Inside the secret greedy deal that proves the Trump summit is a cynical farce
alternet.org -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 6:58:28 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Republican Party Politics, Foreign Policy & International Relations
U.S. President Donald Trump smiles as he signs energy-related executive orders, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 8, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard
This is what happens when cynical, greedy, amoral billionaires and psychopaths run a country.
The Times of London (Murdoch-owned) is reporting that billionaire Steve Witkoff, billionaire Donald Trump, and billionaire Vladimir Putin have worked out a model behind the scenes to solve the Ukraine problem: just make it like Gaza.
They're planning, according to this reporting, to fully respect the borders of Ukraine and the country's sovereignty, but with one catch. Just like Israel did with Gaza, Ukraine can "self-govern" but all political and economic decisions will be made or approved by Moscow, all funds flowing through Moscow, just like the governments of Gaza and the West Bank are subservient to the whims of Netanyahu and the Israeli Knesset.
It's essentially a plan to return Ukraine to the subordinate status it had when it was part of the old Soviet Union, which Putin appears committed to reestablishing, country by country.
Trump's Senior Director for Counterterrorism, former Sinclair Broadcasting commentator Sebastian Gorka, went all "peace for our time" Neville Chamberlain with his apparent endorsement of the idea:
"We recognize the reality on the ground and we have one priority above all else, whether it's the Middle East or whether it's Ukraine. It's to stop the bloodshed. Everything else comes after the bloodshed has been halted."
Meanwhile, NBC News reports that Netanyahu is now moving to Stage Two of his apparent Gaza plan: shipping the citizens of Gaza, who've lived there for millennia, to the hellhole of South Sudan.
I say "hellhole" from personal experience. I was working in South Sudan about a decade ago with an international relief organization, 15 miles from the Darfur border, distributing food, medicine, and tents to refugees fleeing the Janjaweed murderers.
We could see the villages burning on the horizon as desperate people -- nearly all women, children and the elderly, as the military-age men had all been killed -- flooded into the region. Here's an excerpt from the diary I kept during that trip:
"The land here in South Sudan is vast and flat. The 45,000 people around me share one single hand-pumped well (drilled a decade ago by the United Nations), and no other infrastructure beyond that. No buildings, no roads, no septic or sewage, no schools, no clinics or hospitals, no stores or even storehouses, nothing. Most live on a patch of hard-packed reddish dirt about ten feet square with a few of their possessions marking the perimeters of their 'home,' sleeping on the dirt, or on a ragged piece of cloth or, the lucky few, a piece of salvaged tarp from some previous relief mission. Stick-thin women and children with bellies swollen by malnutrition outnumber the men, whose peers were murdered by the Janjaweed or taken as slaves to the north."The air is so hot and dry that even smells of body odor vanish. My nose is encrusted with dust. The land is barren of any vegetation at all other than the occasional large tree with roots deep enough to reach into the water table thirty or so feet below us. Dust devils blow up and around, tiny cyclones that seem to erupt from nowhere amidst air that is so hot and dry it feels as if we've been wrapped in glass wool insulation and tossed into a furnace's heating duct.
"One relief worker I met on the way here, who was leaving the Darfur area via Juba (the capital city with only three short paved streets) on the same small plane that brought us in, said, 'If there is a hell, it is much like South Sudan.'
"This being a refugee community, it is thick with disease, as refugees not only bring diseases with them but are among the most vulnerable of all populations to disease. There's Buruli ulcer, a flesh-eating and incurable (other than by surgery) disease caused by a bacteria related to leprosy: I saw a case of it yesterday in a little girl who had just arrived from Darfur. She had a hole in the side of her shin that was about four inches long, two inches wide, and three-quarters of an inch deep, nearly down to the bone.
"Ebola was first discovered here and in nearby Zaire. Eighty percent of the world's cases of Guinea Worm disease are here in Southern Sudan: the microscopic eggs are in the guts of tiny, almost invisible sand fleas that infest food and water, and about three months after eating one, the worms hatch. Over the course of the next year they grow throughout the body, often boring out through the skin causing an ulcer that can take months before the worm fully emerges, causing dreadful and incapacitating pain. There is no cure.
"In South Sudan sleeping sickness -- caused by a parasite named trypanosoma that's transmitted by the bite of local flies -- kills more people than AIDS. This is also the world epicenter of onchocerciasis -- another worm that grows more than 1 1/2 feet long inside the body and spreads thousands of eggs to all the organs -- soon to become more worms -- over the decade or so it takes to kill a person. Sometimes the smaller worms work their way into the cornea, causing blindness which gives this parasite its common name: 'River Blindness.'
"There's also visceral leishmaniasis, tuberculosis, leprosy, yellow fever, dengue fever, various bacteria and mycoplasma that cause severe and deadly forms of pneumonia, and many, many of the people in this village are infected with malaria (a particularly nasty, drug-resistant, and usually fatal form, P. falciparum, is the most common here in Southern Sudan)."
Following Netanyahu's advice, Trump is also negotiating with South Sudan to take in America's "illegals" in exchange for cash. They've already taken in eight people -- none of them even Africans -- who Trump shipped over there last month.
Nice guys, those two leaders of Israel and America. Along with Putin, "the three caballeros" show what happens when countries are run by entirely self-interested and morbidly rich sociopaths.
Forget about commitments, duty, or loyalty: Trump has never, in his entire life, been big on keeping a promise; just ask his three wives or the thousands of small businesses, workers, and customers he's screwed.
So, it makes perfect sense that he and his billionaire land developer buddy Witkoff, who's now negotiating with Putin and Netanyahu even though he has zero diplomatic experience, would go along with Putin's Great New Idea to Gaza-ize Ukraine.
In fact, in 1994 the US, Ukraine, Great Britain, and Russia signed the Budapest Accord, an agreement that promised America and Britain would defend Ukraine's borders in exchange for them giving up to Russia what was then the third-largest nuclear weapons arsenal in the world, left over from the old Soviet Union. Putin violated it when he took Ukraine's Crimea region, and Obama doubled down on the betrayal by largely ignoring the annexation. Biden only reluctantly gave Ukraine aid, and Trump has blocked US military aid for eight months now.
Thus, for the first time since Germany invaded Poland and kicked off World War II in 1939, one European nation has invaded another, seized territory, and claimed it as their own.
This violation of international law and national sovereignty clearly doesn't bother Trump or his Republican toadies; just look at his talk about annexing Greenland or making Canada the 51st state in a dime-store imitation of Hitler and Putin.
Neither Trump nor the GOP that enables him have any moral compass or core values beyond reestablishing white supremacy, enriching the morbidly rich, and moving women, racial and religious minorities, and the queer community into second-class status subordinate to white "Christian" men.
How else could you explain their behavior?
I get it that Trump's former lawyer just this week acknowledged that Katie Johnson had alleged Trump raped her when she was only 13 years old, and he helped deep-six the case. As an adult, she gave sworn testimony in multiple court cases, one transcript published by Politico:
"Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties. On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff's pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted."Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump, Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed."
(After her testimony, Johnson received a series of death threats from Trump supporters and has since vanished.)
But will sabotaging Ukraine with a Gaza-like deal (and possible eventual resettlement to South Sudan) be enough to get us to stop talking about the possibility that the current President of the United States is a child rapist? Or is Trump just selling out Ukraine to get another billion-dollar real estate deal, this time one in Moscow and St. Petersburg?
With this administration and the entire Republican Party having lost any semblance of a moral core, commitment to democracy, or respect for the rule of law, the responsibility for the preservation of American values falls to us and the Democratic Party.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent revelations surrounding the collaboration between billionaires like Donald Trump and Steve Witkoff, alongside authoritarian leaders such as Vladimir Putin, reflect a disturbing trend that prioritizes profit and power over the basic human rights and dignity of individuals caught in geopolitical conflicts. The Times of London’s report, which likens the planned governance of Ukraine to the situation in Gaza, highlights how the powerful often manipulate the suffering of the vulnerable as a means to achieve their own ends. This model of governance—where a nation ostensibly retains its sovereignty but is economically and politically subservient to a more powerful state—signals a regression toward imperialist practices reminiscent of the Cold War, when nations were often treated as pawns in a larger geopolitical chess game.
Historically, the manipulation of smaller nations by larger powers is not a new phenomenon. The Soviet Union’s control over Eastern European countries during the Cold War serves as a stark reminder of how the interests of the few can overshadow the aspirations of the many. The proposed arrangement for Ukraine, where it could theoretically govern itself under the watchful eye of Moscow, echoes the Soviet practices of yore. It is essential to recognize that such an arrangement is not merely about maintaining the status quo; it represents a conscious effort to reestablish a sphere of influence that disregards the autonomy and desires of the Ukrainian people, who have demonstrated a clear wish for independence and self-determination.
Moreover, the comparison made with Gaza is particularly telling. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has long been characterized by power imbalances and the subjugation of Palestinian rights. By suggesting that Ukraine could adopt a similar governance model, we are not only witnessing the commodification of sovereignty but also a callous disregard for the lived experiences of those affected by such policies. The plight of Gazans, who have faced years of blockades, violence, and displacement, should serve as a cautionary tale. The ongoing humanitarian crisis there is a testament to the failures of international governance structures that allow powerful nations to dictate terms to their weaker counterparts without accountability.
As we consider these developments, it becomes apparent that the motivations behind them are deeply rooted in economic interests. The involvement of billionaires in shaping foreign policy raises significant questions about the democratic process and accountability. When private interests intermingle with statecraft, the outcomes are rarely aligned with the public good. Instead, they tend to reflect the desires of the wealthy elite, who leverage their resources to influence governance in ways that perpetuate inequality and undermine the voices of those most affected by their decisions. This dynamic is especially concerning given the current climate of rising economic disparity, where the wealth gap between the richest and the rest continues to widen, and where policies often prioritize corporate interests over the welfare of citizens.
In conclusion, the proposed Ukraine model is not merely a political maneuver but a reflection of a broader systemic issue that prioritizes power and profit over justice and equity. The historical context of imperialism and the ongoing struggles for self-determination in regions like Gaza should inform our understanding of the implications of such governance models. As citizens and advocates for social justice, it is crucial to engage in conversations about these issues, to challenge the narratives put forth by the powerful, and to stand in solidarity with those whose rights are at stake. The urgency of addressing these matters cannot be overstated, as the actions taken today will shape the geopolitical landscape for generations to come.
The article presents a chilling perspective on the geopolitical machinations involving the likes of Donald Trump, Steve Witkoff, and Vladimir Putin, suggesting a cynical plan to reshape Ukraine into a state of subservience reminiscent of Gaza's situation. This scenario is rooted in a broader historical context where might often overwhelms right, and the sovereignty of nations is compromised by powerful interests. The implications of such an arrangement are profound, as they not only undermine the political autonomy of Ukraine but also set a dangerous precedent for global power dynamics, where economic deals supersede human rights and democratic freedoms.
Historically, the narrative of powerful nations encroaching upon the sovereignty of smaller states is not new. The Cold War era was replete with examples of nations being manipulated or coerced into subservience to larger powers, often under the guise of protecting regional stability or countering perceived threats. The proposed model for Ukraine appears to harken back to these troubling times, where the decisions of local governance are dictated by foreign interests. This is not merely a critique of foreign policy but a reminder of the ongoing struggle against imperialism in various forms, reminiscent of the struggles faced by colonized nations throughout the 20th century. The contemporary actors involved in this scheme—billionaires and political figures—reflect a capitalist system where profit motives and political power intertwine, often at the expense of vulnerable populations.
As Americans, it is imperative to recognize the role we play in these international dynamics. Our foreign policy, often swayed by the interests of the wealthy elite, has far-reaching consequences beyond our borders. We can take action by advocating for more transparent and accountable foreign policy that prioritizes human rights and the sovereignty of nations. This can be achieved through grassroots movements, urging our representatives to support legislation that emphasizes diplomatic solutions over militaristic ones, and ensuring that foreign aid is tied to human rights standards rather than political expediency. Educating ourselves and others about the implications of foreign interventions and the historical context behind them is crucial. By doing so, we can foster a more informed citizenry that demands better from its government.
Furthermore, it is essential to draw parallels between the situations in Ukraine and Gaza. The plight of the Palestinian people, facing displacement and systemic oppression, serves as a poignant reminder of the consequences of ignoring human rights in favor of geopolitical interests. Engaging in discussions about these comparisons not only broadens our understanding but also strengthens our arguments against policies that perpetuate oppression under the guise of peacekeeping or stability. This discourse can be an effective tool to challenge narratives from those who would dismiss the suffering of individuals in favor of grand strategic goals.
In conclusion, the cynical plans purportedly being discussed by Trump, Witkoff, and Putin represent a dangerous precedent in international relations, one where economic power can dictate the fate of nations. As citizens of a nation that plays a significant role in global politics, we must remain vigilant and proactive. By advocating for policies that respect human rights and sovereignty, educating ourselves and others about the historical context of these issues, and drawing connections between contemporary struggles, we can contribute to a more just and equitable world. It is our responsibility to challenge the status quo and ensure that the voices of those affected by these decisions are heard and respected.
To respond meaningfully to the troubling developments outlined in the article, individuals can take several concrete actions. Here’s a detailed list of steps that can be taken:
### 1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - **Action:** Read more about the situations in Ukraine and Gaza, and understand the geopolitical implications of foreign policies and deals made by leaders. - **Example:** Share informative articles, documentaries, and books on social media platforms or in community groups to raise awareness.
### 2. **Contact Elected Officials** - **Action:** Write to your congressional representatives to express your concerns about the proposed geopolitical strategies and their humanitarian implications. - **Who to Write To:** - **Your Senator:** Find your senator’s contact information [here](https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm). - **Your Representative:** Locate your representative’s contact details [here](https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative). - **What to Say:** - Express your concerns about the potential for increased suffering in Ukraine and Gaza due to these agreements. - Urge them to advocate for policies that prioritize human rights and humanitarian aid over political expediency.
### 3. **Sign and Create Petitions** - **Action:** Join or initiate petitions that call for a reassessment of U.S. foreign policy regarding Ukraine and Gaza. - **Example:** Use platforms like Change.org or Care2 to find ongoing petitions or to start your own. - **Topics to Focus On:** - Demanding transparency in U.S. foreign policy decisions. - Advocating for humanitarian assistance to those affected by conflict.
### 4. **Support Humanitarian Organizations** - **Action:** Donate to or volunteer with organizations that provide aid to refugees and those impacted by war. - **Examples of Organizations:** - **International Rescue Committee (IRC):** [Website](https://www.rescue.org/) - **Doctors Without Borders:** [Website](https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/) - **What to Do:** - Make a financial contribution or organize a fundraising event in your community. - Volunteer time to assist in local refugee support programs.
### 5. **Engage with Local Activist Groups** - **Action:** Join local organizations that focus on peace, human rights, and social justice. - **Examples:** - MoveOn.org: Engage in local chapters to mobilize community action. - Amnesty International: Participate in local events or campaigns. - **What to Do:** - Attend meetings and work with others to organize actions such as rallies, letter-writing campaigns, or educational events.
### 6. **Utilize Social Media for Advocacy** - **Action:** Use social media platforms to raise awareness and advocate for policy changes. - **What to Do:** - Share articles and personal insights on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. - Use relevant hashtags to engage in broader conversations about these issues.
### 7. **Participate in Local Politics** - **Action:** Attend town hall meetings and local government sessions to voice your concerns about foreign policy and humanitarian issues. - **What to Do:** - Ask your local representatives how they plan to address international issues and advocate for humanitarian policies.
### 8. **Write Opinion Pieces** - **Action:** Submit letters to the editor or opinion pieces to local newspapers to raise awareness about these issues. - **What to Do:** - Clearly articulate your concerns and proposed solutions to stimulate public discourse.
### Contact Information for Elected Officials (Example Addresses) - **Senator [Name]** - [Office Address] - Washington, D.C. 20510 - Email: [Official Email Address]
- **Representative [Name]** - [Office Address] - Washington, D.C. 20515 - Email: [Official Email Address]
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to a collective effort to address the complex challenges posed by international conflicts and the humanitarian crises that arise from them. Each small action can contribute to a larger movement advocating for peace and justice.