KCarl Smith: Hillary's crime, Obama's silence | Alabama News
1819news.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 3:29:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S. Elections & Voting Rights, U.S.–Russia Relations, Presidential Campaigns
For years, Americans were told that Russia helped Donald Trump win the 2016 election. News anchors repeated it nonstop. Social media blasted it out. People believed it. More facts have come out - and they tell a very different story.
The real lie wasn't about Trump. It was about protecting Hillary Clinton and shielding President Obama. It was a distraction from the truth. The truth is this: the people in power abused that power, and the media helped them do it.
As a Frederick Douglass Republican®, I care more about truth than political teams. I care more about principles than personalities. Frederick Douglass stood for truth, justice, personal responsibility, and liberty. Those values still matter today.
What Really Happened with Hillary's Emails?
While serving as U.S. Secretary of State, Clinton used a private email server instead of a secure government system. That wasn't just wrong - many believe it was downright illegal. Some of those emails contained classified information that never should've been sent on an unprotected network.
If an everyday government worker had done that, they would likely be in prison. Not Clinton. The FBI admitted she was "extremely careless," but chose not to charge her. It sent a message loud and clear: there are two sets of rules - one for the powerful, and one for the rest of us.
Instead of being held accountable, Hillary was protected. The investigation - led by James Comey - was carefully managed to protect her from criminal charges. The legal term "gross negligence" was quietly swapped for "extremely careless" to avoid prosecution.
The media? Silent. They helped cover it up. Reporters stopped asking tough questions. They pushed a different story instead. The press became a shield, not a spotlight.
Obama's Role: Not So Innocent
Obama claimed he didn't know about Clinton's secret server. That wasn't true - he emailed her using it. Under a fake name. That means he did know and did nothing to stop it.
Declassified documents now prove it: Obama's team was briefed in 2016 that Hillary's campaign planned to tie Trump to Russian hackers to take attention off her email issues.
The Russia Hoax: A Smokescreen for Corruption
When the truth about Hillary's emails became public, her campaign came up with a plan to distract the nation. So they pushed a false story that Trump was working with Russia.
It worked. The media jumped all over it. The FBI opened investigations. For years, Americans were fed a lie. This wasn't just dirty politics - it was abuse of power. It cost taxpayers millions of dollars, divided Americans, and weakened our trust in key institutions. Many people forgot about Clinton's server.
Let that sink in.
The entire "Russian collusion" story - planted by a political campaign, funneled through the FBI, and echoed by the media - wasn't based on facts. It was a calculated political hit job. Weaponizing government agencies and the media to target political opponents is high-level corruption, plain and simple.
The Constitution Protects Us - If We Defend It
This is why the U.S. Constitution matters so much. It was written to protect the people from a government that becomes too powerful, dishonest or corrupt. It only works when we hold those leaders accountable. Douglass called the Constitution "a glorious liberty document" because he knew that justice, truth, and limited government power are the foundation of freedom.
Our freedom isn't under attack by Russia - it's being threatened by our own leaders.
Clinton's email problems and the fake Russia hoax remind us of a hard truth: When the powerful break the law and walk free, liberty isn't just at risk - it's being dismantled.
We Need Truth-Tellers - Not Power-Hungry Politicians
Karl Marx believed the government should control more of people's lives. Douglass believed people should control their own - free to grow and take full responsibility for their future.
Freedom isn't protected by powerful politicians in Washington. It's protected by everyday Americans who choose truth over lies and right over wrong. If we want to save our country, we need more courage in our homes, churches, and communities - and we must hold crooked politicians accountable. That means real justice, not special treatment. That's how we bring America back.
What You Can Do
Stop cheering for political teams. Start standing for truth.
Too many Americans treat politics like a sports game - loyal to their side no matter what. Even when their "team" lies, cheats, or abuses power, they stay silent. This isn't a game. Blind loyalty is not patriotism - it's moral failure.
Truth isn't red or blue. It's right or wrong.
It's time we stop defending politicians based on party labels. Wrong is wrong - whether it comes from the left or the right. When we care more about defending our side than defending justice, we become part of the problem.
Demand equal justice - no matter who's in power.
In a free country, the law must apply to everyone. No exceptions. No special treatment. When politicians break the rules and walk free while everyday people face punishment for less, the system becomes a lie. Frederick Douglass understood this. He believed no one - not presidents, not party leaders - should ever be above the law.
Teach your children what real leadership looks like.
We don't need more kids growing up worshipping celebrities or influencers. We need a generation that values character, honesty, hard work, and faith. Let's raise young people who tell the truth, stand up for what's right, and defend freedom.
The future of our country doesn't depend on a party - it depends on our principles.
The Russia hoax was a calculated weapon used to protect the powerful and mislead the American people. We stand at a crossroads: either accept the lie in silence, or stand boldly to demand the truth and hold every lawbreaker accountable - including Clinton. Our future depends on justice and the courage to root out corruption wherever it hides.
It's time to choose truth over tyranny.
To contact KCarl or request a speaking engagement, go to www.kcarlinc.com.
The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the policy or position of 1819 News. To comment, please send an email with your name and contact information to [email protected].
Don't miss out! Subscribe to our newsletter and get our top stories every weekday morning.
Sign Our PetitionThe discourse surrounding the 2016 election and its aftermath remains fraught with contention, particularly as it pertains to the actions of political elites and their accountability. The article by KCarl Smith raises several points concerning Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server, the investigations that followed, and the alleged collusion narrative surrounding Donald Trump, framing them as examples of elitist hypocrisy and systemic corruption. However, to fully understand the implications of these claims, it is necessary to delve into the historical context surrounding political accountability and the long-standing struggles for transparency and justice in the American political system.
Historically, the United States has been marred by instances where those in positions of power have evaded accountability for actions that would typically lead to severe repercussions for ordinary citizens. This phenomenon is not new; it echoes through the annals of American history, from the Watergate scandal involving President Nixon to the financial crisis of 2008, where executives of major banks received bonuses while the public bore the brunt of the economic collapse. In each case, the disparity in accountability between the powerful and the average citizen raises critical questions about the integrity of our institutions. The insistence that “there are two sets of rules” within the article serves as a poignant reminder of this reality, highlighting a pervasive belief among many that the political elite operate above the law, shielding themselves from scrutiny while ordinary people face harsh punitive measures for similar conduct.
The claims regarding Clinton’s emails and the subsequent investigations reveal a broader narrative of how political narratives can be manufactured and manipulated. While it is essential to scrutinize the actions of public officials, it is equally vital to understand that the political landscape is often shaped by competing interests and the need for narratives that serve those interests. The article contends that the narrative framing Clinton's email use and the Russia investigation was a strategic distraction, yet it is crucial to examine who benefits from such distractions. The framing of one political figure as a villain can often serve to obscure systemic issues—such as economic inequality, racial injustice, and the erosion of civil liberties—that affect a vast majority of Americans.
Moreover, the invocation of Frederick Douglass as a political touchstone by the author raises questions about how historical figures are co-opted in contemporary political discourse. Douglass, a former enslaved person who became a leading voice for abolition and civil rights, championed the cause of justice and equality. To align oneself with Douglass is to embrace a commitment to truth and justice for all, yet such alignment becomes problematic when it is used to deflect from systemic injustices. The struggles for racial and social equity that Douglass fought for continue today, as marginalized communities face ongoing discrimination and disenfranchisement. The focus on individual accountability, while essential, must not overshadow the collective systemic reforms necessary to achieve true justice.
The article also posits that the media played a significant role in perpetuating a false narrative, suggesting a complicity that undermines the foundational role of a free press in democracy. While there is indeed a valid concern regarding sensationalism and bias in media coverage, it is critical to recognize the broader context of media consolidation and the political economy of news. Many media outlets operate under corporate interests that often prioritize profitability over public service, leading to coverage that may reflect elite narratives rather than the diverse realities of American life. The role of independent journalism in holding power accountable is more crucial than ever, particularly in an age where misinformation can spread rapidly across digital platforms.
Finally, the discourse surrounding these issues provides an opportunity for deeper engagement with the ongoing social struggles in America. The focus on accountability, transparency, and systemic reform must extend beyond partisan lines to encompass the voices of those historically marginalized and oppressed. As discussions about political ethics and accountability evolve, they must also address the structural inequalities that underpin our political and economic systems. Engaging with these critical conversations can further empower individuals to advocate for justice and equity, fostering a political landscape that prioritizes the needs of the many over the interests of the few. As history has shown, the fight for accountability and justice is not just about individual figures but about the collective will to reshape the institutions that govern our lives.
The article in question raises serious concerns about accountability, integrity, and the role of both government and media in shaping political narratives. It presents a perspective that critiques the actions of prominent political figures, namely Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, while pointing to a broader issue: the perceived discrepancy in how justice is applied based on status. This commentary will explore these themes, delve into the historical context, and suggest how individuals can engage in meaningful conversations that challenge harmful narratives.
At the heart of the article is the assertion that powerful individuals often escape accountability for their actions, a phenomenon that has deep historical roots in American politics. The issue of accountability is not new; it dates back to the earliest days of the Republic when elites were often shielded from the consequences of their actions. This historical pattern raises a critical question: how can ordinary citizens demand justice when systems seem rigged in favor of the powerful? Engaging in this conversation helps to illuminate the complexities of our political landscape and invites others to reflect on their values.
Furthermore, the article suggests a coordinated effort to manipulate media narratives for political gain. This claim, while controversial, underscores the vital role of the media as a watchdog in a democracy. However, when the media fails to ask tough questions or holds the powerful accountable, it undermines public trust in these institutions. This is particularly relevant in our current era, where misinformation spreads rapidly through social media and traditional outlets alike. Encouraging a culture of critical media consumption is essential; citizens should be empowered to question the narratives presented to them, seek diverse perspectives, and hold media outlets accountable for their reporting practices.
In addressing the claims made about the Russia investigation and its implications for political discourse, it’s imperative to recognize the broader context of political polarization in the United States. The idea that one political party employs tactics deemed unscrupulous by the other is a recurring theme in our history. The responsibility falls on all citizens to promote dialogue that is rooted in facts rather than fear, narrative, or party allegiance. By framing discussions around shared values—such as justice, integrity, and accountability—individuals can foster a more constructive political environment.
Moreover, the article's discussion about the manipulation of public perception through strategic messaging is a reminder of the power of grassroots organization. As citizens, we can take action by mobilizing our communities to demand transparency and accountability from our elected officials, regardless of party affiliation. This might include participating in town hall meetings, advocating for campaign finance reform to address the influence of money in politics, or supporting independent journalism that prioritizes facts over sensationalism. These actions can help restore faith in democratic institutions and encourage a more informed electorate.
In conclusion, the themes articulated in the article invite us to grapple with critical issues of accountability, media integrity, and the manipulation of political narratives. By fostering open discussions that challenge entrenched narratives and by advocating for systemic changes in our political and media landscapes, we can push for a more equitable society. It is essential for Americans to recognize their role in demanding accountability from those in power and to engage in thoughtful dialogue that transcends partisan divides, ultimately aiming for a more just and transparent political system.
In response to the issues raised in the article regarding accountability and the intersection of politics and media, there are several proactive steps we can take as engaged citizens. The aim is to advocate for transparency, accountability, and equitable treatment under the law, as well as to promote integrity in media reporting. Here’s a detailed list of actions to consider:
### Personal Actions We Can Take
1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - Engage in discussions about the importance of accountability for public officials. Share articles, research, and resources that highlight issues of inequality in legal repercussions and media coverage.
2. **Support Media Literacy Programs** - Advocate for and participate in media literacy initiatives in your community to help others critically assess news sources and narratives. This can help prevent misinformation from spreading.
3. **Promote Transparency in Government** - Join or form local advocacy groups focused on government accountability and transparency, ensuring that public officials are held responsible for their actions.
### Exact Actions We Can Personally Take
1. **Petition for Accountability** - **Create or Sign Petitions**: Use platforms like Change.org to create or sign petitions calling for investigations into the actions of public officials and the media’s role in political narratives. - Example Petition: "Demand Accountability for Public Officials" on Change.org.
2. **Contact Your Representatives** - **Write to your Congressional Representatives**: Express your concerns about the necessity for equal treatment under the law for all individuals, regardless of political status. - Find your representatives' contact information at [House.gov](https://www.house.gov/) or [Senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov/). - Sample Message: ``` Subject: Demand for Accountability and Transparency Dear [Representative/Senator's Name], I am writing to express my concern about the apparent lack of accountability for public officials regarding the handling of classified information and the influence of political narratives in the media. It is crucial that we uphold the principle of justice for all, ensuring that no one is above the law. I urge you to advocate for investigations into these matters and support legislation that prioritizes transparency and accountability in government. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] ```
3. **Engage with Local Media** - **Write to Local Newspapers**: Share your perspective on media responsibility and accountability through letters to the editor. - Example: Submit to your local paper, addressing the need for journalistic integrity and the importance of challenging narratives that may obscure accountability.
4. **Organize Community Forums** - Host or attend community discussions to inform and engage others about the importance of accountability in both government and media. This could include inviting guest speakers, such as local activists or educators.
5. **Support Advocacy Organizations** - Contribute to or volunteer with organizations that focus on government accountability and media integrity. Examples include: - **Common Cause**: Advocating for accountability in government. - **Media Matters for America**: Tracking conservative misinformation in media. - **American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)**: Engaging in issues related to civil rights and legal accountability.
### Who to Write to
- **Local and State Representatives**: Find contact information through your state's legislative website. - **Key Organizations**: Consider contacting organizations that align with your values such as: - Common Cause - Email: info@commoncause.org - Address: 1133 19th St NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20036 - ACLU - Email: info@aclu.org - Address: 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10004
By taking these concrete steps, we can advocate for a political environment that values accountability and integrity, ensuring that our democratic institutions function equitably for all citizens.