Trump cedes to China the global energy future
newsregister.com -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 11:58:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–China Relations, Economic Policy & Jobs, Classified Documents & National Security
When it comes to energy planning, China and the U.S. are moving in opposite directions. As the New York Times reported recently:
"The Trump administration wants to keep the world hooked on fossil fuels like oil and gas ... The United States is the world's largest producer of oil and the largest exporter of natural gas, offering the potential for what Mr. Trump has called an era of American 'energy dominance' ... China is racing in an altogether different direction. It's banking on a world that runs on cheap electricity from the sun and wind, and that relies on China for affordable, high-tech solar panels and turbines. China leads the world in both."
Unlike the United States, the Times goes on, "China doesn't have much easily accessible oil or gas of its own, relative to its huge population. So it is eager to eliminate dependence on imported fossil fuels and instead power more of its economy with renewables."
It's important to note that each country's primary motivation is national security, not concern about climate change or protection of the environment.
Trump wants U.S. energy dominance to avoid dependence on foreign powers. Directly and indirectly subsidizing the fossil fuel industries is, thus, his top priority.
He's willing to drill everywhere, most recently opening huge areas of the Tongass and other national forests while at the same time eliminating hundreds of environmental protection regulations.
Xi Jinping also wants to avoid dependence on foreign sources of energy, an aim underscored when Iran, a major source of oil for China, came under attack. And like Trump, he puts production ahead of environmental protection.
The breakneck speed of China's production of clean energy technologies, from mining to factory, probably has come at considerable cost to worker safety and health. There is no free lunch, as Barry Commoner reminded us many years ago.
China now has a large and growing lead in energy technologies -- the manufacture of solar panels, wind turbines, batteries and electric vehicles, among others.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration is busily cutting subsidies to all these industries. In the estimate of the Rhodium Group, a research firm, Trump's big budget bill will put a stop to between 57 and 72 percent of new solar and wind projects.
Recently, Trump once again revealed his ignorance about the subject when he complained that China exports wind turbines but doesn't use wind power.
In fact, China is the world leader in wind farms. It accounts for three times the wind energy of the U.S.
China also holds a hammer over the U.S. and all other countries in its dominant position in the mining and processing of rare earth minerals. And you can't operate wind turbines, drive an EV, or produce any advanced technology without those minerals.
Although China has promised to smooth applications for rare earth magnets, its commerce ministry is taking its time -- and taking passports away from rare earth experts to prevent the sharing of trade secrets.
Both countries are exporting their energy models -- the U.S. by trying to persuade customers to buy American oil (most recently Japan and even China), and China by winning over developing countries with green energy technologies (notably, even oil-rich Saudi Arabia).
China leads the world by a large margin in the export of lithium-ion batteries, EVs and solar panels, while the U.S. is far ahead in export of oil and natural gas. Guess whose direction countries in the Global South are leaning?
Finally, China's lead over the US is growing in nuclear power.
China has 24 nuclear plants in operation and more than 1,000 in various stages of construction, nearly as many as the rest of the world combined.
Its nuclear power capacity puts China third behind the US and France, but not for long. Beijing has announced advances in next-generation nuclear technologies and fusion.
China's energy advantage has been shaped by the organization of work, as robotics plays an increasingly important role in factories. "Cluster manufacturing" brings all the elements of production together.
As one Chinese solar panel manufacturer says: "There are places where, within a three- to four-hour drive, you can have everything. The components, the manufacturer, the skilled workforce, everything. There's nowhere else globally where you can have all that innovation clustered together."
Michael Dunne, a former GM executive with many years in the auto business in Beijing, describes how EV manufacturer BYD has become the world leader by a combination of heavy government subsidies, vertical integration of production, innovation and long-term planning. BYD models are so good, and so inexpensive, that if the U.S. allowed them in, they would quickly put domestic competitors out of business.
The scale of China's green energy operations is staggering. It features huge solar power arrays and EV factories.
Compare that with Trump's budget cuts in renewable energy projects, which means "ghost factories" and hundreds of thousands of jobs lost.
North America's Building Trades Unions slammed the budget as "the biggest job-killing bill in the history of this country." It complained, "Critical infrastructure projects essential to that future are being sacrificed at the altar of ideology."
Is there any question about which country will dominate the energy future?
"The U.S. will champion a fossil fuel economy, and China will become the leader of the low-carbon economy," said Li Shuo, who heads the China Climate Hub at the Asia Society Policy Institute. "The question for the U.S. now is, where do you go from here?"
New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman's answer is that Trump's budget bill will "make China great again." He said, "The Chinese simply can't believe their luck: that at the dawn of the electricity-guzzling era of artificial intelligence, the U.S. president and his party have decided to engage in one of the greatest acts of strategic self-harm imaginable."
The rational response to China's challenge would be, "back to the future," by defeating Trump's drill-baby-drill agenda and restoring all the green energy and environmental protection programs that he has eviscerated. If opinion polls are correct, that answer has the American public's strong support.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent analysis of energy policy under the Trump administration starkly contrasts with that of China, illustrating a critical juncture in the global energy future. The article highlights the United States' focus on maintaining fossil fuel dominance, while China is aggressively pivoting towards renewable energy sources. This divergence is not merely a matter of energy strategy; it reflects deeper ideological and historical currents that have shaped the political landscape of both nations. As we examine the implications of this energy race, it becomes essential to consider the historical context of energy production, the environmental ramifications, and the socioeconomic inequalities that arise from these policies.
Historically, the United States has positioned itself as a bastion of fossil fuel production, leveraging its vast natural resources to exert economic and geopolitical influence. The Trump administration's mantra of "energy dominance" echoes a long-standing American ethos that equates energy independence with national strength. This perspective is rooted in Cold War-era policies, where control of energy resources was seen as essential to national security. The administration's policies—such as drilling in national forests and deregulating environmental protections—reflect a commitment to short-term economic gains over long-term sustainability. In contrast, China's approach is informed by its need to secure energy resources for its enormous population while addressing the urgent challenge of climate change. By investing heavily in renewable energy technologies, China is not only seeking to reduce pollution but is also positioning itself as a leader in the emerging green economy, fundamentally reshaping global energy dynamics.
The implications of this energy race extend beyond mere production figures; they resonate deeply with ongoing social struggles, particularly around environmental justice and labor rights. As the Trump administration cuts subsidies for renewable energy, the potential for job creation in clean energy sectors diminishes. This is particularly salient in the context of a workforce that is increasingly seeking stable employment in sustainable industries. On the other hand, China's rapid expansion of renewable technologies, while impressive, raises critical questions about labor conditions in its manufacturing sectors. Reports of unsafe working conditions in mines and factories highlight the human cost of this energy transition—an issue that cannot be overlooked as we advocate for a just and equitable energy future.
Furthermore, the article underscores the geopolitical implications of energy production and resource dependency, particularly regarding rare earth minerals. China's dominance in this arena grants it significant leverage over other nations, including the United States. The battle for these critical resources is reminiscent of historical conflicts over oil and gas, where access to energy has often dictated foreign policy decisions. As the U.S. struggles with its reliance on fossil fuels, it risks falling behind in the technology race that will define the next century—a race that is not just about energy, but about economic and technological supremacy in a rapidly evolving global landscape.
In light of these developments, it is crucial for advocates of progressive policies to frame the conversation around energy not merely as a choice between fossil fuels and renewables, but as a broader struggle for a sustainable and equitable future. This involves pushing for policies that not only promote renewable energy production but also ensure fair labor practices, environmental protections, and equitable access to the benefits of a green economy. The urgency of these issues cannot be overstated, as the consequences of inaction will disproportionately affect marginalized communities that already bear the brunt of environmental degradation.
Ultimately, the divergence between U.S. and Chinese energy policies provides a rich narrative for understanding the broader implications of energy production and consumption. As we navigate this critical moment, it becomes apparent that the choices made today will define our collective future. The challenge ahead is not just to advocate for a transition to renewable energy, but to ensure that this transition is grounded in principles of justice, equity, and sustainability—principles that will resonate far beyond national borders and impact generations to come.
The article presents a stark contrast between the energy strategies of the United States under the Trump administration and those of China, illustrating a critical moment in global energy politics. Historically, the U.S. has held a dominant position in the fossil fuel industry, but there is a growing recognition that the future of energy lies in renewable sources. This transition is not merely a matter of environmental concern; it is a matter of national security, economic competitiveness, and global leadership. The Trump administration's steadfast commitment to fossil fuels puts the U.S. at risk of falling behind as countries like China invest heavily in renewable energy technologies, positioning themselves as leaders in the new energy economy.
One of the central themes of the article is that both the U.S. and China are motivated by a desire for energy independence. However, their methods diverge significantly. The Trump administration has prioritized fossil fuel extraction, endorsing policies that reduce environmental protections and subsidize the oil and gas industries. In contrast, China has recognized that its lack of domestic fossil fuel resources necessitates a shift toward renewables. This strategy not only aims to secure energy independence but also to mitigate the risks associated with fluctuating global oil prices and geopolitical tensions. As the U.S. doubles down on an outdated model of energy dominance, it risks relinquishing its role as a global leader in innovation and technology.
For those of us concerned about the implications of these energy policies, there are actionable steps that we can take to advocate for a more sustainable and forward-thinking approach to energy. First and foremost, we must engage in conversations about energy policy at all levels—local, state, and federal. By educating ourselves and others about the benefits of renewable energy, we can challenge the narrative that fossil fuels are the only path to energy independence. This includes supporting policies that promote clean energy initiatives, investing in public transportation, and advocating for stricter regulations on fossil fuel industries.
Moreover, it is crucial to emphasize the potential of renewable energy technologies not only as a means to combat climate change but also as a pathway to economic growth. The clean energy sector has the potential to create millions of jobs in manufacturing, installation, and maintenance of renewable energy systems. By framing the transition to renewable energy as an opportunity for economic revitalization rather than a burden, we can appeal to a broader audience, including those who may be resistant to change. Highlighting successful case studies from states that have invested heavily in renewables can provide a compelling argument for others to follow suit.
Finally, we must hold our leaders accountable for their energy policies. This involves pushing back against detrimental subsidies for fossil fuels and advocating for investments in green technologies. Grassroots movements, community organizing, and lobbying efforts are essential to ensure that our voices are heard in the corridors of power. By mobilizing communities around the promise of renewable energy, we can create a collective demand for policies that prioritize sustainability over short-term profits. The future of energy is not only a matter of technology but also of ethical responsibility and global stewardship.
In conclusion, the current energy landscape presents both challenges and opportunities. While the Trump administration's policies may seem entrenched in a bygone era of fossil fuels, the global shift toward renewables is undeniable. By understanding the historical context, recognizing the geopolitical dimensions, and taking concrete action in our communities, we can advocate for a future that embraces clean energy. This transition is not just about averting climate catastrophe; it is about reclaiming leadership on the global stage and ensuring a sustainable, equitable future for all.
In light of the article discussing the contrasting energy policies of the U.S. and China under the Trump administration, there are several actionable steps individuals can take to advocate for renewable energy and environmental protection. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions:
### Personal Actions to Advocate for Renewable Energy
1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - **Action:** Host informational sessions or discussions within your community or online platforms about the importance of transitioning to renewable energy. - **Example:** Organize a community meeting to discuss the impacts of fossil fuels versus renewable energy sources, using data from reputable environmental organizations.
2. **Support Local Renewable Energy Initiatives** - **Action:** Invest in or advocate for local renewable energy projects, such as community solar programs. - **Example:** Join or support a local solar cooperative that allows residents to invest in solar energy projects collectively.
3. **Engage in Petition Campaigns** - **Action:** Sign and promote petitions that call for increased investment in renewable energy and the protection of environmental regulations. - **Example:** - **Petition:** Find petitions on platforms like Change.org or Care2 that advocate for renewable energy policies. One example is the "100% Renewable Energy by 2030" petition available on Change.org. - **Link:** [Change.org Renewable Energy Petition](https://www.change.org) 4. **Contact Your Elected Officials** - **Action:** Write to your representatives urging them to support renewable energy initiatives and oppose fossil fuel subsidies. - **Who to Write To:** - **Senators:** Locate your state senators on [Senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov) and send them emails or letters. For example: - **Senator Elizabeth Warren (MA)** - Email: [warren.senate.gov/contact](https://www.warren.senate.gov/contact) - Mailing Address: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury Street, Boston, MA 02203. - **Senator Bernie Sanders (VT)** - Email: [sanders.senate.gov/contact](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/contact) - Mailing Address: 1 Church Street, Suite 200, Burlington, VT 05401.
5. **Support Environmental Organizations** - **Action:** Donate to or volunteer with organizations that promote renewable energy policies and advocate against fossil fuel dependence. - **Example Organizations:** - **Sierra Club**: [sierra.org](https://www.sierraclub.org) - **Greenpeace**: [greenpeace.org](https://www.greenpeace.org) - **350.org**: [350.org](https://www.350.org)
6. **Engage on Social Media** - **Action:** Use social media platforms to raise awareness about renewable energy issues, share articles, and mobilize your network. - **Example:** Create a hashtag campaign to increase visibility about local renewable energy issues and encourage discussions.
7. **Participate in Local Government Meetings** - **Action:** Attend city council or town hall meetings to voice support for renewable energy policies and oppose fossil fuel projects. - **Example:** Research your local government’s meeting schedule and prepare a statement to present during public comment periods.
8. **Advocate for Education Reforms** - **Action:** Push for curriculum changes in local schools to include comprehensive education on climate change and renewable energy technologies. - **Example:** Write to your school board members advocating for the integration of sustainability topics into the science curriculum.
9. **Promote Sustainable Living Practices** - **Action:** Adopt and share sustainable living practices in your community, such as reducing energy consumption, using public transportation, or biking. - **Example:** Start a neighborhood initiative to encourage carpooling or biking to school or work.
10. **Support Clean Energy Legislation** - **Action:** Stay informed about upcoming legislation related to renewable energy and advocate for support within your network. - **Example:** Follow organizations like the League of Conservation Voters for updates on key legislation and action alerts.
### Crafting Your Message
When writing to representatives or engaging in public discussions, it’s important to articulate clear, concise, and persuasive messages. Here’s a template you might consider using:
**Subject:** Support for Renewable Energy Initiatives
**Dear [Representative’s Name],**
I am writing to urge you to prioritize renewable energy initiatives and oppose subsidies for fossil fuels. As highlighted in recent discussions about global energy strategies, the transition to renewable energy is not only essential for environmental sustainability but also for economic growth and national security.
Investing in renewable technologies can position our nation as a leader in the global energy market, create jobs, and reduce our dependence on foreign fossil fuels. I ask that you advocate for policies that promote solar, wind, and other sustainable energy sources.
Thank you for your attention to this critical issue.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email]
By taking proactive steps and engaging with your community and representatives, you can contribute meaningfully to the conversation on energy policy and advocate for a sustainable future.