Trump and Putin end summit without Ukraine deal
thepeninsulaqatar.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 2:27:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, U.S. Elections & Voting Rights, Foreign Policy & International Relations
Anchorage: Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin made no breakthrough on Ukraine at their high-stakes summit on Friday, pointing to areas of agreement and rekindling a friendship but offering no news on a ceasefire.
After an abrupt ending to three hours of talks with aides, Trump and Putin offered warm words but took no questions from reporters -- highly unusual for the media-savvy US president.
"We're not there yet, but we've made progress. There's no deal until there's a deal," Trump said.
He called the meeting "extremely productive" with "many points" agreed, although he did not offer specifics.
"There are just a very few that are left, some are not that significant, one is probably the most significant," Trump said without elaborating.
Putin also spoke in general terms of cooperation in a joint press appearance that lasted just 12 minutes.
"We hope that the understanding we have reached will... pave the way for peace in Ukraine," Putin said.
As Trump mused about a second meeting, Putin smiled and said in English: "Next time in Moscow."
The former KGB agent quickly tried to flatter Trump, who has voiced admiration for the Russian leader in the past.
Putin told Trump he agreed with him that the Ukraine war, which Putin ordered, would not have happened if Trump were president instead of Joe Biden.
Trump for his part again complained of a "hoax" that Russia intervened to help him the 2016 election -- a finding backed by US intelligence.
Before the summit, Trump had warned of "severe consequences" if Russia did not accept a ceasefire.
But when asked about those consequences during a Fox News interview with Sean Hannity after the talks, Trump said that "because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that now."
The friendly reception contrasted with Trump's berating of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky when he met him at the White House in February.
Trump earlier said he sought a three-way meeting with Zelensky but did not announce one at the summit.
Trump said he would now consult Zelensky as well as NATO leaders, who have voiced unease about the US leader's outreach to Putin.
"Now it's really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump said in the Fox News interview after the summit.
Putin warned Ukraine and European countries to "not create any obstacles" and not "make attempts to disrupt this emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigues."
Trump invited Putin just a week ago and ensured there was some carefully choreographed drama for their first in-person meeting since 2019.
The two leaders arrived in their respective presidential jets and descended on the tarmac of an air base, with Trump clapping as Putin appeared.
US military might was on display with a B-2 stealth bomber flying overhead, as a reporter shouted audibly to Putin, "Will you stop killing civilians?"
Putin, undaunted, grinned widely as Trump took the unusual step of escorting him into "The Beast," the secure US presidential limousine, before a meeting in a room before a screen that said -- in English only -- "Pursuing Peace."
Putin smiled and joked with Russian reporters on the visit, a landmark for a leader who is facing an arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court related to the Ukraine war, which has killed tens of thousands of people.
Russia in recent days has made battlefield gains that could strengthen Putin's hand in any ceasefire negotiations, although Ukraine announced as Putin was flying in that it had retaken several villages.
Trump had insisted he would be firm with Putin, after coming under heated criticism for appearing cowed during a 2018 summit in Helsinki.
While he was traveling to Alaska, the White House announced that Trump had scrapped a plan to see Putin alone and he instead held the talks alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his roving envoy Steve Witkoff.
Zelensky was not included and has refused pressure from Trump to surrender territory seized by Russia.
"It is time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America," Zelensky said in a social media post.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin has reignited discussions about U.S. foreign policy and its implications for global peace, particularly in the context of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The absence of a concrete resolution to the crisis, despite the leaders' optimistic rhetoric, underscores a troubling reality: the prioritization of personal rapport over substantive diplomatic efforts. Historically, such behavior is reminiscent of past leaders who have favored warm embraces with autocrats, often to the detriment of democratic principles and the welfare of nations caught in geopolitical crossfires. Trump's characterization of the summit as "extremely productive" without specific outcomes serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in international relations, especially when lives are at stake.
The dynamics of the Trump-Putin relationship extend beyond mere political posturing; they reflect a broader pattern of complicity and neglect toward international norms. Trump's previous assertions regarding the "hoax" of Russian interference in the 2016 elections not only downplay the significance of foreign meddling but also undermine trust in the democratic process. The findings of U.S. intelligence agencies, which concluded that Russia actively sought to influence the election, should serve as a cautionary tale about the fragility of democracy in the face of authoritarian ambitions. By dismissing these findings, Trump not only erodes the foundations of U.S. democracy but also emboldens autocrats like Putin who seek to exploit divisions within Western societies.
Moreover, the summit highlights the shifting narrative surrounding U.S. support for Ukraine. Trump's earlier interactions with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, which included public humiliation and pressure, starkly contrast with his newfound focus on consultation. This inconsistency raises questions about the sincerity of U.S. commitments to Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. As the conflict continues to claim civilian lives and destabilize the region, the onus should not rest solely on Ukraine to navigate these treacherous waters. Instead, it is crucial for the international community, particularly NATO allies, to reaffirm their support and provide tangible assistance to counter Russian aggression.
The implications of the summit extend beyond Ukraine, touching on broader themes of international justice and equity. Putin's warning to Ukraine and European nations to avoid "creating obstacles" suggests a desire to control the narrative surrounding peace negotiations. This stance echoes historical patterns where powerful states dictate terms to weaker nations, undermining the principles of self-determination and justice. In the context of Ukraine, which has borne the brunt of military aggression, it is imperative for global actors to prioritize human rights and advocate for a resolution that respects Ukraine's sovereignty rather than yielding to the whims of autocrats.
Finally, the spectacle surrounding the summit—complete with military displays and choreographed theatrics—raises significant ethical questions about the portrayal of international relations. The staging of such events often overshadows the urgent humanitarian issues at the heart of conflicts like the one in Ukraine. Instead of fostering genuine dialogue, these performances can mask the real stakes involved, turning complex geopolitical crises into mere political theater. As citizens and advocates, it is our responsibility to hold leaders accountable and demand that diplomacy be rooted in justice, inclusivity, and respect for human rights. Only through a commitment to these values can we hope to navigate the turbulent waters of international relations and contribute to a more equitable world.
The recent summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, which concluded without a deal on the ongoing crisis in Ukraine, underscores the precarious balance of power and diplomacy in contemporary international relations. As the war in Ukraine continues to devastate lives and destabilize the region, the lack of a concrete outcome from this high-profile meeting raises critical questions about the effectiveness of U.S. foreign policy under the previous administration and its implications for the future. The summit's end, characterized by vague assurances rather than definitive actions to secure peace, highlights a troubling tendency toward performative diplomacy that prioritizes personal rapport over substantive policymaking.
Historically, the U.S. has had a complex relationship with Russia, shaped by Cold War tensions and the subsequent emergence of new geopolitical challenges. The current war in Ukraine, ignited by Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and further escalated by the invasion in 2022, represents not just a territorial dispute but a broader ideological struggle between authoritarianism and democratic governance. Trump's meeting with Putin, while framed as an opportunity for dialogue, essentially sidesteps the pressing need for accountability and justice for the Ukrainian people. By failing to address the fundamental issues at stake, such as human rights violations and the sovereignty of nations, the summit risks normalizing aggression and undermining international norms.
In the aftermath of the summit, Americans must consider how to hold our leaders accountable for their foreign policy choices. Advocacy for a robust and principled U.S. stance on Ukraine is essential. This includes pushing for increased support for Ukraine, both in terms of military aid and humanitarian assistance, as well as reinforcing economic sanctions against Russia. Citizens can engage with their elected representatives to demand a clear strategy that prioritizes human rights and the rule of law while also ensuring that any negotiations for peace involve the voices of those directly affected by the conflict. The responsibility does not rest solely on the shoulders of the government; grassroots movements can amplify demands for a foreign policy that reflects the values of justice and solidarity.
Moreover, it is vital to educate and engage the public on the nuances of U.S.-Russia relations and the implications of Trump's rhetoric. His repeated claims that the Ukraine war would not have occurred under his administration are not only historically inaccurate but also undermine the agency of Ukrainian resistance. Engaging in dialogue that dispels myths surrounding the conflict and emphasizes the importance of sovereignty and self-determination can help create a more informed citizenry. Discussions around these issues can be facilitated through community forums, educational workshops, and social media campaigns that encourage critical thinking and shared understanding.
Finally, the summit serves as a reminder of the importance of democratic oversight in foreign affairs. As Americans, we should advocate for transparent processes that involve congressional oversight over military aid and international agreements. The potential for unchecked executive power in matters of war and peace is a threat to democratic principles. Organizations that promote civic engagement and hold leaders accountable can strengthen the democratic fabric of our society and ensure that U.S. foreign policy aligns with our shared values.
In conclusion, while the Trump-Putin summit may have ended without substantial progress in resolving the crisis in Ukraine, the onus is on Americans to respond with informed action. By advocating for a principled foreign policy, educating ourselves and our communities, and demanding accountability from our leaders, we can work towards a future that prioritizes peace, justice, and the protection of human rights. This is not merely a challenge for the political elite, but a collective responsibility that requires the engagement of all citizens committed to a just world.
In light of the recent summit between Trump and Putin, where no significant progress was made regarding the ongoing war in Ukraine, there are important actions that individuals can take to advocate for peace, accountability, and support for those affected by the conflict. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions to consider:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Ourselves and Others:** - Stay informed about the Ukraine situation through reputable news sources, documentaries, and books. Share this information with friends and family to raise awareness about the complexities of the conflict and the human toll it takes.
2. **Engage in Local Activism:** - Join local groups focused on peace, human rights, or advocacy for Ukraine. Participate in events, discussions, or rallies that promote awareness and support for those affected by the war.
3. **Support Humanitarian Organizations:** - Contribute to organizations providing aid to Ukraine, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, UNICEF, or local NGOs focused on refugee assistance.
### Exact Actions We Can Personally Take
1. **Sign Petitions:** - Find and sign petitions that advocate for peace in Ukraine or hold leaders accountable for their actions. Websites like Change.org or Care2 often host petitions regarding international issues. - Example Petition: “Demand Global Leaders Support Peace Talks in Ukraine” (you can create or find similar petitions online).
2. **Contact Elected Officials:** - Write to your local and state representatives, urging them to advocate for a peaceful resolution in Ukraine. You can use the following template:
**Who to Write To:** - Find your representatives through [GovTrack.us](https://www.govtrack.us/) or [ContactingCongress.org](https://www.contactingcongress.org/).
**Example Contacts:** - Senator Alex Padilla (CA) - Email: senator@padilla.senate.gov
- Representative Nancy Pelosi (CA-12) - Email: pelosi.house.gov/contact
**What to Say:** - “Dear [Representative’s Name], I am writing to express my concern regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine following the recent summit between President Trump and President Putin. I urge you to advocate for a peaceful resolution and continued support for humanitarian aid to those affected by the war. It is vital that the U.S. takes a strong stance in favor of diplomacy and prioritizes the safety of innocent civilians. Thank you for your attention to this critical issue.” 3. **Engage on Social Media:** - Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to raise awareness. Share articles, statistics, and personal stories from those impacted by the conflict. Consider using hashtags like #PeaceInUkraine to join broader conversations.
4. **Organize or Attend Peace Vigils:** - Coordinate with local groups to hold vigils or peaceful demonstrations advocating for peace in Ukraine. This can be a platform to raise awareness and show solidarity with those affected by the conflict.
5. **Support Refugees:** - Volunteer with local organizations that assist Ukrainian refugees. This may include providing language support, helping with job searches, or donating goods.
6. **Advocate for Responsible Media Coverage:** - Write to local newspapers and media outlets encouraging responsible reporting on the Ukraine conflict. Emphasize the importance of highlighting humanitarian perspectives and the voices of affected individuals.
7. **Participate in Educational Workshops:** - Attend workshops or forums discussing the Ukraine conflict, U.S.-Russia relations, and international diplomacy. Many universities and community organizations offer these resources.
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to a collective movement toward peace, accountability, and support for those impacted by the conflict in Ukraine. Engaging with the political process, supporting humanitarian efforts, and fostering community awareness are essential steps in creating meaningful change.