Australia's republican future faces a Trump-sized foreign threat
independentaustralia.net -- Thursday, August 14, 2025, 11:47:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–China Relations, State Politics & Governors

As Donald Trump reshapes America into a more coercive and unilateral power, Australia's long-running push for a republic finds itself at a complex geopolitical crossroads, writes Callum Seán Murray.
AMERICA HAS RULED the Western world since the end of World War II. As I have written elsewhere, the American Empire is transmogrifying from an empire by invitation to an empire of coercion. It is perverting the notion of being the "indispensable nation" to exploit trade and military relationships with ostensible allies. These allies, including Australia, have shown obeisance to America's openly coercive turn and kowtowed to President Donald Trump's incoherent and quasi-regal demagoguery.
How can Australia, a middle power and loyal ally to America, demonstrate sovereign agency against America's illiberalism? As I'll explain, by turning notions of republicanism on their head and uniting with other liberal democracies under our common Crown.
I am a republican in two senses. First, I believe that Australia should have its own head of state whilst retaining the liberal-democratic institutions inherited from Britain that make Australia so prosperous. Secondly, I believe in republican political philosophy -- the freedom from arbitrary interference and the 'secure enjoyment of non-domination'.
Republic debate sparks push for local power reform
A growing chorus is calling for Australia's republic conversation to focus less on symbolism and more on empowering local communities through real structural reform.
While Australia remains a constitutional monarchy, we are a republic in neither sense. The prime ministership is a convention in Australian politics. Our Constitution empowers the governor-general - the King's representative - as the highest office in the land.
The office is vested with myriad reserve powers, including making and dissolving Parliament. It follows the advice of the prime minister and their cabinet, but only by longstanding convention. While the governor-general has this constitutional power, they can arbitrarily and unilaterally bypass Australia's political system, making our separation of powers redundant. This occurred almost exactly 50 years ago. With the tacit consent of Queen Elizabeth II, Sir John Kerr sacked Gough Whitlam and appointed Malcolm Fraser as Prime Minister.
The current Labor Government is opposed to the institution of the Crown, but Australia is unlikely to become a republic any time soon. A referendum on this matter was defeated in 1999. In the previous Parliament, Labor established an inquiry into the possibility of holding a second referendum. However, following the categorical rejection of the Voice to Parliament in 2023 - a conservative amendment to the Constitution - another referendum on radical constitutional change has fallen by the wayside. Renowned constitutional scholar Anne Twomey has even speculated that the likelihood of any referenda ever being held again, let alone succeeding, may be slim.
However, arbitrary interference is on a spectrum. It's arguable that at least Australia chose our current political system with the dual-passing of the Australia Act of 1901 through the colonial Australian parliaments, the newly created Federal Parliament and the British Parliament, which was reaffirmed in 1999 following the unsuccessful republic referendum.
Similarly, Australia has willingly allowed American suzerainty as it was considered beneficial to our security and economy. But with the ascension of Trump, America is now actively undermining our sovereignty and others' by unilaterally dictating terms of trade and military expenditure. While the broader public generally disapproves of this unilateralist turn, Australia's politicians are acquiescing to it. Such actions from America directly contravene the republican philosophical notion of non-interference.
Changing Australia's flag the first step toward independence
Australia's flag remains a colonial relic and changing it could be the first step toward true independence.
This all said, so long as the Crown endures in Australia, I believe that the Labor Government should use it to counter America's newly coercive imperialism. Our King - Charles III - is also the King of the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand (which I'll refer to as the "Grand Coalition"). Though each has evolved distinct institutions shaped by their histories as former British dominions, these nation states, all constitutional monarchies, share liberal democratic foundations and ideals.
Beyond these core members, King Charles III also serves as sovereign for 11 other nations outside the traditional Western sphere, which could likewise be invited to join this Grand Coalition if sufficiently aligned to its interests.
Although having a king is inconsistent with republican philosophical thought, our systems of government appear less open to tyranny compared to America due to conventions like responsible government, an adversarial opposition and leadership chosen by the relevant political party. By contrast, America is moving towards a political system with an elected king, replete with power to start war and give pardons and above the law entirely.
The historical irony is unmistakable. America's Revolutionary Wars were fought to overthrow the tyranny of King George III and to establish a republic for the American people. Britain learnt from this lesson. Over time, it granted settler colonies greater autonomy and eventual independence. Many of these former colonies opted to retain the Crown, incorporating constitutional monarchy into their evolving democratic systems.
If Donald Trump wants to act like a king, then the Grand Coalition should explicitly unite under the auspices of the Crown and act in unison to counter America's deleterious foreign policy. Together, the Grand Coalition would span three continents and have a combined GDP of US$8 trillion (AU$12.2 trillion). This would make us the third largest economy in the world behind America and China. Although less than half of America's GDP, we could use this newfound economic might to make new trade deals with other economic behemoths like the European Union, Japan, or even China. The same could be said regarding military alliances, at least for the EU and Japan.
Aussies still girt by monarchy
So, King Charles III finally turned up for the Australian leg of his victory lap of the Commonwealth. Isn't it time an Australian head of state was one of us... and also a resident?
The significance of the Crown has been underscored in Canada recently, where Prime Minister Mark Carney and the Crown received public support after inviting King Charles III to open the new session of the Canadian Parliament. There is also some indication that having a shared head of state is influencing how Australia acts on the international stage. We have just signed a 50-year defence treaty with the UK, and the UK and Australia are acting together to pressure America to maintain the AUKUS agreement.
Australia and New Zealand want to recognise the state of Palestine yet fear the caprice of America. The UK, Canada and other European powers have been moving towards such recognition, which is enabling Australia and New Zealand to follow suit.
But we should go further. The Grand Coalition should make a formal agreement recognising our shared history and head of state while agreeing to remain beacons of liberal democracy and bastions of free trade. We are more powerful together.
Donald Trump wants to be the new King of America. The Grand Coalition would be united under a common Crown. So long as Australia remains a constitutional monarchy, we should use this political institution to our benefit.
American dollars are marked with the term e pluribus unum -- out of many, one. A Grand Coalition would be something similar. We are four nation states composed of people from all around the world represented by one sovereign, a potent source of common power which could serve to balance the scales.
Callum Seán Murray has a Masters Degree in Philosophy, Politics and Economics from Victoria University of Wellington. Callum resides in WA, works in public policy and has a keen interest in international affairs.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License
Support independent journalism Subscribe to IA.
Related ArticlesCraig Foster succeeds Peter FitzSimons as Republic Movement headRoyal glamour holding Australia back from becoming a republicARM'S new model for republic not the people's choiceThe Republic, Easter and the decline of religious devotion in AustraliaA safer way to ditch the monarchy POLITICS REPUBLIC DEMOCRACY INTERNATIONAL AUSTRALIAN REPUBLIC constitutional monarchy Crown Donald Trump coercive empire US foreign policy Grand Coalition sovereignty liberal democracy King Charles III Share Article
Sign Our PetitionIn the context of Australia’s political landscape, the ongoing discourse surrounding its potential transition to a republic reveals not only an internal struggle for democratic governance but also the external influences shaping this national dialogue. The article highlights how the rise of Donald Trump and his coercive, unilateral approach to foreign policy complicates Australia’s quest for sovereignty and self-determination. This intersection of domestic republican aspirations and global authoritarian trends underscores the pressing need for Australia to critically assess its political identity and power structures, particularly in light of its historical ties to the British monarchy.
Historically, Australia has operated under a constitutional monarchy, with the British Crown symbolizing a colonial legacy that many argue is at odds with the nation’s democratic ideals. The 1975 dismissal of Prime Minister Gough Whitlam by Governor-General Sir John Kerr exemplified the potential perils of this colonial arrangement. This watershed moment in Australian history illustrates how the constitutional powers vested in the monarchy can undermine democratic processes, raising fundamental questions about the legitimacy of a political system that allows for such unilateral actions. The narrative surrounding Whitlam’s dismissal continues to reverberate in contemporary discussions, reinforcing the argument for a republican model that prioritizes accountability and democratic integrity.
The push for republicanism in Australia is not merely a matter of changing the head of state; it also encompasses a broader vision for empowering communities and promoting local governance. As articulated in the article, the current republican dialogue is shifting towards substantive reforms that prioritize the needs and voices of local communities. This movement resonates with global trends advocating for decentralization and grassroots political engagement, reflecting a desire to break free from historical hierarchies and foster inclusivity in decision-making processes. The call to focus on structural reforms rather than mere symbolism is a powerful reminder that genuine republicanism must involve a commitment to enhancing democratic participation and ensuring that all citizens have a stake in their governance.
Moreover, the failure of the 2023 Voice to Parliament referendum starkly illustrates the challenges faced by progressive movements seeking to address systemic inequities in Australia. The rejection of this constitutional amendment, which aimed to recognize Indigenous Australians in the Constitution, highlights the significant barriers to enacting meaningful change within the existing political framework. The implications of this setback extend beyond Indigenous rights; they signal a broader resistance to transformative reform in the face of entrenched power structures. As Australia grapples with its identity and aspirations for a more equitable future, the recent referendum serves as a cautionary tale of the necessity for sustained advocacy and coalition-building among marginalized communities and progressive factions.
To navigate this complex political terrain, it is essential for those advocating for a republic to foster alliances with other liberal democracies and engage in international dialogues about democratic values and governance. The article suggests that uniting with like-minded nations could strengthen Australia’s resolve in asserting its sovereignty against coercive foreign influences. By drawing parallels with other countries that have undergone successful transitions to republicanism, advocates can bolster their case for reform and inspire a renewed commitment to democratic principles. Historical examples, such as the transitions in France and India, provide valuable lessons on the importance of resilience and the power of collective action in the face of adversity.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding Australia’s potential transition to a republic is inextricably linked to broader social struggles and global political dynamics. As the nation confronts the ramifications of an increasingly unilateral and authoritarian global landscape, it is imperative to critically examine its historical foundations and envision a future that prioritizes democratic integrity, local empowerment, and social justice. The call for a republic resonates not only as a constitutional reform but as a transformative vision for a society that seeks to overcome historical injustices and build an inclusive and equitable future for all its citizens. As this discourse evolves, it will be essential to remain vigilant and engaged, advocating for a political system that truly reflects the will and needs of the people.
The current geopolitical landscape presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities for nations like Australia, particularly when viewed through the lens of its ongoing conversation about republicanism. As articulated in Callum Seán Murray's article, the push for Australia to establish itself as a republic is inextricably linked to its relationship with the United States, especially under the leadership style of Donald Trump. The article highlights the shift from an "empire by invitation" to one of coercion, compelling us to reassess how Australia can maintain its sovereignty while navigating these changing dynamics. This is not merely a question of governance but one of national identity and agency in a world where liberal democracy is increasingly under threat.
Historically, Australia has derived much of its political and economic structure from its ties to the United Kingdom and, more recently, to the United States. The legacy of British colonialism has provided Australia with a framework that many citizens identify with, but which can also feel outdated and ill-suited to contemporary problems. The sacking of Prime Minister Gough Whitlam in 1975 remains a pivotal moment, underscoring the vulnerabilities inherent in a system where the governor-general, as the monarch's representative, possesses significant reserve powers. Hence, the push for republicanism is not merely about changing a symbol but about redefining the very nature of governance to ensure that it aligns more closely with the principles of popular sovereignty and democratic accountability.
In light of these historical precedents, the conversation surrounding republicanism needs to transcend symbolism. It's crucial for Australians to engage deeply with the concept of local power reform, as noted in the article. Empowering local communities can serve as a foundation for a more resilient and representative political structure. This could involve advocating for decentralized governance, where local councils have more authority to make decisions that directly impact their communities. Such structural changes could act as a counterbalance to the perceived overreach of federal power, particularly in times of political turmoil and uncertainty brought about by global conflicts and authoritarianism.
Moreover, the recent defeat of the Voice to Parliament referendum highlights the deep divisions within Australian society regarding constitutional reform. While the Labor Government may oppose the institution of the Crown, there is a palpable concern that another referendum on republicanism could face a similarly bleak fate. This raises an important question: how can ordinary Australians mobilize to advocate for change? Grassroots movements, community discussions, and educational initiatives are crucial in informing citizens about the importance of republicanism, particularly as it relates to their rights and freedoms. Engaging youth and marginalized communities will be essential in fostering a collective vision for an Australia that embodies the democratic values it professes.
Lastly, the need for solidarity among liberal democracies is paramount. Australia's potential shift toward republicanism could serve as a catalyst for broader discussions on democratic values and governance structures in other nations facing similar challenges. By forging alliances with like-minded countries, Australia can present a unified front against the rising tide of authoritarianism and coercion seen in global politics today. In the face of such threats, it is imperative that Australians not only reflect on their national identity but also actively participate in shaping a future that prioritizes democratic principles, community empowerment, and, ultimately, the realization of a truly sovereign republic. This vision requires thoughtful engagement, sustained activism, and a commitment to the ideals of freedom and equality that should define any modern democracy.
Based on the article discussing Australia's republican future and its relationship with the United States, here are actionable steps you can take to engage in this important political discourse and promote republicanism in Australia.
### Personal Actions You Can Take:
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: - Read up on Australia's political history, the concept of republicanism, and the role of the governor-general. Share this information through discussions, social media, or community forums.
2. **Engage in Local Politics**: - Attend town hall meetings or local political events to discuss the implications of Australia's constitutional monarchy and advocate for republicanism.
3. **Support Local Activist Organizations**: - Join or contribute to organizations advocating for a republic in Australia. Examples include the Australian Republican Movement (ARM).
4. **Petition for Change**: - Start or sign petitions that advocate for a new referendum on becoming a republic. Platforms like Change.org can be effective for this.
### Specific Actions:
1. **Sign Petitions**: - Look for existing petitions advocating for a republic. You can start one focusing on the importance of having a head of state who represents Australia rather than a monarch.
2. **Write to Your Representatives**: - Contact your local and federal representatives to express your support for a republic. Here are a couple of examples:
- **Anthony Albanese (Prime Minister)** - Email: [Contact through Parliament website](https://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/Contact_Us) - Mailing Address: Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia.
- **Tony Burke (Minister for the Arts)** - Email: [Contact through Parliament website](https://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/Contact_Us) - Mailing Address: Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia.
- When writing, express your views on the need for Australia to have its own head of state and the importance of a republican form of governance in ensuring democratic integrity.
3. **Engage with the Media**: - Write letters to editors of newspapers or articles in online platforms discussing the importance of Australia's republican movement. Share your perspective on how a republic can strengthen Australian democracy.
4. **Join Advocacy Campaigns**: - Participate in campaigns organized by the Australian Republican Movement or similar organizations. They often have events requiring volunteers, fundraising efforts, and outreach programs.
5. **Social Media Campaigning**: - Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to raise awareness about the republican movement. Share articles, create infographics, or host discussions to engage your community in the conversation.
6. **Attend Workshops and Forums**: - Look for workshops or forums that discuss constitutional reform and republicanism. These often provide valuable information and networking opportunities to collaborate with like-minded individuals.
### What to Say:
When writing or discussing these topics, consider the following points:
- Emphasize the importance of having a head of state that directly represents the Australian people. - Discuss the implications of having a foreign monarch as the head of state and how it impacts national sovereignty. - Advocate for local governance and how a republic could empower communities to have more direct control over their political affairs. - Highlight historical instances of the governor-general's overreach and the need for constitutional reform to prevent such occurrences.
By taking these actions, you can play a part in shaping Australia's political landscape and contribute to the ongoing conversation about its future as a republic.