Thawing India-China ties drive hunt for potential stock winners
moneycontrol.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 5:55:54 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–China Relations, Economic Policy & Jobs, Trade Policy & Tariffs

Fund managers are now scouring Indian industries such as pharmaceuticals and electronics for firms with Chinese supply lines or export channels that may be among key beneficiaries.
India's stocks are trailing most of their global peers this year but one set of companies may be about to see a resurgence: those with links to China.
Decades of frosty relations between the world's two most-populous nations are thawing as both countries consider themselves unfair targets of President Donald Trump's "America First" trade wars. Fund managers are now scouring Indian industries such as pharmaceuticals and electronics for firms with Chinese supply lines or export channels that may be among key beneficiaries.
There have already been some winners. Shares of InterGlobe Aviation Ltd., which operates the India's largest carrier IndiGo, jumped more than 4% last week on reports that direct flights between the country and China may resume as soon as next month. Car-part maker Minda Corp., which has a Chinese partner, and electronic-component manufacturer Kaynes Technology India Ltd., which imports key parts from China, both jumped more than 5%.
"Disputes will be over very soon and India will open the floodgates to Chinese investments," said Ritesh Jain, founder of Pinetree Macro, a global asset-management company based in Calgary. "The scale and technology at which they operate will create new winners in India, and it's important to be positioned accordingly."Relations between India and China have been plagued for years by a fractious border dispute and conflicting geopolitical aims. A new round of skirmishes broke out in 2020 that led to the deaths of soldiers from both nations and calls for Indian consumers to boycott Chinese goods. Chinese weaponry also helped Pakistan in a recent military escalation with India.
That ill-feeling is now being offset by Trump's chaotic tariff policies that have encouraged Beijing and New Delhi to find common ground. These tariffs currently include a charge of 50% on Indian goods, and the threat of levies on China of at least 54%. In addition to the expected resumption of direct flights, the two countries are in talks to revive border trade, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit China later this month, where he will meet Premier Xi Jinping.
Even as India hardened its position against its neighbor following the latest border conflicts, China has remained its second-largest trading partner. India's imports from China climbed to $113.5 billion in the fiscal year ending March 2025, from $101.7 billion a year earlier. That compares with India's exports to its neighbor of $14.2 billion.
One likely beneficiary of the improving relations between the two countries is the travel and tourism sector.
The resumption of direct flights would be "a symbolic yet practical step towards thawing ties, enabling smoother business and tourism," said Sonam Srivastava, founder of Wright Research in Mumbai. "We see selective opportunities in aviation, travel, and supply chain-linked manufacturing, but would pair these with overweight positions in domestic import-substitution related companies."
In addition to InterGlobe Aviation, other travel-industry shares to gain last week were budget carrier SpiceJet Ltd. and Thomas Cook India Ltd., which sells travel packages.
Pharma, Chemicals
A better trading relationship may make it easier for Indian pharmaceutical companies, such as Lupin Ltd., to import critical ingredients from China. Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. also stands to gain from any loosening of Chinese restrictions on the export of urea.
Electronics manufacturer Dixon Technologies India Ltd., which partners with Chinese electric-vehicle manufacturers such as Xiaomi Corp., may be in a better position to scale up. JSW Group could benefit as its operates a joint venture with China's SAIC Motor Corp.
"Any increased economic co-operation between India and China, if that can happen, would present more opportunities," said Kok Hoong Wong, head of institutional equities sales trading at Maybank Securities Pte in Singapore. "We should be looking at companies that can benefit from cheaper, more cost-effective imports such as Indian pharma and some electronics makers."
The potential boost for stocks such as these would be welcome for Indian investors who have seen the nation's equities underperform in recent months. Fears about the negative impact of Trump's tariffs have limited gains in the benchmark Nifty 50 to just 4.2% this year, versus an advance of 13% for the MSCI World Index.
Ironically, Trump -- the person who inadvertently brought India and China closer together with his trade policies -- had no intention of creating that outcome.
India and China "are facing the same pressure from Trump with regards to purchasing of oil and dealing with Russia so it makes sense to strengthen ties in the face of this increased scrutiny and interference," said Matthew Haupt, a fund manager at Wilson Asset Management in Sydney.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent thaw in India-China relations, as highlighted in the article, illustrates the complexities of global trade dynamics and geopolitical alignments. Fund managers are now closely observing Indian industries, particularly pharmaceuticals and electronics, for potential stock winners amid this diplomatic shift. The historical context of these relations is critical. For decades, India and China have been bound by a series of contentious issues, including a long-standing border dispute and divergent geopolitical aspirations. The violent skirmishes of 2020 that resulted in casualties on both sides serve as a grim reminder of the volatility that can punctuate their interactions. However, as both nations find themselves at a crossroads due to the ramifications of the "America First" trade policies under the Trump administration, it becomes evident that their economic interests may compel them to collaborate rather than conflict.
The idea that both India and China are unfair targets of U.S. trade policies is not merely an economic observation but also a reflection of the historical patterns of Western dominance in global trade. The imposition of tariffs has often led to unintended alliances among non-Western nations, as they seek to consolidate power against a common adversary. This convergence is not simply opportunistic; it represents a broader struggle against neocolonial practices that have historically favored Western economies, often to the detriment of emerging markets. In this light, the resumption of direct flights between India and China mirrors not just an improvement in bilateral ties but also a strategic pivot towards mutual economic empowerment in the face of external pressures.
The potential beneficiaries of this thaw are varied, with a particular focus on companies with established supply chains and partnerships in China. The immediate gains seen in stocks like InterGlobe Aviation Ltd. and Minda Corp. signal a growing recognition of the interconnectedness of global markets. However, this interconnectedness raises important questions about the sustainability of such economic arrangements. While the financial sector may rejoice in the increased stock values, it is crucial to consider the broader implications for labor rights and environmental standards within these industries. As production lines shift and expand, the potential for exploitative labor practices and environmental degradation persists, particularly in regions where regulations may be less stringent. This underscores the need for vigilance and advocacy for ethical practices as economic ties deepen.
Moreover, the anticipated visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to China symbolizes an important diplomatic overture but also highlights the ongoing social struggles within India. The government’s approach to international relations has often been critiqued for sidelining pressing domestic issues, including poverty, inequality, and human rights. While economic partnerships may bolster growth, they should not overshadow the necessity of addressing systemic injustices within India. The government must ensure that the benefits of improved relations with China translate into tangible improvements in the lives of everyday Indians, particularly those in marginalized communities who have historically borne the brunt of economic policies that favor capital over community.
Lastly, as the travel and tourism sector gears up for a potential revival aided by improved ties, it is incumbent upon stakeholders to ensure that this growth is inclusive. The narrative surrounding tourism should not solely promote economic benefits but also foster cross-cultural exchanges that challenge stereotypes and build understanding between the two nations. This is particularly important given the fraught history of perceptions between India and China, which have often been marked by animosity rather than appreciation. In advocating for a thoughtful approach to these diplomatic and economic engagements, we can emphasize the importance of solidarity, both within and between nations, as we navigate the complexities of a rapidly changing global landscape.
In summary, the thaw in India-China relations offers a unique lens through which to view the interplay of global economics and local realities. It is essential to approach this development with a critical eye, considering the historical context, the implications for social justice, and the need for ethical practices in business. As discussions about the future of these two nations unfold, we must advocate for a vision that prioritizes equity, sustainability, and mutual respect over mere profit.
The shifting dynamics of international relations often reveal the complexities of economic interdependence, particularly in the context of major powers like India and China. As reported, the warming of ties between these two nations is largely driven by external pressures, such as the "America First" trade policies initiated during Trump's presidency, which have incentivized both countries to seek collaborative avenues rather than continue their historical rivalry. This delicate balance is not merely a tale of diplomacy but reflects a broader narrative about globalization, supply chains, and the strategic decisions that governments make in response to economic challenges.
Historically, India and China have enjoyed a tumultuous relationship, marked by territorial disputes and competition for regional influence. The 1962 Sino-Indian War fundamentally altered perceptions, creating a legacy of suspicion that has persisted for decades. However, as globalization deepens and economic realities shift, there appears to be a pragmatic recalibration in the approach of both nations toward each other. The article highlights how Indian companies linked to Chinese supply chains are poised to benefit from this thaw, a development underscored by the interwoven nature of global trade. This interconnectedness serves as a reminder that nationalistic economic policies can often backfire, leading to unintended consequences that may ultimately harm domestic industries and consumers.
From a domestic perspective, Americans can advocate for a more nuanced understanding of international trade relations. Rather than viewing trade through the singular lens of competition, it’s essential to recognize the cooperative potential that exists between nations, particularly in areas such as technology, healthcare, and renewable energy. The warming relations between India and China could serve as a case study for promoting policies that encourage collaboration over confrontation. Engaging in dialogues that emphasize mutual benefits and economic interdependence can help shift the narrative away from an adversarial approach to one that embraces partnership and shared goals.
The potential beneficiaries of this evolving relationship, particularly in sectors like pharmaceuticals and electronics, offer insights into how industries can adapt to changing geopolitical landscapes. For instance, as Indian companies position themselves to leverage Chinese technologies, there is an opportunity for American manufacturers to learn from these developments. By investing in innovation and fostering collaborations with international partners, American businesses can remain competitive in a rapidly changing global market. This perspective can be a compelling talking point when discussing trade policies with right-leaning individuals, particularly those who may prioritize isolationist sentiments.
Moreover, the travel and tourism sector stands to gain significantly from improved relations between India and China, as evidenced by the anticipated resumption of direct flights. This revitalization of people-to-people connections not only fosters cultural exchange but also enhances economic ties. Advocacy for policies that support international tourism and collaboration can serve to bridge divides and promote understanding among nations. By emphasizing these economic benefits, Americans can counter isolationist arguments that suggest that closing borders is the solution to global challenges.
Ultimately, as global citizens, we must engage in dialogues that recognize the complexity of international relations and advocate for policies that promote cooperation rather than division. The thawing relations between India and China underscore the importance of adapting to an interconnected world, one where mutual benefits can lead to shared prosperity. By fostering discussions around economic interdependence, innovation, and international collaboration, we can collectively envision a future that prioritizes cooperation over conflict. This approach not only addresses contemporary challenges but also builds a foundation for a more inclusive and prosperous world.
In light of the evolving relationship between India and China, particularly regarding the potential economic shifts and stock market opportunities, there are several proactive steps individuals can take to ensure that their voices are heard and that they advocate for responsible policies. Here is a detailed list of ideas and actions:
### 1. **Promote Responsible Investment and Trade Practices:** - **Educate Yourself and Others:** Share insights about the implications of increasing economic ties with China, especially in sectors like pharmaceuticals and electronics. Host discussions or workshops in your community or online platforms. - **Support Local Businesses:** Prioritize purchasing from Indian companies that emphasize ethical practices and local production rather than those overly reliant on foreign supply chains.
### 2. **Engage with Policy Makers:** - **Write to Local Representatives:** - **Who to write to:** Your local Member of Parliament (MP) or Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA). - **Example:** If you reside in New Delhi, you can contact: - **Manoj Tiwari (MP):** - Email: manoj.tiwari@sansad.nic.in - Address: 33, North Avenue, New Delhi – 110001 - **What to say:** Express your concerns regarding the implications of increased Chinese investments on local industries and workers, advocating for policies that prioritize domestic production and fair labor practices.
### 3. **Petitions and Campaigns:** - **Start or Join Petitions:** Use platforms like Change.org to start petitions focused on transparency in trade practices and ethical investment in local industries. - **Example Petitions:** - A petition to the Indian government demanding regulations on foreign investments that prioritize local employment and sustainability. - **What to include in the petition:** Outline the importance of safeguarding local industries and ensuring that any economic engagement with China does not come at the cost of national interest and livelihoods.
### 4. **Advocate for Sustainable Policies:** - **Contact Relevant Ministries:** - **Ministry of Commerce and Industry** - Address: Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi – 110001 - Email: commerce@nic.in - **What to say:** Urge them to create policies that encourage sustainable trade practices and protect local industries from potential exploitation by foreign entities.
### 5. **Support Social Movements and NGOs:** - **Donate to or Volunteer with Organizations:** Look for NGOs focused on fair trade, labor rights, and sustainability in India. - **Examples:** - **Fair Trade India:** Advocate for equitable trade practices and support for local producers. - **LabourNet:** Focus on improving the livelihoods of workers across various sectors.
### 6. **Social Media Advocacy:** - **Utilize Social Media Platforms:** Create awareness about the implications of the thawing India-China relations. Use hashtags related to fair trade, local businesses, and responsible consumption. - **Engage with Influencers:** Collaborate with local activists and influencers who focus on economic justice to amplify your message.
### 7. **Attend Public Forums and Discussions:** - **Participate in Town Halls or Community Meetings:** Engage with local leaders and express your views on the implications of international trade policies and their impact on local economies.
### 8. **Educate Your Network:** - **Host Informational Sessions:** Create a platform for discussions on international relations and economic policies that affect local markets.
By taking these actions, individuals can actively engage in shaping the economic landscape in a way that prioritizes ethical practices, local empowerment, and sustainable development, fostering a more equitable future.