COMMENTARY: Gerrymandering now truly is a dangerous threat to democracy | Jefferson City News-Tribune
newstribune.com -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 5:24:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Presidential Campaigns, Media Coverage & Press Relations, Democratic Party Responses
TNS Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker greets Texas Democrats on Sunday, Aug. 3, 2025, after their arrival at the DuPage County Democratic Party headquarters in Carol Stream, Illinois.
"If the United States is to deter a nuclear attack," then-U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara said in a 1967 speech in San Francisco, "it must possess an actual and a credible assured-destruction capability."
McNamara was elucidating a long-established defense concept known as "mutually assured destruction," meaning that if one side has the ability to destroy its enemy but knows that it cannot do so without being destroyed itself, and that its enemy can and will act to do precisely that, stability is the result.
Something like that argument is being applied to gerrymandering, which is applying nuclear-level destruction to American democracy at both state and federal levels. And it is proliferating.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom used the phrase "fight fire with fire" when he said he planned to work with the California legislature and congressional representatives on a plan that would temporarily set aside California's independent redistricting commission. The aim is to draw a map that would offset any gains the GOP makes in Texas, where President Donald Trump and Gov. Greg Abbott are trying to force a gerrymandered, mid-decade congressional map through the Texas legislature with the aim of maintaining Republican control of the U.S. House.
That action in Texas, of course, explains why Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker was holding a news conference this week with Texas Democrats who had fled the Lone Star State to try to prevent, well, their own mutually assured destruction. After other Texans in exile made their way to New York City for a separate news conference, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said that "if Republicans are willing to rewrite these rules to give themselves an advantage, then they're leaving us no choice, we must do the same."
Closer to home, Pritzker assailed what was happening in Texas as a "corrupt" act, likely to "silence millions of voters," with nary a sense of irony, as if his own party was squeaky clean on the matter in Illinois, which is hardly the case.
Illinois Republicans, or what is left of them, roared at the hypocrisy, given that the Illinois version of gerrymandering, as egregiously implemented in 2021, has effectively disempowered Republicans, and thus Republican voters, to the point that very few of them even see a point in running for office in Illinois districts anymore, beyond the safe Republican islands. That's despite 44 percent of Illinoisans voting for Trump in 2024.
The problem with applying the language of assured mutual destruction is that democracy does not die in a nuclear flash, to be avoided at all costs. It dies progressively, eaten away by incremental loss of trust.
The Illinois State Fair, which began Thursday in Springfield, is typically the kickoff of the new political season. But this year serious Republican candidates in districts now held by Democrats are outnumbered not just by cows but maybe even the one made of butter. Party representatives tell us that donors can read maps with impossible odds like anyone else and thus no longer see much point in supporting Republican efforts in Illinois. They feel their money is better spent on races outside the state, the competitiveness of which are now being undermined by Trump and his cronies in Texas and elsewhere.
Indiana appears to be next. Vice President JD Vance already has met with the Indiana governor and Republican legislative leaders, reportedly to "discuss ways to strengthen the GOP's House majority ahead of the 2026 midterms." The vice president would have been better advised to stand for fair and impartial maps in the Hoosier State and beyond. He should be shouting out for democracy, loud and clear.
We've railed against gerrymandering on both state and federal levels before, of course, and not just to lament the cowardice on gerrymandering displayed by the Illinois Supreme Court, as well the U.S. Supreme Court's lamentable 2019 decision in Rucho v. Common Cause that removed federal courts as a crucial check on partisan gerrymandering. At the time, Chief Justice John Roberts clearly recognized the threat gerrymandering posed to democracy, but the 5-4 court majority he led ruled that the only lawful remedies were political, as distinct from federal judicial intervention.
Already that decision has not aged well. We're with Justice Elena Kagan, who wrote in her dissent: "The practices challenged in these cases imperil our system of government. Part of the court's role in that system is to defend its foundations."
If not that, then what else is the court for?
We're back on the topic today to say that the events of the last few days only have deepened our conviction that gerrymandering is a real and present threat to American democracy that must be stopped before yet more damage is done. We also are here to say that phrases like "fire with fire" and "all's fair in love and war" are nothing more than lazy, partisan thinking, tempting as they may be to utter.
So we were glad to hear Rep. Mark Lawler of New York say on CNN Tuesday that he thought what his fellow Republicans were doing in Texas was "wrong." A voice in the wilderness perhaps, but a voice nonetheless.
"We have to actually have neutral districts across this country," Lawler told the news outlet. "It would serve the country better."
Ya think?
In a separate interview with PBS, wherein he strikingly echoed the arguments in Kagan's dissent from 2019, Lawler allowed that "both sides have been guilty" of gerrymandering. "We should have competitive districts based on communities of interest, and ultimately the voters, not the politicians, should decide who is in the majority," he said.
Such a novel concept.
Lawson has said he plans to introduce legislation that would "outright ban gerrymandering." Good for him. We hope to be able to support that. We think all Americans with a sense of fairness should do the same.
Erudite cynics like Karl Rove have written that gerrymandering has been around as long as there have been politicians and districts and that public officials invariably become inured to their own hypocrisy. Plus ça change.
Perhaps. But such is the frighteningly rapid deterioration of structural fairness within the American political system these last few months, thanks mostly to a craven administration that sees everything as a zero-sum game and its singular ability to bring out the worst in its opponents, that surely some who have failed to see the clear and present dangers might wake up. Even if that means acting against their own short-term interests.
This isn't about one side laying down its arms, or refusing to do so. It's about building a structure with bipartisan buy-in so both are able to do so at once. We like to believe that could still be done in America.
Sign Our PetitionGerrymandering has re-emerged as a prominent topic in American political discourse, reflecting a deep-rooted issue that undermines the very foundation of democratic governance. The recent commentary on gerrymandering, particularly in the context of discussions among prominent state leaders like Illinois Governor JB Pritzker and California Governor Gavin Newsom, illustrates the escalating stakes of political maneuvering in an era defined by polarization and partisanship. This situation not only highlights gerrymandering as a tactical weapon used to manipulate electoral outcomes, but also draws a parallel to historical struggles for political representation and the ongoing fight for voting rights that persists in contemporary society.
The history of gerrymandering can be traced back to the early 19th century, when Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry famously approved a redistricting plan that favored his party, which led to the creation of oddly shaped districts resembling a salamander—hence the term "gerrymandering." This practice has evolved into a sophisticated tool utilized by both major political parties to solidify their power by diluting the voting power of opposing constituents. The current landscape, marked by aggressive redistricting efforts in states like Texas and Illinois, is a reminder that the manipulation of electoral boundaries is not merely a strategic game; it is a profound affront to the democratic principle of fair representation.
As the article illustrates, the current political climate has prompted leaders like Pritzker and Newsom to consider drastic measures in response to gerrymandering. By potentially overriding independent redistricting commissions, they are reflecting a broader dilemma within the Democratic Party: how to combat Republican efforts while maintaining a commitment to democratic integrity. This dilemma is exacerbated by the realization that both parties have engaged in gerrymandering practices at different times, leading to accusations of hypocrisy. The rhetoric surrounding these discussions often overlooks the fundamental issue: that gerrymandering erodes public trust in democratic institutions and disenfranchises voters, regardless of party affiliation.
The implications of gerrymandering extend beyond mere electoral strategy; they are deeply intertwined with historical and ongoing struggles for social justice. Historically marginalized communities—whether defined by race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status—are often disproportionately impacted by gerrymandering. Districts are frequently drawn in ways that dilute their voting power, further entrenching systemic inequalities. As activists and advocates fight for voting rights, the challenge of gerrymandering highlights the necessity of a more substantive approach to electoral reform that prioritizes equity and representation for all citizens.
Furthermore, the language of "mutually assured destruction" applied to the gerrymandering debate reflects a grim acknowledgment of the stakes involved. Democracy does not crumble overnight; rather, it is eroded gradually, as the public grows disillusioned with a system that appears rigged in favor of entrenched interests. This erosion not only diminishes the legitimacy of electoral outcomes but also fosters a sense of apathy among citizens, who may question the efficacy of their participation in elections. The ongoing struggle against gerrymandering serves as a crucial reminder that the preservation of democracy requires vigilance, accountability, and a commitment to reform that transcends partisan interests.
As we navigate this pivotal moment in American democracy, it is essential for citizens to engage in conversations about gerrymandering and its far-reaching consequences. Advocacy for independent redistricting commissions, transparent electoral processes, and comprehensive voting rights protections is vital in ensuring that democracy works for everyone. By framing the discussion around gerrymandering not merely as a partisan issue, but as a civil rights concern, we can cultivate a more informed electorate that recognizes the importance of equitable representation and the preservation of democratic ideals. It is imperative that we learn from history, drawing connections between past struggles and contemporary challenges, to forge a path toward a more just and representative democracy.
The issue of gerrymandering stands at the intersection of political strategy and democratic integrity, presenting a significant challenge for the health of our electoral system. As highlighted in the article, both major political parties have engaged in the manipulation of electoral district boundaries, a practice that undermines the very foundation of representative democracy. Gerrymandering often results in districts that are drawn to favor one party over another, diluting the voting power of certain populations and entrenching political elites. This practice not only curtails fair competition but also diminishes public trust in the democratic process. Historical trends reveal that gerrymandering has been a tool utilized since the early 1800s, evolving alongside changing political landscapes, yet its implications for contemporary governance are increasingly dire.
The current situation is further exacerbated by the partisan climate in the United States, where political polarization has reached unprecedented levels. As governors like Gavin Newsom and JB Pritzker react to aggressive gerrymandering tactics deployed by Republicans in states like Texas, the sense of urgency grows. Such responses, while potentially justifiable as a means of self-defense against undemocratic practices, also raise concerns about hypocrisy and the cyclical nature of gerrymandering. If both parties resort to the same tactics to maintain power, we risk entering a vicious cycle where the ultimate casualty is the principle of fair representation. The incremental erosion of trust in our electoral institutions is not merely a philosophical concern; it has tangible consequences that reverberate through voter turnout, civic engagement, and public policy.
As citizens invested in the health of our democracy, it is imperative that we take action to counteract gerrymandering. Grassroots movements advocating for independent redistricting commissions can serve as a powerful counter-narrative to the current state of affairs. These commissions, designed to draw district lines without partisan influence, have gained traction in several states and represent a step toward restoring fairness in electoral processes. By actively supporting such initiatives, whether through advocacy, voting, or engaging in community education, citizens can help dismantle the foundation of gerrymandering and promote a more equitable political landscape.
Moreover, increasing public awareness about the implications of gerrymandering is crucial. Educating fellow citizens about how district lines are drawn and their impact on representation can galvanize a broader constituency for reform. Hosting town halls, writing op-eds, and utilizing social media platforms are effective strategies for informing communities about the detrimental effects of gerrymandering. By fostering a culture of transparency and accountability, we can ignite a collective demand for electoral reform that transcends partisan divides and seeks to uphold the integrity of our democratic institutions.
Ultimately, addressing the issue of gerrymandering requires a comprehensive approach that considers historical context, current political dynamics, and the active engagement of citizens. As we navigate this challenging landscape, we must remain vigilant in our efforts to safeguard democracy from the corrosive effects of manipulation. The task ahead is daunting, but by uniting in pursuit of fair representation and advocating for systemic change, we can ensure that the voices of all Americans are heard and valued in our political discourse. It is through this collective action that we can reclaim the principles of democracy and restore faith in our electoral system.
Gerrymandering poses a significant threat to democratic processes, as highlighted in the article. Here are some actionable steps we can take to combat gerrymandering, protect democratic integrity, and promote fair representation in our political system.
### Personal Actions to Take:
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: - Learn about how gerrymandering works and its implications on democracy. Share this knowledge with friends, family, and community members. - Utilize resources like the League of Women Voters or FairVote, which offer clear explanations and educational materials.
2. **Support Fair Redistricting Initiatives**: - Advocate for independent redistricting commissions in your state. These bodies can help to draw fair district lines free from partisan influence. 3. **Engage with Local Organizing Efforts**: - Join or support grassroots organizations that focus on electoral reform. For instance, groups like Common Cause and the National Democratic Redistricting Committee actively work to combat gerrymandering.
### Exact Actions and Real-World Examples:
1. **Petitions**: - Start or sign petitions aimed at your state legislature to support fair districting practices. Use platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org to find existing petitions or create your own. - Example Petition: "Support Fair Redistricting in [Your State]" could be a local initiative to gather signatures.
2. **Contact Elected Officials**: - Write to your representatives urging them to advocate for fair redistricting practices. Here’s how you can do it: - **U.S. Senators**: - **Senator Tammy Duckworth**: - Address: 525 S. 7th St. Room 1420, Springfield, IL 62703 - Email: duckworth.senate.gov/contact - **Senator Dick Durbin**: - Address: 230 S. Dearborn St. Suite 3900, Chicago, IL 60604 - Email: durbin.senate.gov/contact - **State Representatives** (Example for Illinois): - Find your state representative using the Illinois General Assembly website and write to them about gerrymandering. - Example Contact: **State Rep. Anna Moeller**: - Address: 2000 E. Main St., Suite 102, Carpentersville, IL 60110 - Email: staterepmoeller@gmail.com
3. **What to Say**: - When contacting your officials, express your concern about gerrymandering and its impact on voter representation. Here’s a template you can use: ``` Dear [Official's Name],
I am writing to express my concern regarding the issue of gerrymandering and its detrimental effects on our democracy. It is crucial that we ensure fair representation for all voters, regardless of political affiliation. I urge you to support measures that promote independent redistricting processes in our state.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Contact Information] ```
4. **Attend Town Halls and Community Meetings**: - Participate in local government meetings or town halls to advocate for electoral reforms and to raise awareness of gerrymandering. This is also an opportunity to ask your representatives what they are doing to combat the issue.
5. **Raise Awareness on Social Media**: - Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, or Instagram to inform your followers about gerrymandering. Share articles, infographics, and critical information to mobilize your community.
6. **Support Political Candidates Committed to Reform**: - Research candidates running for office who prioritize electoral reform and fair districting. Support them through donations, volunteering, or simply advocating for their campaigns.
By taking these steps, we can contribute to a more equitable political landscape and help to safeguard democracy against the corrosive effects of gerrymandering. It is vital that we mobilize collectively to advocate for fair representation and hold our elected officials accountable.