Treasury Secretary Reveals U.S. Bitcoin Surprise, Triggering Price Shockwaves
forbes.com -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 7:42:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Presidential Campaigns, U.S.–China Relations, Media Coverage & Press Relations
Forbes contributors publish independent expert analyses and insights.
Bitcoin has plummeted after soaring to a fresh all-time high this week, with the combined crypto market losing well over $100 billion despite Elon Musk quietly signalling his support.
Sign up now for CryptoCodex -- A free newsletter for the crypto-curious
The bitcoin price, which has doubled since this time last year, fell by 5% as traders brace for a September shock following U.S. president Donald Trump dropping a $12.2 trillion bombshell.
Bitcoin's bearish reversal comes as U.S. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent revealed the U.S. holds far fewer bitcoin than previously thought, putting the value of the U.S. government's at "$15 billion to $20 billion" -- well below estimates of more than $23 billion.
Sign up now for the free CryptoCodex -- A daily five-minute newsletter for traders, investors and the crypto-curious that will get you up to date and keep you ahead of the bitcoin and crypto market bull run
The figure was used as Bessent appeared to rule out the U.S. buying additional bitcoin for the bitcoin strategic reserve promised by president Donald Trump during what seemed to be off-the-cuff remarks during an interview with Fox Business.
"We've also started -- to get into the 21st Century -- a bitcoin strategic reserve. We're not going to be buying that, but we are going to use confiscated assets and continue to build that up. We're going to stop selling that," Bessent said, following a question about the U.S. gold reserves, adding: "I believe that bitcoin reserve is at today's prices somewhere between $15 and $20 billion."
Estimates for how much bitcoin the U.S. government holds have been put at around $23 billion by various sources, including Arkham Intelligence, which reckons the U.S. is sitting on almost 200,000 bitcoin.
Following the interview, Bessent sought to clarify his comments on X, saying, "Treasury is committed to exploring budget-neutral pathways to acquire more bitcoin to expand the reserve, and to execute on the president's promise to make the United States the 'bitcoin superpower of the world,'" and calling the "bitcoin that has been finally forfeited to the federal government ... the foundation of the strategic bitcoin reserve that president Trump established in his March executive order."
White House crypto czar David Sacks has said Bessent and Commerce secretary Howard Lutnick, an outspoken bitcoin bull, will have final say on whether to purchase additional bitcoin via "budget-neutral" methods, such as selling off other government reserve assets such as gold.
The bitcoin reserve and a broader crypto stockpile were ordered by Trump this year following a campaign promise first made during the Bitcoin 2024 conference.
Trump's order instructed his crypto task force to explore how the reserve and stockpile would be funded, though a hotly anticipated report earlier this month failed to present any ideas, with the report's primary author Bo Hines, who headed Trump's council of advisers on digital assets, leaving his post shortly after publication.
Bitcoin and crypto supporting senator Cynthia Lummis has said the Trump administration's priority is for the now passed Genius Act stablecoin bill and a crypto market structure bill that's still making its way though Congress, with the White House not going to look to the bitcoin reserve until they've both been passed.
Sign up now for CryptoCodex -- A free newsletter for the crypto-curious
Earlier this year, the bitcoin price and crypto market was spooked by reports the U.S. could hold just 30,000 bitcoin -- something Bessent's comments seem to refute.
The U.S. Marshals Service was revealed in July to hold fewer bitcoin than previously thought, according to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by pseudonymous crypto journalist L0la L33tz, raising questions over how much bitcoin the U.S. government holds and whether some of the bitcoin was quietly sold off.
"I'm alarmed by reports that the U.S. has sold off over 80% of its bitcoin reserves -- leaving just ~29,000 coins," senator Cynthia Lummis, a bitcoin supporter who has championed the creation of a U.S. strategic bitcoin reserve, posted to X. "If true, this is a total strategic blunder and sets the United States back years in the bitcoin race."
If the U.S. does only hold less than 30,000 bitcoin, it would bump it down to fourth in the global rankings, behind China (194,000 bitcoin), the U.K. (61,000), Ukraine (46,000) and ahead of Bhutan with 13,000 bitcoin.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent developments surrounding Bitcoin and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's comments have sparked a wave of discussion that extends far beyond the realm of cryptocurrency. As Bitcoin's volatility continues to capture public attention, it's essential to analyze the implications of the U.S. government's involvement in the cryptocurrency market and its broader socio-economic ramifications. The government's fluctuating stance on Bitcoin reflects a larger trend of state intervention in emerging financial technologies, raising questions about regulation, economic equity, and the future of financial systems.
Historically, the rise of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin can be traced back to a growing disillusionment with traditional financial institutions, particularly in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. This crisis exposed deep-seated inequalities within the financial system, where the burdens of economic mismanagement were often shouldered by the working class while the elite were bailed out. Bitcoin, emerging from this context, was heralded by many as a revolutionary alternative—offering a decentralized and borderless financial system. However, as the U.S. government positions itself to become a "Bitcoin superpower," we must scrutinize whether this move serves the interests of average citizens or merely perpetuates the status quo.
Bessent's remarks about the U.S. Bitcoin reserve raise significant concerns about how cryptocurrency assets could be used or misused by the state. The prospect of the government amassing a substantial Bitcoin reserve—potentially funded through the sale of other government assets like gold—invites scrutiny regarding who benefits from this accumulation. Historically, state interventions in the economy have often favored wealthy stakeholders and corporations. The question arises: will this newfound embrace of cryptocurrency help democratize financial access, or will it instead be leveraged as a tool for further consolidation of wealth and power among the elite?
Moreover, the impact of these developments on marginalized communities cannot be overlooked. The promise of cryptocurrencies lies in their potential to provide financial services to the unbanked and underbanked populations. However, if the government’s involvement in Bitcoin primarily serves large investors and corporations, it risks alienating those who stand to benefit the most from an equitable financial system. This contradiction underscores the necessity of advocating for policies that prioritize accessibility and equity in cryptocurrency adoption, rather than allowing it to become another vehicle for wealth extraction.
Finally, as we consider the future of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, it’s important to reflect on the ongoing social struggles for economic justice and reform. The fluctuating nature of Bitcoin's value is a reminder of the volatility inherent in speculative markets, often leaving those least equipped to weather financial storms vulnerable. Activists and concerned citizens must hold the government accountable, ensuring that any strategic reserves or policy shifts surrounding cryptocurrencies are grounded in principles of equity and justice. In a world increasingly defined by economic disparity, the embrace of new technologies must be accompanied by a commitment to ensuring that all individuals have a stake in the financial innovations of the future.
As the conversation around Bitcoin continues to unfold, it is vital to leverage historical context, economic realities, and social justice imperatives to guide a more inclusive approach to cryptocurrency policy. Engaging with right-wing perspectives on these issues—not only as a means of critique, but also as an opportunity for constructive dialogue—can pave the way for a more equitable financial landscape that benefits all Americans, rather than the privileged few.
The recent revelations from U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent regarding the government's Bitcoin holdings have ignited a fierce debate over the future of cryptocurrency regulation and the implications for the American economy. As the crypto market reels from price shocks, triggered by the government’s perceived reluctance to invest further in Bitcoin, it is crucial to examine the broader implications of these developments. The volatility of Bitcoin and its potential as a strategic asset highlights the complexities surrounding its regulation, the relationship between the government and crypto markets, and the historical context that influences current policies.
Historically, the rise of Bitcoin can be traced back to the 2008 financial crisis, a moment that exposed the vulnerabilities of traditional banking systems and sparked interest in decentralized financial solutions. Bitcoin emerged as an alternative to conventional currencies, promising a system free from government control and manipulation. However, as governments worldwide grapple with the impact of cryptocurrencies on their economies, the need for a balanced regulatory framework has never been more pressing. The recent comments by Bessent, which suggest a strategic reserve of Bitcoin, underscore a recognition of crypto's significance but also reveal a hesitance to fully embrace it as a legitimate asset class.
In examining the implications of the U.S. government's stance on Bitcoin, it is essential to consider the broader economic landscape. The Treasury's reluctance to expand its Bitcoin holdings may reflect fears of market instability or financial risk, which could resonate with right-wing critics who often argue against what they perceive as government overreach into private enterprise. However, this perspective neglects the potential benefits that a well-regulated crypto market could bring to the American economy. By viewing cryptocurrencies as a legitimate asset class and implementing robust regulations, the government could foster innovation while protecting consumers and investors from the inherent risks of the volatile crypto market.
So, what can Americans do in response to these developments? First and foremost, citizens should advocate for transparent and equitable regulatory frameworks that prioritize consumer protection and market stability while allowing for innovation in the financial sector. Engaging with local representatives, attending town halls, and participating in public discussions about cryptocurrency regulation can amplify voices that seek a balanced approach. Additionally, forming coalitions with like-minded individuals and organizations can help raise awareness of the benefits of cryptocurrencies and the potential for responsible regulation to foster economic growth.
Finally, it is crucial to educate ourselves and our communities about the intricacies of cryptocurrency and its implications for the future of finance. By understanding the nuances of digital currencies and the historical context from which they arose, we can engage in informed discussions with critics and skeptics. Sharing knowledge about the potential benefits of a well-regulated crypto market—not only for investors but for the economy at large—can help shift perspectives and foster a more progressive dialogue surrounding this revolutionary financial movement. Ultimately, the conversation about Bitcoin, regulation, and the future of finance is not merely an economic issue; it is a question of societal values, innovation, and the pursuit of a more equitable financial system for all Americans.
Analyzing the article reveals significant implications for the future of cryptocurrencies and the government's approach to financial innovation. Here’s a detailed list of actions that individuals can take to engage with this issue:
### Personal Actions: 1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: - Stay informed about cryptocurrency policies, regulations, and market shifts. Share knowledge with friends, family, and social networks. - Attend local or online workshops about cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.
2. **Engage with Local Representatives**: - Contact your local representatives to express your views on cryptocurrency regulations and the government's role in the market. - Organize community meetings or forums to discuss the implications of such policies.
3. **Participate in Advocacy Groups**: - Join or support organizations advocating for financial transparency and equitable cryptocurrency regulations. Groups like the Blockchain Association or Coin Center often have campaigns you can support.
### Specific Actions: 1. **Petition for Responsible Cryptocurrency Regulation**: - **Create or sign petitions** that advocate for fair and transparent cryptocurrency policies. Websites like Change.org allow you to start petitions easily. - Example petition: "Demand Responsible Regulation for Cryptocurrency" — outline the need for regulations that protect consumers while promoting innovation.
2. **Contact Your Senators and Representatives**: - **Who to Write**: - Senators and Representatives can be found at [congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov) where you can search for your specific representatives based on your zip code. - **What to Say**: - Express your concerns about the government's handling of cryptocurrency and its implications for innovation and consumer protection. - Sample message: "Dear [Representative's Name], I am writing to express my concern regarding the U.S. government's approach to cryptocurrency, particularly the recent statements from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. I urge you to support policies that promote innovation, protect consumers, and ensure transparency in the crypto market."
- **Contact Information**: - Example: - **Senator Elizabeth Warren** (D-MA) - Email: https://www.warren.senate.gov/contact - USPS: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury St., Boston, MA 02203 - **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez** (D-NY-14) - Email: https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/contact - USPS: 1236 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515
3. **Engage in Social Media Advocacy**: - Use platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook to raise awareness about cryptocurrency issues and engage in discussions. - Hashtags like #CryptoRegulation, #BitcoinPolicy, or #FinancialTransparency can help amplify your voice.
4. **Attend Public Meetings or Town Halls**: - Participate in local government meetings or town halls where financial policies are discussed. This is an opportunity to ask questions and voice your opinions directly to decision-makers.
5. **Support Local Businesses Accepting Cryptocurrency**: - If you’re a consumer, choose to support local businesses that accept cryptocurrency as a form of payment. This helps normalize crypto usage and promotes a local crypto economy.
6. **Write to Financial Institutions**: - Contact banks or financial institutions urging them to adopt more favorable policies toward cryptocurrencies. - Example contact: - **JP Morgan Chase** - Email: You can reach out through their customer service email found on their website, or use their social media channels. - USPS: 270 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017
### Conclusion: By engaging in these actions, individuals can voice their opinions and contribute to a conversation about the future of cryptocurrency in the U.S. It's crucial to advocate for policies that encourage innovation while ensuring consumer protection and financial education. Taking these steps helps shape a financial landscape that is inclusive and equitable.