Trump administration to crack down on wind farm developers for eagle deaths
wyomingpublicmedia.org -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 2:58:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Presidential Campaigns
The Trump administration is cracking down on wind energy development. That includes wind farms where turbine blades have been found to kill eagles.
It's the latest move that could curb growth of the renewable energy sector, though it is backed by some research.
Researchers are especially worried about the golden eagle population, which is estimated to be about 30,000 birds nationwide. Brown with golden feathers, the golden eagle population is about one-tenth that of the bald eagle, known to be a conservation success.
A study released earlier this year led by New Mexico State University researchers estimates the number of golden eagles colliding with turbine blades to have more than doubled over 11 years. The study finds that mortality counts increased from an estimated 110 deaths in 2013 to 270 in 2024.
"It's not the leading source of mortality, but it is one of the things we're looking at," said Brian Bedrosian, conservation director at the Teton Raptor Center in Jackson, Wyo.
He said cars and humans kill more eagles. But wind farms are still a real threat to the species -- and are often used in political debates.
"Eagles are often the species that get weaponized in that conversation," Bedrosian said. "But it detracts from the real conservation needs that the species has, and really all of our birds have, in North America right now with declines that we're seeing across all bird species."
The Trump administration has already been slowing wind development on federal land by requiring all projects be personally approved by the secretary of the interior and other means. Now, the administration says it's upping enforcement of the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, which prohibits killing the birds without a permit.
Wind energy developers often have permits allowing them to incidentally kill, or "take," a certain number of bald and golden eagles, as long as they take other conservation actions to balance this out. Bedrosian said these companies have to save 1.1 eagle for every one expected to die.
Companies and researchers are exploring painting wind turbine blades black so birds can see them better, or using AI-powered identification technology to stop turbines when birds are near.
Bedrosian also said companies create safety features to help protect eagles off of their wind farms, like retrofitting power poles to reduce the risk of electrocution.
" It is a way for us to provide conservation actions for these birds," he said.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will now be tasked with determining whether wind projects have complied with all reporting requirements around incidental take and whether this system is compatible with the intent of the Protection Act.
Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum recently wrote on X that the administration wants to ensure "our national bird isn't sacrificed for unreliable wind facilities."
Sign Our PetitionThe recent decision by the Trump administration to crack down on wind energy development due to concerns over eagle deaths represents a troubling trend in energy policy that places the interests of fossil fuel industries above the urgent need for sustainable energy solutions. This move, cloaked in the guise of wildlife protection, reveals the complexities and contradictions inherent in the current political landscape, where environmental concerns are often weaponized to stifle renewable energy initiatives. The ongoing struggle for climate justice and sustainable energy transitions is not merely an environmental issue; it is deeply intertwined with social equity, economic stability, and the fight against corporate interests that prioritize profit over the planet.
Historically, the United States has grappled with the balance between environmental conservation and economic development. The conservation movement of the early 20th century laid the groundwork for federal protections of wildlife, but these efforts have frequently come into conflict with industrial interests, particularly in the fossil fuel sector. The introduction of the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act in the 1940s exemplified the nation's commitment to safeguarding these majestic birds, yet the law has often been wielded selectively. As noted in the article, eagle fatalities due to wind turbines, while concerning, do not surpass deaths caused by human activity, such as vehicle collisions and habitat destruction. Thus, the focus on wind energy developers reflects a misdirection of accountability that ignores broader systemic issues impacting wildlife and ecosystems.
The statistics provided by the New Mexico State University study highlight a critical point: while the number of golden eagles affected by wind turbines has increased, it still constitutes a fraction of the overall threats faced by avian populations. The decline of bird species across North America is a pressing issue that requires comprehensive solutions, not merely the scapegoating of renewable energy initiatives. This argument echoes the broader environmental justice movement, which emphasizes the need to address the interconnectedness of ecological degradation and social inequities. By framing the conversation around wind energy in terms of eagle deaths, the administration distracts from the significant and immediate threats to biodiversity, such as climate change, habitat loss, and pollution, which are perpetuated by fossil fuel reliance.
Moreover, the administration's approach appears to undermine the advancements made in the renewable energy sector. Wind energy has emerged as a key player in the fight against climate change, offering a cleaner, sustainable alternative to coal and oil. The impact of wind energy on reducing greenhouse gas emissions is well-documented, and despite the concerns regarding bird mortality, the renewable sector is actively investing in technologies to mitigate these risks. Innovations like painting turbine blades and deploying AI to prevent collisions demonstrate a commitment to coexistence with wildlife, yet these advancements are often overlooked in favor of sensationalized narratives that prioritize eagle deaths over the urgent need for a transition to renewable energy.
Ultimately, the Trump administration’s crackdown on wind energy development illustrates a broader ideological conflict surrounding environmental policy and corporate influence. As right-wing figures rally around the "sacrifice" of the national bird, they are perpetuating a narrative that undermines the potential of renewable energy to combat climate change and promote social equity. Advocates for environmental justice and sustainable energy must seize the opportunity to engage in these debates, emphasizing not only the importance of protecting wildlife but also the necessity of transitioning to an energy system that prioritizes the health of our planet and its inhabitants. By drawing attention to the systemic issues at play, left-wing advocates can counter the simplistic narratives that dominate these discussions and push for a future that harmonizes ecological integrity with sustainable development.
The recent decision by the Trump administration to impose stricter regulations on wind energy development, particularly concerning the incidental deaths of golden eagles, raises significant concerns not only about conservation but also about the broader implications for renewable energy in the United States. This move appears to be part of a concerted effort to undermine the growth of the renewable energy sector at a time when climate change poses an existential threat to both our environment and our economy. Historically, the push for renewable energy has been accompanied by a growing awareness of the need to balance ecological considerations with technological advancements. However, this latest crackdown might reflect a deeper political calculus aimed at appeasing fossil fuel interests rather than genuinely addressing conservation issues.
The golden eagle population, with an estimated 30,000 birds nationwide, is indeed at risk, but this threat does not solely stem from wind energy. A comprehensive understanding of avian mortality reveals that cars, habitat destruction, and human activities account for a far greater number of eagle deaths. The focus on wind energy as a primary culprit distracts from the systemic issues that are endangering not just golden eagles, but bird species across the board. This diversion of attention is reminiscent of previous political narratives that sought to pit economic growth against environmental protection, often resulting in policy decisions that favor short-term gains over long-term sustainability. As advocates for a greener future, it is essential to highlight these discrepancies in order to foster informed discussions about conservation and energy production.
In light of this situation, Americans have a unique opportunity to advocate for a balanced approach that prioritizes both renewable energy and wildlife conservation. One avenue for action is to support research and innovation aimed at minimizing the impact of wind farms on local wildlife. The idea of retrofitting turbines or developing AI technology to prevent bird collisions is promising, but these initiatives require funding and public backing. By engaging in local and national dialogues about the importance of sustainable energy solutions, citizens can hold policymakers accountable and encourage them to invest in research that will help mitigate potential ecological damage while simultaneously promoting renewable energy.
Furthermore, engaging with community organizations that work towards both energy sustainability and wildlife conservancy can amplify our collective voice. These organizations often provide avenues for citizens to actively participate in initiatives that promote responsible energy practices without sacrificing the health of local ecosystems. By collaborating with these groups, individuals can help foster a culture that values environmental stewardship alongside economic development, ultimately leading to a more nuanced understanding of the interconnections between energy production and ecological preservation.
To effectively counter the narrative that pits conservation against renewable energy, it is crucial to educate ourselves and others about the broader context of these issues. Engaging in discussions that highlight the successes of conservation efforts, such as the recovery of the bald eagle population, can serve as powerful examples of how human innovation and commitment can lead to positive environmental outcomes. When confronted with concerns about wind energy and eagle mortality, it is important to pivot the conversation towards the need for comprehensive strategies that address multiple facets of conservation, rather than allowing the focus to remain narrowly on one form of energy production. By doing so, we can foster a more informed and constructive dialogue that ultimately champions both ecological health and renewable energy growth.
In response to the recent developments regarding wind energy regulation and eagle conservation, there are several actions individuals can take to support both renewable energy development and wildlife protection. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: Understanding the complexities of the issue is crucial. Share information about the benefits of renewable energy, the importance of eagle conservation, and the challenges both sectors face.
2. **Engage in Conversations**: Talk to friends, family, and community members about the importance of balancing renewable energy development with wildlife protection. Highlight the necessity of finding solutions that protect both eagles and the environment.
3. **Support Renewable Energy Initiatives**: Advocate for local and state-level renewable energy projects that have strong environmental protections in place.
### Exact Actions We Can Personally Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition for Renewable Energy and Wildlife Protection**: Look for petitions on platforms like Change.org or Care2 that advocate for responsible wind energy development that considers wildlife protection. For example, you might find a petition titled “Support Responsible Wind Energy Development” which could be endorsed and shared widely.
2. **Write to Lawmakers**: - **U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service**: - **Address**: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1849 C St NW, Washington, DC 20240 - **Email**: [Contact through their website](https://www.fws.gov/contact-us) - **Secretary of the Interior**: Doug Burgum - **Address**: 1849 C St NW, Washington, DC 20240 - **Email**: [doug.burgum@ios.doi.gov](mailto:doug.burgum@ios.doi.gov) - **What to Say**: Express your support for renewable energy and urge them to consider innovative solutions that protect eagle populations, such as implementing technology like AI and retrofitting power poles.
3. **Participate in Local Advocacy Groups**: - Join or support local environmental groups that focus on wildlife conservation and renewable energy. For example, groups like the Audubon Society or local environmental organizations often have campaigns you can join.
4. **Contact the Media**: Write letters to the editor of your local newspaper or engage with journalists. Explain the importance of wind energy in combating climate change and propose solutions for eagle conservation.
5. **Social Media Advocacy**: Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to raise awareness. Share articles, create infographics, or write posts that highlight the importance of balancing renewable energy growth with wildlife conservation.
6. **Research and Support Innovative Solutions**: Encourage and support research into solutions like painting turbine blades or developing AI technology to protect birds. You can write to universities or companies involved in this research to express your support.
7. **Attend Public Meetings**: Participate in town hall meetings or local government sessions where renewable energy projects are discussed. Voice your support for responsible wind energy development that includes wildlife protections.
### Conclusion
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute positively to the dialogue surrounding wind energy and eagle conservation. It is essential to push for policies that align with sustainable energy growth while protecting our wildlife, ensuring a more harmonious relationship between development and conservation.