Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Between Washington & Moscow May Be Resigned
infowars.com -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 12:29:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Presidential Campaigns, U.S.–China Relations
On Thursday Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Moscow and Washington may have a chance of resigning the New START Treaty, which was suspended by the Kremlin on February 21, 2023 in the wake of the Ukraine war. The treaty, entered into force on February 5, 2011, imposed limits on the number of deployed nuclear weapon systems.
"If we move to the next stages and reach agreements in the field of strategic offensive arms control, this will create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, in Europe, and in the world as a whole," Putin said.
"Seven years after entry into force (Feb. 5, 2018), New START limits went into effect that capped accountable deployed strategic nuclear warheads and bombs at 1,550, down approximately 30 percent from the 2,200 limit set by SORT and down 74 percent from the START-accountable limit of 6,000. Each heavy bomber is counted as one warhead," The Arms Control Association said.
The New START treaty was the first verifiable U.S. / Russia nuclear arms control treaty since START I in 1994.
https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/new-start-glance
Upon retaking office in early 2025, Trump spoke at the World Economic Forum where he revealed he wants to hold talks with Russia and China about reducing global nuclear weapon stockpiles, including that of the U.S.
"We want to see if we can denuclearize, and I think that's very possible," Trump said. "And I can tell you that President Putin wanted to do it, he and I wanted to do it. We had a good conversation with China, they would have been involved, and that would have been an unbelievable thing for the planet."
Following Trump's comments, the Kremlin has announced that it welcomes these denuclearization initiatives.
"In the interest of the entire world and of our countries' people, we are interested in starting a negotiation process as soon as possible," Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.
Notably, Trump's statements come after a violent autumn characterized by near-world-ending conventional missile exchanges and nuclear proliferation from both sides.
In March Trump spoke about his agenda of global denuclearization.
"It would be great if everybody would get rid of their nuclear weapons," Trump said, replying to a reporter in his Oval Office. "It would be great if we could all denuclearize."
During his 2024 campaign Trump said that his goal is complete and total denuclearization, not just nuclear arms reduction.
The U.S. has 1,770 deployed warheads while Russia has 1,710. China possesses about 500 nuclear warheads with plans to expand that to 1,000.
"According to a recent nongovernmental estimate, Russia has around 1,710 deployed nuclear warheads based on a triad of strategic delivery vehicles roughly consisting of 326 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), 12 ballistic-missile submarines (SSBNs) with 192 submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and 58 strategic bombers," the Congressional Research Service said. "Russia has not exchanged official data with the United States about the structure of its strategic nuclear forces since 2023. Russian officials have stated, however, that Russia continues to abide by New START limits, thus maintaining rough parity with U.S. strategic nuclear forces. According to one nongovernmental estimate, the United States has around 1,770 deployed nuclear warheads."
The State Department said this about New START:
New START limits all Russian deployed intercontinental-range nuclear weapons, including every Russian nuclear warhead that is loaded onto an intercontinental-range ballistic missile that can reach the United States in approximately 30 minutes. It also limits the deployed Avangard and the under development Sarmat, the two most operationally available of the Russian Federation's new long-range nuclear weapons that can reach the United States. Extending New START ensures we will have verifiable limits on the mainstay of Russian nuclear weapons that can reach the U.S. homeland for the next five years. As of the most recent data exchange on September 1, 2020, the Russian Federation declared 1,447 deployed strategic warheads. The Russian Federation has the capacity to deploy many more than 1,550 warheads on its modernized ICBMs and SLBMs, as well as heavy bombers, but is constrained from doing so by New START.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent comments by Russian President Vladimir Putin regarding the potential for the revival of the New START Treaty highlight the delicate and often precarious nature of nuclear arms control in the context of global politics. The New START Treaty, which was designed to limit the deployment of strategic nuclear weapons, represents decades of diplomatic efforts aimed at reducing the risk of nuclear conflict—a legacy rooted in the Cold War era. However, its future remains uncertain, particularly against the backdrop of current geopolitical tensions exacerbated by the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. This situation underscores the need for a renewed commitment to arms control and disarmament, in contrast to the militaristic postures that have dominated U.S.-Russia relations in recent years.
Historically, the New START Treaty is emblematic of a broader trend towards nuclear disarmament that emerged after the Cold War. The treaty’s limits on warheads and delivery systems were a significant step forward, as they not only established verifiable constraints on the nuclear arsenals of the two largest nuclear powers but also fostered a spirit of cooperation amid rivalry. The suspension of this treaty by Russia in early 2023 following U.S. support for Ukraine raises critical questions about the reliability of arms control agreements in times of conflict. The abandonment of such treaties can lead to an arms race, reminiscent of the very tensions that spurred their creation. This historical context serves as a reminder that diplomatic engagement is essential in preventing the escalation of nuclear threats.
Moreover, the conversation around denuclearization, notably revived by former President Donald Trump’s recent remarks, must be approached with caution. While the idea of global denuclearization is noble, it must be grounded in actionable policies and genuine international cooperation. The stark reality is that nuclear weapons are often used as instruments of geopolitical leverage. Trump's assertion that both he and Putin wanted to pursue denuclearization should be scrutinized critically; such statements can easily devolve into rhetoric without substantive commitments. The political intersections of denuclearization efforts must also consider the activities of other nuclear states, particularly China, which is expanding its arsenal. Thus, any dialogue on disarmament necessitates a comprehensive approach that includes all nuclear-armed nations, not just the U.S. and Russia.
The implications of nuclear proliferation extend beyond mere numbers; they touch on the very fabric of global security and social justice. In a world where the threat of nuclear weapons persists, the voices advocating for peace and disarmament must include those from marginalized communities who are most affected by the consequences of militarization. The resources allocated to maintaining and modernizing nuclear arsenals represent a significant diversion from pressing social needs—such as healthcare, education, and housing. The prioritization of military expenditure over human welfare is a moral and ethical failure that disproportionately impacts low-income populations and communities of color. Advocates for social justice must frame the discourse around arms control not only as a matter of international security but as a fundamental issue of human rights.
In conclusion, the potential for resigning the New START Treaty offers a moment for reflection on the broader implications of nuclear policy in a rapidly changing world. The intersection of diplomacy, historical precedent, and social justice must be emphasized in discussions about arms control. As citizens and activists engage with these critical issues, it is vital to advocate for a future where disarmament is not merely a diplomatic goal but a moral imperative. The path to a safer and more just world is paved with the recognition that true security can only be achieved through cooperation, transparency, and a commitment to dismantling the structures of militarization that perpetuate inequality and conflict. The revival of arms control dialogues, therefore, is not just a geopolitical necessity but a call to action for a more equitable global society.
The potential for the U.S. and Russia to revisit the New START Treaty is a significant topic that warrants careful consideration, particularly in the context of both historical precedents in arms control and the current geopolitical climate. The New START Treaty, which came into force in 2011, marked a pivotal moment in U.S.-Russia relations as it placed verifiable limits on the number of deployed nuclear warheads and delivery systems. With President Putin expressing an openness to re-engage in arms control discussions, it presents an opportunity for advocates of peace and global stability to examine the implications of nuclear disarmament and the broader context of international relations.
Historically, treaties like New START emerged from a long-standing recognition of the dangers posed by nuclear proliferation. The Cold War saw an arms race that threatened global safety, leading to a series of treaties aimed at reducing the likelihood of nuclear war. The legacy of these agreements underscores the importance of diplomacy in managing international conflicts. The suspension of New START by Russia following the invasion of Ukraine illustrates how quickly geopolitical tensions can escalate, leading to a breakdown of communication and trust. As citizens of a nation that holds a significant share of the global nuclear arsenal, we must recognize that the stakes are incredibly high and that the pursuit of peace through diplomacy should be prioritized over military escalation.
As discussions of denuclearization gain traction, it is important to critically analyze the motivations behind these initiatives. Trump's comments regarding the potential for denuclearization—while seemingly positive—must be scrutinized within the context of his administration's approach to foreign policy and arms control. His approach has often been characterized by unpredictability and a willingness to undermine established norms. While the notion of eliminating nuclear weapons is noble, we must consider the feasibility and sincerity of such goals, especially given the backdrop of escalating military actions and the continued modernization of nuclear arsenals by global powers, including China. The call for denuclearization should not be an empty promise but rather a commitment to substantive and verifiable disarmament efforts.
What can we, as Americans, do to influence this discourse? First and foremost, we must educate ourselves and others about the implications of nuclear weapons and the history of arms control efforts. Engaging with local and national organizations dedicated to peace and disarmament can amplify our voices. Encouraging dialogue among community members, local leaders, and representatives can foster a culture of understanding around the necessity of nuclear disarmament. Furthermore, we should advocate for policies that prioritize diplomacy over military might, urging policymakers to invest in peacebuilding initiatives rather than contributing to the arms race.
In addition to grassroots activism, we can leverage our platforms—social media, public forums, and educational institutions—to promote awareness of nuclear issues. Engaging in discussions about the importance of treaties like New START and the need for renewed negotiations can help shift the narrative around national security from one dominated by fear and militarization to one that values diplomacy and coexistence. Such efforts can empower individuals to hold their representatives accountable for their positions on arms control and disarmament, ensuring that our government serves the interests of peace rather than perpetuating cycles of violence.
In conclusion, the potential for the U.S. and Russia to revisit the New START Treaty presents both challenges and opportunities. As we navigate this complex landscape, it is essential to draw on the lessons of history and advocate for a future characterized by diplomatic engagement and a commitment to reducing the nuclear threat. By educating ourselves and actively participating in the discourse surrounding arms control, we can contribute to a safer, more peaceful world, standing against the tide of militarization and promoting a vision for global security that transcends borders and ideologies.
Analyzing the current situation regarding the potential resignation of the New START Treaty between the United States and Russia, it is crucial to recognize the importance of nuclear disarmament and the role citizens can play in pushing for peace and stability. Here is a detailed list of actions that individuals can take to advocate for nuclear arms control.
### Personal Actions to Promote Nuclear Nonproliferation
1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - Stay informed about nuclear arms control treaties and their implications. Share articles, books, and documentaries on the subject with friends, family, and community members.
2. **Engage in Dialogue** - Host community discussions or forums to raise awareness about the importance of nuclear nonproliferation. Encourage open conversations about global security and peace.
3. **Support and Join Advocacy Groups** - Become active in organizations that promote nuclear disarmament, such as: - **The Ploughshares Fund** (https://www.ploughshares.org) - **Global Zero** (https://www.globalzero.org) - **Nuclear Age Peace Foundation** (https://www.wagingpeace.org)
4. **Sign Petitions** - Participate in or initiate petitions aimed at urging political leaders to prioritize nuclear disarmament. For example: - **Petition to the United Nations for Global Nuclear Disarmament**: Search for current petitions on platforms like Change.org or Care2 that call for nuclear disarmament initiatives. - **Example Petition**: “Support Nuclear Disarmament” on Change.org (search for relevant titles).
5. **Contact Elected Officials** - Write to your representatives to express your support for nuclear arms control measures. Here are some key figures you might consider contacting:
**U.S. Senators:** - **Senator Bob Menendez** (Chair, Senate Foreign Relations Committee) - Email: senatormenendez@menendez.senate.gov - Mailing Address: 528 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510
- **Senator Chris Murphy** - Email: murphy.senate.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 136 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510
**U.S. Representatives:** - **Representative Adam Smith** (Chair, House Armed Services Committee) - Email: smith.house.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 2310 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515
**Sample Message:** ``` Subject: Urgent Action Needed for Nuclear Nonproliferation
Dear [Representative/Senator Name],
I am writing to express my strong support for nuclear arms control and disarmament initiatives, particularly in light of the recent discussions surrounding the New START Treaty. It is crucial that the United States continues to engage in diplomacy and negotiations with Russia and other nuclear powers to work towards a safer, nuclear-free world.
I urge you to prioritize and advocate for policies that promote nuclear disarmament, including the resumption of treaties like New START and active participation in international disarmament dialogues.
Thank you for your attention to this vital issue.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
6. **Participate in Rallies and Events** - Join local or national events advocating for nuclear disarmament. Check websites of organizations like the ones mentioned above for upcoming events.
7. **Utilize Social Media** - Share information and resources about nuclear nonproliferation on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Use hashtags such as #NuclearDisarmament and #PeaceNotWar to amplify your message.
8. **Support Local Initiatives** - Engage with local peace organizations or community groups focused on disarmament and global security. Volunteer your time or contribute financially to support their efforts.
9. **Promote Peace Education in Schools** - Advocate for peace education programs in local schools that include discussions on global security, nuclear weapons, and the importance of diplomacy.
10. **Stay Informed on Global Developments** - Monitor developments regarding ongoing negotiations and initiatives related to nuclear arms control. Subscribe to newsletters from reputable sources focusing on international relations and security.
By actively engaging in these actions, individuals can contribute to the broader movement for nuclear nonproliferation and advocate for a more peaceful and secure world. It is essential to mobilize communities and leverage collective voices to ensure that disarmament remains a priority on the global stage.