Posobiec: Rise Of The "City Conservative" Changing Image Of The American Right
realclearpolitics.com -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 2:29:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Uncategorized
JACK POSOBIEC: So you see this massive crackdown by President Trump coming in, also announcing that he wants to roll this out -- National Guard and others -- to various cities in the United States. And people are saying, "Why? Why does it matter? Who cares?"
I hear this a lot of times: "Who cares about the cities, the blue cities? Just let them go." And I very famously, back in 2020, had this refrain: get out of cities. I always say this all the time: get out of cities, get out of cities.
Why did I say that? I said get out of cities in 2020 as a tactical retreat. We didn't have the numbers, we didn't have the ability, we didn't have the response mechanisms. And then that continued during the Biden patriot crackdowns of the Biden era and the Biden regime.
However, we're now presented with a new opportunity. Now we have President Trump firmly ensconced in power and firmly focused on this issue.
And so I wrote something on X earlier today that has just gone absolutely viral. It's been something that I've been kind of rattling around in the little gray cells for a couple of years now. I was talking about the difference between "city cons" and "rural cons" -- a city conservative or a rural conservative.
What does this mean? Here's what I've said: it's a coalition. There's a coalition taking place between rural conservatives and city conservatives. City cons are not rural cons, because it's simply like this: when you have seen hell, it changes you. A right-winger from a blue area just hits different.
In fact, right-wingers from blue areas are not the same. They're not built the same. They are built different.
For decades, the American right has been dominated by this image of the rural conservative -- the pickup-driving, small-town patriot with deep roots in red state soil. You love this guy. You can't help but love this guy -- the JD Vance kind of guy.
But there's a new archetype that's emerged on the new right, and that's the city con: the city conservative, the disaffected conservative trapped behind enemy lines in a blue-state metropolis. And when it comes to law and order, mass immigration, and crime, the city con is often far more radical than his rural cousin.
Why is this? Because the rural con typically lives in a place where crime is relatively low -- where immigration is minimal (though of course we know that's rapidly changing), and the local sheriff probably knows his name. Problems are abstract; they're filtered through national headlines. Rural support votes Republican, supports the police, waves the flag, goes to church, and daily life reinforces the idea that America is still salvageable without drastic change.
But then you have the city cons. And by the way, I'm not trying to say one is better than the other or anything like this -- no, I'm talking about a situation and a dynamic that exists. The city con lives in another reality entirely. He has seen the tent city, the open-air drug markets, the unchecked shoplifting, the revolving-door justice system. He watches as waves of illegal immigration and Section 8 hordes transform entire neighborhoods in real time -- not in theory.
You deal with DA offices that refuse to prosecute -- the Soros types -- the defunded police departments, and you see the media gaslighting you in front of your own eyes. So for the city conservative, this isn't a debate about policy -- it's about survival.
He knows the system is not just broken -- it's hostile. And that lived experience breeds a harder edge: harsher penalties for criminals, zero tolerance for illegal entry, and a willingness to challenge sacred cows about policing, public order, and public cleanliness.
It is no accident that the MAGA movement was born on a golden escalator on 5th Avenue in New York City by a New York City billionaire. The city con is fighting for an America that has already been stolen in his own zip code -- fighting for his home.
Now the situation has gotten so bad -- or at least it had gotten so bad until President Trump returned -- that many of these rural areas are now also under assault by these very same forces: the Obama administration and the Biden regime air-dropping migrants into places like Springfield, Ohio, or places like Dearborn, Michigan, and the rest.
We all know the story -- the Somalians at the Mall of America. So the time has come for a coalition of the willing, if you will -- an alliance between the brethren of the city conservatives and the rural conservatives. We will take back America. And when I say America, I don't mean just one part of it. I mean the whole thing.
Sign Our PetitionThe rise of the "city conservative," as articulated by Jack Posobiec, reflects a significant shift within the American right, moving away from the traditional image of the rural conservative that has long dominated political discourse. This concept is not just a superficial alteration in branding; it represents deeper ideological divisions that have historical roots and significant social implications. As we analyze this emergence, it's crucial to understand the historical context of conservatism in America, the evolving nature of political coalitions, and the ongoing struggles that underlie these developments.
Historically, American conservatism has been anchored in rural values, often rooted in agrarian lifestyles, local communities, and a strong sense of patriotism tied to land and tradition. The archetypal rural conservative is emblematic of a worldview that prioritizes individualism, small government, and a return to "traditional" values, often framed within a context of nostalgia for a simpler past. However, as urbanization has accelerated over the past few decades, the demographic landscape of the United States has evolved. Cities have become melting pots of diversity, innovation, and progressive thought, challenging the monolithic nature of conservative ideology. The emergence of the "city conservative" illustrates how these urban environments can cultivate a different kind of conservatism—one that is often more reactionary and radical due to the immediate proximity to issues such as crime, immigration, and social unrest.
Posobiec's assertion that city conservatives are "built different" speaks to a fundamental psychological shift. Urban conservatives, often feeling besieged in predominantly liberal environments, may adopt more extreme stances as they grapple with their political identity. This radicalization is not merely a product of their surroundings but also a response to the perceived threats from social movements that advocate for systemic change and justice. As cities become battlegrounds for issues like police reform, racial justice, and immigration policy, the city conservative's perspective is often shaped by direct experiences with these conflicts, fostering a sense of urgency and moral indignation that can drive them towards more authoritarian solutions.
This dynamic is further complicated by the ongoing social struggles that pit communities against one another, especially regarding policing and law enforcement. The rhetoric surrounding "law and order" has historically been a rallying cry for conservatives, particularly in urban settings where crime rates may be higher and fears of disorder more palpable. However, it is essential to recognize that this call often comes at the expense of marginalized communities. The militarization of police and the push for increased law enforcement presence in cities can exacerbate existing tensions and perpetuate cycles of violence and discrimination. Rather than fostering safety, these strategies can alienate communities that already feel targeted, pushing them further into opposition against the conservative agenda.
The political implications of this shift cannot be understated. The coalition of "city cons" and "rural cons" may present a unified front for the right, but it also reveals fractures within their ranks. As urban conservatives become more radicalized and potentially more authoritarian, they may clash with traditional rural conservatives who hold onto a vision of America that is less about control and more about individual autonomy. This internal conflict could lead to a redefinition of what it means to be conservative in America, creating rifts that progressives could exploit to advocate for more comprehensive social justice policies that address the root causes of the issues these groups decry.
In conclusion, the rise of the "city conservative" is emblematic of broader shifts within American conservatism that are deeply tied to historical, social, and political contexts. As urban environments continue to evolve, the responses from those who feel threatened by progressive movements will likely become more pronounced. For those advocating for social justice, understanding these dynamics is essential in crafting effective counter-narratives. Engaging with the realities that drive these ideological shifts can provide a path towards nuanced discussions that address the fears and frustrations of disparate communities while promoting equity and justice for all. In this ongoing struggle, fostering dialogue and understanding across divides will be crucial in forging a more just society.
The emergence of the "city conservative" as articulated in the article reflects a notable shift within the American right, illustrating a growing discontent rooted in urban experiences. This transformation is not merely a demographic change; it represents a fundamental recalibration of political identity for a segment of the conservative population. Historically, the American right has been characterized by its rural base—individuals who have championed traditional values, smaller government, and a strong national defense. However, the rise of the city conservative signals a reimagining of what it means to be part of the right in America, driven by the unique challenges and perspectives of those living in urban environments.
The article highlights the notion that city conservatives, or "city cons," have a different worldview compared to their rural counterparts. This difference stems from the realities of urban life—higher crime rates, issues of mass immigration, and a perceived lack of law and order. The assertion that city cons are "more radical" than rural conservatives points to a potential strategy for the right: to mobilize urban discontent and channel it into a political force. This connection between urban experiences and conservatism may indeed alter the landscape of political coalitions, as those in blue cities feel increasingly alienated from the governance that they believe is failing them. Such dynamics present an opportunity for those who advocate for more equitable and humane policies to counterbalance this emerging coalition with a progressive vision for urban areas.
As Americans who value social justice, equity, and progressive governance, it is crucial to recognize the implications of this shift in the conservative narrative. Engaging in meaningful dialogue about the issues faced by urban residents is vital. For instance, while city cons may focus on crime and immigration as primary concerns, we can counter these narratives by emphasizing the importance of addressing root causes of crime, such as poverty, lack of access to education, and systemic inequalities. By reframing the conversation around public safety to include community investment rather than punitive measures, we can build a more just society that resonates with both urban and rural constituents alike.
Furthermore, understanding the historical context of these dynamics can equip us with the tools needed for effective advocacy. The political landscape in the United States has long been marked by a divide between rural and urban areas, with both sides often mischaracterizing one another. By fostering community engagement initiatives that bridge these divides, we can present alternative solutions that prioritize collaboration over division. Encouraging participation in local governance, fostering dialogue about community needs, and promoting policies that uplift marginalized voices are essential steps in counteracting the polarizing narratives that currently dominate political discourse.
As we navigate the complexities of this evolving political landscape, we must remain vigilant in our commitment to promoting social equity and justice. The rise of the city conservative should serve as a rallying cry for progressive activists to amplify their efforts in cities and ensure that the voices of the marginalized are heard. This means advocating for policies that support affordable housing, equitable healthcare, and comprehensive education reform. By doing so, we can not only address the concerns of urban residents but also reshape the narrative around conservatism and progressivism in a way that fosters understanding and cooperation across the political spectrum. Ultimately, our goal should be to create a society that values the diverse experiences of all its citizens, regardless of their political affiliations or geographic locations.
In light of the recent article discussing the emergence of the "city conservative" and the implications of this shift in right-wing politics, it's crucial to consider the actions we can take as individuals to counteract this narrative and promote a more inclusive and equitable society. Here are several actionable ideas that can help us engage with our communities, advocate for progressive policies, and resist divisive rhetoric.
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Engage in Community Organizing**: Connect with local organizations that focus on social justice, housing equity, and community safety. Building coalitions that prioritize community needs over divisive narratives can create more resilient neighborhoods.
2. **Educate and Inform**: Share accurate information about urban issues and the impact of policies on marginalized communities. Use social media platforms to disseminate facts, stories, and experiences that challenge the prevailing narratives from the right.
3. **Participate in Local Politics**: Attend town hall meetings, city council sessions, and school board meetings. Engage with local representatives on issues that matter to your community, from policing to housing.
### Exact Actions We Can Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition for Police Accountability**: Support local initiatives advocating for police reform. Websites like Change.org often host petitions that can make a difference. - **Example**: Search for "Police Accountability" or "Community Safety" petitions in your area, or create your own focusing on demands for transparency and community involvement in policing.
2. **Write Letters to Elected Officials**: - **Who to Write**: Local city council members, mayors, and state representatives. Research your local representatives and their contact information. - **Example**: - **Mayor of [Your City]**: [Name] Email: [mayor@city.gov] Mailing Address: [City Hall Address, City, State, Zip Code].
- **What to Say**: Express your concerns regarding public safety strategies, emphasizing the need for community-led initiatives rather than militarization. Suggest alternatives like mental health services and affordable housing.
3. **Join Local Advocacy Groups**: - **Examples**: Look for groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Black Lives Matter, or local grassroots organizations focused on social justice and community welfare. - **Action**: Attend meetings, volunteer for campaigns, or participate in fundraising events.
4. **Support Local Candidates**: - **Research**: Identify and support candidates running for office who prioritize equity, community engagement, and social justice. - **Example**: Volunteer for campaign efforts, donate, or help organize events.
5. **Engage in Public Discourse**: - **Write Opinion Pieces**: Submit articles to local newspapers or blogs addressing the importance of inclusive policies and community safety. - **Use Social Media**: Share information and resources that promote understanding and unity among diverse groups in urban settings.
6. **Attend Community Workshops**: - Participate in workshops that discuss issues like gentrification, immigration policies, and community safety. Look for events hosted by local universities, libraries, or community centers.
7. **Promote Mental Health Services**: - Advocate for increased funding and resources for mental health services in your community, which can help address issues often blamed on crime without resorting to punitive measures.
8. **Build Bridges**: - Connect with individuals from different political backgrounds to foster dialogue. Consider hosting or participating in community discussions that focus on shared goals rather than divisive issues.
### Conclusion
By taking these steps, we can actively engage with our communities and advocate for policies that promote equity and justice. It's essential to counteract divisive narratives and work towards a society that values collaboration, inclusivity, and the well-being of all its residents. Whether through advocacy, education, or community organizing, our actions can contribute to a more just future.