Readers sound off on trade mayhem, Trump's Putin summit and Pete Alonso
nydailynews.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 3:55:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, State Politics & Governors, U.S.–China Relations
Despite Trump's posturing, the U.S. is weakened
Manhattan: Former President Theodore Roosevelt said, "Speak softly and carry a big stick." President Trump speaks "bigly" and carries no stick. The most dangerous part is that he probably doesn't realize it. He has assembled a team of sycophants and butt-kissers who tell him only what he wants to hear, even in the face of reality.
Trump's threats against China are empty. Chinese leaders understand this, and they're laughing at Trump. China owns massive amounts of U.S. debt. Further, the U.S. is totally reliant on China for rare earth minerals used to make everything from smartphones to missiles. The economic policy is completely incoherent, haphazard and based on Trump's shifting moods, whims and gripes -- and used to punish other countries for their domestic politics. Because Trump doesn't like the Brazilian judicial system and its treatment of his friend Jair Bolsonaro, Americans will pay substantially more for coffee.
Also evident -- and alarming -- is how fragile U.S. institutions turned out to be. When a single man, unchecked, can dictate trade policy on a whim in a king-like manner, it begins to resemble authoritarian systems akin to Russia and China. The difference is increasingly harder to see. Other countries are looking to make short-term deals with the U.S. to bide time while they plot a future no longer reliant on the U.S. and the dollar. These temporary trade deals -- in essence, press releases and not actual trade deals legislated and passed into law -- provide the American public with illusory victories. In reality, Trump's approach is an act of astonishing self-sabotage -- one that will weaken America's position on the global stage, likely beyond repair. Daniel Dolgicer
Home soil
Flushing: I'm pleased that Trump said he will "return to run the country" after his meeting in Alaska. However, where did he think the event was held? Name our states, Mr. President. Lynne Kanner
Stupid stunt
Oak Ridge, N.J.: All that meeting with Vladimir Putin amounted to was a paid-for-by-American-taxes lunch! They both deserve heartburn. Trump had a B-2 bomber fly over and Putin was thinking, "Boy, they have big sparrows here." Imagine trying to muscle that guy with a bogus move like that -- and they are there to talk peace. What a sham. Jim Heimbuch
Trump slump
New Rochelle, N.Y.: After the Anchorage meeting, his body language said it all. Richard Rodrigue
Made safe
Henderson, Nev.: In response to Trump dispatching federal officers to the streets of D.C., Sen. Chuck Schumer said, "I feel perfectly safe" walking around the U.S. Capitol grounds and vicinity. Of course, the senator forgot to mention that he has 24-hour taxpayer-funded security and the use of a car. I bet his young staffers who don't enjoy 'round-the-clock security may whisper that they don't share their boss' view. David Tulanian
It won't work
Glendale, Calif.: "There has to be something in these files that is so bad for Donald Trump. I mean, that is really the key here. It has got to be something worse than you know. I was involved in the Russia investigation. There has to be something there that Donald Trump is deathly afraid of," claims former FBI general counsel and top federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann. A president who constantly gaslights may intentionally use this form of abuse to exert power or control over others with the goal of manipulating them. This is a trait of an authoritarian! Trump has gutted most agencies that oversee and protect us against criminals and is using FBI agents to walk the streets of D.C. while domestic crime and terrorism go unabated. This strategy will backfire. Richard A. French
Extraneous expenses
Brooklyn: Trump and his Republican cohorts campaigned on the need to reduce government spending. However, Trump is clearly doing the opposite. He is busy spending money on himself, playing golf at the taxpayers' expense, filing frivolous lawsuits, wasting the government's time and money, and restoring Confederate memorials at enormous expense. Alan Podhaizer
Dedicated to entertain
Valley Stream, L.I.: I have been pleased to see the efforts of the paper these past few months to put in some movie reviews. In these difficult times, we need news about entertainment options more than ever. However, I do feel that the paper and readership would benefit tremendously from again having a full-time movie critic on staff, as the New York Post and Newsweek have. When the reviews come from random critics in Chicago, there is no one for your readers to relate to or identify with. For reviews to have any real power or substance, there needs to be a name associated with your newspaper who represents it with articles as well as additional material online. Allan Canino
Head north
Carmel, N.Y.: This time, the crook acted with compassion. Charles Williams has his four-legged pal Roc back after several days of uncertainty and fear for both man and beast. While the return of the American Bully had a happy ending, the underlying story remains unsolved: an unfortunate system that fails to assist people like Williams, who is forced to ride a subway car at all hours of the day and night in order to keep cool from the summer's oppressive heat. If New York City can't offer Williams a job and proper lodging for Roc and himself, he should return to the Hudson Valley, where compassion is paramount and assistance readily available. Eric Gross
Just not fair
Fresh Meadows: To Voicer Andrea Mulero: Oh dear God, I live near Flushing and feel a sense of moral outrage for you fine people for being wrongly accused of stealing from a local grocery store and being banned. The store was fatally ignorant as to who wronged them to begin with, so of course they are accusing the wrong party. Years ago, I was banned from a beverage store on Long Island for shoplifting. The guilty woman was someone who looked a little like me. I never received an apology. Lesley Lewis Paulos
Herded & held
Brooklyn: Never will I fly American Airlines again. After leaving Newark International Airport at 6 a.m. for my vacation in South America and a connecting flight out of Miami International Airport, our plane ran out of fuel due to diversions. We ended up sitting in Orlando with no food, scarce drinks and people treated as cattle. Do yourself a favor and book elsewhere for your vacations. Chris Piccigallo
Downtown letdown
Manhattan: Why has no politician from Manhattan even considered giving a resident discount for car owners who live in the so-called congestion zone? Joseph Duffy
Freak show
Manhattan: Why am I gonna miss Mayor Adams when he loses his reelection? Because every day, like the past three years, there's another great story about his incredibly corrupt and incompetent administration. For example, Friday's reporting of how sleazy his Probation Department and its ethics-challenged commissioner are. Adios, Eric. Maybe the circus is hiring. Jeff Bockman
Party solidarity?
Holliswood: Even though the federal government dropped its case against Eric Adams, why haven't any of our New York prosecutors picked it up (I'm looking at you, Manhattan District Attorney Bragg, Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez and New York State Attorney General Letitia James) to prosecute in state court? Is it because they are all Democrats? Gregory W. Chupa
Much-valued player
St. James, L.I.: To Voicer Adam Silbert: As a lifelong, dedicated Mets fan, I strongly disagree with your contention that Pete Alonso "fell out of favor" and that "vocal Mets fans didn't want to re-sign" him. Every Mets fan I encountered was apoplectic that Uncle Steve did not sign him long-term to ensure he spends his entire career with the Metropolitans. In his first five full years in the majors (excluding the COVID year), he has averaged .247, 42 home runs and 110 RBI. He worked exceptionally hard to become an excellent fielder, is beloved in the clubhouse and is, in fact, a fan favorite. What's not to like? When this year ends, he'll be around .250-260, 35-40 home runs and 115-120 RBI. If Uncle Steve doesn't sign him long-term, I'm not the only Mets fan who will consider turning his back. There will be an exodus in Flushing. Carmine E. Esposito
Sign Our PetitionThe recent commentary on former President Trump’s foreign policy, particularly regarding trade and his interactions with authoritarian leaders, reveals significant implications for the United States' standing in the global arena. The critiques outlined in the article draw attention to a period of American history when the country wielded its economic and political clout with a more coherent strategy, contrasting sharply with Trump’s erratic and impulsive approach. This commentary serves as a reminder of the importance of a consistent and principled foreign policy, especially in an era where interdependence between nations is more pronounced than ever.
Historically, the United States has prided itself on its role as a leader in promoting democracy and stability worldwide. The post-World War II order, established through institutions such as the United Nations and trade alliances like GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade), signified a commitment to multilateralism and cooperation. However, Trump’s tenure marked a departure from these principles, leaning towards unilateralism and transactional relationships. The article rightly underscores the implications of this shift: as Trump’s policies alienated traditional allies and emboldened adversaries, it weakened the very fabric of international relations that had been painstakingly woven over decades. The references to China’s dominance in rare earth minerals and debt ownership exemplify the precariousness of relying on a single leader’s whims, illustrating how interconnected global economies can become vulnerabilities.
Moreover, the current global landscape is characterized by a rise in authoritarianism, not just in Russia and China, but also in various democracies facing internal strife. This backslide into authoritarianism can be attributed, in part, to the normalization of aggressive nationalism and populism, as seen in Trump’s rhetoric. The article points to the alarming parallels between Trump’s governing style and those of autocratic regimes, where centralized power leads to a lack of accountability and democratic erosion. This highlights the necessity for vigilance in safeguarding democratic institutions, particularly when they are susceptible to being compromised by leaders who prioritize personal interests over the common good.
The commentary regarding the economic consequences of Trump's policies also resonates deeply with ongoing social struggles, notably the pandemic's impact on working-class Americans. The rise in prices for everyday goods, including coffee, as a direct result of trade policies reflects broader economic inequities. For many, these price increases are not mere inconveniences; they exacerbate existing struggles faced by low-wage workers and marginalized communities. The connection between trade policy and social justice cannot be overstated; economic decisions made at the top have cascading effects that often burden the most vulnerable. This reality should prompt a reevaluation of who benefits from such policies and the need for a more equitable approach to trade that prioritizes human welfare over corporate profits.
Finally, it is essential to recognize the long-term strategic errors made during Trump’s administration that have left the U.S. vulnerable. The commentary aptly points out that other nations are exploring alternatives to reliance on the dollar, signaling a potentially seismic shift in global economic power. This move towards de-dollarization threatens to undermine the United States’ financial hegemony, a status that has allowed the country to impose its will internationally. As the world pivots away from a U.S.-centric model, the implications for American workers and consumers could be dire, leading to increased instability and uncertainty. It is imperative for advocates of a progressive agenda to articulate a vision for a foreign policy that not only reestablishes American leadership through cooperation and diplomacy but also addresses the root causes of economic inequality that have been exacerbated by reckless governance.
In conclusion, the analysis of Trump’s foreign and economic policies serves as a clarion call for a renewed commitment to democratic principles, international cooperation, and social justice. The historical context of U.S. foreign policy underscores the dangers of erratic leadership and the necessity for strategic coherence in an increasingly interconnected world. As the global landscape continues to evolve, the need for policies that prioritize equity and sustainability becomes ever more pressing. Ensuring that future trade agreements serve the interests of all citizens, rather than a select few, is critical for fostering a more just and prosperous society. Engaging in these discussions with right-wing perspectives can illuminate the broader implications of policy choices, emphasizing the need for a future that prioritizes collective well-being over individual gain.
The recent discourse surrounding former President Trump's approach to international trade and diplomacy is emblematic of a broader trend in American politics that requires careful examination. At the heart of this discussion is the alarming reality that U.S. foreign policy has become increasingly erratic and driven by individual whims rather than coherent strategies. In a world where nations are interconnected through complex economic and social ties, the consequences of Trump’s unpredictable "bigly" rhetoric and impulsive decision-making have far-reaching implications that extend beyond mere trade deficits or tariffs. As Americans, it is crucial for us to engage critically with these issues, advocating for a more nuanced and sustainable foreign policy that prioritizes stability, cooperation, and fairness.
Historically, the United States has prided itself on being a global leader, promoting democratic values and fostering international alliances. Yet, the shift to a more isolationist and unilateral approach under Trump reflects an unsettling departure from these principles. The reliance on intimidation tactics, such as threats against China or abrupt policy changes, undermines longstanding diplomatic relations and destabilizes global markets. It is reminiscent of authoritarian regimes where decisions are made in isolation, often disregarding the broader implications for citizens and international partners alike. This shift serves as a cautionary reminder that the health of our institutions is contingent upon checks and balances, and when power is concentrated in one individual, the consequences can be dire.
The ramifications of Trump's foreign policy decisions extend beyond borders; they directly impact the American economy and society. The article highlights the reliance on China for essential materials and the interdependence of global markets. By engaging in trade wars and punitive tariffs, not only are we risking economic retaliation, but we are also increasing costs for everyday Americans. For instance, higher coffee prices due to strained relations with Brazil are not just a trivial inconvenience; they reflect a broader reality where nationalistic posturing translates into tangible hardships for citizens. This is where we as Americans can take action—by advocating for policies that prioritize diplomacy and multilateral agreements that consider the needs of all parties involved, rather than the whims of a single leader.
Moreover, the fragility of our democratic institutions is a pressing concern that cannot be ignored. The fact that trade policy can be dictated by the whims of an individual, as noted in the article, raises serious questions about accountability and the rule of law. To counter this trend, it is imperative for citizens to demand greater transparency and accountability from their elected officials. This means supporting legislation that reinforces the role of Congress in trade agreements and foreign policy decisions, ensuring that diverse voices and perspectives are included in the decision-making process. By holding our leaders accountable and advocating for institutional integrity, we can work to restore faith in our democratic systems.
Finally, educating ourselves and others about the complexities of these issues is essential for fostering informed discussions. Engaging in conversations about the interconnectedness of global economies, the implications of trade policies, and the importance of diplomatic relations can empower individuals across the political spectrum to recognize the shared responsibility we have in shaping a better future. By focusing on common interests rather than divisive rhetoric, we can build a more robust movement that advocates for sustainable policies and practices that serve the needs of all Americans, ensuring that our nation remains a leader on the global stage for generations to come.
The article discusses the implications of former President Trump's trade policies and international relations, particularly concerning China and Russia. It raises significant concerns about the fragility of U.S. institutions, the incoherence of trade policy, and the broader consequences of a leadership style that resembles authoritarianism. This situation calls for proactive engagement from individuals who are invested in the future of equitable and sustainable governance. Here’s a detailed list of actions that can be taken:
### Personal Actions
1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - **Action**: Stay informed about international trade, economic policies, and the implications of political decisions. Share this information within your community. - **Example**: Organize or attend local discussion groups or book clubs focused on political economy or U.S. foreign policy.
2. **Engage with Elected Officials** - **Action**: Contact your local representatives to express your concerns about trade policy and international relations. - **Who to Write To**: - **Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY)** - **Email**: schumer.senate.gov/contact/email-chuck - **USPS Address**: 757 Third Avenue, Suite 17-2, New York, NY 10017 - **Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)** - **Email**: gillibrand.senate.gov/contact - **USPS Address**: 780 Third Avenue, Suite 2601, New York, NY 10017
3. **Petition for Accountability and Transparency** - **Action**: Start or sign petitions demanding clearer trade policies and accountability from elected officials. - **Example**: Use platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org to find or initiate petitions aimed at demanding fair trade practices and sustainable economic policies.
4. **Support Organizations Advocating for Economic Justice** - **Action**: Donate to or volunteer with organizations that focus on economic fairness, labor rights, or consumer advocacy. - **Examples**: - **Public Citizen**: Focuses on trade policies and corporate accountability. - **Economic Policy Institute**: Advocates for policies that benefit working families. - **Websites**: - [Public Citizen](https://www.citizen.org/) - [Economic Policy Institute](https://www.epi.org/)
5. **Participate in Local Government Meetings** - **Action**: Attend town hall meetings or city council sessions to voice your concerns and learn about local responses to national policies. - **Example**: Check your local city or county government’s website for meeting schedules and agendas.
### What to Say in Communications
- **Express Concerns Clearly**: When contacting officials, articulate your concerns about the impact of incoherent trade policies on the economy, job security, and international relations. - **Example Message**: "Dear [Senator/Representative], I am deeply concerned about the current state of U.S. trade policy under the previous administration. The lack of coherence and reliance on whim-based decisions is detrimental to our economy and global standing. I urge you to prioritize clear, fair trade agreements that protect American jobs and promote sustainable practices."
- **Advocate for Action**: Encourage your representatives to take specific actions, such as holding hearings on trade practices or supporting legislation that ensures accountability in trade negotiations. - **Example Message**: "I urge you to support legislation that promotes transparency in trade negotiations and holds our leaders accountable for the consequences of their policies."
By taking these steps, individuals can play a critical role in advocating for a more stable and equitable approach to trade and foreign policy, ensuring that the voices of the public are heard at every level of governance.