How Trump and Zelensky's relationship has evolved since remarkable Oval Office shouting match in February | News Channel 3-12
keyt.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 8:26:24 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, Presidential Campaigns
By Kit Maher, Kevin Liptak, CNN
(CNN) -- The last time Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was inside the Oval Office, he was berated by his US hosts, denied a planned luncheon and abruptly asked to leave the West Wing.
"He can come back when he is ready for peace," President Donald Trump said after the meeting fell apart.
Six months later, Zelensky is returning to the White House on Monday to learn more details of Trump's Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin -- and to learn what, exactly, the US president envisions peace looking like in Ukraine.
During the meeting in February, Trump told Zelensky: "You don't have the cards."
After Trump's summit with Putin in Alaska, it remained unclear how the deck had been reshuffled.
Initial indications have not been received particularly well, either by the Ukrainians or by European officials briefed on the contents of the nearly three-hour summit in Anchorage. Trump said afterward he was abandoning his hope for an immediate ceasefire, pushing instead for a full peace agreement without first insisting Russia's bombardments end.
That is the opposite stance of European leaders and Zelensky, who say Ukraine cannot be made to negotiate its future while under constant attack from Moscow.
So, too, has Trump seemed receptive to Putin's plan for major land concessions by the Ukrainians as a condition for ending the war. Trump told European officials on the phone as he was arriving back in Washington that Putin had not abandoned his demand for the entire eastern Donbas region, suggesting the war could be resolved quickly if Zelensky agreed to give it up.
Trump's openness to US security guarantees for Ukraine once the war ends has given some European officials hope, but the specifics of what he's willing to provide remain unknown.
It all will make for consequential discussions inside the Oval Office on Monday, as Trump presses for an end to a conflict he once promised to resolve within a day of taking office.
Since the fracas in February, Trump and Zelensky have gone a long way toward repairing their relationship. European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, have provided Zelensky pointers in how to approach Trump, suggesting a less combative attitude and more overt demonstrations of gratitude for US support.
Zelensky was sure to note his gratitude for the invitation to Washington, writing Saturday on X, "On Monday, I will meet with President Trump in Washington, D.C., to discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war. I am grateful for the invitation."
European leaders have also been invited to Trump's meeting with Zelensky, a White House official told CNN. It's unclear which leaders are scheduled to attend, but it could be a show of unity toward Zelensky, who has the backing of Europe.
Officials in Europe said they were working to include Finnish President Alexander Stubb, who has bonded with Trump over golf, in the talks. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte could also travel to Washington for the meeting, one official said.
The optics of an Oval Office invitation just days after the summit with Putin in Alaska are significant. While Putin was treated to a showy display of welcome in Anchorage, he was not pictured alongside the US president in the Oval Office -- a room he hasn't been in since 2005.
Trump clapped when Putin walked down the tarmac and joined the US president inside his armored limo -- a rare sight for any foreign leader, let alone an adversary. Trump described the talks as "warm," and the imagery from the day underscored Putin's return to the diplomatic fold after being frozen out following his invasion of Ukraine.
Still, he was also greeted by a show of force: a B-2 bomber flyover and four F-22 Raptors parked alongside Air Force One, the same planes used to intercept Russian aircraft when they intrude in American airspace.
Monday will be Zelensky's first time returning to the Oval Office since Trump said he was "gambling with World War III" and Vice President JD Vance accused the Ukrainian leader of a lack of gratitude, asking him, "Have you said thank you once?" A source familiar said Vance will also attend Monday's meeting.
But Trump and Zelensky have met face-to-face twice since then, and their relationship has greatly improved.
In April, Trump met briefly with Zelensky in the Vatican before Pope Francis' funeral and in June on the sidelines of the NATO summit in the Netherlands.
"You know we had some rough times," Trump said after his meeting with Zelensky at NATO. "He couldn't have been nicer."
"I took from the meeting that he'd like to see it end," Trump added.
The Vatican meeting was an intimate one, with Zelensky and Trump huddled closely across from each other in St. Peter's Basilica underneath a massive painting of Jesus' baptism.
"I believe that we had the best conversation with President Trump of all those that have taken place before," Zelensky told reporters after the meeting.
After the meeting, Trump threatened potential new sanctions on Russia and questioned whether Putin was serious about peace or "tapping" him along.
But several months later, he has stopped short of applying the new sanctions, and many Western officials believe Putin is still stringing along the president as he plays for time to accomplish his war aims.
In May, after Putin blew off an opportunity to meet with Zelensky in Istanbul, sending a lower-level delegation instead, Trump told reporters, "Look, nothing's going to happen until Putin and I get together, OK?"
Trump has cleared that hurdle, but achieving a lasting peace remains elusive.
The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2025 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Sign Our PetitionThe evolving relationship between former President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky presents a compelling case study in the intersection of geopolitics, historical precedent, and the ongoing struggle for sovereignty and self-determination. The recent developments concerning their meetings, particularly after the tumultuous Oval Office encounter in February, offer insights not only into the dynamics of international relations but also into the broader implications of U.S. foreign policy on global stability. As the world watches, it is important to reflect on how these interactions resonate with historical contexts and contemporary social movements, particularly those advocating for democratic integrity and national sovereignty.
Historically, the U.S. has often positioned itself as a champion of democracy, selectively intervening in foreign affairs to support nations under threat. However, the Trump administration's approach to Ukraine starkly contrasts with this narrative. In February, Trump’s dismissal of Zelensky and his apparent alignment with Russian President Vladimir Putin signified a troubling departure from established U.S. foreign policy norms. It is essential to recognize that this behavior is not merely a reflection of Trump's idiosyncrasies but part of a broader trend of prioritizing transactional relationships over principled alliances. This shift undermines the very foundations of democratic values that the U.S. professes to uphold and raises critical questions about the integrity of its support for nations like Ukraine, which are grappling with the ramifications of Russian aggression.
The current dynamics of Trump's relationship with Zelensky also highlight the precariousness of Ukrainian sovereignty in the face of external pressures. The insistence by Trump on negotiating peace without preconditions, particularly while Russian forces continue their bombardments, threatens to place the burden of compromise squarely on Ukraine. European leaders, who have historically been invested in Ukraine's stability, seem to recognize the potential dangers of such negotiations. The calls for Zelensky to adopt a more conciliatory tone towards Trump are indicative of a larger pattern in international diplomacy, where the voices of those directly affected by conflict are often sidelined in favor of power dynamics that favor stronger nations. This reality echoes the sentiments of various social justice movements that argue for the inclusion of marginalized voices in decision-making processes, reminding us that true peace cannot be achieved at the expense of sovereign rights.
Furthermore, the role of European leaders in advising Zelensky on his approach to Trump underscores the collaborative nature of international politics, but it also reveals the limitations of such alliances. While the support from European leaders may offer some strategic advantages, it often comes with the implicit expectation that Ukraine will make concessions, potentially jeopardizing its territorial integrity and democratic aspirations. This scenario is not unique to Ukraine; it reflects a broader historical pattern in which powerful nations impose solutions that prioritize geopolitical stability over the rights and desires of smaller nations. The ongoing conflict in Ukraine serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of sovereignty in the face of imperial ambitions, be they from Russia or the U.S.
In light of this, it becomes imperative for advocates for social justice and international solidarity to engage with these themes of power, sovereignty, and democratic integrity. The situation in Ukraine can inspire conversations about the importance of supporting self-determination movements globally, especially in regions that have faced colonization and imperialism. As the world grapples with the consequences of military conflicts, it is vital to emphasize the need for a foreign policy that is rooted in respect for human rights and the voices of those directly impacted by international decisions. The struggles of nations like Ukraine are part of a larger tapestry of resistance against oppression and a call for a more equitable global order.
Finally, as discussions about the future of Ukraine unfold in the context of the Trump-Zelensky dynamic, it is crucial for observers to remain vigilant about the implications of such high-stakes diplomacy. The historical lessons from past interventions—often characterized by broken promises and shifting alliances—serve as a warning against complacency. A principled approach to foreign policy must advocate for the autonomy of nations and the protection of their democratic processes, championing the idea that peace cannot be achieved through coercion or compromise of fundamental rights. The ongoing struggle for Ukraine should inspire not only solidarity but also a reexamination of how we define peace and justice on the global stage, ensuring that the lessons learned are applied to foster a more just and equitable world.
The evolving relationship between former President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky showcases a complex intersection of international diplomacy, national interests, and historical context. The tension stemming from their previous Oval Office confrontation reveals not only the fragility of diplomatic relationships but also the broader implications of U.S. foreign policy in Eastern Europe. As the United States navigates its role in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, it becomes paramount for Americans to understand the nuances of these interactions and their potential impact on global stability and democracy.
Historically, Ukraine has been at the geopolitical forefront, especially since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The 2014 annexation of Crimea by Russia marked a significant turning point, igniting international condemnation and a reevaluation of alliances. The West, particularly through NATO and the European Union, has sought to support Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. Trump's previous interactions with Zelensky, characterized by a mixture of confrontational rhetoric and transactional diplomacy, highlight the challenges Ukraine faces in securing consistent support from U.S. leadership, which can be influenced by domestic political agendas rather than a steadfast commitment to democratic values and international norms.
The recent meeting's context is essential for understanding the stakes involved. Trump's apparent willingness to entertain concessions to Russia, such as land giveaways in the eastern Donbas region, raises alarms about the potential undermining of Ukrainian sovereignty. This approach starkly contrasts with the positions of European leaders and Zelensky himself, who assert that any negotiations under ongoing aggression from Russia are fundamentally unjust. It is critical for Americans to recognize that supporting Ukraine is not merely an act of foreign policy; it is a stand for democratic resilience against authoritarian aggression. Engaging in discussions about the implications of Trump's strategies can help illuminate the risks of compromising on democratic principles in favor of expedient solutions.
As citizens, we have a role to play in shaping the discourse surrounding this issue. Advocating for strong, unwavering support for Ukraine is essential. Writing to elected representatives, participating in town halls, and educating our communities about the importance of international alliances can amplify the voices that demand a principled foreign policy. Furthermore, we must hold leaders accountable for their actions and ensure that any negotiations prioritize the sovereignty and well-being of the Ukrainian people over geopolitical bargaining. This can be achieved through grassroots movements and alliances that push for policies reflecting a commitment to democracy, human rights, and international law.
Moreover, we must foster a culture of informed discussion around U.S. foreign policy decisions. Engaging with right-leaning individuals on this topic offers an opportunity to challenge the narrative that prioritizes short-term political gains over long-term stability and ethical responsibilities. Highlighting the historical precedents of U.S. support for democratic movements and the dangers of appeasing authoritarian regimes can create a compelling case for a more robust commitment to Ukraine. By emphasizing the interconnectedness of global democracy, we can encourage a broader understanding of why American support for Ukraine matters, not only for the region but for the integrity of democratic values worldwide.
In conclusion, the relationship between Trump and Zelensky serves as a microcosm of the larger geopolitical struggles we face today. By analyzing the historical context, advocating for principled policies, and engaging in informed discussions, we can empower ourselves and others to champion a foreign policy that aligns with democratic ideals. The stakes are high, and the implications of our actions today will resonate for generations. As engaged citizens, let us rise to the occasion and ensure that our leaders reflect the values we hold dear, advocating for a world where democracy prevails over tyranny.
In light of the article regarding the evolving relationship between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky, it is crucial to take proactive steps that support Ukraine and advocate for a just resolution to the ongoing conflict with Russia. Here’s a detailed list of actions we can take personally to engage with this issue.
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: Understanding the historical context of the conflict, the implications of U.S. foreign policy, and the current dynamics between the U.S., Ukraine, and Russia is essential. Share this information through discussions, social media, or community events.
2. **Support Humanitarian Organizations**: Contribute to organizations that provide humanitarian aid to Ukraine. This can include financial donations or fundraising efforts in your community.
3. **Engage in Political Advocacy**: Contact your elected representatives to express your views on U.S. support for Ukraine and the need for a diplomatic resolution that respects Ukraine's sovereignty.
4. **Participate in Petitions**: Sign and promote petitions that demand stronger support for Ukraine and condemn any actions that could jeopardize its territorial integrity.
5. **Attend Local Events**: Participate in rallies or forums discussing U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine. This can amplify voices demanding a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
### Exact Actions to Take
#### 1. Support Humanitarian Organizations - **Example**: Donate to organizations like the International Rescue Committee (IRC) or Doctors Without Borders, which provide aid to Ukrainian refugees and those affected by the conflict. - **Website**: [International Rescue Committee](https://www.rescue.org/) | [Doctors Without Borders](https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/)
#### 2. Contact Your Representatives - **Who to Write to**: - Your local congressional representative. - Senators from your state. - **How to Find Contact Information**: - Use [House.gov](https://www.house.gov/) for representatives. - Use [Senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov/) for senators.
- **Sample Email/Letter**: ``` Subject: Support for Ukraine and a Just Peace
Dear [Representative/Senator Name],
As a concerned citizen, I am writing to urge you to support robust U.S. assistance to Ukraine and advocate for a diplomatic resolution that upholds Ukraine's sovereignty. It is critical that we stand against any proposals that would sacrifice Ukraine's territorial integrity in the name of expediency.
Please ensure that U.S. policy reflects our commitment to democratic values and the rights of nations to self-determination.
Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
#### 3. Sign and Share Petitions - **Example Petition**: "Support Ukraine’s Sovereignty and Request for Increased U.S. Aid" - **Where to Find Petitions**: Websites like [Change.org](https://www.change.org/) or [MoveOn.org](https://www.moveon.org/) often have relevant petitions.
#### 4. Attend Local Events - **How to Find Events**: Look for local community events, town halls, or discussions on platforms like Facebook Events, Meetup, or local university bulletin boards related to Ukraine and international relations.
### Conclusion By taking these actions, we can collectively contribute to a more informed dialogue about the situation in Ukraine, support humanitarian efforts, and advocate for policies that respect the autonomy and rights of nations. Each of us has a role to play in ensuring that the voices of those affected by this conflict are heard and that our government reflects our values in its foreign policy decisions.