Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

Maps show how California's redrawn congressional lines could look

wapt.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 5:25:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Federal Legislation & Congress, Democratic Party Responses, Presidential Campaigns
Maps show how California's redrawn congressional lines could look

The California Assembly on Friday released a proposed map of new congressional districts that voters would weigh in on a special election, if approved by the state legislature next week. See a breakdown of the map in the video aboveKCRA 3 first obtained the maps earlier Friday, which were submitted by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee to the California Legislature. Documents obtained by KCRA 3 show a 60-page presentation of the proposed map. The presentation also includes a letter by Julie Merz, executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Read that letter here."We anticipate this proposal will have widespread support both among California office holders and various stakeholders across the state," Merz said in a statement on Friday. The leaked drafts match what was released by the Assembly on Friday night. See an interactive map below:(Can't see the map? Click here.)This comes a day after Gov. Gavin Newsom launched what he and other Democrats are calling the Election Rigging Response Act at a campaign rally in Los Angeles. He and his office have stated for days that if Texas does not back down from its efforts to send more Republicans to Congress, they will attempt to counteract by sending more Democrats to the Lower House. California law does not allow politicians to draw districts, but Democratic leaders are hoping voters approve a measure to temporarily change that in an election later this year. The maps were put together by congressional Democrats and their consultants. An interactive map shared with KCRA 3 was on redistrictingpartners.com, which is headed by an elections expert and vice president of Political Data Inc., Paul Mitchell. A news release from Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas states that the California Legislature will consider three measures in order to call the special election:A constitutional amendment that authorizes the replacement of the existing Congressional map.A statute that contains the new proposed Congressional map for voter approval.A statute to call the special election, appropriate funding for election administration, and make conforming changes to election calendars.Rivas' office also shared a timeline for the next week as legislators work to officially call for a special election:Monday, Aug. 18: Legislation put into print in the Assembly and SenateTuesday, Aug. 19: Assembly and Senate Elections Committees hear legislationWednesday, Aug. 20: Assembly Appropriations Committee hears legislationThursday, Aug. 21: Anticipated floor votes in both Assembly and SenateFull submitted map What does California's congressional district map look like?California currently has 52 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Democrats hold 43 of them, while Republicans have nine.The five California Republicans targeted by the redistricting plan include Representatives Doug LaMalfa in District 1, Kevin Kiley in District 3, David Valadao in District 22, Ken Calvert in District 41, and Darrell Issa in District 48.According to the submitted map, it shows that LaMalfa's inland rural district would remove many of his Republican North State constituents and stretch west to encompass more Democratic voters along the coast. "If you want to know what's wrong with these maps -- just take a look at them," LaMalfa said in a statement Friday. "How on earth does Modoc County on the Nevada and Oregon Border have any common interest with Marin County and the Golden Gate Bridge? Voters took this power from Sacramento for just this reason. This is naked politics at its worst."Kiley's redrawn map includes parts of Democratic-leaning Sacramento County and removes a large swath of the Eastern Sierra."Make no mistake, I will win reelection to the House regardless of the proposed changes to my district," Kiley said Friday. "I fully expect that the beautiful 3rd District will remain exactly as it is. We will defeat Newsom's sham initiative and vindicate the will of California voters." A source familiar with District 6 Congressman Ami Bera's thinking said Bera is now exploring all of his options to keep representing the Sacramento region, including potentially running for District 3 if the new maps are approved."I have had the honor of representing the Sacramento region in Congress since 2013. I intend to continue representing the Sacramento region in the next Congress," Bera said. "Right now, we must stop Donald Trump and Texas Republicans from gerrymandering their way to a House majority in 2026. I look forward to supporting this ballot initiative to level the playing field and fight back against Donald Trump's destructive agenda."The act of intentionally redrawing district lines to favor a specific political party is known as gerrymandering, which is typically something not publicly boasted about. But with President Donald Trump's request to have Texas send five more Republicans to the U.S. House of Representatives, Democratic California leaders, including Newsom, have been more open about "fighting fire with fire."Kiley has decried gerrymandering and proposed legislation that would invalidate mid-decade redistricting efforts. Redistricting is normally done every 10 years after a U.S. Census.If California lawmakers can complete the plan by Aug. 22 for a special election, voters would be asked on Nov. 4 to approve this map that would take effect for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 elections if Texas or another Republican state redistricts before the end of this decade. Since two ballot initiatives in 2008 and 2010 were approved, California's redistricting process has been done by a citizen-led independent commission.Related video below -- Get the Facts: Redistricting or gerrymandering?Lindsay Weber contributed to this report.

The California Assembly on Friday released a proposed map of new congressional districts that voters would weigh in on a special election, if approved by the state legislature next week.

See a breakdown of the map in the video above

KCRA 3 first obtained the maps earlier Friday, which were submitted by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee to the California Legislature.

Documents obtained by KCRA 3 show a 60-page presentation of the proposed map. The presentation also includes a letter by Julie Merz, executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Read that letter here.

"We anticipate this proposal will have widespread support both among California office holders and various stakeholders across the state," Merz said in a statement on Friday.

The leaked drafts match what was released by the Assembly on Friday night.

See an interactive map below:

(Can't see the map? Click here.)

This comes a day after Gov. Gavin Newsom launched what he and other Democrats are calling the Election Rigging Response Act at a campaign rally in Los Angeles. He and his office have stated for days that if Texas does not back down from its efforts to send more Republicans to Congress, they will attempt to counteract by sending more Democrats to the Lower House. California law does not allow politicians to draw districts, but Democratic leaders are hoping voters approve a measure to temporarily change that in an election later this year.

The maps were put together by congressional Democrats and their consultants. An interactive map shared with KCRA 3 was on redistrictingpartners.com, which is headed by an elections expert and vice president of Political Data Inc., Paul Mitchell.

A news release from Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas states that the California Legislature will consider three measures in order to call the special election:

Rivas' office also shared a timeline for the next week as legislators work to officially call for a special election:

* Monday, Aug. 18: Legislation put into print in the Assembly and Senate

* Tuesday, Aug. 19: Assembly and Senate Elections Committees hear legislation

* Wednesday, Aug. 20: Assembly Appropriations Committee hears legislation

* Thursday, Aug. 21: Anticipated floor votes in both Assembly and Senate

Full submitted map

What does California's congressional district map look like?

California currently has 52 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Democrats hold 43 of them, while Republicans have nine.

The five California Republicans targeted by the redistricting plan include Representatives Doug LaMalfa in District 1, Kevin Kiley in District 3, David Valadao in District 22, Ken Calvert in District 41, and Darrell Issa in District 48.

According to the submitted map, it shows that LaMalfa's inland rural district would remove many of his Republican North State constituents and stretch west to encompass more Democratic voters along the coast.

"If you want to know what's wrong with these maps -- just take a look at them," LaMalfa said in a statement Friday. "How on earth does Modoc County on the Nevada and Oregon Border have any common interest with Marin County and the Golden Gate Bridge? Voters took this power from Sacramento for just this reason. This is naked politics at its worst."

Kiley's redrawn map includes parts of Democratic-leaning Sacramento County and removes a large swath of the Eastern Sierra.

"Make no mistake, I will win reelection to the House regardless of the proposed changes to my district," Kiley said Friday. "I fully expect that the beautiful 3rd District will remain exactly as it is. We will defeat Newsom's sham initiative and vindicate the will of California voters."

A source familiar with District 6 Congressman Ami Bera's thinking said Bera is now exploring all of his options to keep representing the Sacramento region, including potentially running for District 3 if the new maps are approved.

"I have had the honor of representing the Sacramento region in Congress since 2013. I intend to continue representing the Sacramento region in the next Congress," Bera said. "Right now, we must stop Donald Trump and Texas Republicans from gerrymandering their way to a House majority in 2026. I look forward to supporting this ballot initiative to level the playing field and fight back against Donald Trump's destructive agenda."

The act of intentionally redrawing district lines to favor a specific political party is known as gerrymandering, which is typically something not publicly boasted about. But with President Donald Trump's request to have Texas send five more Republicans to the U.S. House of Representatives, Democratic California leaders, including Newsom, have been more open about "fighting fire with fire."

Kiley has decried gerrymandering and proposed legislation that would invalidate mid-decade redistricting efforts. Redistricting is normally done every 10 years after a U.S. Census.

If California lawmakers can complete the plan by Aug. 22 for a special election, voters would be asked on Nov. 4 to approve this map that would take effect for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 elections if Texas or another Republican state redistricts before the end of this decade. Since two ballot initiatives in 2008 and 2010 were approved, California's redistricting process has been done by a citizen-led independent commission.

Related video below -- Get the Facts: Redistricting or gerrymandering?

Lindsay Weber contributed to this report.

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The recent developments concerning California's congressional redistricting process reveal much about the ongoing political battles that are shaping the nation's legislative landscape. With the California Assembly poised to approve a proposed map that aims to shift the balance of power in Congress, this redistricting effort cannot be understood outside the broader historical context of gerrymandering and electoral politics in the United States. The intersection of demographic changes, partisan strategies, and social justice movements is critically significant here, as it embodies the struggle for representation in a country still grappling with its democratic ideals.

The proposed map, derived from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, underscores the lengths to which political entities will go to ensure their survival and dominance. Historically, gerrymandering has been a tool for both major parties, often leading to the disenfranchisement of communities and the entrenchment of political power. It is imperative to recognize that the current attempt to redraw lines is not merely an act of political maneuvering but a response to systemic inequities in representation. As California's demographics continue to evolve, with increased diversity among its population, the fight for an equitable electoral landscape becomes even more urgent. This proposed redistricting is a strategic effort to counteract the stark underrepresentation of certain communities, particularly those of color, who have historically been silenced in political discourse.

Governor Gavin Newsom's "Election Rigging Response Act" serves as a rallying cry for Democrats who are increasingly aware of the urgency to protect their foothold in Congress. This countermeasure is a direct response to Republican tactics in states like Texas, where aggressive redistricting efforts have already been set in motion to favor conservative candidates. The implications of these actions extend beyond party lines; they touch on fundamental questions about democracy and the integrity of the electoral process. The fact that California's Democratic leadership is actively seeking a short-term fix to reestablish balance highlights a critical moment in which the integrity of our electoral systems must be fiercely defended against partisan encroachments.

Moreover, the outlined timeline for this special election illustrates the urgency with which California Democrats are approaching this issue. The proposed measures, including a constitutional amendment and a statute for voter approval, are reflective of a broader movement towards participatory democracy, one that seeks to involve the electorate in the decision-making process. This is particularly relevant in the context of ongoing social struggles, where historically marginalized communities are asserting their rights to fair representation. Engaging voters in this redistricting process not only allows for a more equitable distribution of power but also embodies a commitment to civic engagement against a backdrop of apathy and disenfranchisement.

As we examine the potential outcomes of this redistricting initiative, it is crucial to consider the broader implications for social justice and equity. The targeting of specific Republican representatives, as highlighted in the article, signals a strategic approach that mirrors the long-standing struggles for political representation among marginalized groups. This initiative, if successful, could empower communities that have been systematically neglected in the political arena. The fight for equitable representation is not solely about party power; it is fundamentally about ensuring that every voice is heard and valued in the democratic process. The stakes are high, and the outcome of this redistricting effort will likely reverberate through future elections, influencing the very fabric of U.S. democracy.

In conclusion, the proposed congressional maps in California serve as a microcosm of the larger political battles occurring across the nation. The historical context of gerrymandering, the urgency of protecting democratic integrity, and the necessity of empowering marginalized communities all converge in this moment. As political analysts and engaged citizens, it is essential to advocate for equitable representation and to hold our elected officials accountable for their decisions. The outcome of California’s redistricting will not just determine party strength but will ultimately shape the future of democracy in America, making it a critical point of discussion for anyone invested in social justice and the equitable distribution of power.

Action:

The recent redrawing of congressional district lines in California, as proposed by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, represents a critical moment in the ongoing struggle over electoral fairness and representation in the United States. This situation is not just about maps and boundaries; it reflects deeper historical and political currents that shape our democracy. Historically, redistricting has often been a tool used by both parties to consolidate power and influence elections. In California, where Democrats currently dominate the congressional landscape, this proposed map aims to counteract Republican efforts in states like Texas, where aggressive gerrymandering has been employed to solidify Republican control. Understanding the implications of this redistricting effort is essential in our broader fight for equitable representation in government.

The urgency of this redistricting effort cannot be overstated. Governor Gavin Newsom's "Election Rigging Response Act" is a clear response to what many see as an existential threat posed by Republican strategies to potentially undermine democratic norms. By pursuing a temporary amendment to allow for new congressional maps, California Democrats are not merely reacting—they are actively seeking to protect the integrity of their electoral process. This aligns with a growing recognition that, in an era where hyper-partisanship and voter suppression tactics are rampant, states that value democratic principles must take bold steps to ensure fair representation. The stakes are high; as the political landscape shifts, the ability to influence national policy and direction hinges on these district maps.

For Americans concerned about the principles of democracy and representation, the California redistricting effort offers several pathways for action. First and foremost, engaging in grassroots advocacy is crucial. Voters should be encouraged to participate in the upcoming special election to approve these new maps, emphasizing the importance of their voices in shaping the electoral landscape. Additionally, raising public awareness about the ongoing voter suppression tactics in Republican-controlled states can galvanize support for similar efforts nationwide. By fostering a culture of activism around these issues, constituents can hold their representatives accountable and push for reforms that protect voting rights and equitable representation.

Moreover, it is vital to engage in educational initiatives that inform the public about the implications of gerrymandering and redistricting. Organizations and activists can partner to provide workshops, webinars, and discussions that dissect the complexities of electoral maps and their impact on representation. By empowering individuals with knowledge, we can dismantle the misconceptions that often surround these topics and encourage a more informed electorate. This understanding is especially important when discussing redistricting with individuals who may hold differing views, as it helps to frame the conversation around democratic values rather than partisan interests.

As we navigate the political landscape shaped by these new congressional maps, it is essential to keep in mind that these actions in California are part of a larger national dialogue about democracy and representation. The push for fair districting is not just a local issue; it resonates with the struggles faced across the country. By standing in solidarity with those fighting for fair electoral practices and pushing back against anti-democratic tactics, we can contribute to a more equitable political system. It is imperative that we recognize the interconnectedness of these efforts and work collectively toward a future where all Americans have a voice in their government. In this pivotal moment, we must remain vigilant, informed, and active in advocating for the principles that uphold our democracy.

To Do:

The article provides a snapshot of California's redrawn congressional lines and the potential for a special election to approve new district maps. This presents an opportunity for engaged citizens to take action in shaping their political landscape. Here’s a detailed list of ideas on what we can personally do about this situation:

### What Can We Personally Do?

1. **Stay Informed**: Understanding the implications of redistricting and how it affects local politics is crucial. Regularly follow news updates and analyses regarding the redistricting process.

2. **Engage with Community Organizations**: Join local groups that focus on voter rights, electoral reform, and civic engagement. Organizations such as the League of Women Voters or local grassroots movements often have resources and initiatives directly related to redistricting efforts.

3. **Participate in Local Meetings**: Attend town halls or community forums where redistricting is discussed. Engage with legislators and express your opinions on the proposed maps.

### Specific Actions to Take

1. **Sign Petitions**: Look for online petitions demanding fair redistricting practices. Websites like Change.org often host petitions you can support.

- Example: Search for petitions that oppose gerrymandering or support fair representation.

2. **Contact Your Representatives**: Write to your local and state representatives to voice your opinion on the new congressional map. Here are examples of whom to contact in California:

- **Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas** Email: Assemblymember.Rivas@assembly.ca.gov Address: 1000 N Street, Sacramento, CA 95814

- **Governor Gavin Newsom** Email: governor@gov.ca.gov Address: 1021 O Street, Suite 900, Sacramento, CA 95814

- **California State Assembly** (general inquiries) Email: assemblymember@assembly.ca.gov Address: 1020 N Street, Room 455, Sacramento, CA 95814

In your correspondence, you can say: “I urge you to support fair and equitable redistricting practices that reflect the diverse communities of California. I believe that the proposed maps should prioritize representation and not partisan advantage.”

3. **Mobilize Your Network**: Encourage friends and family to participate in advocacy efforts. Share information on social media about the importance of fair redistricting and provide them with resources to take action.

4. **Attend Legislative Hearings**: Participate in the hearings scheduled on August 19 and 20. This is an opportunity to voice your support or opposition directly to decision-makers. Check the California Assembly’s website for details on how to attend or participate virtually.

5. **Educate Others**: Host or participate in community discussions or workshops about the implications of redistricting. Use platforms like Zoom to reach a broader audience and engage community members.

6. **Support Local Activist Groups**: Donate to or volunteer for organizations that focus on electoral reform and fair representation. Groups such as Common Cause California work to ensure that voters have a voice in the redistricting process.

7. **Use Social Media Wisely**: Amplify important messages regarding redistricting on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Tag your representatives and use relevant hashtags to draw attention to the issue.

By taking these steps, individuals can play a meaningful role in influencing the redistricting process and ensuring that it serves the interests of their communities rather than political agendas. Engaged and informed citizenry is vital to fostering a democratic process that is fair and representative of all voices.


Sign Our Petition



2 Related Article(s):

Texas Republicans plan another redistricting session. California Democrats will counter

South Floridians protest against potential overturning of legalized same sex marriage, gerrymandering


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com