What states are doing in the battle over congressional maps as Texas pursues plan Trump sought
audacy.com -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 1:29:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Democratic Party Responses, Trade Policy & Tariffs, Federal Legislation & Congress

A partisan move by Texas to redraw its congressional maps in the middle of the decade to secure five more GOP seats in the U.S. House set off a clamor to replicate the effort in statehouses controlled by both parties.
So far, though, only California has taken steps toward redistricting.
Changing congressional maps in a bid to ensure one party's victory over another -- called gerrymandering -- has typically been done more furtively. But President Donald Trump's call for Texas to redraw the maps to better ensure that Republicans retain control of the House in the 2026 elections has blown the lid off the practice.
Here is a rundown of what states are doing.
Texas kicked it off, then Democrats left the state
Democratic lawmakers who left Texas have scuttled a special session on redistricting but appear set to end their standoff after nearly two weeks.
The Republican majority adjourned their special session Friday morning in Austin. Gov. Greg Abbott quickly called another, though there still were not enough Democrats present. The minority caucus members have said they would return to Texas provided California Democrats move forward with their own new maps.
Past efforts by Democrats to abscond and deny Republicans a quorum similarly only delayed the passage of bills, but didn't quash them. Abbott has said he will keep calling new special sessions, if necessary.
State Rep. Jon Rosenthal, a Democrat from Houston, told The Associated Press this week that their protest was about raising awareness.
"They may still pass these maps, but we're going to do everything we can to awaken America," he said.
California Democrats propose retaliation
In response to Texas, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Thursday that the state will move forward with redrawing congressional maps aimed at putting five more Democrats into the U.S. House.
The proposed maps, which are expected to be released Friday, are an attempt to counterbalance Texas' and Trump's plan to add five Republican seats.
Newsom has been outspoken about retaliating if Texas's redistricting takes effect, telling Trump this week in a letter that the president was "playing with fire."
Unlike Texas, however, California has an independent commission that handles redistricting after the census each decade, which is typically when districts are reshaped to account for population shifts. Any changes would first need the approval of state lawmakers and voters.
State lawmakers plan to officially declare a special election next week.
Missouri Republicans take steps toward redistricting
At Trump's urging and partly in response to California's threats, Missouri's Republican majority is preparing for a special session on congressional redistricting
A document obtained by The Associated Press shows the state Senate has received a $46,000 invoice for software licenses and staff training for redistricting.
While Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe hasn't officially announced a special session, Republican House Majority Leader Alex Riley told the AP it is "pretty likely" to happen. Riley added that he has had discussions with White House staff about it.
Republicans hold six of Missouri's eight congressional seats. The party could target a Democratic-held district in Kansas City to pick up another seat.
In justifying the redistricting, Missouri Republicans accused neighboring Illinois of rigging its maps and pointed to a draft proposal circulating in California.
New York Democrats try to change state law
New York, similar to California, has an independent commission that changes the political maps only after every census. But state Democrats introduced legislation to allow mid-decade redistricting.
Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul said that if Texas proceeds, "we must do the same."
But the soonest new maps could be in place would be for the 2028 elections. That is because the proposal would require an amendment to the state constitution, a change that would have to pass the Legislature twice and be approved by voters.
Wisconsin Democrats take a different tack
While Republicans control the Legislature, Democrats turned to the courts to try to force a redrawing of congressional district boundary lines before the 2026 midterms.
Two lawsuits were filed in July after the liberal-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court -- without explanation -- previously declined to hear challenges directly.
Maryland Democrats promise a response to Texas
Maryland House Majority Leader David Moon, a Democrat, says he will sponsor legislation to trigger redistricting if Texas or any other state holds redistricting ahead of the census.
Florida's governor hints at support for redistricting
Republican state House Speaker Daniel Perez said his chamber will take up redistricting this year through a special committee. Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis has told the public to "stay tuned" and has reiterated his support for the state joining the redistricting fray. Ohio must redraw its maps before the 2026 midterms
A law in Republican-led Ohio requires new political maps before the 2026 midterm elections. The GOP holds 10 of its 15 House seats already and could try to expand that edge. Indiana's governor spoke with the vice president
Vice President JD Vance said he spoke with Republican Gov. Mike Braun last week, as the redistricting melee intensified, but both politicians remained mum about the discussions.
Braun, who would have to call a special session to draw new maps, has said he expects a "broad conversation" with legislative leaders on the move's constitutionality and said no commitments have been made.
Republicans face more limited possibilities of squeezing out another GOP seat in Indiana. Republican U.S. representatives outnumber Democrats 7-2 in the state already. Kansas Republicans haven't ruled out redistricting
Republican state Senate President Ty Masterson didn't rule out trying to redraw the state's four congressional districts, one of which is held by the state's sole Democrat House representative.
The Legislature's GOP-supermajority could do so early next year, which would put the new lines in place before the June 1 candidate filing deadline.
____
Associated Press writers Bill Barrow in Atlanta, Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, New York, Holly Ramer in Concord, New Hampshire, Scott Bauer in Madison, Wisconsin, David Lieb in Jefferson City, Missouri, Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan, and Brian Witte in Annapolis, Maryland, contributed to this report.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent developments in Texas and California regarding congressional redistricting underscore a critical and contentious aspect of American political life: gerrymandering. This practice, which involves redrawing electoral district boundaries to favor one political party over another, has historically been used by both major parties to entrench their power. However, the current situation, spurred by former President Donald Trump's public call for Texas to redraw its maps, exemplifies a new level of audacity in partisan maneuvering. Trump's approach has not only revitalized discussions around gerrymandering but has also prompted an unusual response from Democrats, illustrating how the political landscape is shifting as both parties grapple with the implications of such strategic redistricting.
Gerrymandering has deep historical roots in the United States, often reflecting broader social and political struggles. The term originated in the early 19th century when Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry approved a redistricting plan that favored his party, the Democratic-Republicans, creating a district that resembled a salamander. Fast forward to today, and the practice has evolved into a sophisticated, often technologically-assisted method of securing electoral advantages. The current battle in Texas is particularly alarming because it signals a willingness among Republicans to manipulate the electoral process in blatant disregard of democratic norms. This is not merely a tactical decision; it is a strategic assault on representation, especially in a state with significant demographic diversity where many communities are underrepresented.
The actions in Texas are part of a broader trend wherein state legislatures, emboldened by partisan control, seek to entrench their power through machinery that should ideally serve the electorate. The recent exodus of Texas Democrats from the state legislature to protest this redistricting attempt highlights the lengths to which lawmakers will go to protect democratic principles. By leaving the state to deny Republicans a quorum, they aimed to raise national awareness about gerrymandering and its implications for fair representation. This act of civil disobedience draws on historical precedents of dissent, invoking the legacy of figures like Rosa Parks and civil rights activists who fought against unjust laws through nonviolent resistance. Just as those movements aimed to shift public consciousness, the Texas Democrats are attempting to shine a light on the undemocratic undercurrents in contemporary politics.
In response to these aggressive tactics by Texas Republicans, California's Democratic leadership has indicated plans to retaliate with their own redistricting efforts. Governor Gavin Newsom's commitment to counter Texas's moves emphasizes the escalating nature of this political showdown. However, California's approach differs significantly due to its independent commission overseeing redistricting, which serves as a safeguard against partisan manipulation. This highlights the importance of structural reforms in the electoral process that can mitigate the worst excesses of gerrymandering. Such reforms are vital not only for the integrity of the electoral system but also for fostering a political environment that encourages voter engagement and trust in democratic institutions.
The ongoing struggle over redistricting serves as a crucial reminder of the broader social justice issues at play. Gerrymandering disproportionately affects marginalized communities, diluting their votes and undermining their representation in government. As demographic shifts continue to reshape the American landscape, the fight for equitable representation becomes even more pressing. This moment in Texas and California should galvanize grassroots movements that advocate for fair electoral processes and challenge the entrenched power structures that perpetuate inequality. By connecting the struggle against gerrymandering to the broader fight for social justice, activists can build a coalition that highlights the urgency of reforming our political institutions to reflect the diverse voices of the American populace.
Ultimately, the current redistricting battle is more than just a political skirmish; it is a critical juncture in the ongoing struggle for democracy in the United States. As both parties grapple with the implications of gerrymandering, it is essential to advocate for reforms that prioritize fair representation over partisan gain. This includes supporting independent redistricting commissions, championing voting rights legislation, and raising awareness about the detrimental effects of gerrymandering on democracy. By doing so, we can work towards a political system that truly reflects the will of the people and upholds the principles of justice and equality for all.
The ongoing battle over congressional redistricting in the United States is a vivid reflection of the political maneuvering that often undermines democratic principles. At the forefront of this struggle is Texas, where Republican legislators are pursuing a plan to redraw congressional maps, spurred by former President Trump’s call for a partisan advantage. This action not only exemplifies the contentious nature of gerrymandering but also reveals the lengths to which political parties will go to secure their power. Historically, both major parties have engaged in this practice, but the current scenario marks a significant escalation, with states like Texas and Missouri actively attempting to manipulate district boundaries for electoral gain. Understanding this context is crucial for Americans who value a fair and democratic political process.
Gerrymandering is not a new phenomenon; it has roots dating back to the early 19th century when Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry signed a map that favored his party. Over the years, this practice has evolved, often becoming a tool for entrenching power rather than reflecting the will of the voters. The current situation, where Texas seeks to gain five additional Republican seats, raises questions about the integrity of electoral systems. Recent developments highlight a shift towards more overt and aggressive gerrymandering efforts, particularly as political polarization intensifies. The actions of Texas and Missouri suggest that these states are willing to disregard traditions of fair representation for the sake of party dominance.
In response to the Texas initiative, California’s Democrats have proposed their own redistricting efforts, signaling a tit-for-tat approach that could lead to further polarization. Governor Gavin Newsom’s commitment to retaliate against Texas's plans highlights an essential aspect of this debate: the need for states to be aware of the broader implications of their actions. While it is encouraging to see California lawmakers taking a stand, the reliance on partisan responses only perpetuates a cycle of conflict that ultimately undermines the democratic process. The answer lies not in matching partisan tactics, but in advocating for systemic reforms that prioritize equitable representation for all voters, regardless of political affiliation.
As engaged citizens, we must focus on actionable steps that can help counteract the detrimental effects of gerrymandering. One significant avenue is supporting initiatives that promote independent redistricting commissions, similar to California's model. These commissions can provide a non-partisan framework for drawing district lines, ensuring that electoral maps reflect the demographics and needs of the community rather than the whims of political parties. Additionally, grassroots movements aimed at raising awareness about gerrymandering can empower constituents to demand fair representation from their elected officials. By involving voters in the conversation, we can cultivate a more informed electorate that actively participates in the democratic process.
Educational outreach is also vital in this fight against gerrymandering. By providing resources and information to communities about the implications of redistricting, we can nurture a culture of accountability among lawmakers. Empowering individuals to engage in local governance and advocate for fair electoral practices is essential. Hosting town halls, workshops, and discussion forums can create platforms where citizens can learn and voice their concerns about gerrymandering. In this age of information, we can leverage social media and digital tools to amplify our message and mobilize support for reform. Engaging in substantive discussions with those on the other side of the political spectrum can also help bridge divides and foster a collective commitment to improving our electoral system.
In conclusion, the current landscape of congressional redistricting presents both challenges and opportunities for American democracy. The actions taken by states like Texas and Missouri underscore the urgency for citizens to advocate for fair representation. By focusing on systemic reforms, supporting independent redistricting efforts, and engaging in educational initiatives, we can collectively push back against the divisive tactics of gerrymandering. It is essential that we work towards a political environment that prioritizes the voices of the electorate, ensuring that every vote counts and that representation reflects the diverse fabric of our society.
In light of the recent developments regarding gerrymandering and congressional redistricting, it is crucial for individuals to take proactive steps to ensure fair representation and combat potential partisan manipulation of electoral maps. Here is a detailed list of ideas and actions that can be pursued:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: - Understand the impacts of gerrymandering on democracy and representation. - Share informative resources, articles, and data on social media and in community forums to raise awareness.
2. **Engage with Local Organizations**: - Connect with organizations focused on electoral reform, such as the League of Women Voters, Common Cause, or local grassroots groups advocating for fair maps.
3. **Support Independent Redistricting Commissions**: - Advocate for the establishment or maintenance of independent commissions in your state to handle redistricting. - Promote state ballot initiatives that seek to limit partisan influence in redistricting.
### Exact Actions We Can Personally Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - Search for existing petitions aimed at stopping partisan gerrymandering. Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org often host relevant petitions. - For example, support the “End Gerrymandering” petition at [Change.org](https://www.change.org).
2. **Write to Elected Officials**: - Contact your state representatives to express your opposition to gerrymandering and urge them to support fair redistricting practices.
**Sample Contacts**: - **Texas Governor Greg Abbott** Email: [governor@texas.gov](mailto:governor@texas.gov) Mailing Address: P.O. Box 12428, Austin, TX 78711
- **California Governor Gavin Newsom** Email: [governor@gov.ca.gov](mailto:governor@gov.ca.gov) Mailing Address: 1021 O Street, Suite 900, Sacramento, CA 95814
- **Senator Elizabeth Warren** (for Massachusetts) Email: [warren.senate.gov/contact](https://www.warren.senate.gov/contact) Mailing Address: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury St., Boston, MA 02203
3. **Organize Community Meetings**: - Host local gatherings to discuss the implications of gerrymandering and strategize collective actions. - Collaborate with local civic groups to create a larger impact.
4. **Use Social Media**: - Post about gerrymandering, share your thoughts, and encourage your network to take action. - Use hashtags like #FairMaps and #EndGerrymandering to connect with broader movements.
5. **Participate in Local Elections**: - Vote in local elections, and encourage others to do the same. Understand how local representatives impact redistricting. - Attend town hall meetings and ask candidates about their stance on redistricting.
### What to Say
- When writing to officials, express your concerns clearly and concisely: - "I am writing to urge you to take a stand against gerrymandering in our state. It undermines the democratic process and disenfranchises voters. I support the establishment of independent redistricting commissions to ensure fair representation for all citizens." - When discussing with friends or at community meetings: - "It's crucial that we stand against gerrymandering. It’s not just a partisan issue; it's about ensuring that every vote counts equally. We need to advocate for fair maps to protect our democracy."
By taking these actions, individuals can play an active role in combating gerrymandering and advocating for a fair electoral process. Together, grassroots efforts can lead to meaningful change.