Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

Marjorie Taylor Greene goes scorched earth on Lindsey Graham over Israel

newsweek.com -- Thursday, August 14, 2025, 10:32:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Social Media & Public Statements, Foreign Policy & International Relations
Marjorie Taylor Greene goes scorched earth on Lindsey Graham over Israel

Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia ripped into fellow Republican Lindsey Graham, South Carolina senator, over funding for Israel amid the ongoing war in Gaza.

Newsweek reached out to the State Department via online form Thursday for additional comment.

Why It Matters

The exchange reflects an ongoing split within sections of the Republican coalition over U.S. policy toward Israel, Iran and broader Middle East involvement, highlighting tensions between isolationist "America First" Republicans and party figures who have urged stronger U.S. backing for Israel.

What To Know

In a lengthy post to X, formerly Twitter, Greene attacked Graham over his Israel commentary, as the senator said, in part: "If Israel wanted to commit genocide, they could. They have the capability to do that. They choose not to. Hamas, they would commit genocide in 30 seconds."

Replying to his video, Greene remarked that it was "quite a statement and is an acknowledgment that nuclear armed Israel is more than capable of defending themselves, by themselves, and not only defeating their enemies, but completely wiping them out! So why is America funding them and fighting for them??!!! We should not be!! And it is not a matter of supporting either Israel or Hamas, as he suggest [sic], which is ridiculous."

Greene continued to note that Graham does not have children, while saying her motherhood fuels her "fierce invested interest to be ALL IN to save America."

"Funding and blindly supporting an ally who is starving children is not going to bring God's favor on America, as a matter of fact, I'll argue it will instead bring God's wrath," Greene later said. "America's intervention should be to stop the war and work for peace and demand the release of the poor Oct 7th hostages, while equally demanding to stop the genocide and humanitarian crisis in Gaza."

Israel and Iran were recently embroiled in a "12 day war," dubbed by President Donald Trump, which ended in a fragile ceasefire agreement.

What People Are Saying

Greene concluded in her post: "Lastly, American's hard earned tax dollars should go to AMERICA ONLY!!! If we are going to pull the plug on anything, we should pull the damn plug on FUNDING FOREIGN WARS AND FOREIGN COUNTRIES!!!!!!!"

Graham on X this month: "Enough already. Hamas stands in the way of peace. Israel is our greatest ally in the Middle East, and we will always stand with them."

Trump on Truth Social in June: "CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE! It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in progress, final missions!), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED! Officially, Iran will start the CEASEFIRE and, upon the 12th Hour, Israel will start the CEASEFIRE and, upon the 24th Hour, an Official END to THE 12 DAY WAR will be saluted by the World. During each CEASEFIRE, the other side will remain PEACEFUL and RESPECTFUL."

Trump continued: "On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, 'THE 12 DAY WAR.' This is a War that could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn't, and never will! God bless Israel, God bless Iran, God bless the Middle East, God bless the United States of America, and GOD BLESS THE WORLD! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA."

Independent Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, on X in July: "The Netanyahu government's extermination of Gaza intensifies. Malnutrition is rampant, children are starving to death, people are shot while waiting for meager food rations -- and US weapons allow it to happen. Trump and Congress must act NOW. Stop the slaughter. Feed the people."

What Happens Next

The confrontation illustrates continuing intraparty clashes over foreign policy that could shape Republican messaging and congressional votes on potential foreign aid packages. Observers and party officials could face pressure to clarify positions ahead of any legislative decisions on aid to Israel or measures related to Iran.

Separately, Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are set to meet Friday in Anchorage, Alaska, amid ongoing conversations about a potential ceasefire agreement between Russia and Ukraine.

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The recent exchange between Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lindsey Graham over U.S. support for Israel has illuminated the fractures within the Republican Party regarding foreign policy, particularly in relation to the Middle East. Greene’s vehement criticism of Graham’s defense of Israel showcases a growing faction within the Republican base that is increasingly skeptical of traditional foreign interventionist strategies. This internal conflict is not merely a political squabble; it reflects broader historical currents in U.S. foreign policy and the ongoing debate about America's role in the global order.

Historically, the U.S. support for Israel has been rooted in a complex mix of geopolitical strategy, historical alliances, and cultural ties. Since the mid-20th century, Israel has been positioned as a critical ally in the Middle East, particularly during the Cold War, when the U.S. sought to counter Soviet influence. This relationship has persisted into the present day, often at the expense of Palestinian rights and the broader stability of the region. The starkness of Greene's criticism underscores a pivotal moment where some Americans, including certain factions within the Republican Party, are beginning to question the morality and efficacy of this longstanding support, particularly given the humanitarian crises unfolding in Gaza.

Greene's comments raise an essential point regarding the moral implications of U.S. foreign aid, particularly in contexts where it appears to support actions that many characterize as oppressive. Her argument that funding a nation which is "starving children" contradicts American values is not without historical precedent. The anti-war movements of the 1960s and 1970s, which criticized U.S. military interventions in Vietnam and elsewhere, were founded on similar principles of questioning the morality of foreign involvement. By invoking her role as a mother, Greene taps into a narrative that resonates with many who are concerned about the welfare of children and the ethical responsibilities of a nation that prides itself on its humanitarian ideals.

Moreover, Greene's call for a reduction in foreign aid mirrors a broader sentiment of isolationism that has gained traction among certain segments of the American populace. The "America First" ideology, which gained significant political momentum in the Trump era, advocates for prioritizing domestic issues over foreign entanglements. This perspective challenges the post-World War II consensus that the U.S. should play an active role in international affairs. While Greene's motivations may be rooted in a nationalist framework, they inadvertently align with a progressive critique of militarism and imperialism that has been championed by many social justice advocates.

As the conversation around U.S. support for Israel intensifies, it is crucial to examine the implications of such debates on ongoing social struggles. The plight of Palestinians, often sidelined in discussions of U.S. foreign policy, deserves attention in this context. The humanitarian crises resulting from military actions, blockades, and broader systemic inequalities are emblematic of the challenges faced by marginalized groups worldwide. By focusing on the human costs of foreign policy decisions, advocates for social justice can reframe the narrative to emphasize accountability and the responsibility of states to uphold human rights universally.

In conclusion, the exchange between Greene and Graham serves as a microcosm of larger ideological rifts within the Republican Party and American society at large. It reflects a critical moment in the ongoing struggle to redefine American identity in relation to its global responsibilities. As we dissect this political discourse, it is imperative to ground our discussions in historical context, ethical considerations, and the voices of those impacted by U.S. policies. Engaging with these dimensions can foster a more comprehensive understanding of the complexities at play and empower advocates for social justice to hold their leaders accountable, regardless of party affiliation.

Action:

The recent exchange between Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lindsey Graham demonstrates a significant rift within the Republican Party regarding U.S. foreign policy, particularly in relation to Israel and the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Greene's vehement criticism of Graham's stance highlights a growing faction of the Republican base that is increasingly skeptical of traditional foreign aid and military interventionism. This division is not merely a political squabble; it reflects deeper ideological currents that question long-standing U.S. commitments and approaches in the Middle East. As Americans, it is crucial to engage with these discussions, not only to understand the complexities of international relations but also to discern how these policies align with our values of justice, equity, and human rights.

Historically, U.S. support for Israel has been a cornerstone of American foreign policy, often justified through a narrative that frames Israel as a democratic ally in a volatile region. However, this perspective has come under scrutiny, especially in light of recent escalations in violence and the humanitarian disaster unfolding in Gaza. Greene's comments resonate with a growing awareness among many Americans that unconditional support for Israel—especially in the face of reported human rights violations—compromises our ethical standing on the global stage. This critical view aligns with a broader call for a reassessment of U.S. foreign aid, which, as Greene argues, should prioritize domestic concerns over foreign commitments.

Greene’s argument that American taxpayer dollars should be directed toward domestic needs rather than foreign wars underscores a growing sentiment among constituents across the political spectrum. As citizens, we must actively engage with our elected representatives to demand accountability and transparency regarding how our tax dollars are spent. This means advocating for a foreign policy that emphasizes diplomacy and humanitarian aid rather than military intervention. By participating in town halls, writing letters, and utilizing platforms for advocacy, we can voice our concerns and push for policies that reflect the values of compassion and solidarity, rather than blind allegiance to any foreign government.

Moreover, Greene's call for an end to funding foreign conflicts raises important ethical questions about the consequences of U.S. military aid. Supporting nations that engage in actions resulting in civilian casualties and humanitarian crises runs counter to the principles of human rights that many Americans hold dear. It is vital for citizens to educate themselves on the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, understanding the historical context and power dynamics at play. This knowledge can empower individuals to advocate for policies that not only seek to protect American interests but also promote peace, justice, and human dignity for all people involved.

In conclusion, the discord within the Republican Party over U.S. foreign policy toward Israel reflects broader societal tensions regarding our role in the world. As the conversation shifts toward a more introspective examination of our values, it is imperative for Americans to seize this moment as an opportunity for engagement and activism. By supporting policies that prioritize humanitarian efforts and diplomatic solutions, we can work towards a future that respects the rights and lives of all people, regardless of their nationality. The ongoing debates surrounding foreign aid and military involvement are not merely political; they are moral imperatives that call for our active participation and awareness.

To Do:

In light of the recent dialogue surrounding U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding funding for Israel and the conflict in Gaza, it is essential to engage actively and thoughtfully in advocating for a shift in how we approach these issues. Here is a detailed list of actions that individuals can take to make their voices heard and contribute to a more humane and responsible foreign policy:

### 1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - **Action**: Read up on U.S. foreign policy, the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Share articles, documentaries, and books with friends and family. - **Example**: Recommend books like "Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom" by Norman Finkelstein or watch documentaries like "The 50 Years War: Israel and the Arabs."

### 2. **Contact Elected Officials** - **Action**: Write to your local and national representatives expressing your stance on U.S. funding for Israel and the need for humanitarian support in Gaza. - **Who to Write To**: - **Your House Representative**: Find your representative’s contact information at [house.gov](https://www.house.gov/). - **Your Senators**: Contact your two U.S. Senators; find their information at [senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov/). - **Example Letters**: - Express your concern about military funding for Israel amid the humanitarian crisis. Highlight the need for increased humanitarian aid and a ceasefire. - Example email template: ``` Subject: Urgent Action Required on U.S. Foreign Policy

Dear [Representative/Senator Name],

I am writing to express my deep concern about the continued military funding to Israel amidst the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. As a constituent, I urge you to advocate for policies that prioritize humanitarian aid over military support, ensuring that American tax dollars contribute to peace and stability, not further conflict.

Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.

Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```

### 3. **Sign and Share Petitions** - **Action**: Find and sign petitions that advocate for ending military aid to Israel and supporting humanitarian efforts in Gaza. - **Examples**: - **Petition to Congress**: “End U.S. Military Aid to Israel” can often be found on platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org. - **Petition for Humanitarian Aid**: Look for petitions that call for increased humanitarian support for Gaza refugees. - **How to Share**: Utilize social media to bring attention to these petitions and encourage others to sign.

### 4. **Participate in Local Activism** - **Action**: Join or support local organizations that advocate for Palestinian rights and humanitarian assistance. - **Examples**: - **Organizations**: Join groups like Jewish Voice for Peace, the Palestinian Youth Movement, or local peace activists. - **Events**: Attend rallies, town hall meetings, or community discussions focusing on foreign policy and humanitarian issues.

### 5. **Engage in Social Media Advocacy** - **Action**: Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, or Instagram to share information, raise awareness, and mobilize others to take action. - **Examples**: - Share infographics about the humanitarian situation in Gaza. - Use hashtags like #EndMilitaryAid or #StandWithGaza to connect with broader movements.

### 6. **Contact Local Media Outlets** - **Action**: Write op-eds or letters to the editor expressing your views on U.S. involvement in the Israel-Palestine conflict. - **Who to Contact**: Identify local newspapers or online news platforms in your area. - **Example**: Write about the need for a balanced approach in U.S. foreign policy that prioritizes human rights.

### 7. **Support Boycotts and Divestment Initiatives** - **Action**: Participate in or support the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel until it complies with international law and respects Palestinian rights. - **How to Get Involved**: Research local BDS campaigns and share their initiatives within your community.

By taking these actions, you can contribute to a movement that advocates for a more just and equitable foreign policy that prioritizes human rights and humanitarian needs. Every voice matters, and collective action can lead to significant change.


Sign Our Petition



10 Related Article(s):

Trump says Russia-Ukraine war should be resolved through settlement, not via ceasefire - i24NEWS

Zelenskyy outlines peace demands before high-stakes White House meeting with Trump

Jaishankar, British counterpart Lammy discuss Ukraine developments

Trump's Push For Peace Shifts To Zelenskiy In Oval Office Again

'Stop the killing': Zelensky says Putin 'complicating the situation' by refusing ceasefire as Trump pushes for deal

Zelensky Demands Terms While Trump Works to End Endless Ukraine-Russia War [WATCH]

Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron, Other European Leaders To Join Ukrainian President Zelenskyy For White House Meeting With Trump

European, Ukrainian leaders scramble to respond to Trump's shift of position on Russia-Ukraine conflict

Ukraine's allies meet as Zelenskyy travels to Washington to meet with Trump

Zelensky immediately defies Trump just moments after president lays out terms of peace plan with Putin setting up round two of combative White House clash


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com