Donald Trump is 'not a force for good' London Mayor says
shropshirestar.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 2:59:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Uncategorized

By contributor Katrine Bussey, PA Scotland political editor
London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan has said he would be "more than happy" to meet Donald Trump - despite warning that the US President could be "inadvertently radicalising people" and is "not a force for good".
Sir Sadiq dismissed jibes that President Trump made against him on a recent visit to Scotland, where he claimed the London Mayor was "a nasty person" who has "done a terrible job".
The Labour politician said remarks such as those were "water off a duck's back".
However, he told an event at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe it sometimes felt like he was "nine years old again" and "in the school playground".
But Sir Sadiq, speaking at the Political Party show with comedian Matt Forde, hit back at the US President, saying: "Somebody who has views like he does about black people, about women, about gays, about Muslims, about Mexicans, thinks I'm nasty.
"Really. He is the leader of the free world, arguably the most powerful man in the world, and really."
He spoke out as he said that records showed since the middle of January this year - when Mr Trump began his second term in the White House - and July "there have never been more Americans applying to British citizenship and living in London".
The Mayor said: "So I think Americans have got good taste by and large."
He added that he hoped the President would come to London during his state visit to the UK next month, with Sir Sadiq stressing the "diversity" of the capital was a "strength, not a weakness".
Speaking about this diversity, he insisted: "I think it makes us stronger not weaker, richer not poorer.
"And when President Trump says some of the things he does, it brings from the periphery to the mainstream, views that are potentially dangerous.
"He inadvertently - I'm not going to suggest he does it deliberately - he inadvertently could be radicalising people with views that could lead to them doing things that are dangerous."
He spoke out about fears that minorities "could be treated less favourably because of the views of the President of the USA" as he accused Mr Trump of "using London and our diversity as a political football, as a proxy for a culture war".
The London Mayor continued: "On a personal level, it is water off a duck's back, but we can't run away from the fact that there are some really serious challenges we face as a western society and President Trump, in my view, I speak generally, isn't a force for good."
However he insisted that he would be "more than happy to meet President Trump" saying he would seek to show him that it is "possible to be proud to be a westerner and a proud to be Muslim, that it is possible to be British, and proud to be British, and be of Pakistani origin and be a law abiding citizen and we aren't three headed monsters".
The Labour politician said: "I suspect President Trump may have formed a view of Muslims because of the actions of a small minority of really bad people who are terrorists and use Islam in a perverted way.
"What I would want President Trump to know is that is a very small fraction of Muslims across the globe.
"So if there was an opportunity to meet President Trump, I would be more than happy to do so."
Sign Our PetitionThe comments made by London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan regarding Donald Trump resonate deeply within the broader context of contemporary political discourse, particularly as it pertains to issues of identity, diversity, and the consequences of leadership rhetoric. Khan’s assertion that Trump is “not a force for good” reflects a growing awareness of the dangers posed by populist leaders who exploit societal divisions for political gain. Historically, this phenomenon is not new; it echoes the rise of authoritarian figures who have, time and again, used xenophobia and bigotry as tools to consolidate power. Such leaders often thrive in environments where fear and division are prevalent, signaling a need for vigilance in our political engagement.
Khan’s remarks highlight a critical issue in contemporary politics: the radicalization of societal views through the normalization of hate speech and discriminatory rhetoric. Trump’s presidency has been marked by a series of statements and policies that marginalize various groups, including racial minorities, women, and immigrants. This marginalization can lead to an increase in hate crimes and the ‘othering’ of communities that have long been part of the social fabric. Khan’s concern that Trump may be inadvertently radicalizing individuals points to the broader societal consequences of such rhetoric, which can embolden extremist views and actions. The historical context is essential here—authoritarian regimes often rise when societal norms shift away from inclusivity and understanding toward division and hostility.
Furthermore, Khan’s emphasis on the diversity of London as a strength is a powerful counter-narrative to Trump’s often reductionist view of national identity. The Mayor's assertion that diversity enriches society challenges the very foundation of nativist and exclusionary ideologies. Historically, cities like London have thrived on their multiculturalism, contributing to their economic, social, and cultural vibrancy. This perspective is crucial in discussions with those who might espouse a more homogenous view of national identity, as it illustrates that diversity is not a liability but an asset that drives innovation and cohesion. The idea that one can be both British and of Pakistani origin, as Khan eloquently states, undermines the simplistic and damaging binaries often perpetuated by populist rhetoric.
Khan’s willingness to engage with Trump, despite their stark differences, serves as a reminder that dialogue remains vital in a polarized political landscape. His intention to show Trump that being proud of one’s heritage does not conflict with national pride is a challenge to the notion that one must choose between identity and belonging. This perspective becomes especially relevant when discussing issues of immigration and integration, where narratives of ‘us versus them’ often dominate. Engaging in conversations that promote understanding and bridge cultural divides is essential, especially as contemporary politics becomes increasingly fraught with antagonism.
Finally, the underlying message from Khan’s comments is a call to action for progressive movements around the globe. It emphasizes the importance of standing up against divisive rhetoric while also advocating for a society that embraces diversity, equity, and justice. As we navigate these complex and often turbulent political waters, it is imperative to remember the historical struggles for civil rights and social justice that have shaped our current landscape. The fight against bigotry and for inclusivity is ongoing, and it is fueled by individuals like Khan who refuse to be silenced in the face of adversity. The responsibility lies on all of us to actively participate in this discourse, ensuring that we challenge harmful narratives and advocate for a more just and equitable society.
In the current political climate, the words of London Mayor Sadiq Khan hold significant weight. His characterization of President Donald Trump as “not a force for good” serves not merely as a personal opinion but as a critique of the broader implications of Trump's rhetoric and policies. Khan’s remarks resonate deeply considering the historical context of political discourse in the United States, where leaders have a moral obligation to unite rather than divide. Trump's presidency has been marked by a worrying normalization of xenophobia, racism, and misogyny that echoes historical patterns of populism that have often led to violence and division. In this light, Khan's warning about the potential radicalization of individuals through Trump's rhetoric is not just alarmist; it is a necessary caution that should be heeded by all who value democratic ideals.
The historical relationship between the U.S. and the U.K. has often been framed by shared values, yet Trump's tenure has tested these bonds. Khan's comments reflect a growing concern that the United States' political direction under Trump may embolden extremist ideologies and foster division rather than inclusivity. This concern is not unfounded, as political leaders have often played crucial roles in shaping societal norms and attitudes. By dismissing diversity as a strength, Khan counters Trump's divisive narratives and challenges his supporters to reevaluate what it means to be part of a global community. This approach aligns with historical movements that have championed civil rights and social justice, underscoring the importance of embracing diversity rather than weaponizing it.
As U.S. citizens, we must recognize the implications of Trump's divisive rhetoric and actively engage in counter-narratives. One of the most effective actions we can take is to foster conversations that emphasize the value of diversity and the strength that comes from multiculturalism. Engaging in community dialogues, supporting inclusive policies, and advocating for educational programs that promote understanding and acceptance are crucial steps. By sharing personal stories and experiences that highlight the benefits of diversity, we can dismantle the misconceptions that often accompany fear of the "other." These grassroots efforts can serve as powerful counterweights to the populist sentiments that thrive on division.
Moreover, it is essential for citizens to hold their elected officials accountable. This can be done by supporting legislation that protects minority rights and by voting for candidates who prioritize inclusivity and social justice. Khan's call for a meeting with Trump, framed as an opportunity to educate rather than confront, underscores the importance of dialogue. However, it is equally vital for Americans to engage with local representatives and push for policies that reflect a commitment to diversity and inclusion. This involves not only advocating for meaningful immigration reform but also supporting initiatives that uplift marginalized communities, ensuring that the voices of all citizens are heard and valued.
Finally, we must leverage the power of social media and other platforms to amplify messages of unity and diversity. Sharing articles, infographics, and personal testimonies can create a ripple effect that counters divisive narratives. It is through collective action and the use of our voices that we can challenge the prevailing discourse. Khan’s assertion that “Americans have got good taste by and large” is a reminder that there is a significant portion of the population that values inclusivity. By organizing, educating, and advocating, we can contribute to a more just and equitable society that stands firmly against the forces of division. This is not just the responsibility of a few; it is a collective obligation to ensure that the future we build reflects the values we espouse.
In response to the comments made by London Mayor Sadiq Khan regarding President Trump, there are several actionable steps individuals can take to advocate for inclusion, diversity, and fairness in society. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions to consider:
### 1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - **Action:** Host or attend community workshops or discussion groups focusing on social justice, diversity, and inclusion. - **Example:** Organize a local event through platforms like Meetup or Eventbrite to discuss the implications of political rhetoric on marginalized communities.
### 2. **Support Organizations That Promote Diversity** - **Action:** Donate to or volunteer with organizations that advocate for minority rights and social justice. - **Examples:** - **ACLU** (American Civil Liberties Union): https://www.aclu.org/ - **Human Rights Campaign**: https://www.hrc.org/ - **Contact:** - ACLU National Office, 125 Broad St, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10004 - HRC, 1640 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036
### 3. **Engage with Local Representatives** - **Action:** Write to your local representatives expressing your views on the dangers of divisive rhetoric and the importance of diversity. - **Who to Write To:** - Your Congressional Representative (find contact info here: https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative) - **What to Say:** Emphasize the need for inclusive policies and the positive impact of diversity on society. Share personal stories or data that highlight these points.
### 4. **Sign and Share Petitions** - **Action:** Sign and circulate petitions that call for action against divisive statements and policies. - **Examples:** - **Change.org petitions** focusing on diversity and inclusion. For example, you can create or support petitions that call for diverse representation in government or condemn hate speech. - **How to Share:** Use social media platforms or community boards to spread the word.
### 5. **Attend Local Government Meetings** - **Action:** Participate in city council meetings or town halls where issues of diversity and inclusion are discussed. - **What to Bring:** A written statement or points you want to address regarding the impact of divisive rhetoric on community well-being.
### 6. **Utilize Social Media for Advocacy** - **Action:** Use platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook to amplify messages of inclusion and challenge harmful narratives. - **Examples of Hashtags:** - #DiversityIsStrength - #StandAgainstHate - **What to Post:** Share articles, personal stories, and resources that highlight the importance of diversity and the dangers of divisive rhetoric.
### 7. **Engage in Peaceful Protests or Rallies** - **Action:** Join local protests or rallies that advocate for social justice and against discrimination. - **How to Find Events:** Check local community boards, social media events, or organizations like the NAACP or local chapters of larger movements.
### 8. **Encourage Conversations in Your Community** - **Action:** Start dialogues with friends, family, and coworkers about the importance of accepting and celebrating diversity. - **Example:** Organize a book club that focuses on literature from diverse authors or that addresses themes of social justice.
### 9. **Support Local Businesses Owned by Minorities** - **Action:** Make a conscious effort to patronize businesses owned by individuals from marginalized communities. - **What to Look For:** Local directories or apps that feature minority-owned businesses.
### 10. **Write Opinion Pieces** - **Action:** Submit opinion pieces to local newspapers or online platforms discussing the societal impact of divisive rhetoric. - **What to Include:** Personal anecdotes, data, and a call to action for the community to embrace diversity.
### Conclusion By taking these actions, individuals can actively contribute to a more inclusive society and counter the negative effects of divisive rhetoric. Whether through education, advocacy, or community engagement, every effort counts in promoting diversity and unity.