly arranging a second, three-way summit with Zelenskiy would be more important than his encounter with Putin.
Zelenskiy said Friday's summit should open the way for a "just peace" and three-way talks that included him, but added that Russia was continuing to wage war.
A Russian ballistic missile earlier struck Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region, killing one person and wounding another.
"It's time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America," Zelenskiy wrote on messaging app Telegram.
Zelenskiy has ruled out formally handing Moscow any territory and is also seeking a security guarantee backed by the United States.
Trump said before the summit that there is mutual respect between him and Putin.
"He is a smart guy, been doing it for a long time, but so have I ... We get along," Trump said of Putin.
He also welcomed Putin's decision to bring businesspeople to Alaska.
"But they're not doing business until we get the war settled," he said, repeating a threat of "economically severe" consequences for Russia if the summit goes badly.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent summit between former President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin has sparked renewed debate over the complexities of international diplomacy and the precarious situation in Ukraine, a country that has been embroiled in conflict since Russia's invasion in February 2022. The lack of substantive outcomes from this meeting underscores the challenges faced by world leaders in addressing aggressive military actions and the broader implications for global security. This moment is crucial for understanding not only the current geopolitical landscape but also the historical patterns of power dynamics that have shaped these events, particularly in the context of global social justice and the rights of nations to self-determination.
Historically, the relationship between the United States and Russia has been fraught with tension, particularly during the Cold War and its aftermath. The legacy of this adversarial relationship influences contemporary perceptions of Russia's actions in Ukraine, which many view as a blatant disregard for international law and the sovereignty of a neighboring state. The discussions at the summit, framed under the banner of "Pursuing Peace," evoke a sense of irony as they transpire against a backdrop of ongoing violence and humanitarian crises. The notion of peace is often manipulated in political rhetoric to obscure the realities faced by civilians on the ground, especially in war-torn regions like Ukraine where millions have been displaced and countless lives lost.
Trump's assertive stance—claiming he could gauge Putin's intentions for peace within moments—raises questions about the efficacy of his approach to diplomacy. Critics, including national security experts and former aides, have pointed out that the summit ultimately benefitted Putin more than it did the United States or Ukraine. Such an outcome reveals the dangers of engaging in high-stakes diplomacy without the necessary safeguards in place to protect vulnerable nations. The absence of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy at the talks, and the suggestion that future discussions could take place in Moscow, further exacerbates fears that the sovereignty of Ukraine is being sidelined in favor of political expediency. Here, the principle of self-determination is crucial; the voices of the Ukrainian people should not be overshadowed by the maneuverings of powerful leaders.
Moreover, the dialogue—or lack thereof—between Trump and Putin reflects a broader trend in international relations, where the interests of powerful nations often overshadow the rights and needs of smaller, affected countries. The historical context of imperialism and colonialism is particularly relevant here, as nations have repeatedly struggled for their autonomy against larger powers. The right to self-determination is a cornerstone of international law, yet it is routinely compromised in the face of geopolitical interests. The reluctance to hold leaders accountable for acts of aggression can lead to a cycle of violence, perpetuating conflicts that could otherwise be resolved through genuine dialogue rooted in respect for human rights.
As we move forward, it is critical to examine the implications of this summit and the ongoing situation in Ukraine through a lens that prioritizes social justice, human rights, and the principles of diplomacy grounded in mutual respect. The call for a "just balance of security" articulated by Putin must be scrutinized, as it often serves as a euphemism for legitimizing aggressive policies that threaten the rights of others. An informed public must engage in these discussions, advocating for policies that prioritize peace, justice, and the protection of vulnerable populations. The stance taken by leaders must reflect a commitment to uphold international norms and the dignity of all nations, particularly those that are marginalized in the global arena.
In this light, it becomes vital for advocates of social justice to challenge narratives that prioritize power over people. As discussions about diplomacy and international relations continue to unfold, it is the responsibility of engaged citizens to hold their leaders accountable, ensuring that the pursuit of peace is not merely a rhetorical flourish but a tangible goal backed by concrete actions. The situation in Ukraine serves as a poignant reminder of the stakes involved in these discussions, as the lives and futures of countless individuals hang in the balance amidst the shifting tides of global power.
The recent summit between former President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin has stirred significant concern among political observers, particularly regarding the implications for Ukraine and the broader geopolitical landscape. The meeting, held in Anchorage, Alaska, marks a critical juncture in international diplomacy, especially considering the ongoing devastation in Ukraine since Russia's invasion in February 2022. Despite the hopeful rhetoric surrounding the theme of "Pursuing Peace," the outcome was decidedly unclear, with both leaders failing to produce a tangible path forward. This situation highlights not only the challenges of unilateral negotiations in a complex geopolitical conflict but also the pressing need for a more collaborative and principled approach to peace efforts.
Historically, the relationship between the United States and Russia has oscillated between rivalry and cooperation, often influenced by leadership dynamics and international events. The Cold War era established a context of mutual distrust and antagonism, while the post-Cold War period saw attempts at engagement and collaboration. However, recent years have displayed a stark regression in this relationship, characterized by aggressive posturing and military conflicts. The invasion of Ukraine was a significant turning point, eliciting global condemnation and a unified response from NATO and European allies. Yet, the failure of this summit suggests that for some leaders, the broader strategic goals may overshadow the immediate humanitarian needs of the Ukrainian people.
As American citizens and as part of the global community, it is vital to stay informed and actively engage in discussions about foreign policy and its ramifications. One way to foster a more inclusive dialogue is through grassroots campaigns that advocate for the rights and sovereignty of Ukraine. This can take the form of educational outreach, community forums, and collaboration with organizations that focus on peace-building and conflict resolution. Furthermore, encouraging local representatives to prioritize diplomatic solutions that involve direct dialogue with Ukrainian leadership can help ensure that the voices of those most affected by the conflict are heard and respected.
Moreover, the complexities of this situation demand a critical examination of the narratives surrounding national security. Putin's assertions regarding "fundamental threats to our security" echo historical justifications for aggression, invoking fears that can easily sway public opinion. It is important to counteract this rhetoric with facts about the sovereignty of nations and the right to self-determination. Engaging in debates that highlight the importance of upholding international law and the principles of democracy can serve as a potent counter-narrative to those who would excuse or normalize aggressive state behavior.
Lastly, it is essential to recognize the role of media in shaping public perception of foreign policy. The analysis provided by figures such as John Bolton, who pointedly noted that Putin walked away with the upper hand, emphasizes the importance of scrutinizing the outcomes of such high-profile meetings. Citizens should demand accountability and transparency from leaders, particularly when decisions have grave implications for global peace and security. Engaging with independent media, supporting investigative journalism, and participating in public discourse are all actionable steps that can empower citizens to hold their leaders accountable and advocate for a foreign policy that prioritizes diplomacy, peace, and the rights of nations to exist free from aggression.
In conclusion, while the summit between Trump and Putin may not have yielded immediate results, it serves as a reminder of the complexities and responsibilities inherent in international diplomacy. As engaged citizens, we must advocate for a more principled approach that prioritizes negotiation, the voices of those directly affected, and a commitment to uphold international norms. By fostering informed discussions and demanding accountability, we can collectively work towards a future where peace is not just a slogan, but a reality that reflects the will of the people.
In light of the recent summit between Trump and Putin, where the focus was on the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, there are several actions individuals can take to advocate for peace and support the sovereignty of Ukraine. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions that can be pursued:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Raise Awareness**: Share information about the conflict in Ukraine and the implications of international diplomacy on social media, community forums, and other platforms. 2. **Engage with Local Representatives**: Contact elected officials to express concern about the lack of support and representation for Ukraine in international discussions, emphasizing the importance of Ukrainian sovereignty.
3. **Support Humanitarian Efforts**: Consider contributing to organizations providing aid to Ukraine, which can help alleviate the human suffering caused by the war.
4. **Participate in Peaceful Protests**: Join or organize local demonstrations advocating for peace in Ukraine, calling for non-violent solutions to conflicts.
5. **Educate Yourself and Others**: Take time to learn more about the historical context of the Ukraine conflict and the geopolitical dynamics involved, sharing insights with friends and family.
### Exact Actions We Can Take
1. **Petition for Increased Support for Ukraine**: - **Action**: Start or sign petitions that call for increased humanitarian aid and military support for Ukraine. - **Example**: Check out platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org for existing petitions. You can also create your own and gather signatures.
2. **Contact Elected Officials**: - **Who to Write To**: - **U.S. Senator**: Contact your state's senator. - Example: Senator Dick Durbin (IL) - Email: contact@durbin.senate.gov - Example: Senator Marco Rubio (FL) - Email: info@rubio.senate.gov - **U.S. House Representative**: Find your local representative and express your concerns. - Example: Rep. Nancy Pelosi (CA) - Email: pelosi.house.gov/email - Example: Rep. Kevin McCarthy (CA) - Email: kevinmccarthy.house.gov/contact - **What to Say**: - "Dear [Representative's Name], I am writing to express my concern regarding the recent summit between Trump and Putin and the implications it may have for Ukraine. It is crucial that the U.S. continues to support Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. Please advocate for a strong, principled approach that prioritizes peace and support for the Ukrainian people."
3. **Support Local and National Advocacy Groups**: - Get involved with organizations such as: - **Ukrainian National Women's League of America**: Advocate for awareness and support for Ukraine. - **Amnesty International**: Join campaigns focused on human rights in conflict zones. - **Human Rights Watch**: Support their efforts in monitoring and reporting on the situation in Ukraine.
4. **Social Media Campaigns**: - Use platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook to share posts about the importance of Ukrainian sovereignty, using hashtags like #StandWithUkraine, #PeaceInUkraine, and #EndTheWar.
5. **Write Opinion Pieces**: - Consider writing letters to the editor or opinion pieces for local newspapers to raise awareness and advocate for a strong U.S. stance on international peace efforts.
6. **Organize Community Events**: - Host discussions or forums in your community to educate others about the Ukraine conflict and discuss paths toward peace.
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to a broader movement advocating for peace and supporting Ukraine in the face of ongoing conflict. Each action, big or small, can help raise awareness and advocate for the rights and dignity of those affected by war.