Live updates: Trump, Putin meet in Alaska summit
desertsun.com -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 4:59:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, Media Coverage & Press Relations
WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin greeted each other warmly on the red carpet after exiting their planes in Alaska for a summit that Trump hopes will lead to a resolution of the three-year Ukraine war.
The two men walked toward each other and shook hands. They exchanged words and Trump saluted assembled U.S. troops.
Reporters shouted, "Mr. Putin, did you underestimate Ukraine?" and "President Putin, will you stop killing civilians?" while Putin stood next to Trump on the platform. After the second question, Putin made a face, pointed to his head, shrugged and lifted his palms to the air.
Trump and Putin then rode together in the 20,000-pound U.S. presidential limousine, known as The Beast, to the formal summit. Putin smiled and waved from behind the 3-inch-thick glass.
Before Air Force One landed for the high-stakes meeting, Trump told reporters he would "walk" if things didn't go well with the Russian strongman.
"We're going for a meeting with President Putin in Alaska, and I think it's going to work out very well - and if it doesn't, I'm going to head back home real fast," Trump told Fox News anchor Bret Baier in an interview during the flight.
Putin has been reluctant to halt the bloody Ukraine conflict, frustrating Trump, who has lashed out and threatened economic penalties. The Aug. 15 summit is a test of whether Trump can make progress on a deal that is acceptable to both Ukraine and Russia.
The two leaders are meeting at a U.S. military base in Alaska. Not invited: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who spoke with Trump twice this week and has rejected the idea of territorial concessions to end the war.
A grimace from Putin at start of meeting
The leaders held a brief photo opportunity as the meeting began. On each side of the room was an interpreter and three senior aides to each man.
Trump and Putin sat next to one another, tilted forward with their hands in between their legs, in front of a dark blue banner that said "Pursuing Peace" and "Alaska 2025."
Trump did not respond to shouted questions from reporters, other than to say, "Thank you very much. Thank you." Putin appeared to bristle at one question. He cupped his hands around his mouth as he officered an inaudible response.
-Francesca Chambers
Trump administration mulls Russian icebreakers for Arctic oil and gas development
The United States has had internal discussions about using Russian nuclear-powered icebreaker vessels to support the development of gas and LNG projects in Alaska as one of the possible deals to aim for when President Trump meets Vladimir Putin, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
The icebreaker idea has been discussed among White House officials as one of the potential deals to try to strike with Russia at the Alaska summit, one of the sources said.
The ongoing talks between the United States and Russia over Ukraine have included discussions about business deals. The White House is planning to continue this approach at the Aug. 15 summit, said the source, who, like the others spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the talks.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Kremlin officials were not available for comment.
- Reuters
Zelenskyy says Ukraine is counting on 'strong position' from Trump
As Trump arrived in Alaska, Zelenskyy issued a statement saying that he and the people of Ukraine "count on a strong position from America."
"On the day of negotiations, the Russians are killing as well. And that speaks volumes," the Ukrainian leader said in a videotaped statement posted on X.
"Everyone needs a just end to the war. Ukraine is ready to work as productively as possible to bring the war to an end, and we count on a strong position from America. Everything will depend on this - the Russians factor in American strength. Make no mistake - strength."
Ukraine spies say Russia is testing new, nuclear-capable missile
Russia is preparing to test a new nuclear-capable, nuclear-powered cruise missile, and, if successful, plans to use the results to bolster its negotiating position with the West, Ukrainian military intelligence said on August 15.
Andriy Yusov, a spokesperson for the service, issued the written statement to Reuters just before President Donald Trump was due to hold talks in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin on ending Moscow's war in Ukraine.
Reuters on Tuesday reported two U.S. researchers and a Western security source as saying that Moscow was readying a test of the Burevestnik at its Pankovo test site on the Barents Sea archipelago of Novaya Zemlya.
- Reuters
Quigley: 'The tyrants of the world' see what Trump is doing
Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Illinois, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said Trump's willingness to attend the summit with Putin allowed him to "blow past the sixth deadline" Trump has given the Russian leader to reach a ceasefire deal.
"Putin continues to ask for maximalist conditions and escalates the conflict," Quigley told USA TODAY.
"The tyrants of the world see what the president's doing, and frankly, they see a lack of interest, or weakness."
Putin's recent "flattering" is "what he's smart enough to know works with Trump," he added.
Of Putin's efforts to negotiate a new nuclear deal, Quigley said, while Putin's motives were suspect, "There's always time for diplomacy."
"I don't trust Putin, but we need to try to do this on a multilateral basis for the future of peace in the world," he said.
Trump arrives in Alaska, red carpet awaits
Trump, aboard Air Force One, landed at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska at 2:20 p.m. ET, or 10:20 a.m. local time.
Trump will be joined in his meeting with Putin by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, White House press secretary Karoline Levitt told reporters.
A red carpet is sitting on the tarmac awaiting Trump and Putin to greet each other.
Putin was expected about half an hour later, according to C-SPAN.
Trump says he'll 'walk' if Putin meeting doesn't go well
Trump, on board Air Force One en route to Alaska, said he will end his high-stakes meeting with Putin quickly if it doesn't go well.
"We're going for a meeting with President Putin in Alaska, and I think it's going to work out very well - and if it doesn't, I'm going to head back home real fast," Trump told Fox News anchor Bret Baier in an interview during the flight.
"I would walk," the president added in an excerpt of the interview released by the television network.
Russian foreign minister says 'our position is clear'
After landing in Alaska, Sergey Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, told reporters that he expected to continue a "productive conversation" with Trump but declined to say whether the summit would be successful.
"We never try to anticipate the outcome or make any guesses," Lavrov said Aug. 15, after being told Trump had predicted a 25% chance the talks would be unsuccessful. "What we do know, however, is that we have arguments we can contribute to the discussion and that our position is clear. We will present it."
Lavrov showed up at the talks wearing a CCCP sweatshirt, from when Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union.
Putin teases new nuke deal ahead of Trump summit
Russian President Vladimir Putin indicated he's interested in securing a new nuclear arms control pact with the United States, raising the stakes of the summit with President Donald Trump.
Putin suggested the summit could create "the long-term conditions of peace between our countries ... and in the world as a whole, if we reach agreements in the field of strategic (nuclear) offensive arms control," while speaking to senior Kremlin military and civilian officials at an Aug. 14 meeting.
The world's last remaining nuclear arms control treaty, New START, limits the U.S. and Russia to keeping only 1,550 long-range nuclear warheads on alert at any given time. It expires in February 2026, though Russia in 2022 paused and later stopped consultation meetings and stopped U.S. and NATO inspections of its nuclear arsenal.
Trump, long a proponent of reducing the risks of nuclear weapons, tried and failed to initiate three-way arms control negotiations with Putin and Chinese President Xi Xinping during his first term.
- Davis Winkie
Russia predicts marathon talks
The Kremlin predicts that Trump's tete-a-tete with Putin could last as long as six or seven hours, state broadcaster RIA reported.
Trump, meanwhile, has said the entire summit could be a short-lived bust.
"At the end of that meeting, probably the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made," he said Aug. 11.
Trump speaks with Belarus leader before Russia summit
President Donald Trump said before his Russia summit that he called Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko to thank him for releasing 16 prisoners and to discuss the release of 1,300 more prisoners.
"Our conversation was a very good one," Trump said on social media. "We discussed many topics, including President Putin's visit to Alaska."Lukashenko, a key Putin ally, is accused of holding hundreds of political prisoners in Belarus, which his government denies.Trump added that he hoped to meet with Lukashenko "in the future."
Trump sees a 'possibility' of US security guarantees for Ukraine
Asked if there was a possibility of the U.S. providing security guarantees to Ukraine, Trump first sought to banish the idea of a NATO membership for the country.
"Not in the form of NATO," he said. "There are certain things that aren't going to happen."
Aside from that, security guarantees could be on the table, he said.
"Along with Europe, there's a possibility," he said.
Summit 'has risks for everybody': Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan
GOP Sen. Dan Sullivan called the summit in his home state of Alaska "really preliminary" but a chance for Trump to get a sense of whether Putin is ready for a ceasefire with Ukraine before tackling more complex issues, such as territorial issues and security guarantees.
"Negotiating peace is very complex, very difficult," Sullivan told CBS's "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" in an interview Aug. 14 that will air Aug. 17. "Even this kind of high-level diplomacy has risks for everybody, including the president and his team."
"I would call it, you know, an exercise in place-setting for the real negotiations," Sullivan added.
- Bart Jansen
Trump says Putin's 'genes' may be responsible for attacks on Ukraine
Asked for his view on Russian attacks on Ukraine on the eve of their summit which killed at least seven civilians, Trump said it might be them setting the stage for negotiations.
"In his mind that helps to make a better deal. It actually hurts him," Trump told reporters while flying to Alaksa. "In his mind, that helps him make a better deal if they could continue the killing."
Trump went on to analyze Putin and the "part of the world" he belonged to.
"Maybe it's just his fabric, his genes, his genetics," he said. "But he thinks that makes him, gives him strength in negotiating. I think it hurts him, but I'll be talking to him about it."
- Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy
Trump calls Putin 'a smart guy'
Asked about what would be different in a face-to-face meeting with Russian President Putin, President Trump reflected on his impressions of the Russian leader and their relationship during an interview with reporters on Air Force One on his way to Alaska.
"Look, he's a smart guy," said Trump. "We get along. It's a good respect level on both sides. And I think, you know, something's going to come of it."
Trump said he'd noticed that Putin was bringing "a lot of business people from Russia."
"That's good. I like that," he said. "Because they want to do business, but they're not doing business until we get the war out."
- Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy
POTUS on his way to meeting with Putin
President Donald Trump departed the White House around 7:30 a.m. on Aug 15 en route to his highly anticipated meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
He had one message for those watching: "HIGH STAKES," he wrote in a Truth Social post earlier in the morning.
Traveling along with him is a 16-member entourage consisting of cabinet secretaries, communications staff and aides. They include Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scot Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, CIA Director John Ratcliff and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
- Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy
Secondary tariff on India 'probably' played a part in Putin-Trump summit
On the eve of his trip to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin, President Donald Trump said the secondary tariffs against India for purchasing oil from Russia "probably" played a part in Putin wanting to meet with him.
On July 28, Trump gave an ultimatum to Russia: declare a ceasefire in Ukraine within 10-12 days or face sanctions.
Instead, on Aug. 8, the day the deadline was supposed to expire, Trump announced that he was meeting Putin on Aug. 15.
Meanwhile, Trump also announced that a 25% secondary tariff on India would go into effect later in the month for buying oil from Russia, in addition to the country-specific 25% tariff.
During an interview with Brian Kilmeade of Fox News on Aug. 14, Trump was asked if the 10-day deadline had played a role in Moscow trying to schedule the meeting.
"Everything has an impact," said Trump, before adding that the secondary tariffs on India took the country "out of buying oil from Russia."
"Certainly, when you lose your second largest customer and you're probably going to lose your first largest customer, I think that probably has a role," he said of Russia's incentive to meet.
- Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy
Way back in 1991, as the once-mighty Soviet Union disintegrated and Westerners cheered, Vladimir Putin's favorite rock and roll band released "Don't Fool Around, America," a patriotic hit about an even older lost cause - Russia's 1867 sale of Alaska to the United States.
This bouncy, accordion-driven single ignored the disorienting collapse of the Soviet dictatorship and instead pointed listeners east, 2.4 miles across the Bering Strait, to the 49th U.S. state, demanding:
"Give us our dear Alaska back/Give us our dear native land."
Now the song, by rabble-rousing rockers Lyuba (the Loud Ones), has taken on new significance as President Donald Trump hosts Putin at an Alaskan military base - and conspiracy theories resurface claiming Uncle Sam swindled Mother Russia out of the 665,000-square-mile Arctic jewel.
Read more on Russian seller's remorse in USA TODAY.
- Dan Morrison
What time is it in Alaska now? What time does the meeting start?
Alaska is currently four hours behind Eastern Standard Time.
The meeting between Trump and Putin is scheduled to begin around 11 a.m. Alaska Daylight Time, according to the White House, which means it will begin around 3 p.m. ET.
- Gabe Hauari
A Trump-Putin reunion
Trump and Putin will meet in Anchorage, Alaska, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, home to about 30,000 service members, their families and civilian employees.
Alaska was once part of Russia - the U.S. bought it for $7.2 million in 1867 - and is separated by the Bering Strait from the Russian mainland by just 55 miles at the narrowest point.
Trump met with Putin multiple times during his first term, including in Helsinki, Finland, in 2018. Putin denied interfering in the 2016 election, comments that Trump embraced, saying Putin "was extremely strong and powerful in his denial" despite U.S. intelligence assessments pointing to interference by Moscow on Trump's behalf.
- Zac Anderson
Trump's relationship with Putin in the spotlight
Trump has had a famously warm relationship with Putin over the years, often praising the Russian autocrat. Trump reportedly shared classified intelligence with Russian officials during his first term and tried to soften U.S. opposition to Russia's past aggression against Ukraine and its human rights violations.
Meanwhile, Ukraine and Zelenskyy featured in one of the lowest points of Trump's first term. He was impeached over allegations that he pressured Zelenskyy to dig up dirt on political rival Joe Biden.
Trump's friendly approach to Putin has largely continued as he worked to get a peace deal and focused his ire on Zelenskyy, most notably during an explosive Oval Office meeting when the two clashed publicly. Trump told the Ukrainian leader he didn't "have the cards" when it came to resolving the conflict in the country's favor.
Lately, though, Trump has repeatedly slammed Putin and complained about his unwillingness to stop the fighting.
Putin escalated his attacks on Ukraine ahead of the summit, which former GOP House speaker and Trump ally Newt Gingrich called "a sign of very bad faith." Trump said Aug. 13 that there would be "very severe consequences" if Putin does not agree to end the war.
- Zac Anderson
Jockeying over territorial concessions
Trump is trying to push Moscow into an accord that Kyiv and its allies fear will include the loss of significant territory seized by Russia in its 3-year-old war.
Speculating about an eventual deal on Aug. 8, Trump said it would involve "some swapping of territories."
That drew a sharp response from Zelenskyy, who said, "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier."
But Trump has continued to push, saying on Aug. 11 that he was a "little bothered" by the Ukrainian leader's assertion that a land swap would violate the country's constitution.
"There will be some swapping," Trump insisted Aug. 11. "There will be some changes in land."
The debate over territorial concessions hangs over the summit. Putin claims four Ukrainian regions - Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson - as well as the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, which he annexed in 2014.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska serves as a significant moment not only in the current geopolitical landscape but also in the broader context of international relations and historical conflict. The Ukraine war, which has persisted for over three years, exemplifies the complexities of modern warfare, where local struggles are often influenced by the grand strategies of global powers. The absence of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy from this high-stakes discussion underscores a troubling dynamic: the sidelining of the very nation that has borne the brunt of aggression in this conflict, highlighting a pattern in international diplomacy where the interests of powerful nations overshadow the voices of those directly affected by war.
Historically, the relationship between Russia and Ukraine has been fraught with tension and conflict, rooted in centuries of intertwined histories and identities. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 marked a significant escalation in hostilities, as Russia sought to reclaim what it considers a historically significant territory. This moment not only altered the geopolitical landscape of Eastern Europe but also triggered a resurgence of nationalism and militarization within Ukraine. Thus, any resolution to the ongoing conflict must prioritize Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity—principles that have been consistently undermined in discussions that occur without Ukrainian representation. The question that arises, and one that should be raised in conversations with those who might support these negotiations, is whether negotiating with aggressors without the victims at the table truly serves the cause of lasting peace.
The decision to hold the summit at a U.S. military base in Alaska is also laden with implications. This choice is emblematic of the military-industrial complex's enduring influence on U.S. foreign policy, where military might is often seen as a viable solution to diplomatic challenges. The notion that U.S. military presence can facilitate negotiations raises important questions about the role of militarization in international relations. While Trump expressed hope for a resolution, one must consider the consequences of a militarized approach to diplomacy. The legacy of interventions in the Middle East and the ongoing conflicts that have resulted from such strategies should serve as a cautionary tale against the belief that military strength can dictate diplomatic outcomes.
Furthermore, the prospect of discussing economic deals, such as the use of Russian icebreakers for Arctic oil and gas development, introduces another layer of complexity to the summit. This potential arrangement speaks to the intersection of environmental concerns and global energy politics. The Arctic, increasingly accessible due to climate change, presents a battleground for both ecological preservation and resource extraction. Engaging with Russia on these terms raises ethical questions: can we justify economic partnerships that may contribute to environmental degradation, particularly in fragile ecosystems? Those advocating for social and environmental justice must critically examine the implications of such agreements and their potential repercussions on indigenous populations and global climate efforts.
Lastly, the summit encapsulates a broader struggle for accountability and justice in international relations. Questions posed by reporters, such as those challenging Putin on civilian casualties, are essential in holding leaders accountable for their actions. However, the dismissive reactions from leaders like Putin illustrate the dangerous normalization of impunity in global politics. Engaging in discussions about how to address war crimes and uphold human rights in diplomatic dialogues is crucial for building a more just international order. Advocates for social justice can leverage these conversations to reinforce the idea that true diplomacy must prioritize human rights and the voices of those affected by conflict, rather than merely seeking expedient solutions that favor powerful nations.
In conclusion, the Trump-Putin summit is not merely a meeting of two leaders; it represents the ongoing struggle for justice, sovereignty, and accountability in international affairs. It serves as a reminder that discussions of peace must involve all stakeholders, especially those who endure the consequences of war. As the world watches this summit unfold, we must advocate for a foreign policy that emphasizes respect for sovereignty, accountability for human rights violations, and a commitment to environmental justice—principles that should guide any meaningful pursuit of peace.
The recent summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska is emblematic of a broader geopolitical drama that has far-reaching implications for global peace and security. As the two leaders engaged in discussions aimed at resolving the three-year-old conflict in Ukraine, the absence of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy highlights a concerning trend in international relations, where the voices of those most affected by conflict are often sidelined. The optics of the meeting, set against the backdrop of U.S. military might, raises questions about the motivations behind such high-stakes diplomacy and the potential consequences for the people of Ukraine.
Historically, U.S.-Russia relations have been fraught with tension, especially since the annexation of Crimea in 2014, which sparked a war that has claimed thousands of lives. The idea that a sitting U.S. president would meet with a leader accused of war crimes without the presence of the affected nation's representatives underscores a troubling disregard for democratic processes and the rights of sovereign nations. It is crucial to remember the lessons of history, particularly the failures of appeasement that have led to devastating conflicts. Engaging with authoritarian leaders like Putin without accountability not only undermines international norms but also emboldens such regimes at the expense of democratic values.
As concerned citizens, there are meaningful actions we can take to address the implications of this summit. First, we must advocate for a robust dialogue that includes all parties affected by the conflict, especially the Ukrainian people. This can be achieved by urging congressional representatives to prioritize humanitarian aid for Ukraine and to support measures that hold Russia accountable for its actions. Furthermore, engaging in grassroots movements that raise awareness about the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Ukraine can pressure our leaders to take a stand that prioritizes peace and justice over political expediency.
Moreover, the discussion surrounding the potential collaboration on Arctic oil and gas development using Russian icebreakers raises significant environmental concerns. The climate crisis is at a tipping point, and any agreements that prioritize fossil fuel development over sustainable practices must be challenged. Activists can work to highlight the risks associated with such ventures, emphasizing the need for a transition to renewable energy sources. By mobilizing around climate justice, we not only advocate for the health of our planet but also reinforce the idea that our foreign policy should align with the collective good of humanity rather than short-term economic gains.
Educational outreach also plays a vital role in equipping citizens with the knowledge needed to engage in informed discussions about U.S.-Russia relations and the Ukraine conflict. Hosting community forums, webinars, and discussions that delve into the complexities of foreign policy can empower individuals to voice their concerns effectively. Encouraging critical thinking about the narratives presented by media outlets regarding these summits can help foster a more nuanced understanding of the stakes involved. Armed with this knowledge, citizens can confront the misleading rhetoric that often accompanies discussions about authoritarian regimes and their geopolitical maneuvers.
In conclusion, the Alaska summit serves as a reminder of the intricate interplay between diplomacy, democracy, and human rights. As we navigate this complex landscape, it is essential to advocate for inclusive dialogues that prioritize the voices of those affected by conflict, challenge environmentally damaging policies, and engage in educational initiatives that promote informed civic participation. By taking these actions, we can work towards a more just and equitable future, ensuring that the lessons of history inform our approach to international relations and the preservation of peace.
The recent summit between President Trump and President Putin raises numerous concerns regarding international diplomacy, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, and the potential implications for global peace and security. Here are some significant actions that individuals can take to make their voices heard on this pressing issue.
### Personal Actions to Take
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: - Stay informed about the Ukraine conflict, its history, and the geopolitical stakes involved. Share this information within your community, through social media, and in discussions.
2. **Raise Awareness**: - Organize or participate in local events, discussions, or rallies focused on peace in Ukraine and accountability for war crimes. Use these platforms to educate others and raise awareness about the implications of global summits like this one.
3. **Engage with Petitions**: - Sign and share petitions that advocate for peace in Ukraine and hold leaders accountable for their actions. Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org frequently host relevant petitions.
### Specific Actions and Examples
1. **Petition for Peace in Ukraine**: - **Petition Name**: "Demand Peace for Ukraine" - **Link**: Find relevant petitions on platforms like Change.org or Avaaz.org. For instance, you can search for petitions that call for an end to arms sales to Ukraine or sanctions against Russia. - **Action**: Sign the petition and share it on social media to gather more support.
2. **Contact Elected Officials**: - Write to your representatives urging them to advocate for peace in Ukraine and to support humanitarian aid efforts. - **Who to Write To**: - **U.S. Senators**: Find your senators’ contact information at [senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov). - **U.S. Representatives**: Find your representative’s information at [house.gov](https://www.house.gov). - **Example Email Template**: ``` Subject: Urgent Action Needed for Peace in Ukraine
Dear [Representative/Senator's Name],
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the implications of the recent summit between President Trump and President Putin. It is crucial that U.S. leadership prioritizes diplomatic efforts to bring about a peaceful resolution and protects the rights and dignity of civilians affected by this conflict.
Please advocate for increased humanitarian aid and push for a diplomatic solution that respects Ukraine's sovereignty.
Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
3. **Support Relevant Organizations**: - Donate to or volunteer with organizations that are working on the ground in Ukraine, such as: - **Doctors Without Borders**: Provides medical assistance to those affected by conflict. - **International Rescue Committee**: Offers aid and support to refugees and displaced individuals. - Visit their websites to find opportunities for support and involvement.
4. **Utilize Social Media**: - Create posts that highlight the urgency of the situation in Ukraine and provide information on how others can get involved. Use hashtags like #PeaceForUkraine, #StandWithUkraine, and #EndTheWar.
5. **Engage in Local Activism**: - Join or form local activist groups focused on foreign policy and peace initiatives. Participate in meetings, discussions, and events to amplify your voice and the voices of others who care about this issue.
6. **Participate in Letter-Writing Campaigns**: - Join initiatives that focus on letter-writing campaigns to government officials, encouraging them to take strong stances against aggression and support peace efforts. Websites like Amnesty International often have templates and guidance.
### Conclusion
The recent summit between Trump and Putin highlights the complexities of international diplomacy and the urgent need for collective action to promote peace and accountability. By educating ourselves, engaging with our representatives, and supporting organizations working for peace, we can play a vital role in advocating for a better future. Each action, no matter how small, contributes to a larger movement for justice and peace.