I was pardoned by President Trump. I believe in Clean Slate laws | Letter
freep.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 7:28:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Uncategorized

The Constitution allows presidents the broad power to grant pardons that come in several forms with only a few limits.
The recent arrest of a Flint councilman has prompted some national media outlets to target the state's Clean Slate law, suggesting that giving people a second chance is to blame.
Just as troubling, some reporting has characterized Clean Slate as a Democrat-driven initiative. Such characterizations are not just misleading; they are patently false.
Michigan's Clean Slate law was not a Democrat or Republican effort -- it was a bipartisan reform passed with broad support from across the political spectrum. Since its passage, more than 900,000 people have had part or all of their records sealed, according to a report on the program's first three years, opening doors of opportunity for better jobs, housing, education, and stability. That's not just smart public policy -- it's common sense.
Clean Slate was never about politics. It's about people who have made mistakes, but have since led a crime-free life for at least seven years.
And as someone who received a second chance myself through a pardon from President Donald Trump, I can personally attest to the power of redemption.
We should celebrate policies that expand opportunity and reduce recidivism, not use them as political footballs when convenient.
David SafavianThe writer is chief operating officer at Unify.US and criminal justice policy adviser for CPAC, the Conservative Political Action Conference
Editor's note: Safavian served as chief of staff of the General Services Administration in George W. Bush's administration. In 2009, he was convicted on charges of making false statements and obstruction of justice in connection with the investigation of former lobbyist D.C. Jack Abramoff, and sentenced to a year in prison. In 2020, Safavian was pardoned by President Donald Trump.
Sign Our PetitionIn recent discourse surrounding criminal justice reform, the Clean Slate law in Michigan has emerged as a significant point of contention, particularly in the wake of the arrest of a Flint councilman. Opponents often scapegoat such initiatives to further a narrative that undermines the very principles of rehabilitation and second chances that they are designed to uphold. The Clean Slate law, which facilitates the sealing of criminal records for individuals who have demonstrated a sustained commitment to a crime-free life, is a testament to the potential for redemption. This law has been inaccurately portrayed as a partisan initiative, which obscures its bipartisan origins and the broader implications for social justice.
Historically, the U.S. has maintained a punitive approach to criminal justice, often prioritizing punishment over rehabilitation. This ethos is deeply rooted in systemic inequities that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. The war on drugs, mass incarceration, and the criminalization of poverty have perpetuated cycles of disadvantage, leaving many individuals with criminal records facing barriers to employment, housing, and education. The Clean Slate law represents a shift towards a more compassionate and pragmatic approach, recognizing that individuals can change and contribute positively to society if given the chance. By sealing criminal records, the law provides a pathway to reintegration that is not only just but beneficial to society as a whole.
Critics who frame Clean Slate as a Democratic initiative ignore the collaborative efforts that brought the law to fruition. Bipartisan support for criminal justice reform is a critical development in a deeply polarized political landscape. When legislators from different sides of the aisle come together to address the failures of the criminal justice system, it signals a growing recognition of the need for systemic reform. The fact that over 900,000 individuals have had their records sealed as a result of Clean Slate is a powerful statistic that speaks to the law's success in opening doors for those who were once marginalized. It is an indictment of the narrative that such reforms are merely political maneuvers, highlighting the genuine impact on people's lives.
Moreover, the criticism levied against Clean Slate illustrates a broader societal struggle with the concept of forgiveness and redemption. In a culture that often vilifies those who have made mistakes, the ability to acknowledge human fallibility and offer second chances is crucial. The narrative that equates the sealing of records with enabling criminal behavior is not only misleading but detrimental. It perpetuates stigmas that hinder rehabilitation and ultimately work against public safety. The experiences of individuals like David Safavian, who received a pardon and now advocates for Clean Slate laws, emphasize the importance of understanding the complexities of criminality and the potential for positive change. By focusing on rehabilitation rather than retribution, society can foster environments that support reintegration rather than exclusion.
Finally, the ongoing debates about Clean Slate laws and similar initiatives serve as a reminder of the critical need for an informed and empathetic dialogue around criminal justice reform. For advocates of social justice, it is essential to articulate the benefits of policies that promote second chances and to challenge the misconceptions that fuel resistance to such measures. Engaging in fact-based discussions about the impact of these laws can help dismantle harmful stereotypes and foster a more inclusive understanding of justice. As the United States grapples with its legacy of mass incarceration and systemic racism, embracing comprehensive reforms like Clean Slate will be vital in shaping a more equitable future. This is not merely a political issue; it is a moral imperative that resonates with the core values of justice, equity, and opportunity for all.
The letter penned by David Safavian reflects an important conversation surrounding criminal justice reform and the structures we have in place for rehabilitation in the United States. The Clean Slate law in Michigan, a product of bipartisan effort, seeks to address issues of recidivism and societal reintegration for individuals with past convictions. The law allows for the sealing of criminal records for those who have demonstrated a commitment to change, thus offering them a pathway towards economic stability and personal redemption. However, the recent events in Flint, where a councilman was arrested, have reignited pushback against such progressive initiatives, suggesting that the very framework designed to foster rehabilitation is being unjustly scapegoated.
Historically, the United States has struggled with balancing public safety and the rights of individuals reintegrating into society after serving their time. The war on drugs and harsh sentencing laws have historically marginalized entire communities, disproportionately affecting people of color and low-income individuals. This context underscores why laws like Clean Slate are crucial. They are not only a moral imperative; they are backed by evidence that shows sealing records significantly reduces recidivism rates. By promoting second chances, we are not just being compassionate; we are being practical. The pushback against such laws often ignores this historical context and instead sensationalizes isolated incidents as a means to justify maintaining punitive systems that do more harm than good.
In response to the criticisms aimed at Clean Slate laws, it is essential that we engage in meaningful dialogue about the benefits of these reforms rather than vilifying them. Advocates for criminal justice reform can point to the tangible successes of Clean Slate laws, which have already helped over 900,000 people in Michigan alone. This data can be used as ammunition in discussions with those who may be skeptical of the law's efficacy. We need to emphasize that providing opportunities for employment, housing, and education is not merely a political issue; it is an economic necessity. A stable workforce benefits everyone, and sealing criminal records contributes to a safer society by decreasing the likelihood of re-offending.
Moreover, as citizens, we hold the power to influence the narrative surrounding criminal justice reform. Engaging with local representatives, participating in community forums, or joining advocacy groups that support Clean Slate laws can amplify our voices. We can also harness the power of storytelling, sharing personal experiences and testimonials of those who have benefited from such laws. By humanizing the issue, we can counteract the fear-based rhetoric that often dominates discussions about crime and punishment. This is not about running from accountability; it is about embracing a system that recognizes the potential for change and growth in every individual.
Lastly, we must critically assess the motivations behind the criticism of Clean Slate laws. The framing of such laws as partisan issues serves to deepen divisions rather than foster understanding. It is vital for us to remind ourselves and others that the push for criminal justice reform is not merely a political battle; it is a human rights issue that transcends party lines. By reframing the conversation around Clean Slate laws, we can elevate the discourse to focus on the values of justice, equity, and second chances that resonate with many Americans, regardless of their political affiliations. Ultimately, it is about creating a society that recognizes and supports the capacity for redemption, allowing all individuals the opportunity to thrive.
Analyzing the article, it is evident that the Clean Slate law serves as a crucial tool for providing individuals with a second chance after past mistakes, promoting opportunities for employment, housing, and education. The backlash against this law, framed as a political issue, calls for a mobilized response to support criminal justice reform and the principles of redemption and rehabilitation. Here is a list of actions individuals can take to advocate for Clean Slate laws and similar initiatives:
### Personal Actions to Support Clean Slate Laws
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: - Read up on the Clean Slate laws and similar criminal justice reforms. Share this knowledge with your friends, family, and social media networks to raise awareness.
2. **Engage with Local Advocacy Groups**: - Connect with organizations that focus on criminal justice reform, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Brennan Center for Justice, or local chapters of the Freedom to Thrive Coalition.
3. **Support Legislation**: - Track state-level bills related to Clean Slate laws or criminal justice reform. Websites like Ballotpedia provide updated information on legislation.
4. **Participate in Community Meetings**: - Attend town hall meetings or local government sessions where criminal justice policies are discussed. Voice your support for Clean Slate laws and advocate for their expansion.
### Specific Actions to Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - Support existing petitions that advocate for Clean Slate laws. Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org often have active petitions. - Example: Search for “Clean Slate Law” petitions in Michigan and add your name to amplify the message.
2. **Contact Your Representatives**: - Write to your state legislators expressing your support for Clean Slate laws. - **Example Contacts**: - **Michigan House of Representatives**: - Speaker of the House: Joe Tate - Email: joe.tate@house.mi.gov - Mailing Address: 124 N Capitol Ave, Lansing, MI 48933
- **Michigan Senate**: - Senate Majority Leader: Mike Shirkey - Email: senmshirkey@senate.michigan.gov - Mailing Address: P.O. Box 30036, Lansing, MI 48909
3. **Draft a Letter or Email**: - When writing, express your support for Clean Slate laws and highlight the importance of providing second chances. A sample message could be: ``` Dear [Representative's Name],
I am writing to express my strong support for Clean Slate laws in Michigan, which play a vital role in providing individuals with second chances after they've paid their debt to society. These laws not only promote rehabilitation but also contribute to safer communities by reducing recidivism.
I urge you to support and expand these initiatives, allowing more individuals to access opportunities in employment, housing, and education. It's essential to celebrate policies that prioritize human dignity and rehabilitation.
Thank you for your attention to this important issue.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
4. **Engage on Social Media**: - Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to advocate for Clean Slate laws. Share articles, personal stories, and statistics about the impact of these laws using hashtags like #CleanSlate and #SecondChances.
5. **Organize or Join Local Events**: - Participate in rallies, forums, or discussions centered on criminal justice reform. If there aren’t any scheduled, consider organizing one in your community.
6. **Support Local Candidates**: - Research and support political candidates who advocate for criminal justice reform and Clean Slate laws. Volunteer for their campaigns and help spread their message.
By taking these steps, individuals can play an active role in advocating for Clean Slate laws and contributing to a more equitable justice system that prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment. Every action counts in this collective effort for change.