Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

Trump, Zelenskyy Will Meet 1st Monday Before European Leaders Join In

wmal.com -- Monday, August 18, 2025, 1:27:51 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, Presidential Campaigns
Trump, Zelenskyy Will Meet 1st Monday Before European Leaders Join In

President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance will first hold a meeting alone with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Monday afternoon in the White House and then only later be joined by European officials traveling to Washington for talks on the future of the Russia-Ukraine war, two sources told sources told NewsNation on Sunday.

Pundits had speculated that the European leaders heading to Washington with Zelenskyy -- including French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte -- are seeking to prevent another situation that occurred in February when the American leaders publicly berated Zelenskyy and accused him of not appreciating their support when they met with him alone at the White House.

These pundits are fearing another such scenario, according to NewsNation, after concerns were revisited in Europe that the U.S. under Trump was sliding away from Kyiv and toward Moscow over the conflict when the U.S. president during his summit on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin backed away from the idea of an urgent ceasefire before an overall peace agreement is hammered out.

Read more at Newsmax© 2025 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The recent meeting scheduled between former President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy underscores an ongoing tension in U.S. foreign policy regarding Ukraine and its relationship with Europe. As the war in Ukraine continues to ravage the nation and has broader implications for global security, it is essential to analyze not just the dynamics of this meeting but also the historical context and the larger implications for social justice and international solidarity.

Historically, the U.S. has positioned itself as a bulwark against Russian expansionism, particularly following the Cold War. However, recent developments suggest a retrenchment in this stance, especially with the former President’s provocative rhetoric and actions that hint at a preference for diplomatic ties with Russia over support for Ukraine. This shift is troubling not only for Ukraine but for the broader geopolitical landscape, where authoritarianism threatens democratic values. The notion that Trump could be leaning towards Moscow raises alarms about the long-term implications for U.S. alliances, which have traditionally valued democratic governance and human rights.

The presence of European leaders such as Emmanuel Macron, Keir Starmer, and Friedrich Merz in this context highlights the growing concern among European nations regarding U.S. commitment to Ukraine. Their involvement is not merely ceremonial; it reflects a collective anxiety about the future of NATO and the unity required to counter Russian aggression. The fears of a repeat scenario where Zelenskyy is publicly berated by American leaders emphasizes the precariousness of international relationships in times of conflict. It is crucial to recognize that these leaders are not merely seeking to protect their own interests but are also striving to uphold principles of international law and justice, which are being challenged by the actions of the Russian state.

Moreover, the implications of this meeting extend beyond geopolitical strategy; they resonate deeply with ongoing social struggles within Ukraine, where the conflict has exacerbated humanitarian crises, including displacement and economic instability. The need for sustained support from the U.S. and its allies is critical for Ukraine to address these challenges effectively. As the war continues, it is vital for Americans to understand that support for Ukraine is not just a matter of national interest but also a moral obligation to stand against tyranny and support self-determination. This perspective aligns with historical struggles for liberation and justice, where international solidarity has often played a pivotal role.

Furthermore, the backdrop of this meeting illustrates the broader ideological battle occurring within U.S. politics. The differences in approach to foreign policy between traditional Democrats and the more isolationist tendencies represented by Trump and Vance reflect a significant schism that has implications for domestic and international solidarity. Advocates for social justice should leverage discussions surrounding this meeting to highlight the necessary connection between foreign policy and domestic social issues. For example, how the U.S. handles its relationships abroad can directly affect its moral standing and influence in addressing inequality and human rights issues at home.

In conclusion, the upcoming meeting between Trump, Vance, and Zelenskyy serves as a critical moment not only for U.S.-Ukraine relations but for the very principles that underpin international cooperation and justice. A nuanced understanding of this event, rooted in historical context and an awareness of ongoing social struggles, can equip advocates for justice with the insights needed to challenge regressive narratives and promote a foreign policy that genuinely reflects democratic values and human rights. The stakes are high, and the outcomes of such meetings will have lasting impacts that extend far beyond the immediate political landscape.

Action:

The geopolitical dynamics surrounding the Russia-Ukraine conflict remain tangled and complex, particularly as we observe the upcoming meeting between Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. This meeting is significant not only for its immediate implications for U.S.-Ukraine relations but also for the broader context of American foreign policy. Historically, the United States has positioned itself as a supporter of Ukraine against Russian aggression, a stance that has garnered bipartisan backing. However, the specter of a Trump-led administration raises questions about the continuity of this support, especially given Trump's past rhetoric and actions toward Russia.

In recent years, the U.S. has played an essential role in providing military and economic aid to Ukraine, framing this support as vital to upholding democratic values and international norms. However, Trump's previous administration often exhibited a disjointed approach to foreign policy, leaning toward transactional relationships that prioritized national interests over established alliances. This shift could undermine the solidarity that has characterized Western support for Ukraine, a nation striving to defend its sovereignty against an aggressor. As European leaders prepare to join the discussion after the initial meeting, there is palpable concern that a unilateral dialogue could jeopardize the delicate balance of support that Ukraine has relied upon.

For Americans who advocate for a principled stance on international affairs, there are several actions to consider. First, it is crucial to engage in grassroots advocacy that emphasizes the importance of unified support for Ukraine. This can take the form of contacting local representatives to stress the necessity of continued aid, or organizing community discussions that raise awareness about Ukraine's plight. These actions help cultivate a robust dialogue that counters the isolationist sentiments that often emerge in discussions about foreign aid and military support, particularly from right-wing factions.

Moreover, educating oneself and others about the implications of shifting foreign policy dynamics is vital. By understanding the historical context of U.S.-Ukraine relations and the ongoing conflict with Russia, individuals can more effectively articulate the stakes involved. Resources such as academic articles, expert analyses, and historical documents can enrich discussions and provide a more nuanced view that challenges simplistic narratives often propagated by those skeptical of international alliances. Engaging with media that explores these issues from multiple perspectives can also enhance one’s ability to discuss and defend the need for U.S. support for Ukraine.

Finally, it is essential to recognize that the U.S. role in the world is not merely about military might or economic interests; it is fundamentally about upholding democratic values and supporting nations striving for self-determination. As Americans engage in conversations with those who hold differing views, emphasizing the ethical dimensions of U.S. foreign policy can be a powerful tool. The principle that allies should support one another in times of crisis resonates across political divides, and framing the conversation in this manner can foster a more constructive dialogue. By advocating for a coherent, values-driven foreign policy that aligns with both historical commitments and moral imperatives, Americans can play an active role in shaping the future of U.S. relations with Ukraine and other nations facing existential threats.

To Do:

In light of the recent developments regarding the upcoming meeting between President Trump, Vice President Vance, and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, there are several actions we can take to advocate for a strong, principled U.S. support for Ukraine and to ensure that diplomatic efforts prioritize peace and human rights.

### Personal Actions We Can Take:

1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Stay informed about the situation in Ukraine, the U.S. role, and the implications of various political stances. Share this information with friends, family, and community members to raise awareness.

2. **Contact Elected Officials:** - Reach out to your representatives to express your support for Ukraine and urge them to maintain a strong stance against aggression from Russia. - **Who to Write:** - U.S. Senators and Representatives from your state. - **Example Contact:** - **Senator Elizabeth Warren** - Email: warren.senate.gov/contact - USPS: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury St., Boston, MA 02203 - **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez** - Email: ocasiocortez.house.gov/contact - USPS: 1231 Lafayette Ave, 2nd Floor, Bronx, NY 10474

3. **Sign and Share Petitions:** - Participate in petitions that call for continued support for Ukraine, emphasizing humanitarian aid and military support. - **Examples:** - **Petition to Congress for Increased Support for Ukraine:** Available on platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org. - Share these petitions on social media to gather more signatures.

4. **Attend Local Events:** - Participate in local rallies or protests supporting Ukraine or promoting peace initiatives. Look for events organized by local advocacy groups or NGOs. - Example: Check organizations such as Amnesty International or local peace coalitions for event announcements.

5. **Engage with Local Media:** - Write letters to the editor or opinion pieces in local newspapers to highlight the importance of U.S. support for Ukraine and advocate for a peaceful resolution to the conflict. - **What to Say:** - Discuss the implications of U.S. foreign policy on global stability and human rights. - Share personal stories or historical examples to illustrate the importance of supporting allied nations against aggression.

6. **Support Ukrainian Communities:** - Contribute to or volunteer with organizations that support Ukrainian refugees and displaced persons. - Example: Organizations such as the Ukrainian National Women’s League of America or local refugee assistance programs.

7. **Utilize Social Media:** - Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to raise awareness about the situation in Ukraine. Share informative content, updates, and ways for others to get involved. - Example Hashtags: #StandWithUkraine, #SupportUkraine, #PeaceInUkraine.

8. **Advocate for Peaceful Diplomacy:** - Write to the White House advocating for a diplomatic approach to the conflict, emphasizing the need for negotiations and peaceful resolutions. - **Contact:** - The White House - Email: comments@whitehouse.gov - USPS: 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20500 - **What to Say:** - Urge the administration to prioritize peace talks and humanitarian efforts while ensuring support for Ukrainian sovereignty.

By taking these actionable steps, we can play a role in shaping the narrative around U.S. foreign policy in relation to Ukraine and contribute to a movement that prioritizes peace, democracy, and human rights for all.


Sign Our Petition



10 Related Article(s):

Ukrainian strike kills one, wounds 10 in Russia: governor | News

RUSSIA HOAX 2.0: NBC Cites Cooked Election Intel in Collusion Callback

Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, August 14, 2025

Alaska Summit to Foster US-Russia Trust - Ex-Austrian Diplomat

Trump and Putin are meeting in Alaska today - what does each side want?

In the news today: Air Canada flight attendants could strike tonight

Trump eyes trilateral talks with Zelensky after Alaska summit with Putin

There's nothing 'hot' about Trump, Kennedy's 'perennial bronze shade' | Letters

What Will Trump and Putin Have to Say in Alaska?

Trump Departs For Alaska Summit | Putin Trump Meeting In Alaska | Russia Ukraine War | N18G


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com