Kennedy Center Senior VP of Artistic Programming to Step Down
broadwayworld.com -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 1:59:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Presidential Campaigns

The New York Times has reported that Jeffrey Finn, senior vice president of artistic programming and vice president and executive producer of theater at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, will step down. Finn has programmed the Kennedy Center's Broadway national tours and more for nearly a decade.
Earlier this week, The Kennedy Center revealed the 2025 Kennedy Center Honorees, including Tony Award-winning performer Michael Crawford (The Phantom of the Opera), actor/writer Sylvester Stallone (Broadway's Rocky), country music star George Strait, disco and gospel artist Gloria Gaynor, and rock band KISS. This marks the first Kennedy Center Honors under the new Trump administration.
Since returning to office, the President has taken a personal interest in his new role as chairman of the American institution. He stepped into the position in February, after dismissing several board members.
The dismissal came after The National Endowment for the Arts announced major changes to its 2026 grant guidelines and Trump announced that the President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities has been disbanded.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent announcement regarding Jeffrey Finn stepping down as the senior vice president of artistic programming at the Kennedy Center underscores an unsettling trend in how cultural institutions are navigating the intersection of politics and the arts. Finn's departure not only raises questions about the future of artistic programming at this prestigious venue but also reflects broader shifts in the political landscape influenced by the current administration. The Kennedy Center, as a national cultural institution, has long been a beacon of artistic expression; however, its leadership and direction now seem to align more closely with political agendas rather than a commitment to artistic integrity and diversity.
Historically, the Kennedy Center has served as a platform for a wide array of artistic expressions. Founded in the wake of the turbulent 1960s, it was meant to reflect the rich tapestry of American culture, celebrating both established and emerging voices. However, this mission is now at risk as the Trump administration's approach prioritizes a narrow view of American culture, one that often sidelines marginalized artists and dissenting narratives. The disbandment of the President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities, a move that many see as a blow to the arts community, signals an alarming trend where art is increasingly viewed through a political lens rather than as a universal human experience.
Moreover, the announcement of the 2025 Kennedy Center Honorees raises questions about representation and inclusivity in the arts. While the honorees include renowned figures such as Sylvester Stallone and Gloria Gaynor, the selection process itself seems to reflect a more conservative approach to cultural recognition. This contrasts sharply with the diverse array of artists who have previously received accolades, often highlighting voices from underrepresented communities. The current administration's influence on such decisions may indicate a return to a more homogenized view of American culture, where the contributions of artists from various backgrounds are minimized or excluded altogether.
This unfolding situation is emblematic of the broader cultural battles that are being waged across the United States, where art serves as both a reflection of society and a battleground for social justice. The arts have historically played a critical role in challenging societal norms and advocating for change. From the Harlem Renaissance to the Civil Rights Movement, artists have utilized their platforms to address issues of race, gender, and class. However, under the current regime, there is a palpable fear among artists that their voices may be stifled or co-opted to serve a political agenda, undermining the role of art as a catalyst for social progress.
As we reflect on these developments, it is crucial for advocates of the arts and social justice to remain vigilant and vocal. Engaging in discussions about the implications of political influence on cultural institutions is essential for advocating a more equitable and inclusive arts landscape. Encouraging dialogue around the importance of diverse representation in the arts can serve as a powerful counter-narrative to the prevailing political rhetoric. By highlighting the contributions of marginalized artists and championing the necessity of artistic freedom, we can work towards preserving the integrity of cultural institutions like the Kennedy Center, ensuring that they remain true to their foundational mission of celebrating the multifaceted nature of American life.
The recent announcement regarding Jeffrey Finn stepping down from his role as Senior VP of Artistic Programming at the Kennedy Center is indicative of a shifting landscape in the arts and culture sector, particularly as it relates to the influence of political leadership on artistic expression. This development should alert us to the broader implications of political machinations on the arts, especially under a leadership that has shown a pattern of undermining cultural institutions in favor of partisanship and populism. The Kennedy Center, a beacon of American culture, has historically served as a platform for diverse artistic expression; however, its evolution under the current administration raises critical questions about the future of the arts in America.
Historically, the Kennedy Center has been a site where artistic meritocracy thrives, allowing for a variety of voices to be heard and celebrated. The recent changes, however, signal a departure from this tradition, particularly with the disbanding of the President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities. This committee has long been a vital advocate for the arts, promoting public engagement and funding for creative initiatives across the country. The elimination of such a body suggests a troubling shift toward a narrow vision of culture that may prioritize commercial viability over artistic integrity. This trend can be traced back to previous conservative administrations that have sought to diminish funding and support for the arts, often framing such cuts as fiscally responsible, yet they come at a significant cost to cultural diversity and artistic expression.
As concerned citizens, we must recognize that the arts are not merely a luxury but a crucial component of a healthy democracy. They allow for the expression of dissent, celebration of cultural heritage, and the fostering of societal cohesion. The current political environment poses a challenge to these values, leading to a chilling effect on artistic freedom. In response, it is essential for individuals and communities to advocate for robust funding of the arts through grassroots movements, lobbying, and support for organizations that defend artistic integrity. Engaging with local arts councils, promoting inclusive cultural events, and supporting artists—particularly those from marginalized communities—can create a counter-narrative to the top-down approach of the current administration.
Moreover, as members of a democratic society, we have the power to influence change through our consumer choices. Supporting art that champions progressive values, investing in organizations that uplift diverse voices, and even participating in public discussions about the importance of the arts can create a ripple effect that challenges the status quo. It is crucial to remind others that the arts are a public good, deserving of investment and protection. This can be a practical point of contention when engaging with those who may support the current administration's approach, emphasizing that cuts to arts funding ultimately impoverish the cultural fabric of our communities.
Lastly, education plays a significant role in shaping the discourse surrounding the arts and their value. Informing ourselves and others about the historical context of arts funding, the contributions of various artistic movements, and the impact of political decisions on cultural institutions is imperative. By fostering an informed citizenry that values the arts, we can strengthen our arguments against policies that seek to diminish these vital resources. We should encourage discussions around the importance of artistic expression in challenging inequities and proposing visionary solutions that enrich our society. Ultimately, the future of the arts in America depends on our collective action and commitment to ensure that these institutions remain vibrant, inclusive, and reflective of the diverse tapestry of our nation.
In light of the recent developments surrounding the Kennedy Center and its leadership changes, particularly under the new administration's influence, there are several proactive steps individuals can take to advocate for the arts and ensure that cultural institutions remain accessible and representative of diverse voices. Below is a detailed list of ideas and actions you can consider:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Raise Awareness**: Share information about the Kennedy Center’s changes and the implications for artistic programming and funding for the arts. Use social media platforms, community boards, and local newspapers.
2. **Support the Arts**: Attend local performances, art exhibits, and community events. Use your spending power to support artists and arts organizations in your area.
3. **Advocate for Funding**: Engage in discussions about the importance of arts funding at local, state, and national levels. Highlight the benefits of the arts for community well-being and economic growth.
4. **Participate in Grassroots Movements**: Join or support organizations that advocate for the arts and push back against cuts or changes to funding.
### Exact Actions You Can Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition to Support the National Endowment for the Arts**: Check platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org for ongoing campaigns aimed at protecting arts funding. - **Example Petition**: Look for petitions titled “Protect Arts Funding” or “Support the NEA” and add your name.
2. **Contact Government Officials**: - **Write to Your Representatives**: Reach out to your local and state representatives to express your support for arts funding and against the disbandment of arts committees. Here’s how: - **Find Your Representatives**: Use [CanIVote.org](https://www.canivote.org/) to locate your local representatives. - **Example Contact**: - **Senator Elizabeth Warren** (MA) - Email: senator_warren@warren.senate.gov - USPS: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury St, Boston, MA 02203 - **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez** (NY-14) - Email: aoc@mail.house.gov - USPS: 1237 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515
3. **Attend Public Meetings**: Look for city or state council meetings where arts funding is discussed. Engage in public comment to voice your concerns and support for the arts.
4. **Organize or Join Local Arts Advocacy Groups**: Many cities have local organizations that focus on arts advocacy. Join these groups or start your own initiative to support the arts in your community.
5. **Write Letters to the Editor**: Use local newspapers to express your views on the importance of the arts and the ramifications of budget cuts or policy changes.
### What to Say
1. **In Your Letters/Emails**: - Start by expressing your love for the arts and their importance in your community. - Discuss how cuts in funding or changes in leadership can impact the diversity and accessibility of arts programming. - Urge your representatives to support policies that protect and promote the arts, including funding for the National Endowment for the Arts. - Highlight specific examples of how the arts have positively impacted your life or your community.
2. **In Public Meetings**: - Share personal stories about the impact of the arts on education, community engagement, and mental health. - Request that your representatives prioritize arts funding and advocate for inclusive programming that reflects the community's diversity.
By taking these actions, you can help ensure that the arts remain a vital part of our culture and community, regardless of administrative changes. Your voice matters, and collective action can lead to meaningful change.