What is Trump's approval rating in Illinois? See how numbers compare to other states
eu.pjstar.com -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 1:28:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Public Opinion & Polling, U.S.–Russia Relations, Political Protests & Rallies

President Donald Trump is traveling to Alaska for a "high-stakes" meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss a Ukraine ceasefire.
President Donald Trump's approval ratings have dipped in recent months, with the Epstein controversy and immigration swaying national opinion.
Still, more than half of the states approve of his job performance. But how do Illinois voters feel about the president?
What is Trump's approval rating in Illinois?
In Illinois, Trump has one of the lowest approval ratings in the country, according to an Aug. 12 update from Morning Consult, which gathers polls over the course of three months to get a look at state-level data among registered voters.
Just 43% of Illinois voters approve of Trump's performance, while 54% disapprove.
The data shows that Trump is most popular in Wyoming, where 66% of voters approve of his job performance, and least popular in Vermont, where 64% disapprove.
Does Trump have an overall positive approval rating?
RealClearPolitics Poll Average shows Trump's approval rating was becoming more negative throughout the first few weeks of July before buoying toward the end of the month. Aggregated polls by the New York Times show a similar trend.
As of Jan. 27, Trump received a +6.2 percentage point approval rating, but as of March 13, it flipped to slightly negative, the RealClearPolitics graphics show. The approval rating reached its most negative on April 29 at -7.2 percentage points, which fell around Trump's 100-day mark. It came close to that low again on July 22 and 23 at -7.1 percentage points, as the controversy over Epstein carried into its third week.
His average approval rating margin as of Aug. 12, according to RealClearPolitics, is -5.4 percentage points. The approval margin according to the New York Times aggregator on Aug. 12 is -8 percentage points.
Does Trump have a lower approval rating than previous presidents?
A historical analysis by Gallup shows Trump's approval ratings in July of his first years in office - both as the 45th and 47th presidents - are lower than any other modern president at the same time in their administrations.
In a Gallup poll conducted from July 7-21, 37% approved of Trump's job performance. Here is how that compares to other presidents in July of their first year of their term, according to Gallup:
Sudiksha Kochi contributed to this article.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent article discussing President Trump's approval ratings, particularly in Illinois, reflects a broader narrative about the state of American politics and the social landscape in which it operates. As the approval ratings fluctuate, it's crucial to contextualize these numbers within the larger framework of historical political dynamics, social movements, and the continuing struggle for justice and equality. The decline in Trump's ratings amidst controversies such as Epstein and immigration policies can be interpreted not merely as a reflection of individual discontent but as an indicator of a more profound societal unease.
Historically, Illinois has been a microcosm of broader American political trends, often swinging between liberal and conservative ideologies. The state's significant urban centers, like Chicago, are heavily Democratic, reflecting a diverse electorate that is increasingly vocal about issues of systemic injustice, economic inequality, and environmental degradation. In contrast, the rural areas tend to lean more conservative. This dichotomy creates a unique tension that highlights the diverging priorities of different demographic groups. As Trump’s approval rating in Illinois languishes at a mere 43%, it suggests that many voters are disillusioned not only with his presidency but with the broader implications of his policies for social justice and equity.
The article references Trump's declining approval ratings and juxtaposes them with those of previous presidents. This historical analysis is especially telling; Trump’s numbers are notably lower than those of his predecessors at similar points in their presidencies. Such a trend prompts a conversation about the nature of leadership and accountability in a democratic society. It raises pertinent questions: How do voters assess the effectiveness of leadership amidst crises? How do societal values shift in response to perceived failures? The present moment serves as a reminder that public opinion is not static; it evolves in response to leaders’ actions and the pressing issues facing the nation.
Moreover, the article’s mention of Trump's controversies, particularly surrounding immigration, exposes the deep fractures within American society. The treatment of immigrants and marginalized communities has sparked widespread protests and movements aimed at advocating for human rights and dignity. The enduring impact of these movements can be seen in the way public opinion has shifted in response to administration policies, especially regarding families separated at the border and the deportation of undocumented immigrants. These actions have not only galvanized voter discontent but have also revived a commitment to social justice among those who feel the moral imperative to advocate for the oppressed.
In a climate where Trump’s approval ratings are declining, left-wing activists have an opportunity to engage right-wing counterparts in meaningful discussions about the implications of leadership choices that prioritize division over unity. It is essential to challenge the notion that approval ratings are merely numbers devoid of context. Instead, they reflect the populace's engagement with critical issues: economic disparity, racial injustice, and the erosion of democratic norms. By framing these conversations around shared values of fairness, justice, and community, advocates can encourage a dialogue that transcends partisan divides and fosters a collective vision for a more equitable society.
In conclusion, the examination of Trump's approval ratings, particularly within the context of Illinois, is not merely an exercise in political analysis. It serves as a springboard for deeper discussions about the trajectory of American society. Understanding these ratings within the historical and social contexts allows us to grasp the underlying currents of discontent and hope that characterize today’s political landscape. It is a pivotal moment that invites all citizens—regardless of political affiliation—to reflect on their values and the kind of leadership they wish to support as the nation navigates its future.
The dynamics of political approval ratings serve as a mirror reflecting the public's sentiment toward leadership, particularly during tumultuous times. The article detailing President Trump's fluctuating approval ratings in Illinois and across the nation illustrates a significant trend of discontent among voters. With only 43% of Illinois residents approving of Trump’s performance, this statistic is not merely a reflection of political allegiance; it underscores deeper societal concerns regarding governance, ethics, and policy. Historically, approval ratings provide insight into the health of a democracy, and the recent data presents a compelling case for reevaluating the political landscape in America.
The historical context of presidential approval ratings reveals that leaders often experience a honeymoon phase, typically characterized by higher approval in the early months of their presidency. However, Trump's unique presidency has been marked by unprecedented controversies, from the Epstein scandal to immigration policy challenges, which have significantly eroded public trust. Comparatively, other presidents have navigated crises that similarly impacted their approval ratings, yet few have faced a continual barrage of ethical questions and policy missteps. This historical backdrop provides an important framework for understanding the current political climate, including the implications of Trump's low ratings in states like Illinois, where public sentiment signals a call for accountability.
As citizens concerned about the direction of our democracy, it is essential to translate these approval ratings into actionable steps for engagement. One of the most effective actions is to mobilize grassroots efforts aimed at educating voters about the implications of these ratings. Organizing community forums, leveraging social media platforms, and fostering discussions in local settings can effectively raise awareness about the consequences of political decisions and the importance of informed voting. Furthermore, promoting voter registration and participation in upcoming elections is critical, as higher voter turnout can directly influence political accountability and representation.
Moreover, it is essential to highlight the role of local and state-level politics in shaping broader national policies. Engaging in local governance by attending city council meetings, advocating for progressive policies, and supporting candidates who align with a vision of social and economic justice can create a ripple effect. The sentiment expressed in Illinois is not an isolated phenomenon; it is a reflection of national discontent that can be harnessed to drive change at all levels of government. By connecting local issues to national narratives, activists can reinforce the idea that every vote counts and that local engagement can lead to significant shifts in approval ratings and public policy.
Finally, embracing educational outreach as a core strategy in political discourse can help bridge divides between differing ideological perspectives. When engaging with those who hold opposing views, presenting well-researched arguments and historical context can foster productive discussions. It is vital to approach these conversations with a mindset of understanding and shared values, rather than confrontation. By equipping ourselves with facts and empathy, we can challenge the prevailing narratives that uphold harmful policies and promote a more equitable society. The current approval ratings, especially in states like Illinois, can serve as a rallying point for advocates of change, emphasizing the need for a collective movement toward a more just and responsible governance.
Given the content of the article regarding President Trump's approval ratings, particularly in Illinois, here are some actionable ideas for individuals who want to engage politically and influence public opinion and policy:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: - Stay informed about the political climate and the implications of presidential approval ratings. - Share articles, resources, and discussions with friends, family, and social media networks to raise awareness.
2. **Engage in Local Politics**: - Attend town hall meetings, community forums, or local government sessions to voice your concerns and opinions. - Support local candidates who align with your values.
3. **Participate in Advocacy**: - Join or support organizations focused on issues you care about, such as immigration reform, criminal justice reform, or social justice.
### Exact Actions You Can Personally Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org host petitions on various issues. Search for petitions addressing immigration reform, healthcare, or government transparency. - Example petition: "Demand Transparency from Our Government" on Change.org.
2. **Write to Your Elected Officials**: - Contact your U.S. Senators and Representatives to express your views on current issues. Be specific about what you want to see changed. - **Who to Write**: - **Senator Dick Durbin** Email: https://www.durbin.senate.gov/contact/ USPS Mailing Address: 525 S. 8th St. Suite 150, Springfield, IL 62703 - **Senator Tammy Duckworth** Email: https://www.duckworth.senate.gov/content/contact-tammy USPS Mailing Address: 230 S. Dearborn St. Suite 3900, Chicago, IL 60604 - **Representative (choose your district)**: Find your representative's contact information at https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative
3. **Organize or Join a Local Group**: - Form or participate in groups focused on advocacy or grassroots organizing within your community. - For example, join local chapters of groups like the ACLU or Planned Parenthood.
4. **Volunteer for Campaigns**: - Offer your time to help local political campaigns that resonate with your values. This could involve canvassing, phone banking, or organizing events.
5. **Use Social Media**: - Share your thoughts and engage in discussions online. Use platforms like Twitter and Facebook to amplify your voice and connect with like-minded individuals. - Create or join groups focused on political activism and community engagement.
6. **Attend Protests and Rallies**: - Participate in peaceful demonstrations that align with your values. Look for local events on platforms like Eventbrite or local community boards.
7. **Contact Media Outlets**: - Write letters to the editor or op-eds to express your opinions on local and national issues. This can influence public discourse and raise awareness. - Example Publication: Chicago Tribune Email: letters@chicagotribune.com
### What to Say
- **When Writing to Officials**: Be clear and concise. State your position on an issue, why it matters to you, and what you would like them to do. For example: "Dear Senator [Name], I am writing to express my concern regarding the current immigration policies that disproportionately affect vulnerable communities. I urge you to support comprehensive reform that prioritizes human rights and dignity."
- **In Petitions**: Personalize your message. Explain your reasons for supporting the petition and how it affects you or your community.
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to shaping a political landscape that reflects their values and priorities. Engaging in these efforts can help create a more informed and active citizenry, ultimately influencing decision-making at all levels of government.