How Ambitious Democratic Governors Are Navigating Trump's Redistricting War
nytimes.com -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 5:09:51 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Presidential Campaigns, State Politics & Governors, Democratic Party Responses
Reid J. Epstein and Nick Corasaniti have covered redistricting fights since the completion of the 2020 census.
Two weeks before the Texas House Democrats fled their state to block a Republican-led redistricting effort, a handful of them flew to Chicago. They met with Gov. JB Pritzker of Illinois, who promised them a future safe harbor, should they need it.
In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom declared that his state would counter any move by Republicans to further entrench President Trump's grip on power in Washington.
But when one of the Texas lawmakers was in Philadelphia and sought a meeting with Gov. Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania, Mr. Shapiro's aides replied that the logistics were too complicated to work out, and Mr. Shapiro was too busy in negotiations over the state budget, according to two people involved in the discussions.
For weeks, the Democratic Party has grappled with how to respond to Mr. Trump's aggressive push for new voting maps in Texas and other Republican-controlled states. If successful, the effort would give his party a major advantage in the race for control of the U.S. House. With Democrats locked out of power in Washington, their party's governors have emerged as a front line of opposition even though there is little coordination between them on just how to proceed.
Some with national ambitions have embraced openly partisan warfare, and are working through their own plans to redraw the maps in their states to greater Democratic advantage. They've welcomed the Texas Democrats to their states and hosted them at news conferences. Others have remained on the sidelines, ceding the spotlight in a moment broadly seen as critical to their party's ability to hold Mr. Trump to account in next year's midterms.
At a time when the base is clamoring for signs that Democratic leaders can forcefully take on Mr. Trump, there is a split between the Democratic fighters -- a group led by Mr. Pritzker, Mr. Newsom and Gov. Kathy Hochul of New York -- and those who have shown far less interest in spending their own political capital on the public debate over redistricting, like Mr. Shapiro, Gov. Wes Moore of Maryland and others.
Amid deep polarization and the norm-busting tactics of the Trump White House, the divide centers less on redistricting itself, and more around power, and how to wield it.
"This is nothing short of a legal insurrection," Ms. Hochul said in an interview this week. "History will judge us on how we respond to this moment. You're a leader of a great state like New York in 2025 when Donald Trump and Republicans decided to hijack our democratic process and twist it to meet their own ends, and what did you do? The answer has to be: We stood up and fought back."
The redistricting battle has scrambled traditional political alliances. Some governors who have long supported the idea of nonpartisan redistricting commissions find themselves backing a push to draw more Democratic seats in response to the efforts in Texas, where Republicans are ready to implement maps that would give them up to five new and safely red districts.
State Democratic lawmakers scattered in an effort to keep the new maps from coming to a vote, though how long they can hold out is in question.
Even groups like Common Cause, the good-government organization that has long opposed political gerrymandering, announced this week that it would "not automatically condemn" Democrats for attempting to even the playing field.
But for many governors, the ability to act is limited. Mr. Shapiro, Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, Gov. Andy Beshear of Kentucky and others who preside over divided or Republican-controlled state legislatures have no power to redraw district lines.
Confined by state politics or constitutions, these governors who have their eye on the 2028 race for the White House must navigate the agitation for more direct confrontation with Trump in the Democratic base along with the disapproval of gerrymandering by voters of all parties. That, of course, comes after working through the realities of governing a state in the Trump era.
Mr. Shapiro last week called the Texas redistricting effort "shameful" and said it was a tactic by Mr. Trump to distract people from the ramifications of his domestic policy bill. (His office declined to comment for this article.) Mr. Walz and Gov. Laura Kelly of Kansas earlier this month used nearly identical language at a Democratic Governors Association gathering to say Democratic governors who can draw more blue seats must "respond in kind" to Texas, though there is not much they can do themselves.
Other governors with few options have tried to lend moral support. Gov. Maura Healey of Massachusetts invited Texas legislators to meet with her when they were in Boston for a conference last week. Mr. Beshear on Thursday spoke with the legislators who fled to Illinois, on a video conference call. And aides to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan have been in regular contact trying to arrange a meeting between her and the Texas lawmakers.
"It's a fight that nobody asked for, that nobody came looking for," Ms. Healey, who presides over a state with an all-Democratic congressional delegation, said in an interview this week. "Others need to be thinking about how to match that and fight fire with fire."
In Illinois, Mr. Pritzker welcomed the Texas Democrats with news conferences, against a backdrop emblazoned with his name. He has helped find lodging for the Texans, who fled to a series of Chicago-area hotels, and his staff has assisted in arranging local news conferences and other media logistics. On Wednesday, Mr. Pritzker declared that "we are messing with Texas" through their efforts.
But no Democratic governor has done more regarding redistricting than Mr. Newsom, who on Thursday launched a campaign to redistrict California and create five more Democratic congressional seats to counter Texas, calling on his fellow Democrats to follow suit.
"We need to stand up, not just California," Mr. Newsom said. "Other blue states need to stand up. We need to be firm in our resolve."
Many Democrats have wondered privately why they have not heard more about redistricting from Gov. Wes Moore of Maryland, one of just a handful of Democratic governors who share Democratic control of the statehouse, and have state laws that leave redistricting up to the partisan legislature.
Though his state's congressional districts are already gerrymandered to favor Democrats, activists have argued that the map could be drawn to eliminate the lone district held by a Republican.
Mr. Moore has remained largely quiet on the issue, with his office stating for weeks that the governor will "evaluate all options as states around the country make decisions regarding redistricting." On Thursday Mr. Moore, in his first public comments on redistricting, told a Baltimore radio station that "all options are on the table."
The Maryland governor could be in a bind created by his state's last redistricting attempts. In 2022, a state court knocked down the initial maps drawn by Democrats in Maryland as an "extreme gerrymander," finding that "the voice of Republican voters was diluted." Any outright embrace of openly partisan maps by Mr. Moore could risk their success in a future legal challenge.
Nonetheless, there's growing evidence that Democratic voters want to hear more from their leaders, and few Democratic governors have been as vocal about the need to fight back against the Republican effort as Ms. Hochul, of New York.
Ms. Hochul has unabashedly supported an extreme partisan gerrymander in her state if Texas passes its proposed maps, rebuffing the pleas of some good government groups to maintain redistricting reforms.
In the interview, she ticked through the Republican-run states where lawmakers are discussing implementing new maps to add to their partisan advantage.
"We have no choice," Ms. Hochul said. "All this could change the power dynamic so quickly, really, not just for a few years, but for a generation, where Democrats will never have a chance to regain the power necessary to have a balance in Washington."
Though Ms. Hochul and New York will not be immediately able to counter maps from Texas or other Republican states, as the process for amending New York's constitution to remove the independent redistricting commission will take a minimum of two years, she has been undeterred and unrelenting on the issue.
Other Democratic governors in similar situations have just not talked about redistricting. In Colorado, where Democrats enjoy a trifecta, Gov. Jared Polis has said next to nothing. Nor has Gov. Bob Ferguson of Washington State. Both states have independent redistricting commissions like New York's, which Ms. Hochul is seeking to upend. But both states would likely net Democrats only a single new district per state.
Neither Mr. Polis nor Mr. Ferguson have joined the fight, rhetorically or practically. Their offices did not respond to requests for comment.
Adrian A. Boafo, a Democratic state legislator in Maryland, said that his most recent town hall meeting, with over 150 in attendance, was overrun by questions about redistricting.
"The No. 1 question I'm getting asked about is what are you going to do, is Maryland going to get in this fight?" Mr. Boafo recalled in an interview. "And my answer is, 'Yes, I think we will.'"
Sign Our PetitionThe ongoing struggle over redistricting in the wake of the 2020 census embodies a critical moment in American democracy, illustrating the deepening fissures within the political landscape. As Reid J. Epstein and Nick Corasaniti report, Democratic governors across the United States are grappling with how best to respond to the aggressive redistricting efforts spearheaded by the Republican Party, particularly in states like Texas. This situation is emblematic of a broader ideological battle that transcends traditional party lines, echoing historical attempts to manipulate electoral systems for partisan gain. The redistricting process, often cloaked in technical language and procedural details, ultimately serves as a battleground for the future of representative democracy in America.
Historically, redistricting has been a tool wielded by those in power to maintain or extend their political dominance. The practice of gerrymandering, first documented in the early 19th century, has consistently been used to dilute the voting power of specific demographic groups, often racial or ethnic minorities. This manipulation of electoral districts can disenfranchise communities and undermine the principle of fair representation. As governors like JB Pritzker and Gavin Newsom stand firm against the redistricting machinations of their Republican counterparts, they draw on this history, recognizing the stakes of the present moment. The actions of these governors are not merely political maneuvering but reflect an urgent response to the ongoing erosion of democratic norms and the increasing normalization of tactics reminiscent of authoritarian regimes.
The current situation also highlights the stark divide within the Democratic Party itself, as some governors display a willingness to engage in what they describe as "partisan warfare" while others remain reluctant to prioritize this struggle over other pressing issues, such as state budgets. This internal conflict raises essential questions about the nature of leadership and responsibility during a time of political crisis. Governor Kathy Hochul's assertion that "history will judge us on how we respond to this moment" serves as a poignant reminder of the ethical obligation leaders have to protect democratic processes. In this context, the hesitancy of some Democratic governors to fully commit to the fight against redistricting reflects a broader ambivalence towards confronting systemic inequities that have long plagued American politics.
Moreover, the redistricting battle is not an isolated incident but rather part of a larger narrative concerning voter suppression and disenfranchisement across the country. The Republican Party's efforts to manipulate district maps are often accompanied by more insidious policies aimed at suppressing voter turnout, particularly among marginalized groups. Laws that impose strict voter ID requirements, limit early voting, and purge voter rolls disproportionately affect communities of color, the elderly, and young voters. By addressing redistricting, governors like Pritzker and Newsom are not just engaging in an electoral contest; they are standing against a broader trend of disenfranchisement that seeks to undermine the foundational principles of democracy.
In this context, the actions and decisions of these governors can mobilize grassroots movements that have been working tirelessly for social justice and equity. The current struggle over redistricting can galvanize activists and ordinary citizens alike, as the implications of these maps extend far beyond the realm of politics to affect social and economic justice issues. As the Democratic governors navigate this contentious landscape, they have an opportunity to unite and inspire their constituents, emphasizing that defending democracy is a collective effort that requires vigilance, engagement, and a commitment to the values of equity and representation. The outcome of this redistricting battle will reverberate through the upcoming elections, shaping the political terrain for years to come. It is imperative for communities to understand the stakes involved and to advocate for leaders who prioritize the defense of democratic principles over mere political expediency.
The ongoing redistricting wars, particularly in the wake of the 2020 census, have underscored a critical battleground in American politics, one that could significantly reshape the political landscape for years to come. The article highlights the varying responses from Democratic governors, showcasing a stark contrast between those who are willing to engage in a vigorous defense of democratic principles and those who remain passive in the face of what many see as an existential threat posed by partisan gerrymandering. The importance of this moment cannot be overstated; it is not merely a political maneuver but a fundamental test of our democratic institutions and the values that underpin them.
Historically, redistricting has been a contentious issue, often manipulated by those in power to entrench their political advantage. The practice of gerrymandering dates back to the early 19th century and has evolved into a sophisticated art form used by both major parties. However, the current intensity of the redistricting battle, particularly as it pertains to the Trump-era Republican Party's efforts to redraw maps to solidify power, represents a departure from traditional practices. The stakes are higher than ever, as the outcomes of these redistricting efforts will influence not only congressional representation but also state legislatures and local governance. As the article notes, Democratic governors like JB Pritzker and Gavin Newsom have emerged as frontline defenders, recognizing that inaction could lead to an irreversible erosion of democratic norms.
This moment presents an opportunity for Americans to mobilize, particularly in states where Democratic governors are willing to challenge the Republican-led redistricting initiatives. Citizens can advocate for and support policies that prioritize fair and equitable representation, such as the establishment of independent redistricting commissions. Engaging in grassroots organizing and lobbying efforts to hold state leaders accountable for their responses to redistricting efforts can amplify the voices of those who are disproportionately affected by gerrymandering. The collective action of the electorate can push governors and lawmakers to prioritize the integrity of democratic processes over partisan advantage.
Moreover, educational initiatives must be a part of this movement. It is essential to raise awareness about the implications of redistricting and gerrymandering among the general public. Many voters may not fully understand how these processes impact their lives and undermine their voices in government. Workshops, community meetings, and social media campaigns can be powerful tools in disseminating information about the importance of fair representation. By making the case for equitable districting practices, advocates can foster a more informed electorate that demands accountability from their representatives.
Finally, the divide among Democratic governors highlighted in the article is emblematic of a broader challenge within the party: the need for cohesive leadership in the face of a concerted opposition. As Democrats grapple with their strategy to combat the Trump administration's influence, it is crucial that they move beyond individual ambitions and unite around a common cause. A concerted effort to present a unified front on issues of democracy and representation will not only bolster their chances in future elections but also restore faith among constituents who are yearning for leadership that prioritizes democratic values over political expediency. History will indeed judge how leaders responded to this moment; it is imperative that they rise to the occasion with courage and resolve.
In response to the ongoing redistricting battles and the potential implications for the democratic process, there are several concrete actions that individuals can take to make their voices heard and drive change. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions that can be taken:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: Stay informed about redistricting and how it affects your community. Share this knowledge with friends, family, and social networks to raise awareness.
2. **Support Grassroots Organizations**: Engage with and support organizations that are working to promote fair redistricting practices, such as the League of Women Voters, Common Cause, or the Brennan Center for Justice.
3. **Engage in Local Politics**: Attend town hall meetings and engage with local representatives about redistricting issues. Use these platforms to advocate for transparency and fairness in the process.
4. **Utilize Social Media**: Use your social media platforms to spread awareness about redistricting issues and to mobilize others in your community. Create and share content that highlights the importance of fair representation.
### Exact Actions You Can Personally Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition for Fair Redistricting**: Look for online petitions on platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org that advocate for fair redistricting practices. For example, you might find a petition addressing your state’s redistricting process. - **Example**: Search for “Fair Redistricting in [Your State]” on Change.org and sign or share the petition.
2. **Contact Your Representatives**: - **Write to Your State Governor**: Express your support for fighting against partisan redistricting efforts. Here’s a guide on how to contact them: - **Governor Gavin Newsom (California)**: - Email: governor@gov.ca.gov - Address: 1021 O Street, Suite 900, Sacramento, CA 95814 - **Governor JB Pritzker (Illinois)**: - Email: governor@illinois.gov - Address: 207 State House, Springfield, IL 62706 - **Governor Kathy Hochul (New York)**: - Email: info@executive.ny.gov - Address: State Capitol, Albany, NY 12224 - **Governor Josh Shapiro (Pennsylvania)**: - Email: contact form on [Governor's Website](https://www.governor.pa.gov/contact/) - Address: 508-E East Wing, Pennsylvania State Capitol, Harrisburg, PA 17120
3. **Write Letters**: - **Personalized Letters**: Consider writing personalized letters to your representatives. In your letter, emphasize the importance of fair redistricting and urge them to take a stand against partisan gerrymandering. Highlight the impact that this issue has on your community and democratic representation. - **What to Say**: - "Dear [Governor's Name], I am writing to express my concern regarding the current redistricting efforts in our state. It is crucial that we ensure fair and transparent processes that represent all constituents fairly. I urge you to prioritize these efforts and work towards policies that uphold our democratic values."
4. **Participate in Advocacy Campaigns**: - Join campaigns led by organizations focused on redistricting reform. Participate in rallies, phone banks, or canvassing efforts to raise awareness and mobilize support.
5. **Engage with Local Media**: - Write letters to the editor of your local newspaper expressing your views on redistricting and the importance of fair representation. This can help raise awareness and spark community discussions.
6. **Attend or Organize Meetings**: - Attend community meetings or forums focused on redistricting or voter rights. If none exist, consider organizing one. Gather your community to discuss the importance of fair representation and strategize on collective actions.
By taking these steps, you can contribute to a more equitable redistricting process and help shape the political landscape in a way that reflects the needs and voices of all constituents.