Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

India's rivals China, Turkey seek cheaper Urals, capping oil price rise

business-standard.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 2:58:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–China Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations
India's rivals China, Turkey seek cheaper Urals, capping oil price rise

Trump did not offer a clear stance on doing away with secondary tariffs after his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday but suggested he will not impose similar tariffs on China for the next 2-3 weeks.

China and Turkey are boosting purchases of discounted Russian oil, offered at better rates to them for deliveries in September, October and November. This comes after Trump cut off India's access to the crude by the end of the month, industry officials said, and market data showed.

China has increased purchases of Russian Urals crude oil sixfold compared to the first half of this year while India has had to reduce it to nil after Trump slapped secondary tariffs of 25 per cent from August 27 on most Indian exports as penalty for using Russian oil, according to industry data.

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The geopolitical landscape surrounding oil trade has been heavily influenced by shifting alliances and economic sanctions, particularly in the recent tensions between the United States and countries such as Russia. The recent article highlights how India, once a significant player in the purchase of Russian Urals crude, has been sidelined due to U.S. sanctions while rivals like China and Turkey seize the opportunity to purchase discounted oil. This situation is not merely a matter of economics; it is emblematic of broader issues related to imperialism, international relations, and the ongoing struggle for energy sovereignty.

Historically, the control of natural resources has often been a driving force behind foreign policy decisions and military interventions. The U.S.'s unilateral imposition of secondary tariffs on Indian oil imports exemplifies a contemporary form of economic imperialism where the U.S. uses its vast economic influence to dictate the terms of trade to other nations. This method of exerting control is reminiscent of earlier colonial practices, where powerful nations dictated the economic fortunes of less powerful countries, often to the detriment of local populations. The ramifications extend beyond just trade; they affect energy security, economic stability, and even social justice in nations like India, where access to affordable energy resources is crucial for economic development.

The response of China and Turkey to the U.S.'s actions underscores a significant shift in global power dynamics. By increasing their purchases of Russian oil, these nations are not only securing their energy needs but also challenging the hegemonic influence of the United States in global markets. This pivot illustrates a critical aspect of contemporary geopolitics: the emergence of multi-polarity where various nations seek to assert their sovereignty against a backdrop of U.S. dominance. For many left-leaning activists and scholars, this is a moment to reflect on the importance of solidarity among nations that are resisting economic coercion, and to advocate for policies that prioritize equitable global trade relations rather than punitive tariffs that exacerbate inequality.

Moreover, this situation invites reflection on the environmental implications of fossil fuel dependence. As countries scramble for cheaper oil, often from less scrupulous sources, the pressing issue of climate change is overshadowed. The left has long advocated for a transition to renewable energy sources, emphasizing the need for sustainability and environmental justice. The focus on fossil fuels, especially in the context of discounted Russian oil, distracts from the urgent necessity of investing in green technologies and innovations that can foster a sustainable future. This dialogue is imperative as the world grapples with the impending climate crisis, which disproportionately affects marginalized communities worldwide.

In summary, the intricacies surrounding the trade of Russian Urals crude oil highlight significant issues related to international relations, economic sovereignty, and environmental justice. The U.S.'s imposition of secondary tariffs against India is not an isolated economic action but rather a manifestation of a broader trend of economic imperialism. This moment serves as a critical juncture for leftist movements to advocate for fair trade, solidarity among nations resisting coercive tactics, and a commitment to sustainable energy solutions. Engaging in these discussions not only provides ammunition for political debate but also encourages a more equitable and just global economic order that prioritizes human rights and environmental sustainability over short-term profits and geopolitical maneuvering.

Action:

The current geopolitical landscape concerning oil trade underscores the complexities of global economic interdependence and the often contradictory positions taken by influential powers. The recent developments involving India, China, Turkey, and the United States reveal not only the intricacies of international relations but also the economic leverage wielded by nations in pursuit of their interests. The imposition of secondary tariffs by the former administration on India for its purchase of discounted Russian oil is a prime example of how economic policy can serve as a tool of foreign policy, but it raises pressing questions about the consequences of such actions for global stability and equity.

Historically, the manipulation of oil supply and pricing has been a means through which countries exert influence and secure their respective interests. The U.S. has long viewed its control over oil markets as a critical leverage point in its foreign policy arsenal, often employing sanctions and tariffs to assert dominance. However, the recent move to restrict India's access to Russian oil while allowing other countries to benefit from discounted rates illustrates a selective application of economic power that favors certain nations over others. This inconsistency raises concerns about the fairness of U.S. foreign policy and its implications for countries like India, which find themselves caught between major powers.

As citizens of a globalized economy, Americans should reflect on the broader implications of these actions. The historical precedent of using economic sanctions as a means of exerting political control often results in unintended consequences, such as the strengthening of rival alliances. The burgeoning relationship between China and Turkey in acquiring discounted Russian oil can be seen as a strategic response to U.S. aggression, potentially leading to a new axis of power that undermines American hegemony. It is essential for Americans to recognize that such dynamics not only disrupt global trade but also affect domestic markets, leading to potential increases in energy costs and economic uncertainty.

In light of these developments, there are several actions that concerned citizens can take to advocate for a more equitable approach to foreign policy. First, engaging in grassroots activism to demand transparency in government decision-making regarding trade and tariffs can help illuminate the potential consequences of such policies. Additionally, supporting candidates and organizations that prioritize diplomatic engagement over economic coercion can lead to a shift in how the U.S. interacts with other nations. By fostering dialogue and cooperation, rather than division and penalties, Americans can contribute to a more stable and just international environment.

Moreover, educating ourselves and others about the historical context of U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding oil, can provide critical insight into the motivations behind these decisions. Understanding the relationship between economic sanctions and geopolitical strategies can empower citizens to question and challenge the status quo. By framing discussions around fairness, equity, and cooperative engagement, we can foster a more nuanced dialogue with those who may hold opposing views. In doing so, we not only advocate for more sound policies but also challenge the narrative that economic coercion is a viable or ethical means of achieving foreign policy goals. Ultimately, it is imperative that we approach these conversations with a commitment to justice and mutual benefit, rather than mere dominance.

To Do:

The article highlights significant geopolitical dynamics involving oil trade, tariffs, and the impact on countries like India. Here are thoughts on how to respond to these developments personally and collectively:

### What We Can Personally Do

1. **Educate Ourselves and Others**: - Stay informed about international trade policies and their implications on global relationships and economies. Share articles and insights through social media platforms or community forums.

2. **Engage in Dialogue**: - Discuss these issues with friends, family, and community members to raise awareness about the impacts of tariffs and oil dependency on global politics and local economies.

3. **Support Fair Trade Initiatives**: - Seek out and support companies and products that prioritize ethical sourcing and fair trade practices, which often promote better economic relationships and sustainability.

### Exact Actions We Can Take

1. **Petition for Responsible Trade Policies**: - **Sign Petitions**: Platforms like Change.org and Care2 often have petitions related to trade and foreign policy. A search for “fair trade policies” or “tariff reform” can yield specific actions to support. - Example Petition: Search for petitions related to the impact of tariffs on specific communities or industries affected by recent trade decisions.

2. **Contact Elected Representatives**: - Write to your congressional representatives to express your concerns about trade policies and their impacts on international relations, especially with countries like India. - **Example Contacts**: - **Your Representative**: Use [House.gov](https://www.house.gov/) to find your representative’s contact information. - **Senate Contacts**: Use [Senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov/) for your senators.

**What to Say**: - Express your support for fair trade practices and the need to reconsider tariffs that disproportionately affect specific countries or economies. - Example Message: ``` Dear [Representative's Name],

I am writing to express my concern regarding the recent tariffs imposed on Indian exports and their implications for international relations and global oil markets. It is crucial that we pursue fair trade policies that foster cooperation rather than division. I urge you to advocate for a reassessment of these tariffs and to consider the broad impacts they have on our global standing and economic partnerships.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Contact Information] ```

3. **Support Local and Global Advocacy Groups**: - Donate or volunteer with organizations that focus on fair trade, economic justice, or international diplomacy. Groups like the Fair Trade Federation or Oxfam work on issues that align with these concerns.

4. **Participate in Local Activism**: - Join community groups or forums that discuss economic justice and trade policies. Participating in rallies, town halls, or discussions can amplify your voice on these issues.

5. **Utilize Social Media for Advocacy**: - Leverage platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to raise awareness about the implications of tariffs and trade policies. Use hashtags related to trade, justice, and economic policies to connect with broader movements.

### Real-World Examples

- **Petition Examples**: - Search for petitions like those on **Change.org** that focus on trade policies, tariffs, or international relations.

- **Writing to Elected Officials**: - **Example Address**: - The Honorable [Representative's Name] [Your Representative's Office Address] [City, State, ZIP] By taking these actions, we can contribute to a more informed electorate and advocate for policies that promote fairness and cooperation in the global economy.


Sign Our Petition



3 Related Article(s):

Modi's Meet With Xi, Putin And Trump Will Determine India's Geo-Politics

Alaskan encounter: Only Russian President Putin gained from the meeting

Market Reactions Ahead of Key Fed Policy Week | Headlines


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com